Pathological overview of steatohepatitic hepatocellular carcinoma in a surgical series

[Hepatocellular carcinoma: Histological and molecular classifications]

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignant liver tumour, with a poor prognosis, ranking third for cancer mortality worldwide. HCC is a morphologically and molecularly heterogeneous tumour. This update aims to address this heterogeneity by describing the different histological and molecular subtypes of HCC. Morphologically, eight subtypes have been described according to the WHO classification: steatohepatitic, macrotrabecular massive (MTM), clear cell, chromophobe, scirrhous, fibrolamellar, lymphocyte-rich and neutrophil-rich. Other HCCs are classified as non-specific (not otherwise specified or NOS). These subtypes may be associated with a different prognosis, particularly the MTM, which displays a poorer survival than the other subtypes. Genomically, most HCCs present mutations in the TERT promoter, while other mutations occured later in carcinogenesis, such as TP53 and CTNNB1. TP53 mutated HCCs are associated with a poor prognosis and the MTM subtype. From a transcriptomic standpoint, two classifications are particularly noteworthy, as they are associated with both prognosis (proliferative vs. non-proliferative classification) and clinical, morphological and genomic tumour characteristics (G1-G6 classification). In conclusion, the morphological heterogeneity of HCC, directly linked to molecular heterogeneity, is associated with prognosis. This strongly supports the specification of the different HCC subtypes in our reports.

Clinicopathologic features and prognosis of steatohepatitic hepatocellular carcinoma based on varying cutoffs of tumoral steatohepatitic changes

OBJECTIVES

Steatohepatitic hepatocellular carcinoma (SH-HCC) is currently recognized as a distinct histologic subtype of HCC. The prognosis and specific criteria for determining the amount of steatohepatitis required to define SH-HCC are still unclear.

METHODS

After excluding all recognized HCC subtypes from 505 HCC cases (2010-2019), the remaining cases were categorized as conventional HCC (CV-HCC) (n = 223). The cases classified as SH-HCC (n = 171) were further divided into groups based on the percentage of steatohepatitis: 5% or more, 30% or more, and 50% or more.

RESULTS

Hepatitis C virus infection was the predominant underlying liver disease in both the CV-HCC and SH-HCC groups. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (formerly nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) was more prevalent in all cases of SH-HCC with different steatohepatitic cutoffs than in cases of CV-HCC. There were no differences in the stage of fibrosis of the background liver between the CV-HCC and SH-HCC groups. SH-HCC with different cutoffs exhibited a notable increase in the presence of glycogenated nuclei, Mallory-Denk bodies, and hyaline globules in tumor cells. Survival analysis did not reveal substantial differences in overall survival between the CV-HCC and SH-HCC groups and among patients with SH-HCC with different steatohepatitis cutoffs.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of intratumoral steatohepatitis in patients with SH-HCC does not appear to be a notable prognostic factor. The presence of steatohepatitis in the tumor is better recognized as 1 of the histopathologic patterns of HCC.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for approximately 90% of primary liver cancers. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, along with improved understanding of their application, are transforming patient treatment. Integrating these innovations into clinical practice presents challenges and necessitates guidance. These clinical practice guidelines offer updated advice for managing patients with HCC and provide a comprehensive review of pertinent data. Key updates from the 2018 EASL guidelines include personalised surveillance based on individual risk assessment and the use of new tools, standardisation of liver imaging procedures and diagnostic criteria, use of minimally invasive surgery in complex cases together with updates on the integrated role of liver transplantation, transitions between surgical, locoregional, and systemic therapies, the role of radiation therapies, and the use of combination immunotherapies at various stages of disease. Above all, there is an absolute need for a multiparametric assessment of individual risks and benefits, considering the patient's perspective, by a multidisciplinary team encompassing various specialties.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults

Deaths from the majority of cancers are falling globally, but the incidence and mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in the United Kingdom and in other Western countries. HCC is a highly fatal cancer, often diagnosed late, with an incidence to mortality ratio that approaches 1. Despite there being a number of treatment options, including those associated with good medium to long-term survival, 5-year survival from HCC in the UK remains below 20%. Sex, ethnicity and deprivation are important demographics for the incidence of, and/or survival from, HCC. These clinical practice guidelines will provide evidence-based advice for the assessment and management of patients with HCC. The clinical and scientific data underpinning the recommendations we make are summarised in detail. Much of the content will have broad relevance, but the treatment algorithms are based on therapies that are available in the UK and have regulatory approval for use in the National Health Service.

Imaging and prognostic characterization of fat-containing hepatocellular carcinoma subtypes

PURPOSE

Steatohepatitic hepatocellular carcinoma (SH-HCC) is characterized by intratumoral fat with > 50% inflammatory changes. However, intratumoral fat (with or without inflammation) can also be found in not-otherwise specified HCC (NOS-HCC). We compared the imaging features and outcome of resected HCC containing fat on pathology including SH-HCC (> 50% steatohepatitic component), NOS-HCC with < 50% steatohepatitic component (SH-NOS-HCC), and fatty NOS-HCC (no steatohepatitic component).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From September 2012 to June 2021, 94 patients underwent hepatic resection for fat-containing HCC on pathology. Imaging features and categories were assessed using LIRADS v2018. Fat quantification was performed on chemical-shift MRI. Recurrence-free and overall survival were estimated.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (26%) had nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The median intra-tumoral fat fraction was 8%, with differences between SH-HCC and SH-NOS-HCC (9.5% vs. 5% p = 0.03). There was no difference in major LI-RADS features between all groups; most tumors were classified as LR-4/5. A mosaic architecture on MRI was rare (7%) in SH-HCC, a fat in mass on CT was more frequently depicted (48%) in SH-HCC. A combination of NASH with no mosaic architecture on MRI or NASH with fat in mass on CT yielded excellent specificity for diagnosing SH-HCC (97.6% and 97.7%, respectively). The median recurrence-free and overall survival were 58 and 87 months, with no difference between groups (p = 0.18 and p = 0.69).

CONCLUSION

In patients with NASH, an SH-HCC may be suspected in L4/LR-5 observations with no mosaic architecture at MRI or with fat in mass on CT. Oncological outcomes appear similar between fat-containing HCC subtypes.