The expanding molecular and mutational landscape of nested variant of urothelial carcinoma

Nested and Large Nested Subtypes of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract: A Multi-institutional Study

Nested urothelial carcinoma (NUC) and large nested urothelial carcinoma (LNUC) of the upper urinary tract are exceedingly rare. This has contributed to the paucity of information regarding their clinicopathological and molecular characteristics. To address this knowledge gap, we explored the largest cohort to date of these rare tumors, comprising resection specimens of 10 LNUC and 7 NUC, from 7 participating institutions. Clinicopathological data were retrieved and documented. Whole exome sequencing and RNA sequencing were performed on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 sequencer. The data generated were analyzed using the genome analysis toolkit pipeline. Somatic mutations were annotated using funcotator tool to identify pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. Tumor mutational burden was calculated using python-based "pyTMB" tool. Microsatellite instability analysis was done using MSIsensor2 and the Idylla platform. Differential expression analysis of genes in LNUC and NUC along with mRNA expression-based molecular subtyping was performed by analyzing expression pattern of markers used in The Cancer Genome Atlas subclassification of bladder carcinoma. Both tumor types were more common in older males, were unifocal, and occurred more commonly mixed with minor components of predominantly conventional urothelial carcinoma. Overlying low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma was significantly more common in LNUC (P = .034). On follow-up (LNUC: median, 10 months; range, 3-84 months; NUC: median, 9 months; range, 2-48 months), LNUC had better clinical outcomes (P = .031). Pathogenic mutations in FGFR3 and PIK3CA were significantly more common in LNUC (P = .049 and P = .044, respectively), with the latter present exclusively in LNUC. Seventy-five percent of the cases showed tumor mutational burden of <10, and all cases were microsatellite-stable. FGFR3 mutations were also more common in low-stage tumors. This study expands on the clinicopathological spectrum of NUC and LNUC of the upper urinary tract and is the first to comprehensively analyze the molecular profile of these tumors, highlighting pathogenic genetic alterations of potential therapeutic and prognostic value.

Large, Nested Variant of Urothelial Carcinoma Is Enriched with Activating Mutations in Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-3 among Other Targetable Mutations

The large, nested variant of urothelial carcinoma (LNVUC) is characterized by bland histomorphology mimicking that of benign von Brunn nests. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-3 (FGFR-3) activation and missense mutation in 38 cases, including 6 cases diagnosed with LNVUC and 32 with metastatic invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC). Initially, six formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples of the LNVUC were subjected to whole-exome sequencing (WES), and then we performed targeted sequencing on 32 cases of metastatic invasive UC of various morphological subtypes, which were interrogated for the FGFR3. Our results revealed 3/6 (50%) LNVUC cases evaluated by WES in our study showed an activating mutation in FGFR-3, 33% showed an activating mutation in PIK3CA, and 17% showed activating mutation in GNAS or MRE11. Additionally, 33% of cases showed a truncating mutation in CDKN1B. All LNVUC in our study that harbored the FGFR-3 mutation showed additional activating or truncating mutations in other genes. Overall, 6/32 (18.75%) cases of random metastatic invasive UC showed missense mutations of the FGFR-3 gene. The LNVUC variant showed the higher incidence of FGFR-3 mutations compared to other types of mutations. Additionally, all LNVUC cases show additional activating or truncating mutations in other genes, thus being amenable to novel targeted therapy.

Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations in primary adenocarcinoma of bladder and urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation: pathogenesis and diagnostic implications

Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations have been implicated in urothelial carcinogenesis and are present in 60-80% of conventional and variants of urothelial carcinomas. We investigated the prevalence of TERT promoter mutations in 46 cases of bladder nonurachal adenocarcinoma, 30 cases of urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation, 24 cases of nephrogenic adenoma, eight cases of villous adenoma, 31 cases of florid cystitis glandularis, and 20 cases of intestinal metaplasia of the bladder. TERT promoter mutations were detected in 33% of adenocarcinomas of urinary bladder and in 67% of urothelial carcinomas with glandular differentiation. All 30 cases of urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation harbored identical TERT promoter mutation in both glandular and urothelial carcinoma components from the same tumor, suggesting a common clonal origin. TERT promoter mutations were absent in nephrogenic adenoma, villous adenoma, florid cystitis glandularis, and intestinal metaplasia of the bladder. TERT promoter mutation analysis may be a useful ancillary study in the differential diagnosis.

Molecular pathology of urothelial carcinoma

The current personalized oncology era has witnessed significant efforts to integrate clinical, pathological, and molecular classifications. The growing need for molecular biomarkers to feed personalized oncology, together with the unprecedented wealth of knowledge on the molecular basis of bladder cancer, has led to a novel approach to this disease, incorporating molecularly generated data in clinical practice for locally advanced or metastatic disease. Translational research allows a better understanding of the early events in the development of urothelial carcinoma in the urinary bladder. Thus, mutations in the KMT2D and KDM6A chromatin-modifying genes confer competitive advantages that drive cells to colonize larger regions of the urothelium. Additional mutations in TP53, PIK3CA, FGFR3, or RB1 genes then trigger the process of malignant transformation in the urothelium. In the current review, we provide an overview of what could be the expected transition from the morphology-based classification to a combined, molecularly enriched reporting of clinically meaningful parameters aiming to promote personalized oncology of urothelial carcinoma.

Unusual Faces of Bladder Cancer

Simple Summary

The spectrum of architectural and cytological findings in UC is wide, although transitional cell carcinoma, either papillary or flat, low- or high-grade, constitutes the majority of cases in routine practice. Some of these changes are just mere morphological variations, but others must be recognized since they have importance for the patient. The goal of this review is to compile this histological variability giving to the general pathologist a general idea of this morphological spectrum in a few pages. The review also updates the literature focusing specifically on the morphological and immunohistochemical clues useful for the diagnosis and some selected molecular studies with prognostic and/or diagnostic implications.

Abstract

The overwhelming majority of bladder cancers are transitional cell carcinomas. Albeit mostly monotonous, carcinomas in the bladder may occasionally display a broad spectrum of histological features that should be recognized by pathologists because some of them represent a diagnostic problem and/or lead prognostic implications. Sometimes these features are focal in the context of conventional transitional cell carcinomas, but some others are generalized across the tumor making its recognition a challenge. For practical purposes, the review distributes the morphologic spectrum of changes in architecture and cytology. Thus, nested and large nested, micropapillary, myxoid stroma, small tubules and adenoma nephrogenic-like, microcystic, verrucous, and diffuse lymphoepithelioma-like, on one hand, and plasmacytoid, signet ring, basaloid-squamous, yolk-sac, trophoblastic, rhabdoid, lipid/lipoblastic, giant, clear, eosinophilic (oncocytoid), and sarcomatoid, on the other, are revisited. Key histological and immunohistochemical features useful in the differential diagnosis are mentioned. In selected cases, molecular data associated with the diagnosis, prognosis, and/or treatment are also included.

Stage T1 bladder cancer: diagnostic criteria and pitfalls

Accurate pathological staging is crucial for patient management. Patients with T1 bladder cancer are at risk of recurrence, progression, and death of cancer. Recognition of early invasion (stage T1 disease) in urothelial carcinoma remains one of the most challenging areas in urological surgical pathology practice. A logical roadmap to T1 diagnosis would include careful evaluation of histological grade, stromal epithelial interface, characteristics of the invading epithelium, and the stroma associated responses. Tangential sectioning, crush and cautery artifacts, and associated inflammatory infiltrate are commonly encountered problems and the source of pitfalls. In this review, we outline diagnostic criteria, common pitfalls, and different histological patterns of invasion into the lamina propria. Current recommendations on reporting of biopsy and transurethral resection specimens, molecular biomarkers, clinical implications of T1 cancer diagnosis and recent developments on the T1 substaging are also discussed. Most T1 bladder cancer patients will benefit from conservative management after restaging transurethral resection of bladder and bacillus Calmette-Guérin maintenance. Patients with high risk features, such as concurrent urothelial carcinoma in situ, increased depth of invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and variant histology among others, should be considered for early cystectomy.