Next-generation assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (ERBB2) amplification status in invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on Group 4 by use of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 testing guideline

Convenient determination of serum HER-2 status in breast cancer patients using Raman spectroscopy

Given the significant therapeutic efficacy of anti-HER-2 treatment, the HER-2 status is a crucial piece of information that must be obtained in breast cancer patients. Currently, as per guidelines, HER-2 status is typically acquired from breast tissue of patients. However, there is growing interest in obtaining HER-2 status from serum and other samples due to the convenience and potential for dynamic monitoring. In this study, we have developed a serum Raman spectroscopy technique that allows for the rapid acquisition of HER-2 status in a convenient manner. The established HER-2 negative and positive classification model achieved an area under the curve of 0.8334. To further validate the reliability of our method, we replicated the process using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. The results demonstrate that serum Raman spectroscopy, coupled with artificial intelligence algorithms, is an effective technical approach for obtaining HER-2 status.

Efficacy and safety of HER2-targeted therapy in patients with colorectal cancer: What should we expect from a meta-analysis?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an effective therapeutic target for breast and stomach cancers. However, the application of HER2-targeted therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of HER2-targeted therapy in CRC by performing a meta-analysis of relevant studies.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the ClinicalTrials.gov database to retrieve relevant studies. STATA 16 was used for the statistical analysis. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and incidence of treatment‑related adverse events (TRAEs) were used as the outcome indicators analyzed by random- or fixed-effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 267 patients from nine studies were included in this meta-analysis. The overall ORR and DCR were 27.5% (95% CI 16.8% to 39.6%) and 68.9% (95% CI 55.4% to 81.0%), respectively. No significant heterogeneity was found in PFS among these studies and the overall median PFS was 4.35 months (95% CI 3.70 to 4.99). The overall incidence of all-grade and grade 3 or higher adverse events were 93.5% (95% CI 88.4% to 97.4%) and 16.8% (95% CI 4.8% to 33.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-targeted therapy was confirmed as a promising treatment for colorectal cancer, warranting further high-quality clinical randomized controlled trials to verify.

Deriving tumor purity from cancer next generation sequencing data: applications for quantitative ERBB2 (HER2) copy number analysis and germline inference of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations

Tumor purity, or the relative contribution of tumor cells out of all cells in a pathological specimen, influences mutation identification and clinical interpretation of cancer panel next generation sequencing results. Here, we describe a method of calculating tumor purity using pathologist-guided copy number analysis from sequencing data. Molecular calculation of tumor purity showed strong linear correlation with purity derived from driver KRAS or BRAF variant allele fractions in colorectal cancers (R² = 0.79) compared to histological estimation in the same set of colorectal cancers (R² = 0.01) and in a broader dataset of cancers with various diagnoses (R² = 0.35). We used calculated tumor purity to quantitate ERBB2 copy number in breast carcinomas with equivocal immunohistochemical staining and demonstrated strong correlation with fluorescence in situ hybridization (R² = 0.88). Finally, we used calculated tumor purity to infer the germline status of variants in breast and ovarian carcinomas with concurrent germline testing. Tumor-only next generation sequencing correctly predicted the somatic versus germline nature of 26 of 26 (100%) pathogenic TP53, BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. In this article, we describe a framework for calculating tumor purity from cancer next generation sequencing data. Accurate tumor purity assessment can be assimilated into interpretation pipelines to derive clinically useful information from cancer genomic panels.

Validation of HER2 Status in Whole Genome Sequencing Data of Breast Cancers with the Ploidy-Corrected Copy Number Approach

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein overexpression is one of the most significant biomarkers for breast cancer diagnostics, treatment prediction, and prognostics. The high accessibility of HER2 inhibitors in routine clinical practice directly translates into the diagnostic need for precise and robust marker identification. Even though multigene next-generation sequencing methodologies have slowly taken over the field of single-biomarker molecular tests, the copy number alterations such as amplification of the HER2-coding ERBB2 gene are hard to validate on next-generation sequencing platforms as they are characterized by chromosomal structural heterogeneity, polysomy, and genomic context of ploidy. In our study, we tested the approach of using whole genome sequencing instead of next-generation sequencing panels to determine HER2 status in the clinical set-up.

METHODS

We used a large dataset of 876 patients with breast cancer whole genomes with curated clinical data and an additional set of 551 patients' external genomic data. We used the decision-tree-based algorithm for optimization of the diagnostic tool for HER2 status assessment by whole genome sequencing.

RESULTS

The most efficient approach to assess HER2 status in whole genome sequencing data was the ploidy-corrected copy number, utilizing ERBB2 copy number and mean tumor ploidy. The classifier achieved sensitivity of 91.18% and specificity of 98.69% on the internal validation dataset and 89.86% and 96.06% on the external data, which is similar to other next-generation sequencing methods, currently tested in the clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide evidence that the HER2 status may be reliably determined by whole genome sequencing and is applicable across different laboratory protocols and pipelines. We suggest using the ploidy-corrected copy number for diagnostic purposes.

Heterogeneous clinical and pathological landscapes of HER2 positive colorectal cancer

Introduction: Metastatic (m) colorectal cancer (CRC) can be divided into specific subgroups under the 'one gene, one drug' paradigm of precision medicine. Progress of targeted therapy in mCRC patients significantly improved the overall survival rate, notably by therapy targeting of EGFR signaling in RAS wild-type mCRC patients. Activation of the HER2 pathway is an important mechanism of resistance for anti-EGFR therapy.Area covered: Inhibition of HER2 with monoclonal antibodies and/or tyrosine kinase inhibitors induces tumor responses in partial HER2-positive CRC refractory to standard systemic therapy. This manuscript aimed to provide an overall insight of the HER2 expression pattern and highlighted specific clinicopathological and molecular features involved in mCRC. In addition, we summarize preclinical and clinical trials in HER2-positive mCRC.Expert opinion: The status and progression of HER2-positive gastric cancer and breast cancer and anti-HER2 therapy have been reported widely. However, the understanding of HER2-positive CRC models which may guide future therapeutic decision-making is poor. Therefore, it is essential to summarize the existing research to extract similarity and difference among various studies.

Co-Occurring Potentially Actionable Oncogenic Drivers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

Several oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are considered actionable with available or promising targeted therapies. Although targetable drivers rarely overlap with each other, there were a minority of patients harboring co-occurring actionable oncogenic targets, whose clinical characteristics and prognosis are not yet clear.

Methods

A total of 3,077 patients with NSCLC who underwent molecular analysis by NGS were included, and their demographic and clinical data were retrospectively collected.

Results

Our study found that the frequency of NSCLC patients harboring co-occurring potentially actionable alterations was approximately 1.5% (46/3077); after excluding patients with EGFR-undetermined mutations, the incidence was 1.3% (40/3077); 80% (37/46) harbored both EGFR mutations and other potentially actionable drivers such as MET amplification (21.6%; 8/37) and alterations in ERBB2 including mutations (27%; 10/37) and amplification (21.6%; 8/37); other combinations of potentially actionable drivers including alterations in ERBB2, KRAS, MET, ALK, and RET were also identified. Additionally, de novo MET/ERBB2 amplification in patients harboring EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was associated with shorter PFS (p < 0.05). The efficacy of TKIs in NSCLC patients harboring other co-occurring potentially actionable drivers varied across different molecular subtypes.

Conclusions

Approximately 1.5% of NSCLCs harbored co-occurring potentially actionable oncogenic drivers, commonly involving EGFR mutations. Co-occurring actionable targets may impact the efficacy of TKIs; therefore, future clinical trials in these patients should be anticipated to tailor the combination or sequential treatment strategies.