The impact of endodontic access on the biaxial flexure strength of dentine-bonded crown substrates - anin vitrostudy

The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load resistance of a 3Y-TZP monolithic zirconia crown

The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load resistance of 3Y-TZP zirconia crowns was accomplished by preparing human molars and luting monolithic zirconia crowns with a self-adhesive resin cement. Besides the intact control, teeth received endodontic access preparations and then grouped (n = 12) into a positive control (no access repair), dentin core replacement only and complete access repair groups. Specimens were axially tested until failure with results of no significant difference between the failure load of intact controls and the complete access repair group. However, the positive control and dentin replacement only groups failed at significantly lower loads. Under the conditions of this study, there was no significant failure load difference between 3Y-TZP monolithic zirconia crowns with repaired endodontic access preparations to that evidenced by an unprepared control. Although this evidence is encouraging, caution is advised and definitive recommendations cannot be made until verified by clinical studies.

Endodontic Access Effect on Full Contour Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Failure Resistance

Objectives:

To evaluate the effect of endodontic access on the failure load resistance of both adhesively and conventionally luted, full-contour monolithic yttria-stabilized zirconium dioxide (Y-TZP) and adhesively luted lithium disilicate (LD) crowns cemented on prepared teeth.

Methods and Materials:

Seventy-two human maxillary molars were prepared per respective guidelines for all-ceramic crowns with one group (n=24) restored with LD and the other (n=48) receiving Y-TZP crowns. Preparations were scanned using computer-aided design/computer-aided milling (CAD/CAM) technology, and milled crowns were sintered following manufacturer recommendations. All LD crowns and half (n=24) of the Y-TZP crowns were adhesively cemented, while the remaining Y-TZP specimens were luted using a conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC). One LD group, one Y-TZP adhesive group, and one GIC-luted group (all n=12) then received endodontic access preparations by a board-certified endodontist: the pulp chambers were restored with a dual-cure, two-step, self-etch adhesive and a dual-cure resin composite core material. The access preparations were restored using a nano-hybrid resin composite after appropriate ceramic margin surface preparation. After 24 hours, all specimens were loaded axially until failure; mean failure loads were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test (α=0.05)

Results:

Endodontic access did not significantly reduce the failure load of adhesively luted LD or Y-TZP crowns, but Y-TZP crowns with GIC cementation demonstrated significantly less failure load.

Conclusions:

These initial findings suggest that endodontic access preparation may not significantly affect failure load resistance of adhesively luted Y-TZP and LD crowns. Definitive recommendations cannot be proposed until fatigue testing and coronal seal evaluations have been accomplished.