Dietary insulin index and load with risk of breast cancer in a case-control study

Dietary insulin indices and low-carbohydrate diet and the odds of colorectal cancer: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Regarding the role of insulin and insulin-inducing dietary factors in some cancers' etiology, we hypothesized that the risk of colorectal cancer may be lessened by following a lower carbohydrate and insulinogenic diet. Therefore, we performed this study to explore the association between a low-carbohydrate diet and insulin indices and the odds of colorectal cancer.

METHOD

This hospital-based case-control study was conducted on 150 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients and 300 healthy age- and sex-matched hospitalized controls. A valid and reliable food frequency questionnaire was used to calculate the insulin indices and low-carbohydrate diet score. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the association between insulin indices and low-carbohydrate diet and the odds of colorectal cancer.

RESULT

After adjusting for potential confounders, individuals in the highest tertile of insulin indices had a higher risk of colorectal cancer (OR insulin index  = 3.46; 95% CI, 2.00-5.96; OR insulin load  = 2; 95% CI, 1.17-3.41). No association was found between a low-carbohydrate diet and colorectal cancer (OR = 1.55; 95% CI, 0.85-2.84).

CONCLUSION

Current results demonstrated that a high insulinemic diet was associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer.

The association of dietary insulin load and index with the risk of cancer and cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Insulin levels play an important role in cancer development. However, the link between an insulinogenic diet and cancer is still unclear. Therefore, we performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to investigate the association between dietary insulin index (II) and load (IL) with cancer risk and mortality.

Methods

A comprehensive search between electronic databases (Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar) was conducted to identify relevant studies up to January 2022. The relative risks (RR) and Odds ratios (OR) were extracted from eligible studies, and meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled effect size.

Result

12 papers including 14 studies (10 cohorts and 4 case-control) were included for the meta-analysis. Among them, 10 studies reported effect size for the risk of cancer, and 4 studies reported effect size for cancer mortality. We observed no significant association between II and IL with cancer overall (RR_II: 1.03, 95%CI: 0.91-1.17, RR_IL: 1.16, 95%CI: 0.94-1.42) and in cohort studies, however, in case-control studies was related with higher odds of cancer (OR_II: 2.30, 95%CI: 1.21-4.38, OR_IL: 2.57, 95%CI: 1.64-4.02). Higher II and IL scores were associated with the increased risk of total (RR_II: 1.29, 95%CI: 1.02-1.63) and (RR_IL: 1.39, 95%CI: 1.06-1.83) and colorectal cancer mortality (RR_II: 1.29, 95%CI: 1.13-1.48) and (RR_IL: 1.37, 95%CI: 1.18-1.60).

Conclusion

Higher dietary II and IL were not associated with cancer risk in overall and cohort studies, whereas related with a higher risk of cancer in case-control studies. We observed a significant positive relation of II and IL with cancer mortality, especially CRC mortality.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-022-01013-3.