Prognostic relevance of histological variants in nonspecific interstitial pneumonia

Relationship between idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) and connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD): A narrative review

While idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) centering on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most prevalent interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially in the older adult population, connective tissue disease (CTD)-related ILD is the second most prevalent ILD. The pathogenesis of IPF is primarily fibrosis, whereas that of other ILDs, particularly CTD-ILD, is mainly inflammation. Therefore, a precise diagnosis is crucial for selecting appropriate treatments, such as antifibrotic or immunosuppressive agents. In addition, some patients with IIP have CTD-related features, such as arthritis and skin eruption, but do not meet the criteria for any CTD, this is referred to as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). IPAF is closely associated with idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP) and cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP). Furthermore, patients with iNSIP or those with NSIP with OP overlap frequently develop polymyositis/dermatomyositis after the diagnosis of IIP. Acute exacerbation of ILD, the most common cause of death, occurs more frequently in patients with IPF than in those with other ILDs. Although acute exacerbation of CTD-ILD occurs at a low rate of incidence, patients with rheumatoid arthritis, microscopic polyangiitis, or systemic sclerosis experience more acute exacerbation of CTD-ILD than those with other CTD. In this review, the features of each IIP, focusing on CTD-related signatures, are summarized, and the pathogenesis and appropriate treatments to improve the prognoses of patients with various ILDs are discussed.

Histopathological significance of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease in transbronchial lung cryobiopsy specimens

Differentiating between idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) and secondary interstitial pneumonia, particularly connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), can be challenging histopathologically, and there may be discrepancies among pathologists. While surgical lung biopsy has traditionally been considered the gold standard for diagnosing interstitial pneumonia, the usefulness of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) has been reported. If TBLC could effectively distinguish between primary and secondary diseases, it would provide a less invasive option for patients. The aim of this study was to identify specific pathologic findings in TBLC specimens that could assist in distinguishing CTD-ILD from IIP. A total of 93 underwent TBLC at Tenri Hospital between 2018 and 2022. We retrospectively reviewed cases of CTD-ILD exhibiting a nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern (CTD-NSIP) and cases of NSIP with an unknown etiology (NSIP-UE), as determined through multidisciplinary discussion. Nineteen patients with CTD-NSIP and 26 patients with NSIP-UE were included in the study for clinicopathological analysis. The CTD-NSIP group had a significantly higher proportion of female patients compared to the NSIP-UE group (79% vs. 31%; p = 0.002). The presence of both fresh and old intraluminal fibrosis within the same TBLC specimen was significantly more frequent in CTD-NSIP group than in the NSIP-UE group (p = 0.023). The presence of an NSIP pattern with co-existing fresh and old intraluminal fibrosis in TBLC specimens raised suspicion for CTD-ILD.

Sequential administration of PD‑1 inhibitor and cetuximab causes pneumonia

Severe drug-induced lung injury (DLI) has been reported to be associated with sequential administration of osimertinib, a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, following a programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor. However, the relationship of sequential treatment with an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody and PD-1 inhibitor with the risk of DLI remains to be elucidated. The present study conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of a total of 179 patients with head and neck cancer who had received treatment with cetuximab and/or a PD-1 inhibitor (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) at Chiba University Hospital (Chiba, Japan) between September 2014 and December 2020. The incidence of pneumonia and the clinical background characteristics of the patients were analyzed. The patients were classified into subgroups for analysis of the outcomes in this study: Patients who had received sequential, but not concurrent, cetuximab and PD-1 inhibitor treatment (Group C+P; n=43); patients who had received cetuximab-containing chemotherapy, but not a PD-1 inhibitor (Group C; n=101); and patients who had received PD-1 inhibitor-containing chemotherapy, but not cetuximab (Group P; n=35). The rates of DLI in the three groups were: Group C+P, 18.6%; Group C, 7.9%; and Group P, 11.4%. Prior use of ICI was not associated with any increase in the risk of DLI. DLI is seen frequently in patients receiving sequential PD-1 inhibitor and anti-EGFR antibody therapy.

Can transbronchial lung cryobiopsy benefit adaptive treatment strategies in connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease?

BACKGROUND

Some patients with connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) progress to pulmonary fibrosis over their disease course despite initial improvement, potentially indicating a poor prognosis. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is a new bioptic approach used in diffuse parenchymal lung diseases. This study of CTD-ILD assessed the utility of TBLC in determining therapeutic decision-making strategies.

METHODS

We analyzed medical records of 31 consecutive CTD-ILD patients who underwent TBLC focusing on radio-pathological correlation and disease course. A TBLC-based usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) score was used that assessed three morphologic descriptors: i) patchy fibrosis, ii) fibroblastic foci, and iii) honeycombing.

RESULTS

Among the patients with CTD-ILD, 3 had rheumatoid arthritis, 2 systemic sclerosis, 5 polymyositis/dermatomyositis, 8 anti-synthetase syndrome, 6 Sjögren's syndrome, and 5 had microscopic polyangiitis. Pulmonary function test results showed a mean %FVC of 82.4% and %DL_CO of 67.7%. Among the 10 CTD patients and TBLC-proven pathological UIP, 3 patients had prominent inflammatory cells in addition to a framework of UIP, and pulmonary function of most patients improved with anti-inflammatory agents. Six (40%) of 15 patients with TBLC-based UIP score ≥ 1 had a progressive disease course during follow-up, of whom 4 patients received anti-fibrotic agents.

CONCLUSIONS

TBLC in patients with CTD-ILD can help determine an appropriate medication strategy, particularly when UIP-like lesions are present. TBLC may be useful when judging which agents to prioritize, anti-inflammatory or anti-fibrotic, is difficult. Moreover, additional information from TBLC may be beneficial when considering early intervention with anti-fibrotic agents in clinical practice.

Quantitative CT and machine learning classification of fibrotic interstitial lung diseases

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate quantitative computed tomography (QCT) features and QCT feature-based machine learning (ML) models in classifying interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). To compare QCT-ML and deep learning (DL) models' performance.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 1085 patients with pathologically proven usual interstitial pneumonitis (UIP), nonspecific interstitial pneumonitis (NSIP), and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP) who underwent peri-biopsy chest CT. Kruskal-Wallis test evaluated QCT feature associations with each ILD. QCT features, patient demographics, and pulmonary function test (PFT) results trained eXtreme Gradient Boosting (training/validation set n = 911) yielding 3 models: M1 = QCT features only; M2 = M1 plus age and sex; M3 = M2 plus PFT results. A DL model was also developed. ML and DL model areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were compared for multiclass (UIP vs. NSIP vs. CHP) and binary (UIP vs. non-UIP) classification performances.

RESULTS

The majority (69/78 [88%]) of QCT features successfully differentiated the 3 ILDs (adjusted p ≤ 0.05). All QCT-ML models achieved higher AUC than the DL model (multiclass AUC micro-averages 0.910, 0.910, 0.925, and 0.798 and macro-averages 0.895, 0.893, 0.925, and 0.779 for M1, M2, M3, and DL respectively; binary AUC 0.880, 0.899, 0.898, and 0.869 for M1, M2, M3, and DL respectively). M3 demonstrated statistically significant better performance compared to M2 (∆AUC: 0.015, CI: [0.002, 0.029]) for multiclass prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

QCT features successfully differentiated pathologically proven UIP, NSIP, and CHP. While QCT-based ML models outperformed a DL model for classifying ILDs, further investigations are warranted to determine if QCT-ML, DL, or a combination will be superior in ILD classification.

KEY POINTS

• Quantitative CT features successfully differentiated pathologically proven UIP, NSIP, and CHP. • Our quantitative CT-based machine learning models demonstrated high performance in classifying UIP, NSIP, and CHP histopathology, outperforming a deep learning model. • While our quantitative CT-based machine learning models performed better than a DL model, additional investigations are needed to determine whether either or a combination of both approaches delivers superior diagnostic performance.

Disease pathology in fibrotic interstitial lung disease: is it all about usual interstitial pneumonia?

The interstitial pneumonias comprise a diverse group of diseases that are typically defined by their cause (either idiopathic or non-idiopathic) and their distinct histopathological features, for which radiology, in the form of high-resolution CT, is often used as a surrogate. One trend, fuelled by the failure of conventional therapies in a subset of patients and the broad-spectrum use of antifibrotic therapies, has been the focus on the progressive fibrosing phenotype of interstitial lung disease. The histological pattern, known as usual interstitial pneumonia, is the archetype of progressive fibrosis. However, it is clear that progressive fibrosis is not exclusive to this histological entity. Techniques including immunohistochemistry and single-cell RNA sequencing are providing pathogenetic insights and, if integrated with traditional histopathology, are likely to have an effect on the pathological classification of interstitial lung disease. This review, which focuses on the histopathology of interstitial lung disease and its relationship with progressive fibrosis, asks the question: is it all about usual interstitial pneumonia?

An IPF-like disease course in disorders other than IPF: how can this be anticipated, recognized, and managed?

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)-like chronic disease progression despite treatment cannot be predicted with confidence in interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than IPF at the time of diagnosis.

AREAS COVERED

We review key determinants of a progressive fibrotic phenotype, at initial diagnosis of an ILD other than IPF. Medline literature searches (2000 to 2020) were undertaken with regard to the issues discussed in this review.

EXPERT OPINION

The definition of the progressive fibrotic phenotype in non-IPF patients should remain real world, with a conclusion reached by an experienced clinician that progression has occurred despite the use of appropriate historical therapies, on a case by case basis. There is an urgent need for pathogenetic studies to identify pathways and genetic predilections that are common to chronic progressive fibrosis across different diseases. Efforts should also be focused on the identification of the progressive fibrotic phenotype at first presentation, potentially through a combination of CT and biopsy evaluation and the definition of a biomarker profile associated with subsequent disease progression. Recent anti-fibrotic trials of non-IPF disorders should lead to trials of combination regimens of anti-fibrotic agents and immunomodulatory or other therapies specific to individual diseases.

Interstitial lung disease pathology in systemic sclerosis

Interstitial lung disease is a relatively frequent manifestation of systemic sclerosis with approximately one-third of patients developing clinical restrictive lung disease. Fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia is the most common cause of diffuse parenchymal lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), followed by usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Radiographic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis-like changes may accompany other forms of interstitial lung disease, most commonly UIP. In an appropriate clinical setting with supportive high-resolution computed tomography findings, lung biopsy is not needed to confirm the presence of interstitial lung disease and surgical lung biopsies are often reserved for atypical presentations. In this review, we discuss the histological findings that define the most common patterns of SSc-ILD and outline other findings sometimes encountered in lung biopsies obtained from systemic sclerosis patients, including pulmonary vascular changes, aspiration, chronic pleuritis, and diffuse alveolar damage.

Central paradiaphragmatic middle lobe involvement in nonspecific interstitial pneumonia

OBJECTIVES

Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) lacks specific diagnostic guidelines or criteria for imaging diagnosis, and the need for more reliable computed tomography (CT) characterization remains. We hypothesized that central paradiaphragmatic middle lobe (ML) involvement is present in most patients with NSIP. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of ML involvement and thus to assess its potential as a unique feature of NSIP.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective CT-imaging review of 40 patients with biopsy-proven (7/40, 18%) or clinically established (33/40, 82%) NSIP. Three subspecialty-trained thoracic radiologists reviewed CTs for ML involvement both independently and in consensus, and additional CT findings previously described in NSIP independently.

RESULTS

ML involvement was present in most cases (70%, 28/40, independent review, 78%, 31/40, consensus reading), with substantial agreement among all three readers (κ = 0.65). Fibrosis was present in almost all cases (93%, 37/40). Subpleural sparing occurred in one-third of patients (30%, 12/40). Homogeneity (48%, 19/40), central bronchiectasis (45%, 18/40), and peripheral bronchiectasis (53%, 21/40) were present in about half of patients. Apart from substantial inter-reader agreement on fibrosis (κ = 0.65), the above-mentioned imaging characteristics had fair to slight universal agreement (κ = 0.07-0.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Central paradiaphragmatic ML ground glass attenuation superimposed on reticulation and traction bronchiectasis occurs in most patients with NSIP, with high interobserver agreement.

KEY POINTS

• Central paradiaphragmatic middle lobe ground glass attenuation superimposed on reticulation and traction bronchiectasis is common in nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). • This finding occurs more frequently than subpleural sparing and has a better interobserver agreement.

Clinical, radiological, and pathological evaluation of "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern compared with NSIP in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias

BACKGROUND

Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) and organizing pneumonia (OP) are major subtypes of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) and closely related to connective tissue diseases (CTDs). "NSIP with OP overlap" is a controversial finding that has recently appeared in the criteria of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). However, details of this controversial entity are not well known.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern in IIPs and to identify differences from idiopathic NSIP (iNSIP).

METHODS

In 524 patients with interstitial pneumonia from 39 institutes who underwent surgical lung biopsy, 444 were diagnosed as IIPs by a multidisciplinary discussion meeting via a cloud-based integrated database. Among these patients, 44 (9.9%) who had iNSIP and 21 (4.7%) with histopathologically-defined "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern (a pathological NSIP and OP pattern, but without a UIP pattern) were retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

Patients with "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern showed a significantly greater extent of consolidation (p < 0.001), more subpleural ground glass attenuation (p = 0.036), and more peripheral + bronchovascular distribution (p = 0.009) on high-resolution computed tomography than those with iNSIP. The incidences of newly-developed CTDs during follow-up was similar between the groups and polymyositis/dermatomyositis was the most frequent CTD in both groups. Nearly half of the patients fulfilled IPAF criteria, but no significant difference was found between iNSIP and "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern (47.7% vs. 42.9, p = 0.712). The incidence of acute exacerbation and the survival rates were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern is 4.7% in IIPs. The frequency of newly-developed CTDs during follow-up, mainly polymyositis/dermatomyositis, the frequency of acute exacerbation, and the survival rate in "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern are similar to those of iNSIP.

Computed tomography findings of current nonspecific interstitial pneumonia based on the 2013 updated classification of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: What is a characteristic of previously diagnosed nonspecific interstitial pneumonia excluded from the updated classification

PURPOSE

To evaluate computed tomography (CT) findings of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) based on the current classification of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) and elucidate a characteristic of previously diagnosed NSIP excluded from the current classification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 74 patients with biopsy-proven NSIP (idiopathic NSIP [I-NSIP], 39 patients; NSIP associated with connective tissue disease [CTD-NSIP], 35 patients). Among patients who were compatible with the current classification of IIPs, 29 and 21 were categorized as having current I-NSIP and current CTD-NSIP, respectively. The remaining 24 patients were categorized as having previous I-NSIP or previous CTD-NSIP due to the primary pathologic diagnosis of cellular NSIP or associated findings of acute inflammatory changes. CT findings were evaluated and compared among the four groups.

RESULTS

Current I-NSIP was indicated by ground-glass attenuation and reticulation with traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis in predominantly peribronchovascular areas of the lower lung zone. The previous I-NSIP group tended to show broader airspace consolidation than the current I-NSIP group (p = 0.068). The previous CTD-NSIP group showed significantly broader airspace consolidation than the current I-NSIP group (p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Broad airspace consolidation is a characteristic of previously diagnosed CTD-NSIP excluded from the current classification of IIPs.

Fibrosing pneumonia – how to diagnose, and how to recognize the etiology?

Background

Fibrosing pneumonias are a group of interstitial lung diseases with a different etiologic background and divergent prognosis. They are differentiated into usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), and organizing pneumonia (OP). Some of these entities were initially described by A. Liebow.

Main

In the 90ties the main differences in survival lead to the separation of UIP/IPF as a disease with dismal outcome, from the prognostically better NSIP and OP. Later it was shown that fibrosing NSIP confers an almost identical worse prognosis. Under the heading of pulmologists a classification was created, where the diagnosis has to be established by a multidisciplinary team, based on pattern recognition done by radiologists and pathologists. A clinical diagnosis has to be established based on the patterns: UIP pattern was the basis for IPF, NSIP pattern for the clinical diagnosis NSIP, and organizing pneumonia pattern for the diagnosis of cryptogenic organizing pneumonia. This created confusion, because the pattern UIP was taken almost as synonymous with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Later on in many articles and classifications the role of the pathologic diagnosis was diminished, because pulmologists based their diagnosis on CT-scan and clinical presentation. This resulted in less tissue biopsies but also delay and misinterpretation of diseases. Even new techniques in tissue biopsies such as cryobiopsy was regarded as unnecessary.

Conclusion

Tissue analysis in fibrosing pneumonias is still the gold standard in making a diagnosis and also evaluating the etiologic background. After an analysis the findings should be discussed in a multidisciplinary board to establish a final diagnosis and a treatment option for the patient.

Towards the Essence of Progressiveness: Bringing Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease (PF-ILD) to the Next Stage

Although only recently introduced in the ILD community, the concept of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) has rapidly acquired an important place in the management of non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis fibrosing ILD (nonIPF fILD) patients. It confirms a clinical gut feeling that an important subgroup of nonIPF fILD portends a dismal prognosis despite therapeutically addressing the alleged triggering event. Due to several recently published landmark papers showing a treatment benefit with currently available antifibrotic drugs in PF-ILD patients, endorsing a PF-ILD phenotype has vital therapeutic consequences. Importantly, defining progressiveness is based on former progression, which has proven to be a rather moderate predictor of future progression. As fibrosis extent >20% and the presence of honeycombing have superior predictive properties regarding future progression, we advocate immediate initiation of antifibrotic treatment in the presence of these risk factors. In this perspective, we describe the historical context wherein PF-ILD has emerged, determine the currently employed PF-ILD criteria and their inherent limitations and propose new directions to mature its definition. Finally, while ascertaining progression in a nonIPF fILD patient clearly demonstrates the need for (additional) therapy, in the future, therapeutic decisions should be taken after assessing which pathway is ultimately driving the progression. Although not readily available, pathophysiological insight and diagnostic means are emergent to go full steam ahead in this novel direction.

Diagnostic approach of fibrosing interstitial lung diseases of unknown origin

Interstitial lung diseases encompass a broad range of numerous individual conditions, some of them characterized histologically by fibrosis, especially idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonia, interstitial lung disease associated with connective tissue diseases, and unclassifiable interstitial lung disease. The diagnostic approach relies mainly on the clinical evaluation, especially assessment of the patient's demographics, history, smoking habits, occupational or domestic exposures, use of drugs, and on interpretation of high-quality HRCT of the chest. Imaging is key to the initial diagnostic approach, and often can confirm a definite diagnosis, particularly a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis when showing a pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia in the appropriate context. In other cases, chest HRCT may orientate toward an alternative diagnosis and appropriate investigations to confirm the suspected diagnosis. Autoimmune serology helps diagnosing connective disease. Indications for bronchoalveolar lavage and for lung biopsy progressively become more restrictive, with better considerations for their discriminate value, of the potential risk associated with the procedure, and of the anticipated impact on management. Innovative techniques and genetics are beginning to contribute to diagnosing interstitial lung disease and to be implemented routinely in the clinic. Multidisciplinary discussion, enabling interaction between pulmonologists, chest radiologists, pathologists and often other healthcare providers, allows integration of all information available. It increases the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis prediction, proposes a first-choice diagnosis, may suggest additional investigations, and often informs the management. The concept of working diagnosis, which can be revised upon additional information being made available especially longitudinal disease behaviour, helps dealing with diagnostic uncertainty inherent to interstitial lung diseases and facilitates management decisions. Above all, the clinical approach and how thoroughly the patient's history and possible exposures are assessed determine the possibility of an accurate diagnosis.

Presentation, diagnosis and clinical course of the spectrum of progressive-fibrosing interstitial lung diseases

Although these conditions are rare, a proportion of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) may develop a progressive-fibrosing phenotype. Progressive fibrosis is associated with worsening respiratory symptoms, lung function decline, limited response to immunomodulatory therapies, decreased quality of life and, potentially, early death. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis may be regarded as a model for other progressive-fibrosing ILDs. Here we focus on other ILDs that may present a progressive-fibrosing phenotype, namely idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, unclassifiable idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, connective tissue disease-associated ILDs (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis-related ILD), fibrotic chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, fibrotic chronic sarcoidosis and ILDs related to other occupational exposures. Differential diagnosis of these ILDs can be challenging, and requires detailed consideration of clinical, radiological and histopathological features. Accurate and early diagnosis is crucial to ensure that patients are treated optimally.

Identification of a discriminative metabolomic fingerprint of potential clinical relevance in saliva of patients with periodontitis using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy

Periodontitis is characterized by the loss of the supporting tissues of the teeth in an inflammatory-infectious context. The diagnosis relies on clinical and X-ray examination. Unfortunately, clinical signs of tissue destruction occur late in the disease progression. Therefore, it is mandatory to identify reliable biomarkers to facilitate a better and earlier management of this disease. To this end, saliva represents a promising fluid for identification of biomarkers as metabolomic fingerprints. The present study used high-resolution ¹H-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy coupled with multivariate statistical analysis to identify the metabolic signature of active periodontitis. The metabolome of stimulated saliva of 26 patients with generalized periodontitis (18 chronic and 8 aggressive) was compared to that of 25 healthy controls. Principal Components Analysis (PCA), performed with clinical variables, indicated that the patient population was homogeneous, demonstrating a strong correlation between the clinical and the radiological variables used to assess the loss of periodontal tissues and criteria of active disease. Orthogonal Projection to Latent Structure (OPLS) analysis showed that patients with periodontitis can be discriminated from controls on the basis of metabolite concentrations in saliva with satisfactory explained variance (R2X = 0.81 and R2Y = 0.61) and predictability (Q2Y = 0.49, CV-AUROC = 0.94). Interestingly, this discrimination was irrespective of the type of generalized periodontitis, i.e. chronic or aggressive. Among the main discriminating metabolites were short chain fatty acids as butyrate, observed in higher concentrations, and lactate, γ-amino-butyrate, methanol, and threonine observed in lower concentrations in periodontitis. The association of lactate, GABA, and butyrate to generate an aggregated variable reached the best positive predictive value for diagnosis of periodontitis. In conclusion, this pilot study showed that 1H-NMR spectroscopy analysis of saliva could differentiate patients with periodontitis from controls. Therefore, this simple, robust, non-invasive method, may offer a significant help for early diagnosis and follow-up of periodontitis.

[Interstitial processes of the lungs in childhood]

Interstitial processes in the lungs of children can be due to several underlying diseases. Knowledge of the child's age is important as genetic aberrations play a major role in diseases in the first 2 years, whereas immunological diseases are more common starting in kindergarden age. In general lung diseases are rare in children, which makes the diagnostics difficult and results in a delayed diagnosis. In addition, pediatric pulmonologists are often very reluctant to perform lung biopsies due to a lack of a specialized pathologist. In order to make a contribution to the diagnostics of pediatric pulmonary diseases, pathologists should be specialized in pulmonary pathology, have a good knowledge of genetic methods and fetal lung development, which includes the genetic factors involved in lung growth and differentiation. A close cooperation with the pediatric pulmonologist is necessary and each patient should be discussed jointly on an interstitial lung disease board to promote the quality of diagnostics. The pathologist should be aware that the developing lungs of children are not just a smaller form of adult lungs and often react very differently. In this article, we mainly focus on diffuse infiltration patterns, such as ground glass and reticulonodular infiltrations as described in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Localized interstitial processes, which can sometimes be tumor-like and malformations are not dealt with; however, vascular malformations are included as these often manifest as diffuse interstitial infiltrations and must therefore be taken into consideration for the differential diagnostics.

Pathology of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias

The updated classification of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) in 2013 by American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society included several important revisions to the categories described in the 2002 classification. In the updated classification, lymphoid interstitial pneumonia (LIP) was moved from major to rare IIPs, pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) was newly included in the rare IIPs, acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia (AFOP) and interstitial pneumonias with a bronchiolocentric distribution are recognized as rare histologic patterns, and unclassifiable IIP (UCIP) was classified as an IIP. However, recent reports indicate the areas of concern that may require further evaluation. Here, we describe the histopathologic features of the updated IIPs and their rare histologic patterns and also point out some of the issues to be considered in this context.

Idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia

Non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) is an interstitial lung disease that may be idiopathic or secondary to connective tissue disease, toxins or numerous other causes. Idiopathic NSIP is a rare diagnosis and requires exclusion of these other possible causes. Patients typically present in mid-adulthood with dyspnoea, cough and often constitutional symptoms including fever and fatigue. The disease has a female predominance, and more than 50% of patients have never smoked. Physical exam features mild hypoxaemia and inspiratory rales. Pulmonary function tests demonstrate restriction and a low diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide. High-resolution computed tomography abnormalities include predominantly lower lobe subpleural reticular changes, traction bronchiectasis and ground-glass opacities; honeycombing is rarely seen. An evaluation of the underlying pathology is necessary for a firm diagnosis. Histologically, alveolar and interstitial mononuclear cell inflammation and fibrosis are seen in a temporally uniform pattern with preserved underlying alveolar architecture. NSIP must be differentiated from other parenchymal lung diseases including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. A thorough exposure history and assessment for underlying connective tissue diseases are highly important, as positive findings in these categories would likely denote a case of secondary NSIP. A multi-disciplinary discussion that includes pulmonologist(s), radiologist(s) and pathologist(s) assists in reaching a consensus diagnosis and improves diagnostic accuracy. Treatment of idiopathic NSIP, although not well proven, is generally instituted in the form of immunosuppression. Prognosis is favourable compared with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, although the diagnosis still carries an attributable mortality. Herein we will summarize the clinical characteristics and management of idiopathic NSIP.

Changes in the current classification of IIP: A critical review

Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIP) are a heterogeneous group characterized by unknown aetiology. Establishment of a correct diagnosis of a distinct IIP requires a multidisciplinary approach integrating clinical presentation, physiological data, radiological appearance and histological findings. The 2013 update of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification summarises progress in the field of IIP and outlines potential areas for future research. The main entities defined by the 2002 statement on IIP are preserved, but major IIP are now distinguished from rare IIP and the new category of unclassifiable IIP is introduced. In addition, the existence of idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia as a separate chronic fibrosing IIP and idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis as a specific rare entity are acknowledged. Moreover, the major IIP are categorized according to the features chronic fibrosing, smoking-related and acute/subacute clinical course. Furthermore, a clinical classification of IIP according to disease behaviour with suggestions for treatment goals and monitoring strategies is provided. The goal of this review is to discuss the areas of uncertainty in the updated multidisciplinary classification of IIP and point out potential consequences for clinical management.

Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: survival is influenced by the underlying cause

Idiopathic, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) is most often associated with various clinical disorders, including connective tissue diseases (CTDs) and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (cHP). Emerging evidence also suggests that “idiopathic” NSIP may be the lung manifestation of undifferentiated CTD (UCTD). However, whether or not NSIP outcome is influenced by the underlying cause remains uncertain.

This retrospective study included 127 biopsy-proven NSIP patients (65 women, mean±sd age 55±12 years). Survivals were estimated using a Kaplan–Meier curve and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were based on a Cox model.

15 (11.8%) patients had cHP, 29 (22.8%) had CTD, 32 (25.2%) satisfied the Kinder criteria for UCTD and 51 (40.1%) had idiopathic NSIP. At the end of follow-up (mean±sd 64±54 months), a difference in survival was observed between aetiological groups (p=0.002). Survival was better for UCTD than for idiopathic NSIP (p=0.020) and similar to that observed for CTD. cHP survival tended to be poorer than that of idiopathic NSIP (p=0.087) and was an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio 2.17, 95% CI 1.05–4.47; p=0.035).

NSIP outcome is influenced by its cause. cHP exhibits the highest mortality. UCTD does not differ from CTD supporting the concept of autoimmune NSIP, with a prognosis that is better than that of idiopathic NSIP.