Hepato-pancreatectomy: how morbid? Results from the national surgical quality improvement project

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy with delayed division of the pancreatic parenchyma when utilizing a right lateral approach to the superior mesenteric artery

BACKGROUND

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is a high-risk surgical procedure. Delayed division of the pancreatic parenchyma (DDPP) was reported as a novel technique in HPD for reducing postoperative pancreatic fistula. However, it is often difficult to dissect the pancreatic head nerve plexus while leaving the pancreatic parenchyma intact, particularly in patients with a bulky tumor with vascular invasion. Of the various reported approaches to the superior mesenteric artery, the right lateral approach can provide a useful surgical field to conduct DDPP in HPD.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 78-year-old man visited a local clinic with itching and jaundice. Laboratory tests revealed elevated hepatobiliary enzyme, total bilirubin, and tumor markers. Enhanced computed tomography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and intraductal ultrasonography of the bile duct were performed, and he was diagnosed with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with invasion to the right hepatic artery (40 × 15 mm, Bismuth IIIa, cT3N0M0 cStage III). After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, he underwent left hepatectomy with caudate lobectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, and combined resection of right hepatic artery using DDPP with a right lateral approach to the superior mesenteric artery. The pathological diagnosis was perihilar cholangiocarcinoma ypT3N1M0 ypStage IIIC, R0 resection. He was discharged on postoperative day 57 in good health and has been doing well for 6 months since the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

We present an effective application of the right lateral approach to the superior mesenteric artery in DDPP during HPD. This procedure can provide a clear surgical field to easily divide the pancreatic head nerve plexus before transection of the pancreatic parenchyma.

The Short- and Long-Term Surgical Results of Consecutive Hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for Wide-Spread Biliary Malignancy

BACKGROUND

Cancer-free resection (R0) is one of the most important factors for the long-term survival of biliary carcinoma. For some patients with widespread invasive cancer located between the hilar and intrapancreatic bile duct, hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy (HPD) is considered a radical surgery for R0 resection. However, HPD is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Furthermore, previous reports have not shown lymph node metastasis (LNM) status, such as the location or number, which could influence the prognosis after HPD. In this study, first, we explored the prognostic factors for survival, and second, we evaluated whether the LNM status (number and location of LNM) would influence the decision on surgical indications in patients with widely spread biliary malignancy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 54 patients who underwent HPD with hepatectomy in ≥2 liver sectors from January 2003 to December 2021 (HPD-G). We also evaluated 54 unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients who underwent chemotherapy from January 2010 to December 2021 (CTx-G).

RESULTS

R0 resection was performed in 48 patients (89%). The median survival time (MST) and 5-year overall survival rate of the HPD-G and CTx-G groups were 36.9 months and 31.1%, and 19.6 months and 0%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that pathological portal vein involvement was an independent prognostic factor for survival (MST: 18.9 months). Additionally, patients with peripancreatic LNM had worse prognoses (MST: 13.3 months) than CTx-G.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with peripancreatic LNM or PV invasion might be advised to be excluded from surgery-first indications for HPD.

Essential updates 2021/2022: Update in surgical strategy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Resection is the only potential curative treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC); however, complete resection is often technically challenging due to the anatomical location. Various innovative approaches and procedures were invented to circumvent this limitation but the rates of postoperative morbidity (20%-78%) and mortality (2%-15%) are still high. In patients diagnosed with resectable PHC, deliberate and coordinated preoperative workup and optimization of the patient and future liver remnant are crucial. Biliary drainage is recommended to relieve obstructive jaundice and optimize the clinical condition before liver resection. Biliary drainage for PHC can be performed either by endoscopic biliary drainage or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. To date there is no consensus about which method is preferred. The volumetric assessment of the future remnant liver volume and optimization mainly using portal vein embolization is the gold standard in the management of the risk to develop post hepatectomy liver failure. The improvement of systemic chemotherapy has contributed to prolong the survival not only in patients with unresectable PHC but also in patients undergoing curative surgery. In this article, we review the literature and discuss the current surgical treatment of PHC.

Safety and Outcomes of Combined Pancreatic and Hepatic Resections for Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Approximately 40-50% of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) initially present with distant metastases. Little is known about the outcomes of patients undergoing combined pancreatic and hepatic resections for this indication.

METHODS

Patients who underwent hepatectomy for metastatic pNETs at Mayo Clinic Rochester from 2000 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Major pancreatectomy was defined as pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy, and major hepatectomy as right hepatectomy or trisegmentectomy. Characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent pancreatectomy with simultaneous hepatectomy were compared with those of patients who underwent isolated hepatectomy (with or without prior history of pancreatectomy).

RESULTS

205 patients who underwent hepatectomy for metastatic pNETs were identified: 131 underwent pancreatectomy with simultaneous hepatectomy and 74 underwent isolated hepatectomy. Among patients undergoing simultaneous hepatectomy, 89 patients underwent minor pancreatectomy with minor hepatectomy, 11 patients underwent major pancreatectomy with minor hepatectomy, 30 patients underwent minor pancreatectomy with major hepatectomy, and 1 patient underwent major pancreatectomy with major hepatectomy. Patients undergoing simultaneous hepatectomy had more numerous liver lesions (10 or more lesions in 54% vs. 34%, p = 0.008), but the groups were otherwise similar. Rates of any major complications (31% versus 24%, p = 0.43), hepatectomy-specific complications such as bile leak, hemorrhage, and liver failure (0.8-7.6% vs. 1.4-12%, p = 0.30-0.99), and 90-day mortality (1.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.62) were similar between the two groups. 5-year overall survival was 64% after combined resections and 65% after isolated hepatectomy (p = 0.93).

CONCLUSION

For patients with metastatic pNETs, combined pancreatic and hepatic resections can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality in selected patients at high-volume institutions.

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy With Delayed Division of the Pancreatic Parenchyma: A Novel Technique for Reducing Pancreatic Fistula

Objectives

To review our novel technique of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) with delayed division of the pancreatic parenchyma (DDPP) for reducing postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).

Background

The high operative morbidity and mortality rates after HPD remains a major issue. One of the most troublesome complications is POPF, which might possibly be caused by peripancreatic saponification due to long interval between pancreas resection and reconstruction, as most surgeons prefer a caudocranial approach, performing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) first and then hepatectomy (conventional HPD [C-HPD]).

Methods

A review of the patients undergoing C-HPD and HPD with DDPP was performed. Postoperative outcomes were compared. Multivariable analysis was conducted to evaluate the risk factors of POPF after HPD.

Results

One-hundred two patients comprised of 50 patients undergoing C-HPD and 52 patients undergoing HPD with DDPP. The interval between pancreas resection and reconstruction was significantly shorter in HPD with DDPP group than in C-HPD group (51 vs 263 minutes; P < 0.001). The incidence of POPF was significantly lower in HPD with DDPP group than in C-HPD group (32.7% vs 77.3%; P < 0.001). The postoperative hospital stay was shorter in patients undergoing HPD with DDPP than in those undergoing C-HPD (32 vs 45 days). A multivariate analysis revealed that body mass index >24 kg/m2 and conventional (PD first) procedure were significant risk factors for POPF after HPD.

Conclusions

A novel technique of HPD with DDPP is a simple procedure and the optimal treatment choice to reduce the risk of developing POPF after this extensive surgery.

Current role of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for the management of gallbladder cancer and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is the simultaneous combination of hepatic resection, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and resection of the entire extrahepatic biliary system. HPD is not a universally accepted due to high mortality and morbidity rates, as well as to controversial survival benefits.

AIM

To evaluate the current role of HPD for curative treatment of gallbladder cancer (GC) or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) invading both the hepatic hilum and the intrapancreatic common bile duct.

METHODS

A systematic literature search using the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was performed to identify studies reporting on HPD, using the following keywords: ‘Hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy’, ‘hepatopancreatoduodenectomy’, ‘hepatopancreatectomy’, ‘pancreaticoduodenectomy’, ‘hepatectomy’, ‘hepatic resection’, ‘liver resection’, ‘Whipple procedure’, ‘bile duct cancer’, ‘gallbladder cancer’, and ‘cholangiocarcinoma’.

RESULTS

This updated systematic review, focusing on 13 papers published between 2015 and 2020, found that rates of morbidity for HPD have remained high, ranging between 37.0% and 97.4%, while liver failure and pancreatic fistula are the most serious complications. However, perioperative mortality for HPD has decreased compared to initial experiences, and varies between 0% and 26%, although in selected center it is well below 10%. Long term survival outcomes can be achieved in selected patients with R0 resection, although 5–year survival is better for ECC than GC.

CONCLUSION

The present review supports the role of HPD in patients with GC and ECC with horizontal spread involving the hepatic hilum and the intrapancreatic bile duct, provided that it is performed in centers with high experience in hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery. Extensive use of preoperative portal vein embolization, and preoperative biliary drainage in patients with obstructive jaundice, represent strategies for decreasing the occurrence and severity of postoperative complications. It is advisable to develop internationally-accepted protocols for patient selection, preoperative assessment, operative technique, and perioperative care, in order to better define which patients would benefit from HPD.

Survey of surgical resections for neuroendocrine liver metastases: A project study of the Japan Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (JNETS)

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Hepatic resection is considered the treatment of choice for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM). However, the safety and efficacy of resection have not been fully evaluated using a large cohort. The aim of the present study was to collect real-world data regarding hepatic resections for NELM.

METHODS

A retrospective, multicenter survey was conducted. The background characteristics of patients undergoing an initial hepatic resection for NELM, the operative details, pathological findings, and patient outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 222 patients were enrolled from 30 institutions. The primary tumor site was the pancreas in 58.6%, and the presentation of NELM was synchronous in 63.1% of the cases. Concomitant resection of the primary tumor and liver metastases was performed for 66.4% of the synchronous metastases, and the 90-day morbidity and mortality rates were 12.6% and 0.9%, respectively. The operations resulted in R2 resections in 26.1% of the cases, and 83.4% of the patients experienced recurrence after R0/1 resections. However, the patients were treated using multiple modalities after R2 resection or recurrence, and the overall survival rate was relatively favorable, with 5-year and 10-year survival rates of 70.2%, and 43.4%, respectively. Univariable and multivariable analyses identified the tumor grading (G3) of the primary tumor as a significant prognostic factor for both the recurrence-free and overall survivals.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data confirmed the safety of the surgical resection of NELM. Although recurrences were frequent, the survival outcomes after resection were favorable when a multi-disciplinary treatment approach was used.

Central hepatopancreatoduodenectomy-oncological effectiveness and parenchymal sparing option for diffusely spreading bile duct cancer: report of two cases

Background

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) for diffusely spreading bile duct cancer (DSBDC) usually involves a major hepatectomy and a concomitant pancreatoduodenectomy, and is still challenging surgery because of postoperative liver failure. The present case report demonstrated two cases of DSBDC where we could achieve successful HPD with central liver resection (CHPD) as liver parenchymal sparing surgery.

Case presentation

In Case 1, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) with multiple biopsies revealed that she had DSBDC with Bismuth-Corlette type IIIA. 3D integrated images reconstructed by contrast enhanced CT and CT with drip infusion cholecystocholangiography data revealed the right antero-ventral bile duct (RAVD) confluent to the right hepatic duct and the right antero-dorsal bile duct (RADD) independently confluent to the right posterior bile duct (RPD). Tumor extended common bile duct including intrapancreatic bile duct to the left hepatic duct and RAVD, but the RADD and RPD were spared. Because the future liver remnant (FLR) was assumed not to achieve desirable volume by preoperative portal vein embolization for left or right trisegmentectomy, CHPD including resection of the segments IV and I, and the right antero-ventral segment was done and achieved R0. This procedure is tailored to the anatomical extent of disease in the context of variable biliary anatomy as a modified CHPD, and to our knowledge, this is the first reported case of modified CHPD with antero-dorsal segment preservation. In Case 2, preoperative imaging revealed DSBDC with Bismuth Corlette type IIIA. FLR volume was assumed insufficient for major hepatectomy, CHPD including resection of the segments IV and I, and the right anterior sector was done with R0. The remnant liver volumes of these cases were spared by 55.1% and 25% respectively, and postoperative course was uneventful in both.

Conclusion

CHPD should be considered a valid option for well-selected cases of DSBDC. This is the first case report of modified CHPD with antero-dorsal segment preservation.

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy -a controversial treatment for bile duct and gallbladder cancer from a European perspective

BACKGROUND

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is an aggressive operation for treatment of advanced bile duct and gallbladder cancer associated with high perioperative morbidity and mortality, and uncertain oncological benefit in terms of survival. Few reports on HPD from Western centers exist. The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy for HPD in European centers.

METHOD

Members of the European-African HepatoPancreatoBiliary Association were invited to report all consecutive patients operated with HPD for bile duct or gallbladder cancer between January 2003 and January 2018. The patient and tumor characteristics, perioperative and survival outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 66 patients from 19 European centers were included in the analysis. 90-day mortality rate was 17% and 13% for bile duct and gallbladder cancer respectively. All factors predictive of perioperative mortality were patient and disease-specific. The three-year overall survival excluding 90-day mortality was 80% for bile duct and 30% for gallbladder cancer (P = 0.013). In multivariable analysis R0-resection had a significant impact on overall survival.

CONCLUSION

HPD, although being associated with substantial perioperative mortality, can offer a survival benefit in patient subgroups with bile duct cancer and gallbladder cancer. To achieve negative resection margins is paramount for an improved survival outcome.

Extended liver surgery for gallbladder cancer revisited: Is there a role for hepatopancreatoduodenectomy?

Gallbladder cancer (GBCA) is a rare and fatal disease and the majority of patients presents with advanced stage. Surgical resection associated with lymphadenectomy is the only chance for cure. For patients in stages III and IV, extended resection is the only treatment to achieve R0 margins. For GBCA invading the hepatoduodenal ligament and pancreatoduodenal region, the resection of extrahepatic bile duct and pancreas is necessary. Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) represents the most complex and challenging procedure in the hepatopancreatobiliary region. Kuno at the Cancer Institute Hospital Tokyo performed the first HPD in Japan in 1974 and in 1980 Takasaki presented five cases and the 30-day mortality was 60%. After that, other countries started to perform the procedure including United States and Brazil. The main complications are liver failure and pancreatic fistula. Advancements in perioperative care, surgical technique, medical instruments and postoperative at intensive care unit have resulted in reduction in morbidity and mortality. The use of portal vein embolization is indicated to increase the liver volume in patients with insufficient remnant. Preoperative biliary drainage can prevent cholangitis and improve hepatic function. This procedure should be recommended before extended HPD in jaundiced patients. Operative results with mortality rates below 5% at high volume centers suggest that HPD should be performed at centers with expertise in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy in North America: are the outcomes acceptable?

BACKGROUND

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomies (HPD) are historically associated with high morbidity and mortality. Currently, no data with hepatopancreatobiliary-specific complications have been available for HPD in North America. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the outcomes of HPD to those of major hepatectomy (MH) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in North America.

METHODS

The 2014-16 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for MH, PD, and HPD. Partial hepatectomies, wedge liver biopsies, distal pancreatectomies, pancreatic enucleations and total pancreatectomies were excluded. Propensity score matching was utilized to match 23 HPDs to 92 MHs and 138 PDs by 28 demographic, comorbidity, laboratory, operative and pathologic variables. Outcomes were compared among these three groups.

RESULTS

The overall morbidity and mortality for HPD were 87% and 26%, respectively, and were significantly higher (p < 0.01) compared to both MH (51%, 7.6%) and PD (52%, 1.4%). Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) was more common (p < 0.01) in HPD patients, but pancreatic fistula rates were similar.

CONCLUSION

The morbidity and mortality after HPD are significantly higher than after MH or PD alone and may explain why HPD is performed so infrequently in North America. Centralization of HPD to a very few centers may be a strategy to improve outcomes.

Hybrid Laparoscopic and Robotic Hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for Cholangiocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Combined hepatic resection and pancreaticoduodenectomy is the treatment of choice for patient with extensive horizontal-spreading cholangiocarcinoma involving both the perihilar bile duct and the intrapancreatic distal bile duct.^1-3 This surgical procedure is extremely complex, and incurs a high risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality.⁴ However, in recent years, this complicated high-risk operation can be safely performed in well-selected patients.⁵ However, as we know, none of these operations have been reported as minimally invasive surgery.

PATIENT AND METHODS

A 73-year-old female presented with jaundice and was diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma. The preoperative image studies revealed a 4.3-cm-long diffuse, infiltrative cholangiocarcinoma from the hilar bile duct to the intrapancreatic bile duct without major vascular invasion. The patient was scheduled to undergo left hepatectomy with caudate lobectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy to obtain a free resection margin. In order to maximize the efficiency of each surgical modality, we designed a hybrid method of laparoscopic resection and robotic reconstruction for this complicated surgery with a long operation time. A 12-mm port was placed at the subxiphoid area, which was utilized for laparoscopic CUSA during the liver resection. Three 12-mm ports around the umbilicus and an 8-mm robotic port at the right flank were placed. In the resection phase, pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed first, followed by hilar dissection and liver resection in en bloc manner. Here, a hanging maneuver was helpful for the complete resection of the caudate lobe in environment with the large specimen attached. In reconstruction phase, the right flank 8-mm port and the left side 12-mm port (using the double docking technique) were used for docking of two robotic working arms.

RESULTS

The total operation time was 510 min, and the estimated blood loss was 350 mL without transfusion. The patient's postoperative recovery was smooth, except for a mild fever due to cystitis, and she was discharged on the 16th postoperative day. Permanent pathologic examination revealed a disease-free proximal bile duct margin, but a metastasis was discovered in one regional lymph node metastasis from 18 retrieved lymph nodes. The patient is receiving adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy and regular surveillance. We performed two consecutive cases and the perioperative outcomes were summarized in the attached video.

CONCLUSION

Hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy has a long operative time, involves complicated anatomical structures and difficulty of R0 resection, and it is a remaining frontier of minimally invasive surgery. However, we expect that highly selected patients can carefully undergo minimally invasive surgery if the advantages of the currently available surgical methods are well utilized.

Cholangiographic Tumor Classification for Simple Patient Selection Prior to Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is employed for patients with laterally advanced cholangiocarcinoma. However, the survival benefit of this extended approach remains controversial. The aim of this study is to identify a tumor feature benefiting from HPD from the standpoint of long-term survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with cholangiocarcinoma who underwent HPD with curative intent between 2001 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Tumors were radiologically classified by preoperative cholangiogram. Diffuse type was defined as significant tumor/stricture located from the hilar to intrapancreatic duct; localized type was defined as tumor otherwise. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify prognostic indicators.

RESULTS

Of 100 study patients, 28 (28%) patients had diffuse tumor type, while the remaining 72 (72%) patients had localized tumors. The former group showed significantly longer lateral length (43 versus 22 mm, P < 0.001) and more frequent pancreatic invasion (50% versus 32%, P = 0.110), advanced T classification (64% versus 49%, P = 0.185), and nodal metastasis (57% versus 47%, P = 0.504), compared with the latter group. The survival for patients with diffuse tumor type was significantly worse than that for patients with localized tumor type, with 5-year survival rates of 59.0% versus 26.3%, respectively (P = 0.003). Multivariable analysis identified four independent factors deteriorating long-term survival: cholangiographic diffuse tumor (P = 0.021), higher age (P = 0.020), percutaneous biliary drainage (P = 0.007), and portal vein resection (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Presurgical cholangiographic classification, diffuse or localized type, is a tumor-related factor closely associated with survival probability; therefore, it may be a useful feature for patient selection prior to HPD for cholangiocarcinoma.

Hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for Biliary Cancer: Strategies for Near-zero Operative Mortality and Acceptable Long-term Outcome

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy (HPD) for patients with biliary cancer.

BACKGROUND

HPD is thought to be the only curative treatment for widespread bile duct cancer and for some advanced cases of gallbladder cancer; however, HPD has not yet been accepted as a standard operative procedure because of concerns over morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients undergoing HPD were retrospectively reviewed. The patient and tumor characteristics, preoperative treatments, operative results, and survival outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

Preoperative biliary drainage and portal vein embolization were applied for all patients undergoing right-sided HPD or a left trisectionectomy. A major hepatectomy was performed in 42 patients, and a 2-stage pancreaticojejunostomy was selected in all the cases. The 90-day mortality was 0; however, 1 patient died because of a liver abscess 230 days after surgery. Postoperative significant complications (grade III or greater) and liver insufficiency were observed in 19 (37%) and 2 (3.8%) patients, respectively, and no abdominal bleeding events after the formation of a pancreatic fistula were encountered. The 5-year overall survival rate was 44.5%, and a significant difference was not observed between patients with bile duct cancer and those with gallbladder cancer. The operative procedure was switched to an HPD in 13 patients based on intraoperative findings, and the recurrence-free survival rate for these patients was poorer than that for patients who did not require a switch in operative procedure (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

HPD can be safely performed using the presently reported surgical strategies with acceptable short and long-term outcomes. A precise assessment of the extent of tumor spread might improve patient outcome.

Simultaneous Resection for Synchronous Double Primary Cancers of the Pancreas and the Liver

Simultaneous resection of synchronous hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is extremely rare. Case 1 is a 64-year-old woman, who had undergone anterior resection for rectal cancer 3 years earlier was pointed out to have a cystic tumor in the pancreatic tail and a solitary tumor in the liver. CT revealed a hypovascular tumor in the pancreatic tail and a liver tumor with early enhancement. With a diagnosis of simultaneous HCC and PDAC, she underwent laparotomy, in which intraoperative frozen section examination of the liver was compatible with HCC. Therefore, she underwent hepatic resection as well as distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and remains well with no evidence of tumor recurrence as of 28 months after resection. Case 2 is a 73-year-old man with sustained viral response to antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus, who was pointed out to have a tumor in the pancreatic head and a solitary tumor in the liver. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI exhibited enhancement compatible with HCC. With a diagnosis of concomitant HCC and PDAC, surgery was performed. Intraoperative frozen section examination was compatible with HCC, for which a pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and remains well with no evidence of tumor recurrence as of 16 months after resection. In conclusion, we describe 2 cases of hepato-pancreatectomy for synchronous double primary cancers of the pancreas and the liver, where exclusion of the liver tumor as a metastatic lesion from the pancreatic cancer is important.

Safety-related outcomes of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery board certification system for expert surgeons

BACKGROUND

We investigated safety-related outcomes of hepatobiliary pancreatic (HBP) surgeries performed after establishment of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS) board certification system for expert surgeons.

METHODS

We analyzed post-HBP surgery mortality data obtained from annual safety reports provided by board-certified training institutions between 2012 and 2015.

RESULTS

The 90-day mortality rate for the 53,929 high-level HBP surgeries performed at board-certified training institutions was 1.7%. The 30-day mortality rates for 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015 were 0.9%, 0.7%, 0.6%, and 0.6%, respectively, and the 90-day mortality rates were 2.1%, 1.8%, 1.6%, and 1.3%, respectively, with significant decreases in both. The surgeries with high 4-year cumulative mortality rates were left hepatic trisectionectomy (10.3%), hepatopancreatectomy (7.6%), liver transplant recipient surgery (6.7%), hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection (4.6%), and right hepatic trisectionectomy (4.5%). Over the 4-year period, the number of operations increased, but the 90-day mortality rates for these surgeries, with the exception of right trisectionectomy, decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

The JSHBPS board certification system for expert surgeons has significantly decreased mortality subsequent to high-level HBP surgeries. Reducing mortality associated with high-risk HBP surgeries will be our next challenge.