A prospective cohort study evaluating the outcome of root canal retreatment in symptomatic mandibular first molars with periapical lesions

Root canal therapy combined with endoscopic sinus surgery for odontogenic sinusitis: Efficacy comparison in a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Odontogenic maxillary sinusitis, often triggered by dental issues like periapical periodontitis, significantly contributes to chronic sinusitis, mainly affecting adults around 50 years old, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary diagnostic and treatment approach.

AIM

To investigate the therapeutic effect and clinical value of root canal therapy combined with nasal endoscopic surgery compared with simple root canal therapy in the treatment of severe odontogenic maxillary sinusitis caused by periapical periodontitis.

METHODS

The clinical data, diagnosis, and treatment of 200 patients with severe odontogenic maxillary sinusitis caused by periapical periodontitis from October 2020 to October 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 63 patients were treated with simple root canal therapy as the control group, and 137 patients were treated with root canal therapy combined with nasal endoscopic surgery as the observation group. The therapeutic effect, Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score, paranasal sinus Lund-Mackay score, complication rate, recurrence rate, and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

First, we compared the effective rates: 23 cases were cured, 22 were improved, and 8 were ineffective in the control group, yielding a total effective rate of 84.90%. Meanwhile, 97 cases were cured, 34 improved, and 6 were ineffective in the observation group, resulting in a total effective rate of 95.62%. The observation group had a higher total effective rate compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Second, we compared the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score. Before treatment, no significant difference (P > 0.05) was observed in this score between the two groups. After treatment, the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score decreased in both groups. The Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score of the observation group at 3 and 6 mo after treatment was lower compared to that of the control group (P < 0.05). Third, we compared the Lund-Mackay score of paranasal sinuses. Before treatment, there was no significant difference in this score between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, the Lund-Mackay scores of paranasal sinuses decreased in both groups. The Lund-Mackay scores of paranasal sinuses in the observation group at 3 and 6 mo after treatment were lower compared to those of the control group (P < 0.05). Fourth, we compared the incidence and recurrence rate of complications. Three months after treatment, no significant difference was found in the incidence and recurrence rate of complications between the observation group (6.56%) and the control group (9.52%) (P > 0.05). However, 6 mo after treatment, the incidence and recurrence rate of complications in the observation group (2.91%) was significantly higher compared to that of the control group (12.69%) (P < 0.05). Fifth, we compared patient satisfaction. Six months after treatment, the patient satisfaction of the observation group (93.43%) was significantly better than that of the control group (84.12%) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Root canal therapy combined with nasal endoscopic surgery has a good therapeutic effect on severe odontogenic maxillary sinusitis caused by periapical periodontitis, and it can reduce the injury of maxillary sinus mucosa and bone, and significantly reduce the incidence of complications and recurrence rate. Meanwhile, it has high patient satisfaction and remarkable therapeutic effect, which is suggested to be popularized and applied in clinic.

Influence of apical patency in endodontic treatment outcome - A systematic review of clinical studies

Objective

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the influence of maintaining apical patency (AP) in endodontic treatment outcome.

Methodology

An electronic database search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, LIVIVO, LILACS, and EBSCO host from inception till July 2024. The data from the included articles were extracted and the quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and ROBINS-I tool.

Results

Five articles were included for the qualitative synthesis, and all the included articles were determined to have a low risk of bias. Maintaining the AP resulted in two-fold increase in the healing outcome with long-term follow-up.

Conclusion

It can be concluded from this systematic review that maintaining AP is likely to enhance the endodontic treatment outcome. However, more long-term clinical studies are required to further evaluate the possible influence of AP.

Registration

The protocol of this review was registered in the PROSPERO database with registration number: CRD42022374966.

Outcome of Contemporary Nonsurgical Endodontic Retreatment: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies

INTRODUCTION

The success rates of NS-ReTx have varied across decades of prior research. Nonetheless, recent endodontic advances have substantially enhanced case management. This systematic review aimed to identify rigorous studies on contemporary NS-ReTx, investigating both periapical healing-evaluated strictly for complete resolution or loosely for size reduction of periapical radiolucency-and success, denoting clinical normalcy combined with periapical healing.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and gray literature from January 1988 to December 2022. Article selection and data extraction were independently conducted by 3 reviewers. Selected studies underwent risk of bias assessment, and evidence quality using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Meta-analysis and meta-regression established pooled outcome rates, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and significant clinical prognostic factors (P < .05).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine articles were included. Pooled periapical healing rates using strict and loose criteria were 78.8% (95% CI: 75.2-82.4) and 87.5% (95% CI: 83.8-91.2), respectively. Pooled success rates using strict and loose criteria were 78.0% (95% CI: 74.9-81.2) and 86.4% (95% CI: 82.6-90.1), respectively. Meta-regression analyses revealed significant influences on NS-ReTx outcomes (P < .05), including periapical status, lesion size, apical root filling extent, and follow-up duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Contemporary NS-ReTx shows encouraging outcomes, achieving periapical healing and success rates ranging from approximately 78% (strict criteria) to 87% (loose criteria). The absence of or smaller preoperative lesions, adequate root filling length, and extended follow-ups significantly improve NS-ReTx outcomes. Integrating these factors into treatment planning is pivotal for optimizing the outcome of NS-ReTx.

Outcome of root canal retreatment filled with gutta-percha techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the success rate of root canal retreatment filled with gutta-percha and the variables related to retreatment success.

DATA

The PRISMA guidelines were followed for the present review. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Database of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42021283134). Risk assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Funnel plots were used to detect publication bias and asymmetry was assessed using Egger's tests.

SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and additional sources were searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies published until 10 December 2022. Clinical studies evaluating the success of root canal retreatment filled with gutta-percha with at least a 1-year follow-up were selected.

RESULTS

Ten studies and one unpublished study fulfilled the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis. The success rate of non-surgical root canal retreatment was 71% (95% CI: 66%-76%) with strict criteria and 87% (79% - 93%) with loose criteria for 1-3 years of follow-up, and 77% (66% - 86%) with strict criteria for a 4-5 years of follow-up. Endodontically retreated teeth with periapical lesions had a lower success rate under strict criteria. The tooth type, dental arch, initial periapical index (PAI) score, and the number of visits also affected the treatment success rate under strict criteria. For the loose criteria, teeth with larger periapical lesions and higher initial PAI scores had a lower success rate.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the present systematic review and meta-analysis, non-surgical root canal retreatment results in favourable outcomes. The presence of a periapical radiolucency, periapical lesions >5mm, a higher initial PAI score, multiple-visit retreatments, and mandibular and molar teeth resulted in a lower success rate.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Non-surgical root canal retreatment filled with gutta-percha techniques is a relatively predictable procedure with a high success rate. Several variables can affect retreatment success, mainly the presence and size of a periapical lesion and the type of tooth.

The effect of periapical lesion size on the success rate of different endodontic treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review evaluated the effect of periapical lesion (PL) size on the success rate of different endodontic treatments, including root canal treatment (RCT), non-surgical retreatment (NSR), and apical surgery (AS).

METHODS

Cohorts and randomized controlled trials investigating the outcomes of endodontic treatment of permanent teeth with PL and its size were identified electronically through Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases. Two reviewers independently conducted the study selection, data extraction, and critical appraisal process. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the 11-item Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist for randomized controlled trials. The success rates of the endodontic treatments (small lesions and large lesions) were estimated using the rate ratios (RRs) with an associated 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Out of 44 included studies, 42 were cohort, and 2 were randomized controlled trials. Thirty-two studies had poor quality. For the meta-analysis, five studies in RCT, 4 in NSR, and 3 in AS were considered. The RR of the endodontic treatment success in PLs was 1.04 in RCT (95% CI, 0.99-1.07), 1.11 in NSR (95% CI, 0.99-1.24), and 1.06 in AS (95% CI, 0.97-1.16). Only sub-group analysis of long-term follow-up of RCT showed a significantly higher success rate in small lesions than in large lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the quality of studies and variation in outcomes and size classification, our meta-analysis demonstrated that the PL size had no significant effect on the success rate of different endodontic treatments.

PROBE 2023 guidelines for reporting observational studies in endodontics: Explanation and elaboration

Observational studies play a critical role in evaluating the prevalence and incidence of conditions or diseases in populations as well as in defining the benefits and potential hazards of health-related interventions. There are currently no reporting guidelines for observational studies in the field of Endodontics. The Preferred Reporting Items for study Designs in Endodontology (PRIDE) team has developed and published new reporting guidelines for observational-based studies called the 'Preferred Reporting items for OBservational studies in Endodontics (PROBE) 2023' guidelines. The PROBE 2023 guidelines were developed exclusively for the speciality of Endodontics by integrating and adapting the 'STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)' checklist and the 'Clinical and Laboratory Images in Publications (CLIP)' principles. The recommendations of the Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines were adhered to throughout the process of developing the guidelines. The purpose of this document is to serve as a guide for authors by providing an explanation for each of the items in the PROBE 2023 checklist along with relevant examples from the literature. The document also offers advice to authors on how they can address each item in their manuscript before submission to a journal. The PROBE 2023 checklist is freely accessible and downloadable from the PRIDE website (http://pride-endodonticguidelines.org/probe/).

Outcome and associated predictors for nonsurgical management of large cyst-like periapical lesions: A CBCT-based prospective cohort study

AIM

The aim of this cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based study was to evaluate the outcome of nonsurgical root canal treatment (RCT) performed for the management of large cyst-like periapical lesions (LCPL) and to identify the predictive factors affecting healing.

METHODOLOGY

Fifty-four subjects (77 permanent maxillary anterior teeth) with LCPL (>10 mm) of endodontic origin were included. A single operator performed standardized multi-visit RCT. Patients were clinically and radiographically examined at 6, 12 months, and a CBCT scan was taken at 24 months. Two independent blinded evaluators measured the pre- and postoperative volume of periapical lesions on CBCT scans using ITK snap software (version 3.8.0-beta-20181028-win64). The outcome was assessed as a percentage change in lesion volume and dichotomized as success (resolved/reduced) or failure (unchanged/enlarged). Ten preoperative (gender; age; intraoral draining sinus, soft tissue swelling, tooth discoloration, pulp canal obliteration, open apex, root resorption, cortical bone defect and lesion volume) and four intraoperative (apical extent and density of root filling; number of treatment visits and type of root filling) predictive factors were observed. Bivariate and stepwise multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors affecting treatment outcomes. The significance level was set at 5%.

RESULTS

A recall rate of 88% was achieved. The success rate of RCT was 82.2% (8.9% resolved, 73.3% reduced). Median lesion volume reduction was 75% (IQR 61%-93%). No pre- or intra-operative factors were related to treatment failure. However, presence of preoperative cortical bone defect (palatal versus no cortical defect, β = -51.5; 95% CI: -86.9 to -16, p = .006) and apical extent of obturation (long versus flush, β = -27.2; 95% CI: -53.8 to -0.6, p = .04) were negatively associated with reduction in lesion volume (%).

CONCLUSION

Large cyst-like periapical lesions may be successfully managed with RCT. Preoperative cortical bone defect and apical extent of obturation may negatively influence osseous healing.

Macrophages in periapical lesions: Potential roles and future directions

Periapical lesions are infectious diseases that occur in the apical region of teeth. They result in the destruction of alveolar bone and are usually accompanied by swelling, pain, and possible systemic impacts. A complex interaction between pathogens and the host immune system determines the development, progression, and outcome of periapical lesions. The lesions, if not treated promptly, may cause resorption of bone tissue, destruction of the periodontal ligament, and loss of the affected teeth, all of which can severely worsen the quality of life of patients, often at considerable economic cost to both patients and medical organizations. Macrophages are a group of heterogeneous cells that have many roles in the development of infections, destruction and reconstruction of bone tissues, and microbe–host interactions. However, the differential and comprehensive polarization of macrophages complicates the understanding of the regulatory mechanism of periapical lesion progression. This report provides a comprehensive review of recent advances in our knowledge of the potential role of macrophages in determining the turnover of human periapical lesions. For example, macrophage differentiation might indicate whether the lesions are stable or progressing while the extent of bacteria invasion could regulate the differentiation and function of macrophages involved in the periapical lesion. In addition, alternative strategies for the treatment of apical periodontitis are discussed.

Outcome of single-visit- versus two-visit root canal retreatment in teeth with periapical lesions: a randomized clinical trial

AIM

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcome of single-visit root canal retreatment and to compare the results with conventional two-visit root canal retreatment as control group.

METHODOLOGY

One hundred root canal-treated, single-rooted asymptomatic teeth with periapical lesion were retreated by one operator. Fifty of the teeth were randomly assigned to the single-visit group and the others were treated in two-visits. In both groups, root canal filling material was removed, and re-instrumentation of the root canal was performed using step-back technique with hand files using 2.5% NaOCl and 5% EDTA as irrigants. In the single-visit group 5 ml 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) were applied as the final irrigation and in the two-visit group, calcium hydroxide paste was placed into the root canal as an interappointment dressing. All root canal obturations were performed with lateral compaction. All patients were followed up for 24 months. Success was determined depending on both healed and healing cases. The chi-square or Fisher's Exact test was used to analyse the differences between the groups for success rates and the factors affecting the outcome.

RESULTS

The recall rate was 89 (89%). At 24 months, 39 teeth (88.6%) were considered as healed, 3 teeth (6.8%) as healing, and 2 teeth (4.5%) were identified as failed in the single-visit group, while in the two-visit group 39 teeth (86.7%) had healed, 2 teeth (4.4%) were scored as healing, and 4 teeth (8.9%) as failed. There was no statistically significant difference in the success rates between the two groups (P > 0.05). Size of the lesion and the preoperative length of root canal filling had a statistically significant impact on the outcome (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

No statistically significant difference was observed in terms of healing in 24-month follow-up of retreatments completed in single-visit or two-visits in asymptomatic teeth with periapical lesions. Size of the periapical lesion and initial apical level of root canal filling have affected the outcome of root canal retreatment.