Fluorescencein-situhybridization identifies Mastermind-like 2 (MAML2)rearrangement in odontogenic cysts with mucous prosoplasia: a pilot study

The Challenge of "Monomorphic" Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma-Report of a Rare Case with Pure Spindle-Clear Cell Morphology

BACKGROUND

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is a malignant salivary gland tumor which, in most cases, is composed of variable proportions of mucous, epidermoid, and intermediate cells.

METHODS

We report a case of parapharyngeal mucoepidermoid carcinoma with highly unusual ("monomorphic") light microscopic features as well as atypical immunohistochemical properties. Molecular analysis was performed using the TruSight RNA fusion panel.

RESULTS

The tumor featured heretofore undescribed histopathological features: sheets and nests composed of monomorphic neoplastic (plump spindle to epithelioid) cells with no mucous, intermediate, glandular/columnar, or any other cell type identified. The neoplastic cells displayed variable clear cell change and only expressed cytokeratin 7. Despite this non-classical morphology, the presence of the classical CRTC1::MAML2 fusion was demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma featuring a uniform ("monomorphic") population of neoplastic cells is a novel observation. A confident diagnosis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma can be made upon detection of the CRTC1/3::MAML2 fusion. Our case increases the spectrum of histopathological appearances that mucoepidermoid carcinoma may display.

Diagnostic Reliability of CRTC1/3::MAML2 Gene Fusion Transcripts in Discriminating Histologically Similar Intraosseous Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma from Glandular Odontogenic Cyst: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma (IMEC) and Glandular odontogenic cyst (GOC) are those two pathological entities causing diagnostic dilemma due to the histopathological similarity. An accurate distinction between the two entities is difficult as both presents with a common radiological and histological similarities. The aim of our systematic review was to establish the diagnostic reliability of CRTC1/3::MAML2 gene fusion for the distinction between IMEC and GOC.

METHODS

A complete electronic literature search was made in MEDLINE by PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE databases. Articles with keywords using molecular genetic findings of CRTC1/3::MAML2 gene fusion transcripts, IMEC and GOC were assessed and included for the systematic review.

RESULTS

Twelve subgroups having both qualitative and quantitative analysis revealed CRTC1/3::MAML2 sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 70.59% in differentiating GOC and IMEC. Fixed-effects model confirmed translocation-negative cases to have a decreased risk of association with IMEC (combined odds ratio 8.770, 95% confidence interval - 2.45 to 31.45, p < 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence supports that in all cases with positive gene fusion transcript of the CRTC1/3::MAML2 was specific for IMEC and was significantly differentiating it from GOC. Whereas cases of IMEC with negative gene fusion transcript pose diagnostic difficulty in differentiating from a GOC which is negative for CRTC1/3::MAML2 expression.

MAML2-Rearranged Primary Central Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Mandible as an Incidental Finding: A Case Report and Review of the Literature of Molecularly Confirmed Cases

This report presents an extremely rare case of MAML2-rearranged primary central mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the mandible that was discovered as an incidental finding. Our review of the literature identified 36 cases of MAML2-rearranged intraosseous lesions of the jaw (30 central MECs, 5 odontogenic cysts with mucous prosoplasia, and 1 glandular odontogenic cyst). Given the therapeutic indications for a diagnosis of MEC (a malignant neoplasm), MAML2 rearrangement should be confirmed in suspected cases of central MEC.

Thymic Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: A Clinicopathologic and Molecular Study

Thymic mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is a rare tumor, and its characteristics remain to be clarified. Here we investigated 20 cases of thymic MEC to systematically characterize its clinical, histopathologic, and molecular features. The median age of the patients was 56 years (range, 19 to 80 y), there was a slight male predilection (3:2), and 44% of the patients were asymptomatic at diagnosis. The median tumor size was 6.8 cm in diameter, 55% were pT1 tumors, and 50% were TNM stage I tumors. When 4 tumor grading systems for salivary MEC (Armed Forces Institutes of Pathology, Brandwein, modified Healey, and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering) were employed, low-grade, intermediate-grade, and high-grade tumors accounted for 35% to 70%, 5% to 25%, and 25% to 50%, respectively. Many histologic variants were noted, and 70% of the cases were classified as nonclassic variants. MAML2 rearrangement was detected in 56% of cases, and the fusion partner was CRTC1 in all cases. CRTC1-MAML2 fusion was associated with lower pT classification and lower TNM stage. The overall survival rate of all patients was 69% and 43% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Worse overall survival was associated with higher pT stage, higher TNM stage, residual tumors, greater tumor size, high-grade tumor histology (Armed Forces Institutes of Pathology and Memorial Sloan-Kettering, but not the other 2), and with the absence of CRTC1-MAML2 fusion. Of note, none of the patients with CRTC1-MAML2 fusion-positive tumors died during the follow-up. In conclusion, the clinicopathologic and molecular findings of thymic MEC presented here are expected to contribute to the management of this rare tumor.

miR-22 and miR-205 Drive Tumor Aggressiveness of Mucoepidermoid Carcinomas of Salivary Glands

Objectives

To integrate mRNA and miRNA expression profiles of mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MECs) and normal salivary gland (NSGs) tissue samples and identify potential drivers.

Material and Methods

Gene and miRNA expression arrays were performed in 35 MECs and six NSGs.

Results

We found 46 differentially expressed (DE) miRNAs and 3,162 DE mRNAs. Supervised hierarchical clustering analysis of the DE transcripts revealed two clusters in both miRNA and mRNA profiles, which distinguished MEC from NSG samples. The integrative miRNA-mRNA analysis revealed a network comprising 696 negatively correlated interactions (44 miRNAs and 444 mRNAs) involving cell signaling, cell cycle, and cancer-related pathways. Increased expression levels of miR-205-5p and miR-224-5p and decreased expression levels of miR-139-3p, miR-145-3p, miR-148a-3p, miR-186-5p, miR-338-3p, miR-363-3p, and miR-4324 were significantly related to worse overall survival in MEC patients. Two overexpressed miRNAs in MEC (miR-22 and miR-205) were selected for inhibition by the CRISPR-Cas9 method. Cell viability, migration, and invasion assays were performed using an intermediate grade MEC cell line. Knockout of miR-205 reduced cell viability and enhanced ZEB2 expression, while miR-22 knockout reduced cell migration and invasion and enhanced ESR1 expression. Our results indicate a distinct transcriptomic profile of MEC compared to NSG, and the integrative analysis highlighted miRNA-mRNA interactions involving cancer-related pathways, including PTEN and PI3K/AKT.

Conclusion

The in vitro functional studies revealed that miR-22 and miR-205 deficiencies reduced the viability, migration, and invasion of the MEC cells suggesting they are potential oncogenic drivers in MEC.

The reliability of MAML2 gene rearrangement in discriminating between histologically similar glandular odontogenic cysts and intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinomas

OBJECTIVE

MAML2 expression is proven in the majority of mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MECs) arising in salivary glands. MEC can also occur intraosseously (IMEC). Glandular odontogenic cyst (GOC) is an odontogenic cyst with histologic overlap with IMEC. This study aimed to determine the reliability of MAML2 in distinguishing IMEC cases from GOC cases.

STUDY DESIGN

An institutional review board-approved retrospective search of IMEC, GOC, and IMEC with prior history of GOC was performed within the archives of the University of Florida and the University of Alberta Oral Pathology Biopsy Services. Nine cases from 5 patients were selected. Break-apart fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis was performed on 7 cases for the presence of MAML2 rearrangement.

RESULTS

Four cases had negative MAML2 gene rearrangement, and 3 cases had positive MAML2 gene rearrangement.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it can be concluded that the 3 cases with positive translocation for MAML2 were IMECs, the same conclusion could not be drawn for the 4 cases with negative translocation. Whether the cases that were negative for translocation were GOCs with MEC-like islands or were MAML2-negative IMECs could not be ascertained. Therefore, MAML2 rearrangement is not always reliable in differentiating IMECs from GOCs with overlapping histology.

Assessment of biologically aggressive, recurrent glandular odontogenic cysts for mastermind-like 2 (MAML2) rearrangements: histopathologic and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) findings in 11 cases

BACKGROUND

Glandular odontogenic cyst (GOC) demonstrates a significant predilection toward localized biologic aggressiveness and recurrence. GOC shares certain histopathologic features with intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma (IMEC). The current investigation evaluates a group of recurrent, biologically aggressive GOCs to determine whether any cases demonstrated unique histologic features or mastermind-like2 (MAML2) rearrangements common to IMEC.

METHODS

Microscopic slides from 11 previously diagnosed GOCs were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and assessed by 2 study participants for 10 classic histopathologic features required to establish a diagnosis of GOC. Cases were evaluated utilizing break-apart fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for the presence of MAML2 gene rearrangements. Clinical and demographic data on all patients were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean age for patients included in the study was 55.27 years with a range of 36 to 72 years. The most common presenting symptom was a jaw expansion, and all cysts presented initially as a unilocular or multilocular radiolucency. Cysts displayed a minimum of 6 of 10 histologic parameters necessary for a diagnosis of GOC. One case demonstrated MAML2 rearrangements by FISH. That case also showed marked ciliation of cyst-lining epithelial cells and extensive mucous-secreting goblet cell proliferation.

CONCLUSION

Findings in the current study are in concert with previous investigations, and although this study finds only limited molecular evidence to support the premise that recurrent biologically aggressive GOCs are a precursor to IMEC, detection of MAML2 rearrangements in 1 case suggests that such a theoretic transition, while rare, is possible.

Central mucoepidermoid carcinoma arising from glandular odontogenic cyst confirmed by analysis of MAML2 rearrangement: A case report

Central mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) poses a diagnostic challenge because of its rarity and histological overlap with glandular odontogenic cyst (GOC). In MEC of both salivary glands and jaws, MAML2 arrangement has been well known as the specific gene alteration. We report a case of central MEC arising from GOC diagnosed by MAML2 fusion gene. A 57-year-old male presented a multilocular cystic lesion in left molar region of the mandible. Histopathologically, multiple cysts lined by thin cuboidal or non-keratinized squamous epithelium with small duct-like structures, mucous cells and ciliated cells were present. It was diagnosed as GOC. The recurrent lesion after nine years showed the proliferation of many cystic and solid nests composed of epidermoid, mucous and intermediated cells. Nested PCR revealed CRTC3-MAML2 fusion gene in the recurrent lesion, but not in the primary one. Similarly, MAML-2 rearrangement by FISH analysis was positive in the recurrent lesion, while negative for the primary one, thus confirming the diagnosis of central MEC arising from GOC. Analysis of MAML2 rearrangement can be used as a supportive evidence to distinguish central MEC from GOC.

Intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma: Outcome review

OBJECTIVE

Identify the effect of patient characteristics, disease traits, and treatment modality on patient outcomes in the rare disease process of intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of institutional case records and literature.

METHODS

This study includes one case report, a literature review of the MEDLINE database from 1950 through June 2017 using keywords "intraosseous" and "mucoepidermoid," and a query of the University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Pathology database for all documented cases of intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck.

RESULTS

Indicators of poorer prognosis were male gender (P = 0.0071) and higher histological grade (P = 0.0095). Lesion site, size, association with odontogenic cyst, and treatment type did not have a statistically significant correlation with patient outcomes. There also was no statistically significant correlation observed between treatment modality and recurrent or progressive disease when stratified by histological grade of the cancer.

CONCLUSION

This study identified male gender and high histological tumor grade as poor prognostic indicators; however, it did not reveal a statistically significant relationship between treatment modality and patient outcomes. Data regarding patient outcomes following treatment was limited due to loss to follow-up, suggesting that further investigation is required. Based on this review, decisions regarding treatment should be clinically guided and individually tailored to the patient's baseline health, disease severity, and the patient's treatment goals. A multi-disciplinary conference, as was utilized in the presented case report, may be the best approach to treatment planning for these patients at this time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 128:1083-1092, 2018.

Mucous Cell Prosoplasia in Oral Pathologies: A Brief Review

One of the enigmas in cell differentiation process is prosoplasia, which is contemplated as forward differentiation. A well-known example of prosoplastic switch is mucous cell prosoplasia, which is the transformation of a simple squamous epithelial cell into mucous secreting cell. Numerous theories have been proposed for histogenesis of this phenomenon, which are comprehensively discussed in the present paper. Oral pathologies like odontogenic cysts and salivary gland tumours show mucous prosoplasia quite often; sometimes leading to diagnostic difficulties. In the present paper, efforts have been made to comprehensively discuss diverse aspects of mucous prosoplasia like histogenesis, theories and diagnostic importance in various oral pathologies.

A Rare Case of Exclusively Oncocytic Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma with MAML2 Translocation

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor of the salivary gland. The oncocytic variant of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (OMEC) is rare and a small subset shows exclusive oncocytic morphology. Here we report an OMEC case of the parotid gland in a 74-year-old woman with exclusive oncocytes and rare mucocytes. The oncocytes showed diffuse nuclear positivity with p63 immunostaining. The MAML2 translocation was present, supporting the diagnosis of OMEC. Distinguishing OMEC with exclusive oncocytes from oncocytoma and oncocytic carcinoma can be very challenging for pathologists and is critical for proper clinical management. Our experience suggests that appropriate ancillary studies, especially the MAML2 translocation, may provide the essential evidence in difficult cases. Our literature review shows that the presence of mucocytes in an oncocytic neoplasm might be an important morphologic clue of OMEC.

Primary intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the jaw: Reappraisal of The MD Anderson Cancer Center experience

BACKGROUND

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma arises from major or minor salivary glands, making up 10% of salivary gland tumors. Intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinomas are rare, and make up only 2% to 3% of all mucoepidermoid carcinomas. The t(11;19) and its CRTC1-MAML2 fusion gene transcript have been identified in mucoepidermoid carcinoma and are associated with a subset of mucoepidermoid carcinomas. The extent to which the transcript influences disease features and patient survival is unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of records for clinical features, surgical interventions, and prognoses. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) used to assess the t(11;19) fusion gene in intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma treated between 1998 and 2013 were identified. The t(11;19) fusion gene transcript CRTC1-MAML2 manifested in 9 intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinomas, whereas is was not detected in another 9 intraosseous carcinomas. Although the incidence of this fusion in mucoepidermoid carcinoma varies, it is generally accepted that more than 50% of this entity manifest the CRTC1-MAML2.

CONCLUSION

Intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma diagnosis should be based on clinical and pathologic manifestations and complete resection is the first choice for patient treatment. The need for neck dissection and adjuvant treatment are debatable. Radiotherapy may improve prognosis and may be recommended in the postoperative period. Primary intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma can manifest the fusion transcript in a subset of tumors. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1312-E1317, 2016.

Thymic Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma

Thymic mucoepidermoid carcinoma (TMEC) is a vanishingly rare entity that usually presents as low to intermediate grade MEC and carries a better prognosis when compared with other poorly differentiated thymic carcinomas. The recently described fusions, t(11;19)(q21;p13) CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein)-regulated transcription coactivator 1 and MAML2, mastermind-like gene 2 (CRTC1-MAML2) and t(11:15)(q21;q26) CRTC3-MAML2 characterize a considerable proportion of MEC examples arising from a variety of anatomical sites. Recent data point out that the aberrant proteins produced by this fusion drive oncogenesis by disrupting the cAMP/CREB and NOTCH1 pathways. To date, only 2 TMEC cases have been reported to have MAML2 rearrangements, a feature that was found to be absent in TMEC mimics. These findings led the authors to recommend this test as a diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis for thymic carcinoma. Herein, we present a case of TMEC arising in a 58-year-old woman, which was predominantly cystic with intracystic papillary formations composed of a mixture of mucinous cells and intermediate/epidermoid eosinophilic cells. This case was negative for CTCR1-MAML2 and CTCR3-MAML2 fusion transcripts by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and lacked a MAML2 rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization. We report a CTCR1/3-MAML2 fusion and MAML2 rearrangement–negative TMEC, indicating that a different molecular pathway must be involved in the generation of these tumors. The possibility of fusion-negative TMEC should be taken into consideration in the differential diagnosis of a thymic carcinoma.

Molecular and genetic aspects of odontogenic lesions

In this article we outline the molecular findings of select odontogenic tumors. In each section, we briefly review selected the clinicoradiographic, histologic, immunologic features, focusing on the molecular findings and their applications in practice. The understanding of molecular pathobiology at various other organ sites has developed quite rapidly in recent years, however much remains unknown about the genetic profile of odontogenic tumors. Improved understanding of mutations in odontogenic tumors may clarify classification schema and elucidate targets for novel therapies. Molecular testing will no doubt improve our understanding of odontogenic tumor pathogenesis and will likely be, someday, an important component of routine clinical practice and its role will only increase in the coming years.