SWI/SNF protein and claudin-4 expression in anaplastic carcinomas arising in mucinous tumours of the ovary and retroperitoneum

SMARCA4 and SMARCA2 co-deficiency: An uncommon molecular signature defining a subset of rare, aggressive and undifferentiated malignancies associated with defective chromatin remodeling

Genetic mutations and epigenetic modifications affecting multiple cancer-related genes occur synergistically to drive tumorigenesis. Across a wide spectrum of cancers, pathogenic changes have been identified in members of the SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable complex including its two catalytic subunits, SMARCA4 and SMARCA2. During cancer development, it is not uncommon to lose the function of either SMARCA4 or SMARCA2, however, loss of both together has been reported to be synthetic lethal and therefore unexpected. Co-deficiency of SMARCA4 and SMARCA2 occurs as a pathognomonic feature of the early-onset ovarian cancer Small-cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type. The loss of both catalytic subunits is also described in other rare undifferentiated neoplasms including Thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumors, Malignant rhabdoid tumors and dedifferentiated or undifferentiated carcinomas, predominantly of lung, gastrointestinal, and endometrial origin. This review provides the first extensive characterization of cancers with concurrent SMARCA4 and SMARCA2 loss through the discussion of shared clinical and molecular features. Further, we discuss the mechanisms triggering the loss of catalytic activity, the cellular processes that are dysfunctional as a consequence, and finally, current therapeutic candidates which may selectively target these cancers.

SMARCB1 (INI1) Deficient Tumours of the Uterine Cervix: Report of Two Cases, Including One Associated With an NTRK Fusion

Pathogenic variants (mutations) and other molecular events involving subunits of the SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable chromatin remodelling complex are common in a wide variety of malignancies. Many of these neoplasms are characterized by undifferentiated morphology. They arise at a variety of sites in the female genital tract but have rarely been reported in the uterine cervix. We report 2 primary cervical neoplasms arising in young women (ages 28 and 29 yr) exhibiting loss of nuclear immunoreactivity with SMARCB1 (INI1). In one case, which had a mixture of epithelioid and spindle cells, molecular studies revealed no SMARCB1 pathogenic variant, but showed a SPECCL1::NTRK 3 fusion, in keeping with an NTRK fusion sarcoma. The second case exhibited rhabdoid morphology and molecular testing confirmed a SMARCB1 pathogenic variant (c.425 T>G:p.(Leu142Ter) which, interpreted in conjunction with the morphology and immunohistochemistry, resulted in classification as a proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma. To our knowledge, this is the first reported cervical neoplasm exhibiting a SMARCB1 pathogenic variant and the first NTRK fusion sarcoma showing SMARCB1 protein loss. We discuss the diagnostic challenges and complexities of the molecular findings.

Immunohistochemistry for Claudin-4 and BAP1 in the Differential Diagnosis between Sarcomatoid Carcinoma and Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma

(1) Background. In the differential diagnosis between sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) and sarcomatoid mesothelioma (SM), we aimed to investigate the role of Claudin-4 and BAP1, a panel recently used to distinguish conventional carcinoma from epithelioid mesothelioma. (2) Methods. We collected 41 surgical pleural biopsies of SM, 46 surgical resections of SC from different sites and 49 pleural biopsies of normal/hyperplastic mesothelium. All the cases were tested for Claudin-4 and BAP1 using immunohistochemistry. The statistical calculations of the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were performed. (3) Results: Claudin-4 was negative in 41/41 SMs, while it was positive in 18/36 (50.1%) SCs (eight diffusely, 10 focally) within their sarcomatous component. BAP1 was lost in 23/41 SMs, while it was regularly expressed in 46/46 SCs. All the cases of the normal/hyperplastic mesothelium were negative for Claudin-4 and retained the regular expression of BAP1. The Claudin-4 expression was useful for detecting SC (sensitivity, 39.1%; specificity, 100%) and the BAP1 loss was useful for diagnosing SM (sensitivity, 56.1%; specificity, 100%). (4) Conclusions. The staining for Claudin-4 and BAP1 exhibited a low/moderate sensitivity in diagnosing SC and SM (39.1% and 56.1%, respectively), but a very high specificity (100%). Claudin-4 was expressed only in SC and BAP1 loss was noted only in SM.

SMARCA4-Deficient Undifferentiated Tumor Diagnosed on Adrenal Sampling

OBJECTIVES

SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor has distinct clinicopathologic features. We describe our experience with primary diagnosis on adrenal sampling.

METHODS

We collected six SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumors diagnosed on adrenal sampling. Immunostains for SMARCA4, SF-1, inhibin, calretinin, S-100 protein, EMA, and TTF-1 were performed. A control group of 63 primary adrenocortical tumors was also immunostained.

RESULTS

Patients included four men and two women (aged 52-77 years). Five had unilateral adrenal masses and one bilateral (range, 2.4-9.6 cm). Five had pulmonary masses, and one had a midline mediastinal mass. All cases had a monotonous epithelioid appearance and variable rhabdoid morphology. Immunophenotypically, all six cases had loss of nuclear SMARCA4 expression and no staining for SF-1, inhibin, calretinin, or S-100 protein. Variable EMA immunoreactivity was present in four of six cases and focal nuclear TTF-1 expression in one of six. All 63 adrenocortical neoplasms had retained nuclear SMARCA4 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor may present in the adrenal gland, and this series likely represents metastases from thoracic primaries. Because of the frequent absence of lineage marker expression, knowledge of the characteristic clinical presentation, the rhabdoid morphology, and the typical immunophenotype (loss of SMARCA4/BRG1) allow for appropriate distinction from adrenocortical carcinoma.

Mucinous Ovarian Tumors With Anaplastic Mural Nodules: Case Report

Ovarian mucinous cystic tumors may be associated with various types of mural nodules, which can be classified as benign or malignant (anaplastic carcinoma, sarcoma, carcinosarcoma). However, anaplastic malignant nodules have rarely been reported. Here, we present a case of a 35-year-old woman who presented with abdominal discomfort. Ultrasonography showed a large cystic mass in the pelvic and abdominal cavities measuring 337 × 242 mm. Abdominal computed tomography revealed upper anterior and posterior uterine pelvic cystic lesions based on multiple nodule partition walls and classes. During hospitalization, the patient underwent exploratory laparotomy, which revealed a poorly differentiated ovarian malignant tumor, and subsequent surgical excision was performed. The pathological analysis of the surgical samples of the right ovary revealed a mucinous ovarian tumor, while the mural nodules were classified as anaplastic carcinoma. After surgery, the patient started receiving chemotherapy. Unfortunately, the patient died 6 months later. Mucinous tumor occurring with an anaplastic carcinoma is rare, and the current diagnostic methods are not sufficient in providing an early and accurate diagnosis. Most patients are already in the advanced stage upon diagnosis and combined with poorly differentiated pathological features, the prognosis is extremely poor. Clinicians need to improve the clinical evaluation before surgery and conduct preoperative preparation and communication to improve the prognosis of patients as much as possible.

Ovarian mucinous and seromucinous neoplasms: problematic aspects and modern diagnostic approach

The morphological spectrum of primary ovarian mucinous and seromucinous tumours is broad and presents an array of diagnostic challenges, many unique to these tumour types. This reflects the heterogeneous nature of these lesions, their varied histogenesis and evolving classification systems over recent decades, with further modification to the seromucinous category incorporated in the recently published 5^th edition of the WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumours. In this review we provide an update on the classification of these neoplasms and discuss their histogenesis and diverse morphology, focusing on areas which are diagnostically problematic. We also cover tumour grading, differential diagnosis, immunohistochemistry, the recent elucidation of the molecular underpinnings of ovarian mucinous neoplasia and discuss the gross and intraoperative handling of these tumours. A number of diagnostic issues remain unresolved highlighting the importance of further research on this front, as well as a multidisciplinary approach in the care of patients with ovarian mucinous and seromucinous neoplasia.

Mural nodules in mucinous ovarian tumors represent a morphologic spectrum of clonal neoplasms: a morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 13 cases

Mucinous ovarian tumors rarely harbor mural nodules, which have historically been classified as sarcoma-like, anaplastic carcinomatous, or sarcomatous on the basis of predominant morphologic features. The molecular relationship between mural nodules and associated mucinous ovarian tumors remains poorly characterized, as does the molecular pathogenesis of these mural nodules. Thus, we analyzed the morphological, immunohistochemical, and genetic features of 13 mucinous ovarian tumors and associated mural nodule(s). Three harbored sarcoma-like mural nodules and ten contained anaplastic carcinomatous nodules, including 1 tumor with spatially discrete anaplastic carcinomatous and sarcomatous nodules. Twelve of 13 cases showed genetic evidence of clonality between the mural nodule(s) and associated mucinous ovarian tumor, including all three tumors with sarcoma-like morphology. Mural nodules were genetically identical in the five cases in which there were multiple discrete mural nodules that were sequenced separately. MTAP and p53 immunohistochemistry confirmed the distribution of neoplastic cells in a subset of sarcoma-like and anaplastic carcinomatous nodules. No single recurrent genetic alteration was associated with mural nodule development. No recurrent genetic differences were identified between mural nodules with sarcoma-like, anaplastic carcinomatous, and sarcomatous morphology. Of 11 patients with clinical follow-up, three died of disease 3, 8, and 9 months after diagnosis, but no recurrent genetic events were associated with poor outcome. These molecular data suggest that sarcoma-like, anaplastic carcinomatous, and sarcomatous nodules represent a morphologic spectrum of clonal neoplasms arising in mucinous ovarian tumors rather than three discrete biological entities.

Undifferentiated and dedifferentiated neoplasms of the female genital tract

Undifferentiated neoplasms in the female gynecologic tract comprise two main groups-undifferentiated carcinoma, most common in the endometrium and ovary, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, although tumors with an undifferentiated appearance may occur in all gynecologic organs. Their differential diagnosis is broad and generous sampling, careful morphological evaluation, judicious use of immunohistochemistry, and in many cases, molecular testing is often essential in the diagnostic work-up. As some of these neoplasms fail to respond to conventional chemotherapy regimens and/or radiation therapy, targeted therapy may be valuable in treating these highly aggressive tumors, thus the importance of precise diagnosis. In this review we discuss the clinicopathological features of undifferentiated carcinoma, dedifferentiated carcinoma, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, followed by a comprehensive analysis of morphological mimickers. Finally, we briefly review ovarian and lower genital tract tumors with an undifferentiated histological appearance.

SWI/SNF-deficient malignancies of the female genital tract

Mutations and other molecular events involving subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex are common in a wide variety of malignancies, including those arising at various sites in the female genital tract. Endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas in the uterine corpus and ovary not uncommonly contain mutations in ARID1A and these also occur in other endometriosis-associated ovarian neoplasms such as seromucinous tumours. In these organs, mutations in SMARCA4, SMARCB1, ARID1A and ARID1B (with subsequent loss of corresponding protein expression as a reliable surrogate) are relatively common in undifferentiated carcinomas, including the undifferentiated component of dedifferentiated carcinoma. SMARCA4 mutations are extremely common (almost ubiquitous) in small cell carcinoma of the ovary of hypercalcaemic type (SCCOHT), occurring in about 98% of these neoplasms, often in association with epigenetic SMARCA2 loss. SMARCB1-deficient vulval neoplasms include epithelioid sarcoma and myoepithelial carcinoma, as well as related malignancies which defy easy classification. Recently the spectrum of SWI/SNF deficient female genital malignancies has been expanded to include SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated uterine sarcoma and mural nodules of anaplastic carcinoma in ovarian mucinous neoplasms.