Fundic gland polyps related to diverse aetiologies show subtle morphologic differences: A multicentre retrospective study

The comprehensive review of gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS) from diagnosis and treatment

Gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS) was first proposed by Wothley et al. in 2012 as a rare familial gastric cancer syndrome associated with an autosomal dominant form of inheritance. GAPPS is characterized by gastric basal gland polyposis from the hilum to the body of the stomach. Li et al. in 2016 showed that the cause of the disease is a point mutation in the promotor 1B region of the APC gene, and genetic testing was used to confirm the diagnosis. If the patient has already developed gastric cancer, treatment should be based on the usual treatment for gastric cancer. If no distant metastases exist, a good prognosis can be expected by performing a total gastrectomy. On the other hand, patients with distant metastasis have a poor prognosis. In the case of dysplasia, prophylactic total gastrectomy is recommended, but because it is highly invasive and postoperative postgastrectomy syndrome must be considered, the decision should be made with careful consideration of the patient's background. Therefore, there are no guidelines for screening for GAPPS, the timing of prophylactic total gastrectomy, or methods of endoscopic surveillance. Because GAPPS is a rare disease, its natural history is still unclear. Further case series are needed to elucidate the molecular biology and clinicopathological features of GAPPS and to establish clinical management, including diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance. In this review, we provide an overview of GAPPS, its clinical management, and its problems, which will be useful for the treatment of GAPPS.

Fundic Gland Polyps Lack DNA Content Abnormality Characteristic of Other Adenomatous Precursor Lesions in the Gastrointestinal Tract

Fundic gland polyps (FGPs) develop sporadically (frequently after proton pump inhibitor therapy) or in the setting of a hereditary polyposis syndrome, such as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). FAP-related FGPs often demonstrate low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and are frequently associated with APC mutations, even in the absence of dysplasia. Sporadic FGPs with dysplasia are molecularly similar to FAP-related FGPs and demonstrate frequent mutations in APC gene. Despite having similar molecular alterations with colorectal and other adenomatous precursor lesions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, FGPs rarely progress to advanced gastric neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia [HGD] or adenocarcinoma), and their role in gastric tumorigenesis remains unclear but likely limited. The clinicopathologic features of 192 patients diagnosed with FGPs, including 86 with FAP-related FGPs (33 with dysplastic FGPs and 53 with nondysplastic FGPs) and 106 with sporadic FGPs (12 with dysplastic FGPs and 94 with nondysplastic FGPs), were analyzed. DNA flow cytometry was performed on 111 FAP-related FGP biopsies, including 32 FGPs with LGD and 79 nondysplastic FGPs, to assess the presence of abnormal DNA content (ie, aneuploidy or elevated 4N fraction). Moreover, 40 sporadic FGP biopsies, including 14 dysplastic (13 LGD and 1 HGD) and 26 nondysplastic FGPs, were examined for DNA content abnormality. Patients with FAP and nondysplastic FGPs were more likely to be younger (mean age, 32 years) and present with multiple FGPs (92%, defined as having ≥2 FGPs) than those with sporadic nondysplastic FGPs (61 years and 65%, respectively; P < .001). They also recorded higher rates of previous or concurrent gastric epithelial dysplasia not occurring in a FGP (8%, P = .016), nongastric GI dysplasia (96%, P < .001), and nongastric GI malignancy (17%, P = .001) compared with those with sporadic nondysplastic FGPs (0%, 52%, and 2%, respectively). The sporadic group was more frequently associated with proton pump inhibitor therapy (78%, P < .001), gastric intestinal metaplasia (24%, P = .004), and a family history of gastric cancer (10%, P = .027) than the FAP group (19%, 6%, and 0%, respectively). Almost all FAP-related FGPs had a polypoid endoscopic appearance (98% vs 84% for sporadic FGPs; P = .009). The mean size of the largest FAP-related FGPs (0.5 cm) was similar to that of sporadic FGPs (0.7 cm) (P = .069). None of the 147 patients with FAP-related or sporadic nondysplastic FGPs were associated with subsequent detection of advanced gastric neoplasia within a mean follow-up time of 54 months (range, <1 to 277 months). However, 2 (4%) of the 45 patients with FAP-related or sporadic dysplastic FGPs developed advanced gastric neoplasia within a mean follow-up time of 59 months (range, <1 to 236 months). One (3%) of the 33 patients with FAP and dysplastic FGPs developed signet ring cell adenocarcinoma, whereas 1 (8%) of the 12 patients with sporadic dysplastic FGPs developed HGD (P = .445). However, none of the FAP-related and sporadic FGP biopsies, regardless of the presence or absence of dysplasia, demonstrated DNA content abnormality. In conclusion, FGPs lack large-scale chromosomal changes that are characteristic of the typical adenoma-carcinoma sequence involved in the development of other GI malignancies. Progression to advanced gastric neoplasia is rare in FGPs, which may be partly explained by the apparent lack of the chromosomal instability phenotype in these lesions.