Caregivers to older adults require support: A scoping review of their priorities

What do family caregivers of patients with life-threatening diseases need from healthcare professionals? A qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

To explore the common ground of what family caregivers need in their various roles (caregiver, care recipient and patient's partner, child or friend) from healthcare professionals across healthcare settings and disease trajectories.

DESIGN

Interviews were conducted with family caregivers of patients with life-threatening diseases who were treated at home, in hospitals, nursing homes or hospices between 2017 and 2022. Reflexive thematic analysis was performed.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

63 family caregivers of 65 patients were interviewed. Of the patients, 36 (55%) had COVID-19 and 29 (45%) had other life-threatening diseases (eg, advanced cancer, dementia). The majority of family caregivers were women (83%) and children of the patient (56%).

RESULTS

Three themes were developed regarding family caregivers' core needs across their different roles: (1) 'feeling seen and valued', (2) 'experiencing trust in the provided care' and (3) 'experiencing guidance and security'. Actions of healthcare professionals that meet those needs relate to their contact and relationship with family caregivers, information provision, practical and emotional support, the care for the patient and facilitating the connection between family caregivers and patients.

DISCUSSION

Healthcare professionals should be trained in meeting family caregivers' core needs, in which their (collaborative) relationship with them plays an important role. Efforts to meet the core needs should be incorporated into healthcare organisations' workflows, and future research should investigate related barriers and facilitators.

Narrative reanalysis: A methodological framework for a new brand of reviews

In response to the evolving needs of knowledge synthesis, this manuscript introduces the concept of narrative reanalysis, a method that refines data from initial reviews, such as systematic and reviews, to focus on specific sub-phenomena. Unlike traditional narrative reviews, which lack the methodological rigor of systematic reviews and are broader in scope, our methodological framework for narrative reanalysis applies a structured, systematic framework to the interpretation of existing data. This approach enables a focused investigation of nuanced topics within a broader dataset, enhancing understanding and generating new insights. We detail a five-stage methodological framework that guides the narrative reanalysis process: (1) retrieval of an initial review, (2) identification and justification of a sub-phenomenon, (3) expanded search, selection, and extraction of data, (4) reanalyzing the sub-phenomenon, and (5) writing the report. The proposed framework aims to standardize narrative reanalysis, advocating for its use in academic and research settings to foster more rigorous and insightful literature reviews. This approach bridges the methodological gap between narrative and systematic reviews, offering a valuable tool for researchers to explore detailed aspects of broader topics without the extensive resources required for systematic reviews.

Mapping the Caregiver Experience in a Canadian Province: Research Methodology for the Saskatchewan Caregiver Experience Study

BACKGROUND

Policies and services for older adults are increasingly focused on living in the community, rather than relying on institutions. A total of 70-80% of community care for older adults is provided by family and friend caregivers. With Canada's aging population, the number of caregivers to older adults is growing.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to describe the research methodology that was employed in the Saskatchewan Caregiver Experience Study. The methodology was used to map the experiences and gather perspectives of caregivers in Saskatchewan and to identify their priority support needs.

METHODS

Qualitative description was the approach in this study. An online qualitative survey was administered via SurveyMonkey and distributed via Facebook and community newsletters. The survey collected caregiver demographics and asked three open-ended questions regarding: (1) the challenges that caregivers experience; (2) the positive aspects of caregiving; and (3) the support needs and priorities of Saskatchewan caregivers. A fourth question where caregivers could freely express any other experiences or perspectives was included. Content analysis was the method used for data analysis.

RESULTS

355 individuals met the inclusion criteria for this study. Participants were evenly distributed amongst urban-large, urban-small/medium, and rural settings in Saskatchewan. The average age of caregivers and care recipients were 61 and 83 respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study has implications for research, practice, and policy. By gathering the full spectrum of the caregiver experience in Saskatchewan, this study can help to inform how communities, governments, and our healthcare system can best support caregivers in their role.

The Saskatchewan Caregiver Experience Study: Support Priorities of Caregivers of Older Adults

BACKGROUND

Population aging is a global phenomenon. Many older adults living with chronic conditions rely on family and friend caregivers. The growing demand for family and friend caregivers underscores the necessity for adequate and effective support services.

PURPOSE

The Saskatchewan Caregiver Experience Study sought to gather the perspectives of caregivers of older adults and set priorities for caregiver support.

METHODS

An online survey with open-ended questions was employed in this qualitative descriptive study. In this manuscript, we present our findings from the survey question: "What do you think is most important for support in your caregiving role? In other words, what are your top priorities for support?"

FINDINGS

This survey question received n = 352 responses, evenly distributed across Saskatchewan in urban-large (33%), urban-small/medium (32%), and rural (35%) settings. Support priorities of Saskatchewan caregivers were found to be access to help when they need it; an ear to listen and a shoulder to lean on; assistance in optimizing the care recipient's health; having healthcare professionals that care; and improved policies, legislations, and regulations.

CONCLUSION

Services and interventions that assist caregivers are more likely to be accessed and utilized when caregivers are given the opportunity to identify their own support priorities. This study has the potential to inform health and governmental systems to support caregivers of older adults provincially within Saskatchewan, nationally in Canada, and in a global context.

The use of ecological momentary assessment for family caregivers of adults with chronic conditions: A systematic review

Background

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) as a real-time data collection method can provide insight into the daily experiences of family caregivers.

Purpose

This systematic review aimed to synthesize studies involving EMA completed by family caregivers of adults with chronic conditions.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted within six databases for articles published from the inception of the database through September 2023. We extracted the characteristics of the included studies and data on EMA-specific methods to determine the quality of the included studies.

Results

A total of 12 studies involving EMA completed by family caregivers of adults with chronic conditions were identified, with almost all studies focused on caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's or dementia-related conditions. The average compliance rate across the included studies was 75%, below the recommended rate. In addition, most of the included studies did not collect the family caregivers' daily activities and care contexts in their responses (i.e., affect, stress, well-being, care demand, and fatigue) to the EMA prompts.

Discussion

This review showed that using EMA to collect information on family caregivers of adults with chronic health conditions appeared feasible and acceptable. However, the methodology or design of using EMA to collect caregiver information in this population is still preliminary. The limited number of existing studies that have used EMA to capture the daily experiences of family caregivers does not provide key information that could improve understanding of caregivers' emotional experiences and well-being in real-life situations. We identified gaps in the literature that warrant additional EMA studies for this population.