Considerable variation among Iranian dermatologists in the dosing and monitoring of methotrexate for treating psoriasis

Patient-ready syringes containing 25 mg/mL methotrexate can be kept at temperature ranging from 4 °C to 37 °C for up to 12 weeks for use in psoriatic and rheumatologic conditions

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate (MTX) is a mainstay drug in the treatment of psoriatic and rheumatologic conditions. Subcutaneous MTX has become a feasible treatment alternative with the development of prefilled syringes or autoinjectors containing MTX solution that can be self-administered by the patient at home. However, MTX prefilled auto-injector pens are still not available in some countries.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the stability and sterility of 25 mg/mL MTX solution in a disposable plastic syringe over a 12-week period under light protection at temperatures of 4 °C, 25 °C, and 37 °C.

METHODS

This study was conducted during November 2019 to February 2020 at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. Stability was evaluated using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography technique, and sterility was assessed by cultures for bacterial and fungal contamination.

RESULTS

Our results revealed that patient-ready syringes containing 25 mg/mL MTX solution can be prepared in advance and kept for up to 12 weeks under light protection, and they can be kept at temperatures ranging from 4 to 37 °C.

CONCLUSION

This system for delivering MTX to patients that are refractory to or intolerant of oral MTX via a self-administered pre-filled syringe is both efficient and easy to implement in care settings where commercially alternatives are not yet available.

Considerable variation among Iranian dermatologists in the knowledge and attitudes regarding the use of biologic agents to manage psoriasis. Int J Womens Dermatol 2020;5:356-360. [PMID: 31909157 PMCID: PMC6938863 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2019.09.010]

Background

Many international guidelines have been introduced with the aim of helping clinicians by providing evidence-based advice for the prescription of biologic therapies in psoriasis. Because no local or regional guideline is available, the treatment of psoriasis with biologics is mainly based on clinical experiences regarding the international guideline among Iranian dermatologists.

Objective

To assess the knowledge and attitudes among Iranian specialists regarding the use of biologic agents to manage psoriasis.

Methods

Data were collected using an electronic questionnaire specifically designed for this study based on a review of the literature. The designed Google form consisted of 53 multiple choice questions divided into five sections.

Results

A total of 111 dermatologists agreed to participate in this study. There was considerable variation among the responding dermatologists in terms of their knowledge and attitudes toward biologics. There were some significant associations between knowledge and attitudes of dermatologists toward biologics and their personal and professional characteristics.

Conclusions

More comprehensive educational approaches, both in the dermatology residency and postgraduation periods, could be very beneficial to promote the knowledge and attitude of the dermatologist in treating psoriasis with biologic agents. This study could be one of the first steps to develop a country-based or a region-based plan to improve the knowledge and attitude among dermatologists regarding the use of biologic drugs in psoriasis and possibly to reach a better status to prescribe these agents in the management of psoriasis.

Update on subcutaneous methotrexate for inflammatory arthritis and psoriasis

Methotrexate (MTX) is one of the mainstays of treatment for several immune-mediated inflammatory joint and skin diseases, especially rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Oral MTX has been used for the treatment of such diseases for decades for many reasons. There is, however, a relevant interpatient variability of clinical and safety outcomes that can also be related to differences in patients’ individual pharmacogenomic profile. Orally administered MTX has been found to have a saturable intestinal absorption and nonlinear pharmacokinetics, with significant consequences on drug bioavailability and clinical efficacy. The current evidence shows that parenterally administered MTX results in rapid and complete absorption, higher serum levels, and less variable exposure than oral dosing. The use of parenteral MTX, particularly when administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection, has recently raised great interest in order to overcome the limitations of oral MTX. The effectiveness and safety of SC MTX have mostly been assessed in rheumatological settings, especially in patients with RA. There are only a limited number of data on SC MTX in juvenile idiopathic arthritis and even fewer in psoriatic disease. Various clinical experiences have suggested that SC MTX is more effective than oral MTX and may provide significant benefit even in patients in whom oral MTX proved to be inadequate. The increased efficacy of SC MTX resulting from higher drug exposure compared with oral MTX has been associated with a similar safety profile and in various reports even with a lower frequency of gastrointestinal complaints. The aim of this article was to review the available literature data on SC MTX treatment of inflammatory arthritis, with special emphasis on RA and psoriasis, examining differences with oral MTX treatment. A brief mention of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic features and pharmacoeconomic considerations is also given.