Dataset for reporting of thymic epithelial tumours: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR)

PIT-EASY survey: validation of the European Pituitary Pathology Group proposal for reporting pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

The aim of this multicenter prospective survey called PIT-EASY was to assess the relevance of the European Pituitary Pathology Group (EPPG) diagnostic tools for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) to improve the quality of their histological diagnosis. Each center performed at least 30 histological cases of PitNETs using the EPPG tools and assessed their value using a scorecard with 10 questions. For each center, the histological cases were carried out by pathologists with varying levels of expertise in pituitary pathology defined as junior, intermediate, and expert. Two hundred and ninety histological cases were collected from six French and Italian centers. The three EPPG tools were validated and regarded as helpful for a more accurate and time-efficient diagnosis. The usefulness of level 2 and level 3 of the "EPPG's multi-step approach for immunohistochemistry" including pituitary transcription factors (PIT1, TPIT, and SF1) and chromogranin, SSTRs, and P53 respectively was higher in "other non-functioning" (silent plurihormonal PIT1, silent corticotroph, and null cell): 88% vs 32%, p < 10-6 and 42% vs 14%, p = 0.002, respectively. The diagnostic algorithm proved more useful for junior pathologists (p = 0.0001) and those with intermediate experience. PIT-EASY survey confirmed the importance of a standardized approach to PitNETs for an accurate and reproducible diagnosis and served as validation of the EPPG proposal. The tool appeared to be of practical value to junior participants and staff with intermediate experience for safe routine diagnostic reporting.

International reproducibility study of thymic epithelial tumors staging: pT stage is an issue. proposals for improvement. A RYTHMIC/ITMIG study

INTRODUCTION

Pathologists are staging thymic epithelial tumors (TET) according to the 8th UICC/AJCC TNM system. Within the French RYTHMIC network, dedicated to TET, agreement on pathologic tumor stage (pT) among the pathology panelists was difficult. The aim of our study was to determine the interobserver reproducibility of pT at an international level, to explore the source of discrepancies and potential interventions to address these.

METHODS

An international panel of pathologists was recruited through the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG). The study focused on invasion of mediastinal pleura, pericardium, and lung. From a cohort of cases identified as challenging within the RYTHMIC network, we chose a series of test and validation cases (n = 5 and 10, respectively).

RESULTS

Reproducibility of the pT stage was also challenging at an international level as none of the 15 cases was classified as the same pT stage by all ITMIG pathologists. The agreement rose from slight (κ = 0.13) to moderate (κ = 0.48) between test and validation series. Discussion among the expert pathologists pinpointed two major reasons underlying discrepancies: 1) Thymomas growing with their "capsule" and adhering to the pleurae, pericardium, or lung were often misinterpreted as invading these structures. 2) Recognition of the mediastinal pleura was identified as challenging.

CONCLUSION

Our study underlines that the evaluation of the pT stage of TET is problematic and needs to be addressed in more detail in an upcoming TNM classification. The publication of histopathologic images of landmarks, including ancillary tests could improve reproducibility for future TNM classifications.