Immunohistochemical characterization of prototypical endometrial clear cell carcinoma-diagnostic utility of HNF-1β and oestrogen receptor

Clear Cell Carcinomas of Müllerian Type and Rete Testis Origin Presenting as Scrotal Masses: A Study of Seven Cases

Ovarian-type epithelial tumors involving the testis and paratestis are rare, with clear cell carcinomas (CCC) one of the least frequent. We report our experience with 4 müllerian-type (MT) CCCs presenting as testicular/scrotal masses and arising in the paratestis (n=2) and seminal vesicle (n=2; well supported in 1 case and likely in the other). In addition, we document 3 cases of papillary CCC exclusively within the rete testis (RTCCC) and seminiferous tubules and differing from the MT tumors. The patients with MTCCC were 24 to 85 years old (median, 42 y), and 2 had metastases at presentation. The 2 originating in the paratestis were associated with other MT tumors, an endometrioid borderline tumor and a papillary serous borderline tumor. The other 2 MTCCCs likely involved the testis via extension from seminal vesicle primaries through the vasa deferentia. All MTCCCs showed typical features, including tubules, simple papillae with hyalinized cores, and solid nests of polygonal clear cells with occasional hobnail features. Both paratesticular primaries showed sarcomatoid foci with tumor-associated neutrophilic infiltrates. The 3 RTCCCs presented in 54-, 57-, and 60-year-old men as testicular masses; they showed intrarete arborizing papillary growth with nonhyalinized fibrous cores and piled-up, solid foci, lacked hobnail cells, and expressed carbonic anhydrase IX (2/2) and CD10 (2/2) but not CA125, unlike the MTCCCs. On follow-up, 2 patients with MTCCC died of metastatic tumor (4 and 13.5 mo), a third developed ileal and retroperitoneal metastases at 13 months; and the fourth died at 13.5 months of unspecified cause. Follow-up of 2 patients with RTCCCs showed 1 disease free at 8 months and another alive with unknown disease status at 13 years. We conclude that CCCs involving the testis may either be of MT with often aggressive courses or show some features of renal tumors, with confinement to the rete testis and indolent behavior.

Identification of novel biomarkers and potential molecular targets for uterine cancer using network-based approach

A better understanding of incidences at the cellular level in uterine cancer is necessary for its effective treatment and favourable prognosis. Till date, it lacks appropriate molecular target-based treatment because of unknown molecular mechanisms that proceed to cancer and no drug has shown the required results of treatment with less severe side effects. Uterine Cancer is one of the top five cancer diagnoses and among the ten most common death-causing cancer in the United States of America. There is no FDA-approved drug for it yet. Therefore, it became necessary to identify the molecular targets for molecular targeted therapy of this widely prevalent cancer type. For this study, we used a network-based approach to the list of the deregulated (both up and down-regulated) genes taking adjacent p-Value ≤ 0.05 as significance cut off for the mRNA data of uterine cancer. We constructed the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and analyzed the degree, closeness, and betweenness centrality-like topological properties of the PPI network. Then we traced the top 30 genes listed from each topological property to find the key regulators involved in the endometrial cancer (ECa) network. We then detected the communities and sub-communities from the PPI network using the Cytoscape network analyzer and Louvain modularity optimization method. A set of 26 (TOP2A, CENPE, RAD51, BUB1, BUB1B, KIF2C, KIF23, KIF11, KIF20A, ASPM, AURKA, AURKB, PLK1, CDC20, CDKN2A, EZH2, CCNA2, CCNB1, CDK1, FGF2, PRKCA, PGR, CAMK2A, HPGDS, and CDCA8) genes were found to be key genes of ECa regulatory network altered in disease state and might be playing the regulatory role in complex ECa network. Our study suggests that among these genes, KIF11 and H PGDS appeared to be novel key genes identified in our research. We also identified these key genes interactions with miRNAs.

HER2 Expression in Endometrial Cancers Diagnosed as Clear Cell Carcinoma

There is increasing evidence that many endometrial cancers (EC) diagnosed as clear cell carcinoma (CCC) have substantial overlap with both serous carcinoma (SC) and endometrioid carcinoma (EmC), not only in terms of morphology and immunophenotype but also by molecular characterization. Now with use of HER2-based therapy in SC, a CCC diagnosis in serous-like tumors has the potential to exclude patients from receiving beneficial therapy. To assess HER2 in CCC in relation to other characteristics, a tissue microarray of archived CCC, EmC, and SC was stained for HER2 alongside a battery of immunostains used in EC. Cases with equivocal HER2 IHC were also assessed by in situ hybridization. HER2 status was assessed in 229 cases (23 CCC, 74 SC, 132 EmC). HER2 was positive in 48% of cases diagnosed as CCC, 19% of SC, and 0% of EmC. Rigorous morphologic and immunophenotypic review by 5 gynecologic pathologists revealed diagnostic disagreement in 8/11 HER2+ cases diagnosed as CCC, with SC as the other major diagnostic consideration. All HER2+ (n=25) cases were MMR-intact and most HER2+ EC had aberrant p53 staining (22/25, 88%); the 3 cases with a wild type pattern for p53 (12%) were all negative for ER. Based on these findings, patients with a diagnosis of CCC should be included in future clinical trials of HER2-targeted therapy. Moreover, given the diagnostic difficulty surrounding CCC, immunohistochemistry-based algorithms that include aberrant p53 and/or the absence of ER expression may provide a more objective means of establishing eligibility criteria than is currently possible using traditional histologic classification.

Immunohistochemistry in gynecologic carcinomas: Practical update with diagnostic and clinical considerations based on the 2020 WHO classification of tumors

This review provides an update on immunohistochemistry applications-diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive-in the pathology evaluation of gynecologic carcinomas. The 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumors introduced important changes in the diagnostic classification of lower genital tract, endometrial, and ovarian carcinomas, with major influence on the routine pathology practice. Lower genital tract carcinomas and their precursor lesions are now classified based on their human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated and HPV-independent pathogenesis, reflecting the clinically significant prognostic differences and impacting the therapeutic decision-making. Immunohistochemical markers have an increasing role in the pathology evaluation of endometrial carcinomas: in addition to their traditional use in the differential diagnosis and histologic subtyping, they have also been recently advocated for prognostic classification as surrogates for the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) molecular groups. New entities - mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma and gastric (gastrointestinal)-type mucinous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium - have also been added and often require immunostains for diagnostic confirmation. Ovarian carcinomas frequently show overlapping morphologic patterns and heterogeneous appearance within the same tumor, necessitating immunohistochemical work-up. Beyond diagnostic applications, there is increasing clinical demand for screening of inherited cancer syndromes, prediction of prognosis and guiding targeted therapy. Practical issues and pitfalls related to mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry, HER2, and PD-L1 testing are also discussed.

Accurate Distinction of Ovarian Clear Cell From Endometrioid Carcinoma Requires Integration of Phenotype, Immunohistochemical Predictions, and Genotype: Implications for Lynch Syndrome Screening

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) and ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) are both associated with endometriosis but differ in histologic phenotype, biomarker profile, and survival. Our objectives were to refine immunohistochemical (IHC) panels that help distinguish the histotypes and reassess the prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) in immunohistochemically confirmed OCCC. We selected 8 candidate IHC markers to develop first-line and second-line panels in a training set of 344 OCCC/OEC cases. Interobserver reproducibility of histotype diagnosis was assessed in an independent testing cohort of 100 OCC/OEC initially without and subsequently with IHC. The prevalence of MMRd was evaluated using the testing cohort and an expansion set of 844 ovarian carcinomas. The 2 prototypical combinations (OCCC: Napsin A+/HNF1B diffusely+/PR-; OEC: Napsin A-/HNF1B nondiffuse/PR+) occurred in 75% of cases and were 100% specific. A second-line panel (ELAPOR1, AMACR, CDX2) predicted the remaining cases with 83% accuracy. Integration of IHC improved interobserver reproducibility (κ=0.778 vs. 0.882, P<0.0001). The prevalence of MMRd was highest in OEC (11.5%, 44/383), lower in OCCC (1.7%, 5/297), and high-grade serous carcinomas (0.7%, 5/699), and absent in mucinous (0/126) and low-grade serous carcinomas (0/50). All 5 MMRd OCCC were probable Lynch syndrome cases with prototypical IHC profile but ambiguous morphologic features: 3/5 with microcystic architecture and 2/5 with intratumoral stromal inflammation. Integration of first-line and second-line IHC panels increases diagnostic precision and enhances prognostication and triaging for predisposing/predictive molecular biomarker testing. Our data support universal Lynch syndrome screening in all patients with OEC when the diagnosis of other histotypes has been vigorously excluded.

A Timely Update of Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Classification in the Diagnosis and Risk Assessment of Endometrial Carcinomas

CONTEXT.—

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States and has been traditionally classified based on histology. However, the distinction of certain histologic subtypes based on morphology is not uncommonly problematic, and as such, immunohistochemical study is often needed. Advances in comprehensive tumor sequencing have provided novel molecular profiles of endometrial carcinomas. Four distinct molecular subtypes with different prognostic values have been proposed by The Cancer Genome Atlas program: polymerase epsilon ultramutated, microsatellite instability hypermutated, copy number low (microsatellite stable or no specific molecular profile), and copy number high (serouslike, p53 mutant).

OBJECTIVE.—

To discuss the utilities of commonly used immunohistochemical markers for the classification of endometrial carcinomas and to review the recent advancements of The Cancer Genome Atlas molecular reclassification and their potential impact on treatment strategies.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and authors' personal practice experience.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The current practice of classifying endometrial cancers is predominantly based on morphology. The use of ancillary testing, including immunohistochemistry, is helpful in the identification, differential diagnosis, and classification of these cancers. New developments such as molecular subtyping have provided insightful prognostic values for endometrial carcinomas. The proposed The Cancer Genome Atlas classification is poised to gain further prominence in guiding the prognostic evaluation for tailored treatment strategies in the near future.

Napsin-A and AMACR are Superior to HNF-1β in Distinguishing Between Mesonephric Carcinomas and Clear Cell Carcinomas of the Gynecologic Tract

Mesonephric carcinoma is a rare gynecologic neoplasm commonly mistaken for clear cell carcinoma, because of their overlapping morphologic features. Both tumors are negative for estrogen receptor and p16, magnifying this diagnostic dilemma. Recently, hepatocyte nuclear factor-1 beta (HNF-1β), a marker for clear cell carcinoma, has also been shown to be positive in mesonephric carcinomas. Other more recent markers for clear cell carcinoma, however, such as Napsin-A and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), have not yet been studied in mesonephric carcinomas. Here we examine HNF-1β, AMACR, and Napsin-A immunohistochemistry in 18 mesonephric and 55 endometrial/cervical clear cell carcinomas. HNF-1β was considered positive if nuclear staining was present in ≥70% of cells and at least moderate intensity; for Napsin-A and AMACR, any cytoplasmic staining was considered positive (≥1%). H-scores were determined by multiplying the intensity score by proportion score. HNF-1β was positive in a substantial portion of mesonephric carcinomas (9/18, 50%; H-score 98) and clear cell carcinomas (34/55, 62%; H-score 163) and did not distinguish between the 2 entities (specificity, 50%; P-value of H-score=0.08). Napsin-A and AMACR expression was significantly higher in clear cell [43/55 (78%) and 41/55 (75%), respectively] than mesonephric carcinomas [4/18 (22%) and 4/18 (22%) respectively], and helpful in this differential (specificity: 78% and 78%; P<0.05 for both). When Napsin-A and AMACR staining were seen in mesonephric carcinomas, staining was focal (≤5%), whereas staining in clear cell carcinomas was patchy/diffuse. In summary, Napsin-A and AMACR are helpful in distinguishing mesonephric carcinomas from clear cell carcinomas of the female genital tract, but HNF-1β is not.

Clear cell endometrial carcinomas with mismatch repair deficiency have a favorable prognosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

In the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for endometrial carcinoma management, the risk category of clear cell carcinoma (CCC) is not well defined. In fact, while p53-abnormal (p53abn) CCC are known to be aggressive, the prognosis of mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) and p53-wild-type (p53wt) CCCs is less clear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic value of the MMRd and p53wt groups in CCC through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched from their inception to February 2021. All studies reporting p53 expression, MMR proteins expression and survival outcomes in endometrial CCC (either pure or mixed) were included. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression survival analyses with hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) were performed by using the p53abn group as reference; a significant p-value<0.05 was adopted.

RESULTS

Six studies with 136 CCC (114 pure and 22 mixed) were included. Five-year OS was 95.7 ± 4.3% in the MMRd group, 48.4 ± 8.4% months in the p53wt group and 40.6 ± 10.4% in the p53abn group. The hazard of death was significantly lower in the MMRd group than in the p53abn group (HR = 0.062; p = 0.007), while it did not significantly differ between the p53wt and the p53abn group (HR = 0.673; p = 0.222). The POLEmut group could not be analyzed due to the absence of deaths. Similar results were observed in the pure CCC and mixed CCC subgroups.

CONCLUSION

MMRd CCCs seem to have a favorable prognosis and might be lumped together with MMRd endometrioid carcinoma for management purpose. On the other hand, p53wt CCCs appear prognostically more similar to p53abn CCCs.

Endometrial Tumor Classification by Histomorphology and Biomarkers in the Nurses' Health Study

Objective

Endometrial cancers have historically been classified by histomorphologic appearance, which is subject to interobserver disagreement. As molecular and biomarker testing has become increasingly available, the prognostic significance and accuracy of histomorphologic diagnoses have been questioned. To address these issues for a large, prospective cohort study, we provide the results of a centralized pathology review and biomarker analysis of all incidental endometrial carcinomas occurring between 1976 and 2012 in the Nurses' Health Study.

Methods

Routine histology of all (n = 360) cases was reviewed for histomorphologic diagnosis. Cases were subsequently planted in a tissue microarray to explore expression of a variety of biomarkers (e.g., ER, PR, p53, PTEN, PAX2, AMACR, HNF1β, Napsin A, p16, PAX8, and GATA3).

Results

Histologic subtypes included endometrioid (87.2%), serous (5.6%), carcinosarcoma (3.9%), clear cell (1.7%), and mixed type (1.7%). Biomarker results within histologic subtypes were consistent with existing literature: abnormal p53 was frequent in serous cases (74%), and HNF1β (67%), Napsin A (67%), and AMACR (83%) expression was frequent in clear cell carcinomas. Our dataset also allowed for examination of biomarker expression across non-preselected histologies. The results demonstrated that (1) HNF1β was not specific for clear cell carcinoma, (2) TP53 mutations occurred across many histologies, and (3) GATA3 was expressed across multiple histotypes, with 75% of positive cases demonstrating high-grade features.

Conclusions

Our findings establish the subtypes of endometrial cancer occurring in the Nurses' Health Study, corroborate the sensitivity of certain well-established biomarkers, and call into question previously identified associations between certain biomarkers (e.g., HNF1B) and particular histotypes.

DNA mismatch repair deficiency and p53 abnormality are age-related events in mixed endometrial carcinoma with a clear cell component

Mixed endometrial carcinoma (MEC) is defined as a tumor composed of two or more spatially distinct subtypes, at least one of which is serous or clear cell carcinoma. In this study, the clinicopathological features of 15 MEC cases containing a clear cell component (MEC-C) were investigated. The ages of patients ranged from 32 to 83 years (median, 61 years). The combinations of carcinoma components observed were endometrioid and clear cell in ten patients; endometrioid, clear cell and serous in three; and clear cell and serous in two. Immunohistochemically, nine had DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein deficiency (MMR-d), nine had loss of ARID1A and three cases had aberrant p53 expression. MMR-d and loss of ARID1A showed a strong correlation. Only one case showed both MMR-d and aberrant p53 expression. The patients with MMR-d were younger than those without MMR-d (median; 58 years vs. 71 years). Loss of ARID1A also showed significant predilection for younger women than ARID1A intact cases. In conclusion, MMR-d was observed in 60 % of MEC-C, showed predilection for young women, and was associated with ARID1A loss. In contrast, non- MMR-d MEC-C occurred in elder women and some tumors may associate with TP53 mutation. These findings suggest that MEC-C develop via two different molecular mechanisms and they are age-related events.

Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta: A perspective in cancer

Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta (HNF1 β/B) exists as a homeobox transcription factor having a vital role in the embryonic development of organs mainly liver, kidney and pancreas. Initially described as a gene causing maturity‐onset diabetes of the young (MODY), HNF1β expression deregulation and single nucleotide polymorphisms in HNF1β have now been associated with several tumours including endometrial, prostate, ovarian, hepatocellular, renal and colorectal cancers. Its function has been studied either as homodimer or heterodimer with HNF1α. In this review, the role of HNF1B in different cancers will be discussed along with the role of its splice variants, and its emerging role as a potential biomarker in cancer.

Targeted Molecular and Immunohistochemical Analyses of Endometrial Clear Cell Carcinoma Show that POLE Mutations and DNA Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiencies Are Uncommon

Endometrial clear cell carcinoma (ECCC) is an uncommon histotype without unique identified molecular alterations. Recently, The Cancer Genome Atlas molecular subtypes have been reported in ECCC. ECCC cases were collected from 11 institutions with diagnoses confirmed by morphologic review and immunohistochemistry. DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, p53 expression, and ARID1A expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. Targeted next-generation sequencing was completed for POLE, TP53, KRAS, and PIK3CA. Pathogenicity of mutations was determined using MutationTaster and PolyPhen databases. For p53, immunohistochemistry and sequencing were complimentarily used to assess the p53 status. Of 57 cases, 46 were considered prototypical ECCC by morphology and immunohistochemical profile (Napsin A-positive and ER-negative). Three cases were excluded because of insufficient sample for complete immunohistochemical analysis, and 6 had failed sequencing, resulting in 37 cases. Of the 37 remaining cases, 6/37 (16%) had predicted pathogenic mutations in the exonuclease domain of POLE with an allelic frequency >10%; however, no hot-spot mutations were identified. No cases were MMR-deficient. The gene most commonly affected was TP53 (59%, 22/37), followed by KRAS (13%, 2/15) and PIK3CA (13%, 2/15). The current study is the largest molecular analysis of pure ECCC reported to date. When strict classification criteria are applied, MMR-deficient and POLE mutated subtypes are not represented. Further consensus on what represents a deleterious POLE mutations is needed. The findings support separately studying histologically/immunohistochemically defined ECCC to identify characteristic molecular alterations in future studies.

High-Grade Endometrial Carcinomas: Classification with Molecular Insights

This article provides an overview of the current diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma subtypes and provides updates, including the most recent molecular findings from The Cancer Genome Atlas and others. Interpretation of relevant immunohistochemistry and critical diagnostic differential diagnosis with pitfalls are discussed.

Expresión de p53 en ovario y trompa uterina de tumores malignos epiteliales primarios del ovario

Introducción: la mutación en el gen TP53 se ha asociado con la oncogénesis de los tumores de ovario tipo II. Se ha propuesto que las mutaciones de p53 se inician en las células de la trompa uterina y después migran al ovario. El objetivo de este estudio es establecer la frecuencia de la expresión de p53 en ovario y trompa uterina en carcinoma epitelial primario de ovario. Materiales y métodos: estudio de corte transversal en tumores primarios epiteliales de ovario. Se evaluó la expresión de p53 por inmunohistoquímica en el ovario y en las trompas uterinas. Resultados: se incluyeron 45 pacientes con edad media de 55 años. Se estudiaron 24 casos de carcinomas serosos, 6 endometrioides, 5 mixtos, 3 de células claras, 3 carcinosarcomas, 2 carcinomas mucinosos y 2 indiferenciados. Se observó positividad fuerte y difusa en 68% de los tumores tipo II. En 52% hubo positividad en trompa uterina y ovario, 92% con compromiso bilateral. En 3 de estos casos se reconoció carcinoma intraepitelial tubárico con positividad de p53 en el área tumoral, no tumoral y en el carcinoma seroso. Conclusión: como se ha observado en estudios previos, el gen TP53 está involucrado en la oncogénesis de los tumores tipo II y se ha demostrado que existe una relación entre una mutación inicial de p53, seguida por STIL, STIC, evolucionando a un carcinoma seroso de ovario.

High-grade Endometrial Carcinomas: Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Features, Diagnostic Challenges and Recommendations

This review of challenging diagnostic issues concerning high-grade endometrial carcinomas is derived from the authors' review of the literature followed by discussions at the Endometrial Cancer Workshop sponsored by the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists in 2016. Recommendations presented are evidence-based, insofar as this is possible, given that the levels of evidence are weak or moderate due to small sample sizes and nonuniform diagnostic criteria used in many studies. High-grade endometrioid carcinomas include FIGO grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas, serous carcinomas, clear cell carcinomas, undifferentiated carcinomas, and carcinosarcomas. FIGO grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma is diagnosed when an endometrioid carcinoma exhibits >50% solid architecture (excluding squamous areas), or when an architecturally FIGO grade 2 endometrioid carcinoma exhibits marked cytologic atypia, provided that a glandular variant of serous carcinoma has been excluded. The most useful immunohistochemical studies to make the distinction between these 2 histotypes are p53, p16, DNA mismatch repair proteins, PTEN, and ARID1A. Endometrial clear cell carcinomas must display prototypical architectural and cytologic features for diagnosis. Immunohistochemical stains, including, Napsin A and p504s can be used as ancillary diagnostic tools; p53 expression is aberrant in a minority of clear cell carcinomas. Of note, clear cells are found in all types of high-grade endometrial carcinomas, leading to a tendency to overdiagnose clear cell carcinoma. Undifferentiated carcinoma (which when associated with a component of low-grade endometrioid carcinoma is termed "dedifferentiated carcinoma") is composed of sheets of monotonous, typically dyscohesive cells, which can have a rhabdoid appearance; they often exhibit limited expression of cytokeratins and epithelial membrane antigen, are usually negative for PAX8 and hormone receptors, lack membranous e-cadherin and commonly demonstrate loss of expression of DNA mismatch repair proteins and SWI-SNF chromatin remodeling proteins. Carcinosarcomas must show unequivocal morphologic evidence of malignant epithelial and mesenchymal differentiation.

Comparative Use of Napsin A and Glypican 3 to Distinguish Endometrial Clear Cell from Serous and Endometrioid Carcinomas

Objective

Diagnosis of endometrial clear cell carcinomas is difficult owing to the low reproducibility of histological cell type in high-grade endometrial cancers. Recently, immunoreactivity for napsin A and glypican 3 has been reported in clear cell cancers. We sought to evaluate the use of napsin A and glypican 3 staining to distinguish clear cell carcinoma from other high-grade endometrial cancers.

Methods/Materials

Twenty cases of pure and mixed endometrial clear cell carcinoma were extracted from the 2000–2014 archival material in the Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pathology at Montefiore Medical Center and compared to serous and grade 3 endometrioid controls. Representative sections were stained with monoclonal antibodies to napsin A and glypican 3. Immunostains were independently reviewed by 2 pathologists to assess frequency and pattern of staining. Charts were reviewed for clinicopathologic and treatment data.

Results

Granular cytoplasmic positivity for napsin A was observed in 70% of endometrial clear cell carcinomas; only 25% showed cytoplasmic or membranous glypican 3 positivity. No serous or high-grade endometrioid tumors stained for either marker. No cases of clear cell carcinoma that stained negative for napsin A stained positive for glypican 3. No difference in the immunohistochemical profile was found between pure and mixed clear cell carcinomas and between early- and advanced-stage clear cell carcinomas.

Conclusions

Napsin A is a more sensitive marker for endometrial clear cell carcinoma than glypican 3. In histologically ambiguous cases, napsin A and glypican 3 may help distinguish clear cell carcinoma from other high-grade histologies. Further investigation of endometrial clear cell carcinoma is needed to identify additional diagnostic tools for this rare histology. Correlation of a unique immunohistochemical profile and clinical outcomes is necessary.

Fairly rare clear cell adenocarcinoma mimicking liver cancer: a case report

Background

Clear cell carcinoma commonly occurs in the ovary and kidney, and clear cell cholangiocarcinoma was rarely reported. Differential diagnosis which the origin of the tumor located on the liver surface is intrahepatic or extrahepatic was difficult. Herein, we report a case of clear cell adenocarcinoma mimicking liver cancer.

Case presentation

This was a 55-year-old female who had the tumor with cystic component in the liver. She was performed hepatectomy and diagnosed as clear cell adenocarcinoma. Histopathological evaluation revealed intra-cystic clear cell adenocarcinoma. The tumor has ductal structure including mucin and atypical nuclear with clear cytoplasm. The tumor was separated from the liver and the diaphragm. The expression of Pax8 was positive, but the expression CK7 and HNF1β was positive and that of CD10 and ER was negative, which indicate that the tumor has the feature of clear cell carcinoma of ovary, not renal cell carcinoma nor cholangiocarcinoma.

Conclusions

Our experience with this patient suggests that this tumor may originate from the endometriosis onto the diaphragm from the detailed results of immunohistochemical staining.

An update of Wnt signalling in endometrial cancer and its potential as a therapeutic target

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological malignancy in developed nations, and its prevalence is rising as women defer or decide not to have children and as obesity rises, both key risk factors. Despite this, treatment options remain limited, particularly for advanced or refractory disease. New genomic analyses have revealed distinct mutational profiles with therapeutic and prognostic potential. Wnt signalling, which is pivotal in embryogenesis, healing and homeostasis, is of importance in the endometrium and has been linked to carcinogenesis. This review aims to update and discuss the current evidence for the role of β-catenin dependent and independent Wnt signalling, including the ROR receptors in the endometrium and its potential as a therapeutic target, in light of recent trials of Wnt-targeted therapy in multiple tumour types.

Does a p53 "Wild-type" Immunophenotype Exclude a Diagnosis of Endometrial Serous Carcinoma?

An aberrant p53 immunophenotype may be identified in several histotypes of endometrial carcinoma, and is accordingly recognized to lack diagnostic specificity in and of itself. However, based on the high frequency with which p53 aberrations have historically been identified in endometrial serous carcinoma, a mutation-type immunophenotype is considered to be highly sensitive for the histotype. Using an illustrative case study and a review of the literature, we explore a relatively routine diagnostic question: whether the negative predictive value of a wild-type p53 immunophenotype for serous carcinoma is absolute, that is, whether a p53-wild type immunophenotype is absolutely incompatible with a diagnosis of serous carcinoma. The case is an advanced stage endometrial carcinoma that was reproducibly classified by pathologists from 3 institutions as serous carcinoma based on its morphologic features. By immunohistochemistry, the tumor was p53-wild type (DO-7 clone), diffusely positive for p16 (block positivity), and showed retained expression of PTEN, MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2. Next generation sequencing showed that there indeed was an underlying mutation in TP53 (D393fs*78, R213*). The tumor was microsatellite stable, had a low mutational burden (4 mutations per MB), and displayed no mutations in the exonuclease domain of DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) gene. Other genomic alterations included RB1 mutation (R46fs*19), amplifications in MYST3 and CRKL, and ARID1A deletion (splice site 5125-94_5138del108). A review of the recent literature identified 5 studies in which a total of 259 cases of serous carcinoma were whole-exome sequenced. The average TP53 mutational rate in endometrial serous carcinoma was only 75% (range, 60 to 88). A total of 12 (33%) of 36 immunohistochemical studies reported a p53-aberrant rate of <80% in endometrial serous carcinoma. We discuss in detail several potential explanations that may underlie the scenario of serous carcinoma-like morphology combined with p53-wild-type immunophenotype, including analytic limitations, a nonserous histotype displaying morphologic mimicry of serous carcinoma, and true biological phenomena (including the possibility of a TP53-independent pathway of endometrial serous carcinogenesis). Ultimately, our central thematic question is provisionally answered in the negative. At present, the available data would not support a categorical conclusion that a p53 alteration is a necessary and obligate component in the genesis and/or diagnosis of endometrial serous carcinoma. On the basis of their collective experience, the authors proffer some recommendations on the use of p53 immunohistochemistry in the histotyping of endometrial carcinomas.

Promoter-level transcriptome in primary lesions of endometrial cancer identified biomarkers associated with lymph node metastasis

For endometrial cancer patients, lymphadenectomy is recommended to exclude rarely metastasized cancer cells. This procedure is performed even in patients with low risk of recurrence despite the risk of complications such as lymphedema. A method to accurately identify cases with no lymph node metastases (LN-) before lymphadenectomy is therefore highly required. We approached this clinical problem by examining primary lesions of endometrial cancers with CAGE (Cap Analysis Gene Expression), which quantifies promoter-level expression across the genome. Fourteen profiles delineated distinct transcriptional networks between LN + and LN- cases, within those classified as having the low or intermediate risk of recurrence. Subsequent quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analyses of 115 primary tumors showed SEMA3D mRNA and TACC2 isoforms expressed through a novel promoter as promising biomarkers with high accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.929) when used in combination. Our high-resolution transcriptome provided evidence of distinct molecular profiles underlying LN + /LN- status in endometrial cancers, raising the possibility of preoperative diagnosis to reduce unnecessary operations in patients with minimum recurrence risk.

Immunohistochemistry in Gynecologic Pathology: An Example-Based Practical Update

CONTEXT

- Immunohistochemical stains are routinely applied in the pathology diagnostic workup of gynecologic lesions. The rapidly expanding repertoire of available markers helps in refining the diagnostic criteria for each disease entity; however, limitations and pitfalls exist.

OBJECTIVE

- To provide a practical, relevant update on the use of immunohistochemistry for commonly encountered differential diagnoses in gynecologic pathology.

DATA SOURCES

- Literature review and authors' diagnostic experience.

CONCLUSIONS

- Immunohistochemistry is a helpful adjunct tool in gynecologic pathology. Although the primary application is in the diagnostic workup, novel prognostic and predictive markers, and immunostains to screen for genetic cancer syndromes, have also been recently introduced in the field.

[New features in the 2014 WHO classification of uterine neoplasms]

The 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of uterine tumors revealed simplification of the classification by fusion of several entities and the introduction of novel entities. Among the multitude of alterations, the following are named: a simplified classification for precursor lesions of endometrial carcinoma now distinguishes between hyperplasia without atypia and atypical hyperplasia, the latter also known as endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). For endometrial carcinoma a differentiation is made between type 1 (endometrioid carcinoma with variants and mucinous carcinoma) and type 2 (serous and clear cell carcinoma). Besides a papillary architecture serous carcinomas may show solid and glandular features and TP53 immunohistochemistry with an "all or null pattern" assists in the diagnosis of serous carcinoma with ambiguous features. Neuroendocrine neoplasms are categorized in a similar way to the gastrointestinal tract into well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (small cell and large cell types). Leiomyosarcomas of the uterus are typically high grade and characterized by marked nuclear atypia and lively mitotic activity. Low grade stromal neoplasms frequently show gene fusions, such as JAZF1/SUZ12. High grade endometrial stromal sarcoma is newly defined by cyclin D1 overexpression and the presence of the fusion gene YWHAE/FAM22 and must be distinguished from undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. Carcinosarcomas (malignant mixed Mullerian tumors MMMT) show biological and molecular similarities to high-grade carcinomas.

Endometrial Carcinomas With Clear Cells: A Study of a Heterogeneous Group of Tumors Including Interobserver Variability, Mutation Analysis, and Immunohistochemistry With HNF-1β

Endometrial clear cell carcinoma (CC) is an uncommon tumor and often carries a poor prognosis. It has histologic features that overlap with other endometrial carcinomas and is frequently misclassified. Accurate classification is crucial, however, to improve treatment options. The objectives of this study were (1) to assess diagnostic interobserver variability among 5 gynecologic pathologists for tumors originally diagnosed as CC or with a component of CC (n=44); (2) to determine the utility of immunohistochemical markers estrogen receptor and HNF-1β; and (3) to detect mutations in select genes. Clinical data and morphologic features were also recorded. Agreement among reviewers was only moderate: only 46% of the original CC remained classified as such. After reclassification, estrogen receptor was positive in 8% of CC, 67% of endometrioid carcinomas (EC), and 47% of serous carcinomas (SC). Sensitivities of HNF-1β in CC, SC, and EC were 62%, 27%, and 17%, respectively, whereas specificity for CC versus EC or SC was 78%. Mutations in PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PTEN, KRAS, and NRAS were detected in 41% of 37 cases that had adequate material for study. At least 1 mutation was identified in 33% of CC, 67% of EC, and 33% of SC. This group of patients had poor outcomes: 72% of the patients with follow-up information had died of disease. In summary, this study suggests that the current pool of CC is a heterogeneous group of tumors from the morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular point of views and that only a percentage of them represent true CC.

Pathology of Endometrial Carcinoma

On a clinicopathological and molecular level, two distinctive types of endometrial carcinoma, type I and type II, can be distinguished. Endometrioid carcinoma, the typical type I carcinoma, seems to develop through an estrogen-driven "adenoma carcinoma" pathway from atypical endometrial hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (AEH/EIN). It is associated with elevated serum estrogen and high body mass index and expresses estrogen and progesterone receptors. They are mostly low grade and show a favorable prognosis. A subset progresses into high-grade carcinoma which is accompanied by loss of receptor expression and accumulation of TP53 mutations and behaves poorly. Other frequently altered genes in type I carcinomas are K-Ras, PTEN, and ß-catenin. Another frequent feature of type I carcinomas is microsatellite instability mainly caused by methylation of the MLH1 promoter. In contrast, the typical type II carcinoma, serous carcinoma, is not estrogen related since it usually occurs in a small uterus with atrophic endometrium. It is often associated with a flat putative precursor lesion called serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC). The molecular pathogenesis of serous carcinoma seems to be driven by TP53 mutations, which are present in SEIC. Other molecular changes in serous carcinoma detectable by immunohistochemistry involve cyclin E and p16. Since many of the aforementioned molecular changes can be demonstrated by immunohistochemistry, they are useful ancillary diagnostic tools and may further contribute to a future molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma as recently suggested based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data.

New classification of endometrial cancers: the development and potential applications of genomic-based classification in research and clinical care

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the fourth most common cancer in women in the developed world. Classification of ECs by histomorphologic criteria has limited reproducibility and better tools are needed to distinguish these tumors and enable a subtype-specific approach to research and clinical care. Based on the Cancer Genome Atlas, two research teams have developed pragmatic molecular classifiers that identify four prognostically distinct molecular subgroups. These methods can be applied to diagnostic specimens (e.g., endometrial biopsy) with the potential to completely change the current risk stratification systems and enable earlier informed decision making. The evolution of genomic classification in ECs is shared herein, as well as potential applications and discussion of the essential research still needed in order to optimally integrate molecular classification in to current standard of care.

Concurrent ARID1A and ARID1B inactivation in endometrial and ovarian dedifferentiated carcinomas

Dedifferentiated carcinoma of the endometrium or the ovary is an aggressive epithelial malignancy that comprises an endometrioid carcinoma together with an undifferentiated carcinoma. We recently reported that inactivation of BRG1 or INI1, core subunits of the switch/sucrose non-fermenting (SWI/SNF) complex, was the likely molecular event underlying dedifferentiation in about half of dedifferentiated carcinomas. In this study, we performed a genomic screen that included other members of the SWI/SNF complex to better delineate the molecular basis in the remainder of these tumours. We identified concurrent inactivating mutations involving ARID1A and ARID1B in 12 of 24 BRG1/INI1-intact, 0 of 3 INI1-deficient and 0 of 16 BRG1-deficient dedifferentiated carcinomas. All ARID1A and ARID1B co-mutated tumours displayed loss of ARID1A expression in the undifferentiated component with 11 of 12 tumours also displaying absent staining in the endometrioid component. ARID1B expression was absent in the undifferentiated component in all 12 tumours, whereas the corresponding endometrioid component showed intact expression. Clinically, ARID1A/ARID1B co-inactivated tumours showed similar aggressive behaviour to BRG1 or INI1-inactivated tumours. Given that ARID1A and ARID1B are the only known DNA-binding subunits of the SWI/SNF-A complex, additional inactivation of ARID1B in an ARID1A-deficient background appears to represent an alternative mechanism of disruption of SWI/SNF-mediated transcriptional regulation, resulting in arrested cellular differentiation in endometrial and ovarian endometrioid cancer.

Molecular Analysis of Mixed Endometrial Carcinomas Shows Clonality in Most Cases

Mixed endometrial carcinoma refers to a tumor that comprises 2 or more distinct histotypes. We studied 18 mixed-type endometrial carcinomas-11 mixed serous and low-grade endometrioid carcinomas (SC/EC), 5 mixed clear cell and low-grade ECs (CCC/EC), and 2 mixed CCC and SCs (CCC/SC), using targeted next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry to compare the molecular profiles of the different histotypes present in each case. In 16 of 18 cases there was molecular evidence that both components shared a clonal origin. Eight cases (6 EC/SC, 1 EC/CCC, and 1 SC/CCC) showed an SC molecular profile that was the same in both components. Five cases (3 CCC/EC and 2 SC/EC) showed a shared endometrioid molecular profile and identical mismatch-repair protein deficiency in both components. A single SC/EC case harbored the same POLE exonuclease domain mutation in both components. One SC/CCC and 1 EC/CCC case showed both shared and unique molecular features in the 2 histotype components, suggesting early molecular divergence from a common clonal origin. In 2 cases, there were no shared molecular features, and these appear to be biologically unrelated synchronous tumors. Overall, these results show that the different histologic components in mixed endometrial carcinomas typically share the same molecular aberrations. Mixed endometrial carcinomas most commonly occur through morphologic mimicry, whereby tumors with serous-type molecular profile show morphologic features of EC or CCC, or through underlying deficiency in DNA nucleotide repair, with resulting rapid accrual of mutations and intratumoral phenotypic heterogeneity. Less commonly, mixed endometrial carcinomas are the result of early molecular divergence from a common progenitor clone or are synchronous biologically unrelated tumors (collision tumors).

Androgen receptors are acquired by healthy postmenopausal endometrial epithelium and their subsequent loss in endometrial cancer is associated with poor survival

BACKGROUND

Endometrial cancer (EC) is a hormone-driven disease, and androgen receptor (AR) expression in high-grade EC (HGEC) and metastatic EC has not yet been described.

METHODS

The expression pattern and prognostic value of AR in relation to oestrogen (ERα and ERβ) and progesterone (PR) receptors, and the proliferation marker Ki67 in all EC subtypes (n = 85) were compared with that of healthy and hyperplastic endometrium, using immunohistochemisty and qPCR.

RESULTS

Compared with proliferative endometrium, postmenopausal endometrtial epithelium showed significantly higher expression of AR (P < 0.001) and ERα (P = 0.035), which persisted in hyperplastic epithelium and in low-grade EC (LGEC). High-grade EC showed a significant loss of AR (P < 0.0001), PR (P < 0.0001) and ERβ (P < 0.035) compared with LGEC, whilst maintaining weak to moderate ERα. Unlike PR, AR expression in metastatic lesions was significantly (P = 0.039) higher than that in primary tumours. Androgen receptor expression correlated with favourable clinicopathological features and a lower proliferation index. Loss of AR, with/without the loss of PR was associated with a significantly lower disease-free survival (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Postmenopausal endometrial epithelium acquires AR whilst preserving other steroid hormone receptors. Loss of AR, PR with retention of ERα and ERβ may promote the unrestrained growth of HGEC. Androgen receptor may therefore be a clinically relevant prognostic indicator and a potential therapeutic target in EC.

Endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological tumour in developed countries, and its incidence is increasing. The most frequently occurring histological subtype is endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Patients are often diagnosed when the disease is still confined to the uterus. Standard treatment consists of primary hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, often using minimally invasive approaches (laparoscopic or robotic). Lymph node surgical strategy is contingent on histological factors (subtype, tumour grade, involvement of lymphovascular space), disease stage (including myometrial invasion), patients' characteristics (age and comorbidities), and national and international guidelines. Adjuvant treatment is tailored according to histology and stage. Various classifications are used to assess the risks of recurrence and to determine optimum postoperative management. 5 year overall survival ranges from 74% to 91% in patients without metastatic disease. Trials are ongoing in patients at high risk of recurrence (including chemotherapy, chemoradiation therapy, and molecular targeted therapies) to assess the modalities that best balance optimisation of survival with the lowest adverse effects on quality of life.

Loss of switch/sucrose non-fermenting complex protein expression is associated with dedifferentiation in endometrial carcinomas

Dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma is an aggressive type of endometrial cancer that contains a mix of low-grade endometrioid and undifferentiated carcinoma components. We performed targeted sequencing of eight dedifferentiated carcinomas and identified somatic frameshift/nonsense mutations in SMARCA4, a core ATPase of the switch/sucrose non-fermenting (SWI/SNF) complex, in the undifferentiated components of four tumors. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed the loss of SMARCA4 in the undifferentiated component of these four SMARCA4-mutated cases, whereas the corresponding low-grade endometrioid component showed retained SMARCA4 expression. An expanded survey of other members of the SWI/SNF complex showed SMARCB1 loss in the undifferentiated component of two SMARCA4-intact tumors, and all SMARCA4- or SMARCB1-deficient tumors showed concomitant loss of expression of SMARCA2. We subsequently examined the expression of SMARCA2, SMARCA4, and SMARCB1 in an additional set of 22 centrally reviewed dedifferentiated carcinomas and 31 grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas. Combining the results from the index and the expansion set, 15 of 30 (50%) of the dedifferentiated carcinomas examined showed either concurrent SMARCA4 and SMARCA2 loss (37%) or concurrent SMARCB1 and SMARCA2 loss (13%) in the undifferentiated component. The loss of SMARCA4 or SMARCB1 was mutually exclusive. All 31 grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas showed intact expression of these core SWI/SNF proteins. The majority (73%) of the SMARCA4/SMARCA2-deficient and half of SMARCB1/SMARCA2-deficient undifferentiated component developed in a mismatch repair-deficient molecular context. The observed spatial association between SWI/SNF protein loss and histologic dedifferentiation suggests that inactivation of these core SWI/SNF proteins may contribute to the development of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma.

How to approach the many faces of endometrioid carcinoma

This article reviews the salient features of variants of endometrioid carcinoma (ECa) that can pose a diagnostic challenge and/or are associated with unique clinicopathological findings. Variants with distinct architectural and cytologic features include the following: (1) ECa with a villoglandular pattern (tumor with finger-like papillae lined by bland cells with a tendency for vascular/lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis once this pattern is seen within the myoinvasive component); (2) papillary ECa of intermediate grade (grade 2) (tumor that can be mistaken for serous carcinoma, as it contains papillae showing slightly irregular contours, moderately atypical cells, and it is associated with vascular/lymphatic invasion/lymph node metastasis, but with common association with mucinous metaplasia, MELF (microcystic, elongated, and fragmented) pattern of invasion, and wild p53 expression); (3) ECa with non-villous papillae (tumor containing pseudopapillae within glands with bland-appearing cytology commonly associated with abortive squamous differentiation and otherwise not different from usual ECa); (4) ECa with microglandular-like pattern (tumor that mimics microglandular hyperplasia of the cervix, often lacking the typical appearance of microglandular hyperplasia and showing Ki-67 index >10%, strong CD10 expression, and negative PAX-2, p63, and CD34); and (5) ECa with sex cord-like formations and hyalinization (tumor with interconnected cords and nests of bland epithelioid and spindled cells that merge with a typical component of low-grade ECa, usually associated with squamous differentiation and hyalinization). This tumor should be distinguished from carcinosarcoma and, in contrast to the latter, it shows nuclear β-catenin expression, ER/PR and patchy p16 positivity, tends to present at a low stage, and has a favorable prognosis and (6) dedifferentiated ECa (tumor showing a low-grade ECa juxtaposed to an undifferentiated carcinoma-the latter characterized by variably sized monotonous, often non-cohesive cells with brisk mitotic activity and usually arranged in sheets). Undifferentiated carcinoma tends to be negative for PAX8 and ER/PR with variable expression of keratins and can be associated with microsatellite instability (may be part of Lynch syndrome). Variants with distinct cytological features include the following: (1) ECa with clear cells (tumors with clearing due to 'clear' (glycogenated) squamous cells, distinct vacuoles, or not otherwise specified. EC with clear cells should be distinguished from clear cell carcinoma by the absence of the variety of architectural patterns, lack of cuboidal/flattened/hobnail cells, and lack of degree of atypia usually detected in clear cell carcinoma. In addition, they are ER/PR positive and Napsin A and p504S negative in contrast to clear cell carcinoma); (2) ECa with spindle cells (tumor with transition from spindle cells to the glandular component of a low-grade ECa. The spindle cells are keratin, ER/PR, and patchy p16 positive and show wild-type p53 expression); (3) ECa with mucinous differentiation (this tumor can be mistaken for a cervical adenocarcinoma, as they have overlapping features. Expression of ER/PR and vimentin in the context of a negative or patchy p16 positivity and the absence of high-risk HPV allows a correct diagnosis).

Expression, Epigenetic and Genetic Changes of HNF1B in Endometrial Lesions

Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-beta (HNF-1-beta) is a transcription factor involved in cancerogenesis of various tumors, including endometrioid carcinoma. We performed comprehensive analysis of HNF-1-beta in lesions of the endometrium, including protein expression and genetic and epigenetic changes. Expression of HNF-1-beta was analyzed immunohistochemically in 320 cases including both tumor and non-tumor endometrial lesions. Promoter methylation and genetic variants were evaluated, using bisulphite and direct sequencing, in 30 (18 fresh frozen, 12 FFPE tumors) endometrioid carcinomas (ECs) and 15 ovarian clear cell carcinomas (OCCCs) as a control group. We detected expression of HNF-1-beta in 28 % of ECs (51/180 cases), 26 % of serous carcinoma (7/27 cases), 83 % of endometrial clear cell carcinoma (15/18 cases), 93 % of hyperplastic polyps with atypias (13/14 cases), 100 % of hyperplastic polyps without atypias (16/16 cases), 88 % of hyperplasias with atypias (14/16 cases), 91 % of hyperplasias without atypias (10/11 cases), and in ≥80 % of different normal endometrium samples. The control group of OCCCs showed HNF-1-beta expression in 95 % (18/19 cases). Methylation in promoter region was detected in 13.3 % (4/30) of ECs, but not in corresponding normal tissue where available, nor in OCCCs (0/15 cases). Mutation analysis revealed truncating variant c.454C > T (p.Gln152X) in one EC and missense variant c.848C > T (p.Ala283Val) was detected in one OCCC. In conclusion, expression of HNF-1-beta was detected in various extents in all types of lesions analyzed, nevertheless its strong expression was mostly limited to clear cell carcinomas. Biological significance of genetic and epigenetic changes needs further investigation.

Immunohistochemical Comparison of Ovarian and Uterine Endometrioid Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma With Clear Cell Change, and Clear Cell Carcinoma

Accurate distinction of clear cell carcinoma (CCC) from endometrioid carcinoma (EC) has important clinical implications, but, not infrequently, EC demonstrates clear cell change (EC-CC), mimicking CCC. We examined whether a panel of immunomarkers can help distinguish between these tumors. Sixty-four CCCs (40 ovarian and 24 uterine), 34 ECs (21 ovarian and 13 uterine), and 34 EC-CCs (6 ovarian and 28 uterine) were stained for HNF1β, BAF250a, Napsin A, ER, and PR. Intensity and extent of immunoreactivity was assessed. Fifty-seven of 64 (89%) CCCs, 14/34 (41%) EC-CCs, and 16/34 (47%) ECs expressed HNF1β, and 56/64 (88%) CCCs, 4/34 (12%) EC-CCs, and 1/34 (3%) ECs stained for Napsin A. Most CCCs demonstrated at least moderate and diffuse staining for both markers, whereas only focal and weak expression was identified in most EC-CC/EC. Compared to HNF1β, Napsin A showed increased specificity (93.0% vs. 55.9%, P<0.0001) and similar sensitivity (87.5% vs. 89.1%) in distinguishing CCC from EC-CC/EC. Thirteen of 64 (20%) CCCs, 6/34 (18%) EC-CCs, and 2/34 (6%) ECs showed loss of BAF250a. ER was expressed by 10/64 (16%) CCCs, 30/34 (88%) EC-CCs, and 33/34 (97%) ECs, whereas PR positivity was identified in 9/64 (14%) CCCs, 26/34 (77%) EC-CCs, and 33/34 (97%) ECs. The majority of EC and EC-CC demonstrated diffuse staining for ER/PR, whereas most CCCs showed very focal positivity. There is a statistically significant difference in HNF1β, Napsin A, ER, and PR immunoexpression between CCC and EC/EC-CC, with Napsin A being a more specific marker for CCC than HNF1β. Overall, the immunoprofile of EC-CC is more comparable to that of EC than CCC. The use of a panel of immunostains can help distinguish EC-CC from CCC.

HNF1B polymorphism influences the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

HNF1B (formerly known as TCF2) gene encodes for a transcription factor that regulates gene expression involved in normal mesodermal and endodermal developments. A close association between rs4430796 polymorphism of HNF1B gene and decreased endometrial cancer (EC) risk has been demonstrated. The aim of the current study was to test the hypothesis that rs4430796 polymorphism can influence the prognosis of EC patients.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study. Clinical and pathological data were extrapolated and genotypes were assessed on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded non-tumour tissues. The influence of patients' genotype on overall survival and progression free survival were our main outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 191 EC patients were included in the final analysis. Overall survival differed significantly (P = 0.003) among genotypes. At multivariate analysis, a significant (P < 0.05) effect on overall survival was detected for FIGO stage, and rs4430796 polymorphism of HNF1B gene. After grouping EC patients according to adjuvant treatment, rs4430796 polymorphism resulted significantly (P < 0.001) related to overall survival only in subjects who received radiotherapy plus chemotherapy. A significant (P = 0.014) interaction between rs4430796 polymorphism and chemo-radiotherapy was also detected. Finally, only a trend (P = 0.090) towards significance was observed for rs4430796 polymorphism effect on progression free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

rs4430796 polymorphism of HNF1B gene influences independently the prognosis of EC patients with a potential effect on tumor chemo-sensitivity.

Molecular alterations in endometrial and ovarian clear cell carcinomas: clinical impacts of telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation

Recently, mutations of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter were found in several types of cancer. A few reports demonstrate TERT promoter mutations in ovarian clear cell carcinomas but endometrial clear cell carcinoma has not been studied. The aims of this study were to compare differences of molecular alterations and clinical factors, and identify their prognostic impact in endometrial and ovarian clear cell carcinomas. We evaluated mutations of the TERT promoter and PIK3CA, expression of ARID1A, and other clinicopathological factors in 56 ovarian and 14 endometrial clear cell carcinomas. We found that TERT promoter mutations were present in 21% (3/14) of endometrial clear cell carcinomas and 16% (9/56) of ovarian clear cell carcinomas. Compared with ovarian clear cell carcinomas, endometrial clear cell carcinomas showed older mean patient age (P<0.001), preserved ARID1A immunoreactivity (P=0.017) and infrequent PIK3CA mutation (P=0.025). In ovarian clear cell carcinomas, TERT promoter mutations were correlated with patient age >45 (P=0.045) and preserved ARID1A expression (P=0.003). In cases of endometrial clear cell carcinoma, TERT promoter mutations were not statistically associated with any other clinicopathological factors. In ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients with early FIGO stage (stages I and II), TERT promoter mutation was an independent prognostic factor and correlated with a shorter disease-free survival and overall survival (P=0.015 and 0.009, respectively). In recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients with early FIGO stage, TERT promoter mutations were associated with early relapse within 6 months (P=0.018). We concluded that TERT promoter mutations were present in endometrial and ovarian clear cell carcinomas. Distinct molecular alteration patterns in endometrial and ovarian clear cell carcinomas implied different processes of tumorigenesis in these morphologically similar tumors. In ovarian clear cell carcinoma of early FIGO stage, patients with TERT promoter mutation require close follow-up during the initial 6 months following chemotherapy.

Targeted mutation analysis of endometrial clear cell carcinoma

AIMS

Endometrial clear cell carcinomas (CCC) constitute fewer than 5% of all carcinomas of the endometrium. Currently, little is known regarding the genetic basis of endometrial CCC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed genomic and immunohistochemical analyses on 14 rigorously reviewed pure endometrial CCC. The genomic analysis consisted of sequencing the coding regions of 26 genes implicated previously in endometrial carcinoma. Twelve of 14 tumours displayed a prototypical CCC immunophenotype [napsin A+, hepatocyte nuclear factor-1β (HNF1β(+) ) and oestrogen receptor(-) ] and all showed intact mismatch repair protein expression. We detected mutations in 11 of 14 tumours, and there was a predominance of mutations involving genes that are mutated more frequently in endometrial serous carcinomas than in endometrioid carcinomas. Two tumours displayed a prototypical serous carcinoma mutation profile (concurrent TP53 and PPP2R1A mutations, without PTEN, CTNNB1 or ARID1A mutation). No mutations in PTEN, CTNNB1 or POLE were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall mutation profile of this cohort of endometrial CCC appears to be more serous-like than endometrioid-like, with a minor subset in the TP53-mutated CCC showing serous carcinoma profile. These findings provide new insights into the molecular features of morphologically prototypical endometrial CCC, and underscore the need for further investigations into the oncogenesis of endometrial CCC.

The Utility of Immunohistochemistry in the Differential Diagnosis of Gynecologic Disorders

Context

Immunohistochemistry has assumed an increasing role in the identification and characterization of gynecologic disorders including lesions with deceptively bland morphology, uncommon and underdiagnosed neoplasms, and neoplasms with specific genetic alterations associated with overexpression or loss of expression of specific proteins. The diagnostic accuracy has been significantly improved owing to the discovery and increasing experience with the tumor-associated biomarkers, and the increasing demand for precise tumor classification to assess suitability for the expanding therapeutic modalities including clinical trials.

Objective

To differentiate lesions of the gynecologic tract through the use of effective immunohistochemical panels.

Data Sources

Literature review and authors' personal practice experience.

Conclusions

The application of diagnostic and prognostic immunohistochemical panels has enabled pathologists to better guide therapeutic decisions and to better predict the clinical outcome. It is now well established that the use of ancillary testing, including immunohistochemistry, has a significant power in the identification, differentiation, and classification of reactive, premalignant, and malignant gynecologic disorders. This article discusses the utilities and pitfalls of the commonly used immunohistochemical markers in the context of overlapping morphologic features encountered in the uterus, ovaries, and fallopian tubes.

POLE exonuclease domain mutation predicts long progression-free survival in grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma of the endometrium

OBJECTIVE

POLE exonuclease domain mutations were recently found to occur in a subset of endometrial carcinomas and result in defective proof-reading function during DNA replication. The aim of this study is to further characterize the clinical and pathologic significance of POLE exonuclease domain mutations in high-grade endometrial carcinomas.

METHODS

We assessed for mutations in the exonuclease domain of POLE by Sanger sequencing in 53 grade 3 endometrioid, 25 serous, 16 clear cell and 5 dedifferentiated carcinomas. We correlated POLE mutation status with clinicopathologic features and molecular parameters. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

POLE exonuclease domain mutations were identified in 8 of 53 (15%) grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas and not in any other histotypes examined. Only 1 of the 8 grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas with POLE exonuclease domain mutation displayed deficient mismatch repair protein expression by immunohistochemistry (MSH6 loss), compared to 21 of 45 grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas with wild-type exonuclease domain. When analyzed together with published grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas by The Cancer Genome Atlas, the presence of POLE exonuclease domain mutation was associated with significantly better progression-free survival in univariate (p=0.025) and multivariate (p=0.010) analyses, such that none of the patients with POLE mutated tumors experienced disease progression

CONCLUSIONS

POLE exonuclease domain mutations occur in a subset of grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas and are associated with good clinical outcome. It can serve as an important prognostic molecular marker to guide the management of patients with grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas.