The FlexISH assay brings flexibility to cytogenetic HER2 testing

Complementary Tumor Diagnosis by Single Cell-Based Cytogenetics Using Multi-marker Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (mFISH)

Multi-color (or multi-marker) fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH) is a well-established, valuable, complementary tool for prenatal and pathological (tumor) diagnosis. A variety of chromosomal abnormalities, such as partial or total chromosomal gains, losses, inversions, or translocations, which are considered to cause genetic syndromes, can relatively easily be detected on a cell-by-cell basis. Individual cells either in suspension (e.g., in the form of a cytological specimen derived from body fluids) or within a tissue (e.g., a solid tumor specimen or biopsy) can be quantitatively evaluated with respect to the chromosomal hybridization markers of interest (e.g., a gene or centromeric region) and with due consideration of cellular heterogeneity. FISH is helpful or even essential for the (sub-)classification, stratification, and unambiguous diagnosis of a number of malignant diseases and contributes to treatment decision in many cases. Here, the diagnostic power and limitations of typical FISH and mFISH approaches (except chromosome painting and RNA hybridization) are discussed, with special emphasis on tumor and single-cell diagnostics. Well-established and novel FISH protocols, the latter addressed to accelerate and flexibilize the preparation and hybridization of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues, are provided. Moreover, guidelines and molecular aspects important for data interpretation are discussed. Finally, sophisticated multiplexed approaches and those that analyze very rare single-cell events, which are not yet implemented in diagnostic procedures, will be touched upon. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: (m)FISH applied to formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues Basic Protocol 2: (m)FISH applied to cytological specimens.

Association Between Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features and molecular subtypes of breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

A total of 116 patients (116 lesions) with pathologically diagnosed BC who received conventional ultrasound and CEUS before surgery were enrolled in this study. BC molecular subtypes were identified by postoperative pathological and immunohistochemical analysis as Luminal A (LA), Luminal B (LB), HER2 (H2) over-expression, and triple-negative (TN). Qualitative and quantitative CEUS characteristics were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (continuous variables) or Pearson's χ² test or Fisher's exact probability method (categorical variables).

RESULTS

There were significant differences in enhancement speed and enhancement degree among the four subtypes (P < .05). The area under the curve (AUC), time to peak (TTP), and peak intensity (PI) differed among the four subtypes (P < .05). The AUC of the LA subtype (305.1 ± 188.4) was significantly smaller compared with the H2 (535.7 ± 222.0, P = .007) and TN subtypes (496.6 ± 254.7, P = .019). In addition, TTP was shorter in the H2 subtype (19.8 ± 4.9) compared with the other subtypes, and was significantly shorter than in the LA subtype (26.3 ± 7.2, P = .008) and LB subtype (23.1 ± 6.7, P = .036). The PI of the LA subtype (4.7 ± 2.3) was significantly lower than that of the LB (6.6 ± 2.3, P = .027), H2 (7.4 ± 2.2, P = .005), and TN subtypes (6.9 ± 2.6, P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS features differed significantly among different molecular subtypes of BC. The enhancement patterns and parameters may be important predictive features of different subtypes of BC.

The presence of PD-1 positive tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in triple negative breast cancers is associated with a favorable outcome of disease

Triple negative breast cancer patients have a poor course of disease not least because of limited treatment options however immunotherapy by targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint system is a promising strategy to improve the outcome. Here we systematically investigated the expression of PD-1 on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 on both tumor and infiltrated immune cells. Moreover, the PD-L1 gene status in tumor cells was assessed.

103 tissue microarray samples derived from triple negative breast cancer specimens were immunohistochemically stained against PD-1 and PD-L1. Dual marker fluorescence in-situ hybridization was applied to the PD-L1 gene and centromere region of chromosome 9. The disease free and overall survival rates were determined as a function of the PD-1/PD-L1 status.

A slight gain of the PD-L1 gene region was found in 55% of all samples but an elevated PD-L1/cen9 ratio was rather rare (7%). An increased gene dose is not associated with an enhanced protein expression and the PD-L1 expression only weakly correlates with the amount of immune cell infiltration. Instead, we found an association of PD-L1 expression on tumor and immune cells, respectively. Notably, the PD-1 expression on immune cells is associated with a favorable disease free and overall survival. PD-1 expression indicates an enhanced immunological anti-tumor activity and represents a favorable prognostic impact. A deeper understanding of factors that affect the regulation and function of the PD-1/PD-L1 system is required to establish predictive variables and to utilize the system for therapeutic intervention of triple negative breast cancer patients.