TTF-1 expression in breast carcinoma: an unusual but real phenomenon

Role of SOX10 Immunohistochemical Expression in Diagnosing Triple Negative Breast Cancer and Its Correlation With Clinicopathological Features

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) poses a diagnostic challenge for histopathologists due to the reduced frequency of breast-specific markers. SOX10 has emerged as a useful diagnostic marker for TNBC. The aim of our study was to determine the frequency of SOX-10 immunohistochemical (IHC) expression in our cohort and assess its correlation with clinicopathological and histological features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 72 primary TNBC cases. Specimens included tru-cut biopsies and excision specimens. We stained whole slide sections of these specimens with SOX10 antibody and calculated its frequency (%) of expression and H-score. We applied the chi-square test to assess the correlation between SOX10 expression and clinicopathological and histological features such as the patient's age, specimen type, tumor size, histological type, histological grade, nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic count, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), necrosis, calcification, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), lymph node involvement, T stage, and N stage.

RESULTS

SOX10 expression was observed in 42 (58.3%) cases with a median H-score of 57.5. The expression was significantly higher in tru-cut biopsy specimens as compared to excision specimens (73.5 vs 41.7%) and TILs negative tumors as compared to TILs positive tumors (64.3% vs 27.3). Metaplastic carcinoma showed reduced expression when compared with non-metaplastic tumors (35.7% vs 63.8%), but statistical significance was not achieved. No correlation was observed with the patient's age, tumor size, histological type, histological grade, nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic count, necrosis, calcification, LVI, lymph node involvement, T stage, and N stage.

CONCLUSION

SOX10 was expressed in more than half of the TNBC cases of our study which not only highlights its diagnostic utility but advocated its application in combination with other breast-specific markers. The expression didn't correlate with the majority of clinicopathological and histological features, but correlation with tru-cut biopsy specimens and absence of TILs draws attention towards possible roles of proper fixation and host immunity, respectively.

Immunohistochemical Characterization of a Large Cohort of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Introduction. Triple negative breast carcinomas are characterized by a lack of hormone receptor and HER2 expression and inconsistent expression of breast-specific immunohistochemical markers. The expression of many site-specific markers in these tumors is largely unknown. The objective of the study was to examine the expression of widely used immunohistochemical markers on a large cohort of triple negative breast cancer. Methods. Sections from tissue microarrays were stained with 47 markers using routine protocols. Most markers were scored using a modified Allred method. ATRX, BAP1, SMAD4, e-cadherin, and beta-catenin were scored as retained or lost. Mammaglobin was considered positive if there was at least moderate intensity staining in any tumor cells. P16 was scored as overexpressed or not overexpressed; p53 was scored as wildtype, overexpressed, null, or cytoplasmic. Results. The cohort consisted of 639 tumors including 601 primary and 32 metastases. Overall, 96% expressed GATA3, mammaglobin, and/or SOX10 while 97% of no special type tumors expressed this panel. Carcinoma of apocrine differentiation demonstrated an AR positive, SOX10 negative, K5 negative/focal immunophenotype. PAX8 (SP348), WT1, Napsin A, and TTF1 (8G7G3/1) were never or rarely expressed while CA9, CDX2, NKX3.1, SATB2 (SATBA410), synaptophysin, and vimentin were variably expressed. Conclusions. Almost all TNBC express at least 1 of the 3 IHC markers: GATA3, mammaglobin, and/or SOX10. Carcinoma of apocrine differentiation is characterized by an AR positive, SOX10 negative, K5 negative or focal immunophenotype. Cautious interpretation of so-called site-specific markers, with knowledge of antibody clones, is required in excluding the diagnosis of triple negative breast cancer.

Fine-needle aspiration cytology of metastatic carcinomas with papillary architecture: a systemic assessment of clinical, cytologic and immunohistochemical parameters

BACKGROUND

Papillary structures are frequently encountered in metastatic carcinomas from various organs and tumors of different histotypes. This study aims to investigate the predictive value of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and clinical parameters in assessment of primary sites of metastatic carcinomas with papillary architecture.

METHODS

FNAC of metastatic carcinomas with papillary architecture were evaluated for overall cellularity, epithelial cohesion, background features, architecture of papillae, cytology and IHC. The corresponding clinical information were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Totally 130 cases were included. The most common primaries were thyroid (38.5%), lung (30.8%) and gynecological organs (22.3%) with the remainders being pancreaticobiliary, urothelial, colorectal, and esophageal. Age (p=.039), biopsy site (p<.001) and laterality (p=.006) correlated with primary site. Papillary structures were confirmed on biopsy/excision of most cases (n=85/87, 97.7%). Thyroid primaries demonstrated broad papillary stalks, thin lining epithelium, fewer epithelial polymorphs, and presence of background giant cells and histiocytes (p=.021-<.001). Low-grade cytologic features, nuclear grooves and inclusions (p<.001) were seen in thyroid primaries. High-grade features (p<.001-0.49), multinucleated tumor cells, apoptotic bodies and mitoses (p<.001-0.49) were more common in lung/gynecological primaries. Multivariate analysis identified nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, chromatin character, presence of nuclear groove and mitosis as independent features (p=0.001-.024). TTF1/TGB/PAX8 panel demonstrated good agreement with cytologic assessment and primary site.

CONCLUSION

Papillary structures and cytologic features are reproducible in FNACs of metastases and corresponding primaries. Cytologic features, IHC and clinical information are invaluable in determining the primary site.

Breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation: an update based on the latest WHO classification

Breast cancers with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation are very heterogeneous, comprising broadly cancers that are morphologically similar to NE tumors (NET) of other anatomic sites, infiltrating breast carcinomas, no special type (IBC-NST) and other special subtypes with NE morphology and/or NE markers expression. Depending on the classification schemes, they are variably included into "NE breast cancers". The latest WHO classification harmonized NE breast cancers with NE neoplasms (NEN) of other organ systems, defined NEN into well-differentiated NET (low Nottingham grade) and poorly-differentiated NE carcinoma (NEC) (high Nottingham grade). Other IBC with NE differentiation are diagnosed based on solely the non-NEN component. Due to the changes in diagnostic criteria, variable results were obtained in the previous studies on NE breast cancers. Hence, the clinical value of NE differentiation in breast cancers is not well investigated and understood. In this review, the current understanding in the pathogenesis, clinical, prognostic, immunhistochemical, and molecular features of "NE breast cancers" is summarized. Controversial issues in their diagnosis and classification are also discussed.

Combined SOX10 GATA3 is most sensitive in detecting primary and metastatic breast cancers: a comparative study of breast markers in multiple tumors

PURPOSE

For invasive breast cancer (IBC), high SOX10 expression was reported particularly in TNBC. This raised the possibility that SOX10 may complement other breast markers for determining cancers of breast origin.

METHODS

Here, we compared the expression of SOX10 with other breast markers (GATA3, mammaglobin and GCDFP15) and their combined expression in a large cohort of IBC together with nodal metastases. We have also evaluated the expression of GATA3 and SOX10 in a wide spectrum of non-breast carcinomas to assess their value as breast specific markers.

RESULTS

Compared with other markers, SOX10 showed lower overall sensitivity (6.5%), but higher sensitivity in TNBC (31.4%) than other breast markers including GATA3 (29.7% for TNBC). Its expression demonstrated the highest concordance between the paired IBC and nodal metastases (96.4%, κ = 0.663) among all the breast markers. More importantly, SOX10 identified many GATA3-negative TNBC, thus the SOX10/GATA3 combination was the most sensitive marker combination for IBC (86.6%). For non-breast carcinoma, a high SOX10/GATA3 expression rate was found in melanoma (77.9%, predominately expressed SOX10), urothelial carcinoma (82.0%, predominately expressed GATA3) and salivary gland tumors (69.4%). Other carcinomas, including cancers from lungs, showed very low expression for the marker combination.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggested that SOX10/GATA3 combination can be used for differentiating metastases of breast and multiple non-breast origins. However, the differentiation with melanoma and urothelial tumors required more careful histologic examination, thorough clinical information and additional site-specific IHC markers. For salivary gland tumors, the overlapping tumor types with IBC renders the differentiation difficult.

Identification of key differentially expressed genes and gene mutations in breast ductal carcinoma in situ using RNA-seq analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify the key differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and high-risk gene mutations in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

METHODS

Raw data (GSE36863) were downloaded from the database of Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), including three DCIS samples (DCIS cell lines MCF10.DCIS, Sum102, and Sum225) and one normal control sample (normal mammary epithelial cell line MCF10A). The DEGs were analyzed using NOIseq and annotated via DAVID. Motif scanning in the promoter region of DEGs was performed via SeqPos. Additionally, single nucleotide variations (SNVs) were identified via GenomeAnalysisTK and SNV risk was assessed via VarioWatch. Mutant genes with a high frequency and risk were validated by RT-PCR analyses.

RESULTS

Finally, 5391, 7073, and 7944 DEGs were identified in DCIS, Sum102, and Sum22 cell lines, respectively, when compared with MCF10A. VENN analysis of the three cell lines revealed 603 upregulated and 1043 downregulated DEGs, including 16 upregulated and 36 downregulated transcription factor (TF) genes. In addition, six TFs each (e.g., E2F1 and CREB1) were found to regulate the core up- and downregulated DEGs, respectively. Furthermore, SNV detection results revealed 1104 (MCF10.DCIS), 2833 (Sum102), and 1132 (Sum22) mutation sites. Four mutant genes (RWDD4, SDHC, SEPT7, and SFN) with high frequency and risk were identified. The results of RT-PCR analysis as well as bioinformatics analysis consistently demonstrated that the expression of RWDD4, SDHC, SEPT7, and SFN was downregulated in the tumor tissues as compared with that in adjacent non-tumor tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

The differentially expressed TFs, TFs regulating DEGs (e.g., E2F1 and CREB1), and high-frequency mutant genes (RWDD4, SDHC, SEPT7, and SFN) might play key roles in the pathogenesis of DCIS.

Role of Immunocytochemistry in the Cytological Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tumors

Pulmonary cytology is a challenging diagnostic tool, and it is usually evaluated considering medical history and radiological findings in order to reach an accurate diagnosis. Since the majority of lung cancer patients have an advanced stage at diagnosis, a cytological specimen is frequently the only material available for diagnosis and further prognostic/predictive marker determination. Several types of specimens can be obtained from the respiratory system (including sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial brushing, fine needle aspiration, and pleural fluid) with different technical preclinical management protocols and different diagnostic yields. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) has a pivotal role in the determination of diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive markers. Therefore, limited cytology samples are to be used with a cell-sparing approach, to allow both diagnostic ICC evaluation as well as predictive marker assessment by ICC or specific molecular assays. In this review, we describe the most common ICC markers used for the diagnosis and prognostic/predictive characterization of thoracic tumors in different cytological specimens.

Pathologic differential diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma in the liver

The liver is one of the most common sites to which malignancies preferentially metastasize. Although a substantial number of liver malignancies are primary tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, the metastasis of carcinomas to the liver is relatively common and frequently encountered in clinical settings. Representative carcinomas that frequently metastasize to the liver include colorectal carcinoma, breast carcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, lung carcinoma, and gastric carcinoma. The diagnostic confirmation of suspected metastatic lesions in the liver is generally achieved through a histopathologic examination of biopsy tissues. Although morphology is the most important feature for a pathologic differential diagnosis of metastatic carcinomas, immunohistochemical studies facilitate the differentiation of metastatic carcinoma origins and subtypes. Useful immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis of metastatic carcinomas in the liver include cytokeratins (CK7, CK19, and CK20), neuroendocrine markers (CD56, synaptophysin, and chromogranin A), and tissue-specific markers (CDX2, SATB2, TTF-1, GCDFP-15, mammaglobin, etc.). Here, we provide a brief review about the pathologic differential diagnosis of major metastatic carcinomas in the liver.

Best Practices Recommendations for Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry in Lung Cancer

Since the 2015 WHO classification was introduced into clinical practice, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has figured prominently in lung cancer diagnosis. In addition to distinction of small cell versus non-small cell carcinoma, patients' treatment of choice is directly linked to histologic subtypes of non-small cell carcinoma, which pertains to IHC results, particularly for poorly differentiated tumors. The use of IHC has improved diagnostic accuracy in the classification of lung carcinoma, but the interpretation of IHC results remains challenging in some instances. Also, pathologists must be aware of many interpretation pitfalls, and the use of IHC should be efficient to spare the tissue for molecular testing. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee received questions on practical application and interpretation of IHC in lung cancer diagnosis. After discussions in several International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee meetings, the issues and caveats were summarized in terms of 11 key questions covering common and important diagnostic situations in a daily clinical practice with some relevant challenging queries. The questions cover topics such as the best IHC markers for distinguishing NSCLC subtypes, differences in thyroid transcription factor 1 clones, and the utility of IHC in diagnosing uncommon subtypes of lung cancer and distinguishing primary from metastatic tumors. This article provides answers and explanations for the key questions about the use of IHC in diagnosis of lung carcinoma, representing viewpoints of experts in thoracic pathology that should assist the community in the appropriate use of IHC in diagnostic pathology.

Expression of TTF-1 in breast cancer independently of ER expression: A case report and pathogenic implications

Thyroid Transcription Factor 1 (TTF-1) is often used for the immunohistochemical evaluation of lung cancers, as a significant proportion of these cancers are positive while other adenocarcinomas are usually negative. Breast cancers are known to express TTF-1 only in a small minority of cases but this may be problematic when this staining is used for its differential diagnosis from lung cancer. We present a case of ER-positive breast cancer in 30% of tumor cells that was also TTF-1 positive in some areas of the primary tumor but lost ER expression completely in the metastatic recurrence site while retaining TTF-1 positivity. Additionally, a PTEN mutation was present on genomic evaluation of the primary tumor. Diagnostic, pathogenic and therapeutic implications of these findings are discussed.

Immunohistochemistry in Diagnostic Parathyroid Pathology

Pathologists are usually readily able to diagnose parathyroid tissues and diseases, particularly when they have knowledge of the clinical information, laboratory findings, and radiographic imaging studies. However, the identification of parathyroid tissue or lesions can be difficult in small biopsies, ectopic locations, supranumerary glands, and in some oxyphil/oncocytic lesions. Widely available immunohistochemical studies such as chromogranin-A, synaptophysin, keratin, parathyroid hormone, thyroglobulin, and thyroid transcription factor-1 can help in difficult cases. One of the most difficult diagnostic aspects faced by the pathologist in evaluating parathyroid is distinguishing between parathyroid adenoma, particularly atypical adenoma, and parathyroid carcinoma. Many markers have and continue to be evaluated for diagnostic utility, and are even beginning to be studied for prognostic utility. Single immunohistochemical markers such as parafibromin and Ki-67 are among the most studied and most utilized, but many additional markers have and continue to be evaluated such as galectin-3, PGP9.5, Rb, bcl2, p27, hTERT, mdm2, and APC. Although not widely available in many laboratories, a panel of immunohistochemical markers may prove most useful as an adjunct in the evaluation of challenging parathyroid tumors.

Clinicopathological Features and Therapeutic Responses of Chinese Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Harboring an Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Rearrangement

BACKGROUND

Presence of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement is an indication for crizotinib in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Here, we sought to elucidate the association between clinicopathological features and ALK rearrangement status in Chinese patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring an ALK rearrangement.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ALK rearrangement status was determined using immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tumor tissues from 120 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, and further assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay. The associations between ALK rearrangement status and clinicopathological features were analyzed.

RESULTS

According to IHC testing, the ALK-positive rate among the advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients was 6.67% (8/120). FISH validation found 5 patients with ALK rearrangement among the 8 IHC-positive cases. No significant difference was observed regarding age, sex, or smoking status between FISH-positive and -negative patients (p > 0.05). None of the 5 FISH-positive patients benefited from first-line chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

IHC can be used as a reliable method for ALK rearrangement screening in patients with lung adenocarcinoma, but further FISH validation is imperative. Presence of ALK rearrangement predicts a more aggressive biological behavior of the tumor and might be indicative of poor response to chemotherapy.

Thyroid Transcription Factor-1 Expression in Adenocarcinomas of the Bile Duct

BACKGROUND

The immunoreactivity of thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) is a very specific marker for lung and thyroid neoplasms; the expression of TTF-1 has also been demonstrated in extrapulmonary carcinomas. We examined the expression of TTF-1 in 15 intestinal-type adenocarcinomas of the extrahepatic bile duct. We then compared the expression to TTF-1 staining with other immunohistochemical markers including cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK20, caudal-type homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2), Napsin A, and MUC2. We additionally compared the clinicopathological prognostic factors with the TTF-1 expression status.

RESULTS

Nuclear TTF-1 staining was detected in 2 cases (13.3%), and Napsin A was positive in the same 2 cases (13.3%). All cases were positive for CK20, CDX2, and MUC2; 5 cases were positive for CK7. There was no correlation between TTF-1 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

To avoid potential pitfalls, TTF-1 should be interpreted in conjunction with the clinical setting, histology, and the results of markers such as CK7, CK20, Napsin A, and CDX2. This report is the first of TTF-1 positivity in adenocarcinomas from the extrahepatic biliary tract.

Differential expression of immunohistochemical markers in primary lung and breast cancers enriched for triple-negative tumours

AIMS

In breast cancer patients presenting with a lung lesion, the distinction between lung and breast origin is clinically important. Lung and breast cancers are both CK7(+) /CK20(-) , so additional immunohistochemical markers are needed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined the expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15), p63 and Wilms' tumour 1 (WT1) in a series of tissue microarrays comprising 266 non-small-cell lung cancers and 837 primary breast cancers enriched for triple-negative tumours (TNBC). Staining for ER, PR, TTF-1 and GCDFP-15 was present in 63%, 49%, 0% and 25% of breast and 6%, 9%, 59% and 1% of lung cancers, respectively. Strong staining for p63 was present in 63 (97%) lung squamous cell carcinomas and only eight (9%) TNBC. WT1 nuclear staining was rare; however, cytoplasmic staining was identified in 49 (40%) TNBC and 10 (5%) lung cancers. Cluster analysis segregated TNBC from lung cancers with TTF-1 and/or p63 staining favouring lung origin, and GCDFP-15 or WT1 staining favouring breast origin. Cancers negative for all four markers (17%) were 60% breast and 40% lung origin.

CONCLUSION

An immunohistochemical panel incorporating ER, TTF-1, GCDFP-15, p63 and WT1 can help to distinguish lung cancer from metastatic breast cancer, including TNBC.

Metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary: diagnostic approach using immunohistochemistry

Carcinoma of unknown primary origin (CUP) is one of the 10 most prevalent malignancies. CUP patients in whom a site of origin can be ascribed have better outcomes than those in which the primary tumor remains unidentified. Among the tools available to pathologists in approaching these lesions, immunohistochemistry is a reliable, inexpensive, and widely available resource. New markers continue to emerge, which, in combination with other historically useful antibodies, allow rapid and accurate identification of primary site in an increasing number of cases. This review discusses the approach to the diagnosis of CUP using immunohistochemistry and outlines some of the most useful markers with a particular focus on the utility of lineage-restricted transcription factors, including CDX2, NKX3-1, PAX8, SATB2, TTF-1, and SF1.