1
|
Todorov SD, Tagg J, Algburi A, Tiwari SK, Popov I, Weeks R, Mitrokhin OV, Kudryashov IA, Kraskevich DA, Chikindas ML. The Hygienic Significance of Microbiota and Probiotics for Human Wellbeing. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2024:10.1007/s12602-024-10419-9. [PMID: 39688648 DOI: 10.1007/s12602-024-10419-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/01/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024]
Abstract
The human body can be viewed as a combination of ecological niches inhabited by trillions of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites, all united by the microbiota concept. Human health largely depends on the nature of these relationships and how they are built and maintained. However, personal hygiene practices have historically been focused on the wholesale elimination of pathogens and "hygiene-challenging microorganisms" without considering the collateral damage to beneficial and commensal species. The microbiota can vary significantly in terms of the qualitative and quantitative composition both between different people and within one person during life, and the influence of various environmental factors, including age, nutrition, bad habits, genetic factors, physical activity, medication, and hygienic practices, facilitates these changes. Disturbance of the microbiota is a predisposing factor for the development of diseases and also greatly influences the course and severity of potential complications. Therefore, studying the composition of the microbiota of the different body systems and its appropriate correction is an urgent problem in the modern world. The application of personal hygiene products or probiotics must not compromise health through disruption of the healthy microbiota. Where changes in the composition or metabolic functions of the microbiome may occur, they must be carefully evaluated to ensure that essential biological functions are unaffected. As such, the purpose of this review is to consider the microbiota of each of the "ecological niches" of the human body and highlight the importance of the microbiota in maintaining a healthy body as well as the possibility of its modulation through the use of probiotics for the prevention and treatment of certain human diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svetoslav D Todorov
- ProBacLab, Laboratório de Microbiologia de Alimentos, Departamento de Alimentos E Nutrição Experimental, Food Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil.
- Instituto Politécnico de Viana Do Castelo, 4900-347, Viana Do Castelo, Portugal.
| | - John Tagg
- Blis Technologies, South Dunedin, 9012, New Zealand
| | - Ammar Algburi
- Department of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Diyala, Baqubah, Iraq
| | - Santosh Kumar Tiwari
- Department of Genetics, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, 124001, Haryana, India
| | - Igor Popov
- Center for Agrobiotechnology, Don State Technical University, Gagarina Sq., 1344002, Rostov-On-Don, Russia
- Division of Immunobiology and Biomedicine, Center of Genetics and Life Sciences, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Federal Territory Sirius, Olimpijskij Ave., 1, Federal Territory Sirius, Sirius, 354340, Russia
- Centre for Healthy Eating & Food Innovation (HEFI), Maastricht University-Campus Venlo, Villafloraweg, 1, 5928 SZ, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Weeks
- Health Promoting Naturals Laboratory, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
| | - Oleg V Mitrokhin
- Department of General Hygiene, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, 119435, Russia
| | - Ilya A Kudryashov
- Department of General Hygiene, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, 119435, Russia
| | - Denis A Kraskevich
- Department of General Hygiene, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, 119435, Russia
| | - Michael L Chikindas
- Center for Agrobiotechnology, Don State Technical University, Gagarina Sq., 1344002, Rostov-On-Don, Russia.
- Health Promoting Naturals Laboratory, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
- Department of General Hygiene, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, 119435, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Colleran A, Lima C, Xu Y, Millichope A, Murray S, Goodacre R. Using surface-enhanced Raman scattering for simultaneous multiplex detection and quantification of thiols associated to axillary malodour. Analyst 2024; 149:3989-4001. [PMID: 38948950 PMCID: PMC11262063 DOI: 10.1039/d4an00762j] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Axillary malodour is caused by the microbial conversion of human-derived precursors to volatile organic compounds. Thiols strongly contribute to this odour but are hard to detect as they are present at low concentrations. Additionally, thiols are highly volatile and small making sampling and quantification difficult, including by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. In this study, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), combined with chemometrics, was utilised to simultaneously quantify four malodourous thiols associated with axillary odour, both in individual and multiplex solutions. Univariate and multivariate methods of partial least squares regression (PLS-R) were used to calculate the limit of detection (LoD) and results compared. Both methods yielded comparable LoD values, with LoDs using PLS-R ranging from 0.0227 ppm to 0.0153 ppm for the thiols studied. These thiols were then examined and quantified simultaneously in 120 mixtures using PLS-R. The resultant models showed high linearity (Q2 values between 0.9712 and 0.9827 for both PLS-1 and PLS-2) and low values of root mean squared error of predictions (0.0359 ppm and 0.0459 ppm for PLS-1 and PLS-2, respectively). To test this approach further, these models were challenged with 15 new blind test samples, collected independently from the initial samples. This test demonstrated that SERS combined with PLS-R could be used to predict the unknown concentrations of these thiols in a mixture. These results display the ability of SERS for the simultaneous multiplex detection and quantification of analytes and its potential for future development for detecting gaseous thiols produced from skin and other body sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Colleran
- Centre for Metabolomics Research, Department of Biochemistry, Cell and Systems Biology, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown St, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK.
| | - Cassio Lima
- Centre for Metabolomics Research, Department of Biochemistry, Cell and Systems Biology, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown St, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK.
| | - Yun Xu
- Centre for Metabolomics Research, Department of Biochemistry, Cell and Systems Biology, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown St, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK.
| | - Allen Millichope
- Unilever Research and Development, Port Sunlight, Bebington, CH63 3JW, UK
| | - Stephanie Murray
- Unilever Research and Development, Port Sunlight, Bebington, CH63 3JW, UK
| | - Royston Goodacre
- Centre for Metabolomics Research, Department of Biochemistry, Cell and Systems Biology, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown St, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|