Should Ki67 immunohistochemistry be performed on all lesions in multifocal small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours?

Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Comprehensive Review

ABSTRACT

Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) is the most common adult appendiceal malignant tumor, constituting 16% of gastrointestinal NENs. They are versatile tumors with varying morphology, immunohistochemistry, secretory properties, and cancer genomics. They are slow growing and clinically silent, to begin with, or present with features of nonspecific vague abdominal pain. Most acute presentations are attributed clinically to appendicitis, with most cases detected incidentally on pathology after an appendectomy. Approximately 40% of them present clinically with features of hormonal excess, which is likened to the functional secretory nature of their parent cell of origin. The symptoms of carcinoid syndrome render their presence clinically evident. However, slow growing and symptomatically silent in its initial stages, high-grade neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas of the appendix are aggressive and usually have hepatic and lymph node metastasis at presentation. This review article focuses on imaging characteristics, World Health Organization histopathological classification and grading, American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union or International Cancer Control, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society staging, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society standardized guidelines for reporting, data interpretation, early-stage management protocols, and advanced-stage appendiceal NENs. Guidelines are also set for the follow-up and reassessment. The role of targeted radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and high-dose somatostatin analogs in treating advanced disease are discussed, along with types of ablative therapies and liver transplantation for tumor recurrence. The search for newer location-specific biomarkers in NEN is also summarized. Regarding the varying aggressiveness of the tumor, there is a scope for research in the field, with plenty of data yet to be discovered.

Tumour Heterogeneity and the Consequent Practical Challenges in the Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Tumour heterogeneity is a common phenomenon in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and a significant cause of treatment failure and disease progression. Genetic and epigenetic instability, along with proliferation of cancer stem cells and alterations in the tumour microenvironment, manifest as intra-tumoural variability in tumour biology in primary tumours and metastases. This may change over time, especially under selective pressure during treatment. The gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tract is the most common site for NENs, and their diagnosis and treatment depends on the specific characteristics of the disease, in particular proliferation activity, expression of somatostatin receptors and grading. Somatostatin receptor expression has a major role in the diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs, while Ki-67 is also a valuable prognostic marker. Intra- and inter-tumour heterogeneity in GEP-NENS, however, may lead to inaccurate assessment of the disease and affect the reliability of the available diagnostic, prognostic and predictive tests. In this review, we summarise the current available evidence of the impact of tumour heterogeneity on tumour diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs. Understanding and accurately measuring tumour heterogeneity could better inform clinical decision making in NENs.

Practice patterns for reporting digestive system neuroendocrine neoplasms: results from a large, comprehensive international survey

AIMS

Criteria for the interpretation of digestive system neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) continue to evolve. Although there are some literature recommendations regarding workup and diagnosis of these lesions, different practice patterns exist among pathologists when signing out these specimens. The aim of this study was to assess practice trends among pathologists worldwide when reporting these neoplasms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We created an online survey with multiple questions pertaining to digestive NENs. The results were analysed based on type of practice setting, years of sign-out experience, and practice location. Respondents included 384 practicing pathologists: 70% academic, 30% private practice; 63% gastrointestinal (GI) pathology-subspecialised, 37% not; 39% North American, 42% European, 19% others; 45% with ≤10 years in practice; 55% with >10 years. Some question responses were chosen by the majority (e.g. 85% use both mitotic count and Ki67 index for grading NENs, 82% complete a synoptic, and Ki67 stain even for small incidental appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours [NETs], and 96% utilize the diagnosis of grade 3 NET). However, some questions showed varying responses, including counting mitotic figures, Ki67 stain interpretation, and pancreatic grade 3 NEN workup. Pathologists also had some variability in interpreting regional metastatic foci of small bowel NETs and in choosing blocks for Ki67 staining in multifocal lesions.

CONCLUSION

There existed scenarios wherein practice patterns varied despite recommendations in the literature, and there were also scenarios lacking clear guidelines wherein pathologists used varying judgement. This survey highlights current key grey areas in digestive system NEN evaluation, leading to variation in practice patterns.

Frequency and Prognostic Significance of Intertumoural Heterogeneity in Multifocal Jejunoileal Neuroendocrine Tumours

Background: A recent study found that multifocal jejunoileal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) are genetically unrelated synchronous neoplasms. So far, it is unclear if this finding of synchronous independent neoplasms is mirrored by heterogeneity of key morphological parameters of SI-NETs and how it affects patient survival. Methods: We separately assessed WHO grade (based on the Ki-67 index), expression of basal diagnostic markers (synaptophysin/chromogranin A/CDX2/serotonin), SSTR2a, and the contexture of the immunogenic microenvironment in 146 separate tumors from 28 patients with multifocal SI-NETs and correlated the results with clinicopathological factors and survival. Results: Synaptophysin and chromogranin A were strongly expressed in all tumors. WHO grade was concordant within all multifocal lesions in more than 80% of cases and the highest grade was usually found in the most advanced primary. Intertumoral expression of serotonin, SSTR2, and CDX2 was discrepant in 32%, 43%, and 50% of all patients, respectively. Neither heterogeneity of any of the aforementioned markers nor multifocality itself had any impact on patient survival (p = n.s.). Discussion: Multifocal SI-NET show considerable variability in some of the central diagnostic parameters. However, neither intertumoral heterogeneity of those parameters nor multifocality itself had any impact on patient survival, showing that extensive testing of all multifocal lesions is not necessarily required.

Evaluation of Pathologic Prognostic Factors in Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Small Intestine

The precise contributions of histopathologic features in the determination of stage and prognosis in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are still under debate, particularly as they pertain to primary tumor size, mesenteric tumor deposits (TDs), and number of regional lymph nodes with metastatic disease. This single-institution series reviewed 162 patients with small bowel NETs (84 females, mean age: 60.3±12.0 y). All cases examined (100%) were immunoreactive for both chromogranin A and synaptophysin. Primary tumor size >1 cm (P=0.048; odds ratio [OR]=3.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-9.24) and lymphovascular invasion (P=0.007; OR=4.85, 95% CI: 1.53-15.40) were associated with the presence of lymph node metastasis. Conversely, TDs (P=0.041; OR=2.73, 95% CI: 1.04-7.17) and higher pT stage (P=0.006; OR=4.33, 95% CI: 1.53-12.28) were associated with the presence of distant metastasis (pM). A cutoff of ≥7 positive lymph nodes was associated with pM (P=0.041), and a thusly defined modified pN stage (pNmod) significantly predicted pM (P=0.024), compared with the prototypical pN (cutoff of ≥12 positive lymph nodes), which did not. Over a median follow-up of 35.7 months, higher pNmod (P=0.014; OR=2.15, 95% CI: 1.16-3.96) and pM (P<0.001; OR=11.00, 95% CI: 4.14-29.20) were associated with disease progression. Proportional hazards regression showed that higher pNmod (P=0.020; hazard ratio=1.51, 95% CI: 1.07-2.15) and pM (P<0.001; hazard ratio=5.48, 95% CI: 2.90-10.37) were associated with worse progression-free survival. Finally, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that higher pNmod (P=0.003), pM (P<0.001), and overall stage group (P<0.001) were associated with worse progression-free survival, while higher pM also predicted worse disease-specific survival (P=0.025). These data support requiring either chromogranin or synaptophysin, but not both, for small bowel NET diagnosis, the current inclusion of a 1 cm cutoff in primary tumor size and the presence of TDs in staging guidelines, and would further suggest lowering the cutoff number of positive lymph nodes qualifying for pN2 to 7 (from 12).

Prognostic features of gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in primary and metastatic sites: Grade, mesenteric tumour deposits and emerging novelties

Updates in classification of gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms better reflect the biological characteristics of these tumours. In the present study, we analysed the characteristics of neuroendocrine tumours that could aid in a more precise stratification of risk groups. In addition, we have highlighted the importance of grade (re)assessment based on investigation of secondary tumour lesions. Two hundred and sixty-four cases of neuroendocrine tumours of gastro-entero-pancreatic origin from three centres were included in the study. Tumour morphology, mitotic count and Ki67 labelling index were evaluated in specimens of primary tumours, lymph node metastases and distant metastases. These variables were correlated with overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Tumour stage, number of affected lymph nodes, presence of tumour deposits and synchronous/metachronous metastases were tested as possible prognostic features. Mitotic count, Ki-67 labelling index, primary tumour site, tumour stage, presence of tumour deposits and two or more affected lymph nodes were significant predictors of OS and RFS. At the same time, mitotic count and Ki-67 labelling index can be addressed as continuous variables determining prognosis. We observed a very high correlation between the measures of proliferative activity in primary and secondary tumour foci. The presence of isolated tumour deposits was identified as an important determinant of both RFS and OS for pancreatic (hazard ratio [HR] = 7.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.96-14.6, P < 0.0001 for RFS; HR = 3.28, 95% CI = 1.56-6.87, P = 0.0017 for OS) and ileal/jejunal neuroendocrine tumours (HR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.25-3.13, P = 0.0036 for RFS and HR 2.59, 95% CI = 1.27-5.26, P = 0.009 for OS). The present study identifies the presence of mesenterial tumour deposits as an important prognostic factor for gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, provides evidence that proliferative parameters need to be treated as continuous variables and further supports the importance of grade determination in all available tumour foci.

Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

The latest WHO classification cleanly divides gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms into neuroendocrine tumor (NET; well-differentiated, any grade) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC; poorly differentiated, high-grade by definition), along with mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms. NECs are always aggressive, with multiple mutations; they are treated with chemotherapy. NETs have widely different presentations, behavior, and management depending on site of origin. Esophageal examples are vanishingly rare. Most gastric and appendiceal tumors are indolent, as are many colonic and rectal tumors. The duodenum is home to some unusual variants of NET, and jejunal/ileal NETs frequently metastasize, which impacts their staging and clinical management.

Pathology Reporting in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Digestive System: Everything You Always Wanted to Know but Were Too Afraid to Ask

During the 5th NIKE (Neuroendocrine tumors Innovation in Knowledge and Education) meeting, held in Naples, Italy, in May 2019, discussions centered on the understanding of pathology reports of gastroenetropancreactic neuroendocrine neoplasms. In particular, the main problem concerned the difficulty that clinicians experience in extrapolating relevant information from neuroendocrine tumor pathology reports. During the meeting, participants were asked to identify and rate issues which they have encountered, for which the input of an expert pathologist would have been appreciated. This article is a collection of the most rated questions and relative answers, focusing on three main topics: 1) morphology and classification; 2) Ki67 and grading; 3) immunohistochemistry. Patient management should be based on multidisciplinary decisions, taking into account clinical and pathology-related features with clear comprehension between all health care professionals. Indeed, pathologists require clinical details and laboratory findings when relevant, while clinicians require concise and standardized reports. In keeping with this last statement, the minimum requirements in pathology datasets are provided in this paper and should be a baseline for all neuroendocrine tumor professionals.

Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors undergoing resective surgery

AIM

Several studies demonstrated the prognostic value of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and platelet-to-white blood cells ratio (PWR) in different types of tumors. However, there is no information about a possible role of NLR, PLR and PWR as predictor of presence of metastasis or multifocal disease in patients undergoing surgery with curative intent for midgut NET. The aim of our study was to test the role of preoperative NLR, PLR and PWR as predictors of patients undergoing surgery with curative intent for midgut NET.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled seven foregut, 35 midgut and six hindgut NET patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors operated in our Units from January 2005 to June 2016. Details about preoperative laboratory data, surgical operation, histology and follow-up were retrieved. Non-parametric statistics, ROC curve analysis and survival analysis were used.

RESULTS

NLR was significantly higher in patients with distant metastasis (p = 0.04). The ROC curve analysis indicated that a threshold value of NLR of 2.6 predicted the presence of peritoneal metastasis with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 71% and an overall accuracy of AUC = 0.81 (95%CI: 0.59-0.94), p = 0.05. PLR and PWR was not be associated to metastasis but tended to be associated to multifocal disease.

CONCLUSION

In patients with midgut NET, an impaired adaptive immune response, as suggested by a high NLR ratio, was associated to the presence of distant metastasis and in particular of peritoneal metastasis. This information may be helpful when planning the treatment of a patient with a midgut NET.