A comparative study of AJCC and the modified staging system in pT2/pT3 penile squamous cell carcinoma- A validation on an external dataset

High-risk human papilloma virus status & outcomes for penile squamous cell carcinoma: A single institution experience

OBJECTIVES

There is a paucity of data on North American cohorts of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC). Herein, we aimed to assess the sensitivity of various modalities to identify human papillomavirus (HPV) status, determine the prevalence of high-risk HPV-positivity, and evaluate the prognostic impact of relevant clinicopathologic variables.

METHODS

Patients with pSCC (n = 121) consecutively treated with partial/total penectomy (2000-2022) at a single institution were included. HPV status (based on immunohistochemistry [IHC], in situ hybridization [ISH], and panviral metagenomic sequencing [PMS]), histologic features, and outcomes were reviewed. Outcome events included death due to disease and progression.

RESULTS

The majority of patients were white (105/121, 86.8%). Thirty-seven (30.6%) were high-risk HPV-positive, and morphologic evaluation had a sensitivity of 97.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.2-99.5) for predicting high-risk HPV status compared to IHC/ISH/PMS. Disease progression was more common among high-risk HPV-negative compared to high-risk HPV-positive patients (HR 2.74, CI 1.12-8.23, P = 0.03). Moreover, among high-risk HPV-negative patients, those with moderate-poorly differentiated tumors had increased disease-specific mortality (32.6%, CI 17.1-48.1) compared to those with well-differentiated tumors (0%). Among high-risk HPV-positive patients, those with basaloid morphology had lower disease-specific mortality (0% vs 14.4%, CI 0.0-33.1).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate high-risk HPV-positivity in approximately one-third of patients with pSCC. Morphologic evaluation alone had a high sensitivity in correctly determining HPV status. Our results suggest that high-risk HPV status and morphologic features (differentiation in high-risk HPV-negative, and basaloid subtype in high-risk HPV-positive pSCC) may have prognostic value.

Comparison of a modified staging system with 8th edition AJCC criteria in a North American cohort of pT2/pT3 HPV-negative penile squamous cell carcinoma

The staging for pT2/pT3 penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) has undergone major changes. Some authors proposed criteria wherein the distinction between pT2/pT3 was made using the same histopathological variables that are currently utilized to differentiate pT1a/pT1b. In this single-institution, North American study, we focused on (HPV-negative) pT2/3 pSCCs (i.e., tumors invading corpus spongiosum/corpus cavernosum), and compared the prognostic ability of the following systems: (i) AJCC (8th edition) criteria; (ii) modified staging criteria proposed by Sali et al. (Am J Surg Pathol. 2020; 44:1112-7). In the proposed system, pT2 tumors were defined as those devoid of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) or perineural invasion (PNI), and were not poorly differentiated; whereas pT3 showed one or more of the following: LVI, PNI, and/or grade 3. 48 pT2/pT3 cases were included (AJCC, pT2: 27 and pT3: 21; Proposed, pT2: 22 and pT3: 26). The disease-free survival (DFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ between pT2 and pT3, following the current AJCC definitions (p = 0.19 and p = 0.10, respectively). When the pT2/3 stages were reconstructed using the modified criteria, however, a statistically significant difference was present in both DFS and PFS between pT2 and pT3 (p = 0.004 and p = 0.003, respectively). The proposed staging system has the potential to improve the prognostication of pT2/pT3 tumors in pSCC. Each of these histopathologic variables has been shown to have a significant association with outcomes in pSCC, which is an advantage. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the utility of this modified staging system in patient populations from other geographic regions.

Gradual and synergistic correlation of tumor thickness and histological grade in penile invasive carcinomas

Histological grade and depth of invasion are among the best outcome pathological predictors in penile cancer. The TNM system is based on a combination of both for some stages. It is assumed that high-grade and deep tumors carry the worst prognosis, and the opposite occurs with superficial and low-grade neoplasms. However, there is no systematic evaluation of the phenomenon. We studied 147 patients from the Hospital de Oncologia - Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (period 2000 to 2013). They were treated by total or partial penectomies. Lymph node involvement was evaluated by bilateral inguinal node dissection (126 cases) or ultrasonography (21 cases). Tumor thickness was measured in mm from tumor surface to deepest invasion point, using a cut-point for superficial (≤10 mm) vs deep (>10 mm) tumors. Histological grade was from 1 to 3 according to WHO and AFIP criteria and considering G1 and G2 as low-grade and G3 as high-grade. Average age was 62 (26-98) years old. Tumor thickness mean was 15 mm (2-30 mm). G1, G2 and G3 tumors corresponded to 19 (13 %), 48 (33 %), and 80 (54 %) cases, respectively. Follow-up ranged from 10 to 82 months (median: 57 months). Fifty-three (36 %) patients died of disease. There was an overall correlation of tumor thickness and grade in most of the cases. Low-grade tumors were encountered in 92 % (12/13 cases) of superficial tumors. Deep tumors showed high-grade in 75 % of cases (73/97 cases). Superficial tumors with low histological grade had negative inguinal nodes and no mortality whereas deep tumors showing high histological grade were associated with high metastatic risk to lymph nodes (62/73 cases) and mortality (52/73 cases). Out of 24 deep tumors with low histological grade, seven had nodal spread (29 %) but only one died of disease. No outcome difference was found in HPV associated vs HPV independent tumors. Tumor thickness and grade are important synergistic and predictive pathological factors in relation to prognosis.

WHO 2022 classification of penile and scrotal cancers: updates and evolution

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most common malignant tumour of the penis. The 2022 WHO classification reinforces the 2016 classification and subclassifies precursor lesions and tumours into human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated and HPV-independent types. HPV-associated penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PeIN) is a precursor lesion of invasive HPV- associated SCC, whereas differentiated PeIN is a precursor lesion of HPV-independent SCC. Block-type positivity of p16 immunohistochemistry is the most practical daily utilised method to separate HPVassociated from HPVindependent penile SCC. If this is not feasible, the term SCC, not otherwise specified (NOS) is appropriate. Certain histologies that were previously classified as "subtypes" are now grouped, and coalesced as "patterns", under the rubric of usual type SCC and verrucous carcinoma (e.g. usual-type SCC includes pseudohyperplastic and acantholytic/pseudoglandular carcinoma, and carcinoma cuniculatum is included as a pattern of verrucous carcinoma). If there is an additional component of the usual type of invasive SCC (formerly termed hybrid histology), the tumour would be a mixed carcinoma (e.g. carcinoma cuniculatum or verrucous carcinoma with usual invasive SCC); in such cases, reporting of the relative percentages in mixed tumours may be useful. The consistent use of uniform nomenclature and reporting of percentages will inform the refinement of future reporting classification schemes and guidelines/recommendations. The classification of scrotal tumours is provided for the first time in the fifth edition of the WHO Blue book, and it follows the schema of penile cancer classification for both precursor lesions and the common SCC of the scrotum. Basal cell carcinoma of the scrotum may have a variable clinical course and finds a separate mention.

Updates in staging of penile cancer: the evolution, nuances, and issues

Staging based on the tumor (T), node (N), and metastasis (M) schema of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) is usually the most important prognostic factor for any tumor type. Although a rare tumor, in penile cancers, this staging has evolved rapidly in the last two editions of the AJCC Cancer Staging manuals. These changes and updates are largely based on the advancement in our knowledge of the complex anatomy of the penis, the role of histopathological variables in disease biology, and the results of multicentric studies comprising large data sets. In this review, we present the evolution of the AJCC staging model from its inception to the present day. The evidence and data that entailed these changes are also discussed. We highlight a few issues with the current staging model and also briefly discuss the future perspectives and the road map which, with the help of global efforts, can further refine the staging models.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: penile cancer

OBJECTIVE

To update French oncology guidelines concerning penile cancer.

METHODS

Comprehensive Medline search between 2020 and 2022 upon diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of testicular germ cell cancer to update previous guidelines. Level of evidence was evaluated according to AGREE-II.

RESULTS

Epidermoid carcinoma is the most common penile cancer histology. Physical examination is mandatory to define local and inguinal nodal cancer stage. MRI with artificial erection can help to assess deep infiltration in cases of organsparing intention. Node negative patients (defined by palpation and imaging) will present micro nodal metastases in up to 25% of cases. Invasive lymph node assessment is thus advocated except for low risk patients. Sentinel node dynamic biopsy is the first line technique. Modified bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy is an option with higher morbidity. 18-FDG-PET is recommended in patients with palpable nodes. Chest, abdominal and pelvis computerized tomography is an option. Fine needle aspiration (when positive) is an easy way to assess inguinal palpable node pathological involvement. Its results determine the type of lymphadenectomy to be performed (for diagnostic or curative purposes). Treatment is mostly surgical. Free margins status is essential, but it also has to be organ-sparing when possible. Brachytherapy and topic agents can cure in selected cases. Lymph node assessment should be synchronous to the removal of the tumour when possible. Limited inguinal lymph node involvement (pN1 stage) can be cured with the only lymphadenectomy. In case of larger lymph node stage, one should consider multidisciplinary treatment including chemotherapy and inclusion in a trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Penile cancer needs demanding surgery to be cured, surrounded by chemotherapy in node positive patients. Lymph nodes involvement is a major prognostic factor. Thus, inguinal node assessment cannot be neglected.