Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in HIV-coinfected individuals: problems in diagnosis and treatment

Immune recovery-related patterns of post kala-azar dermal and ocular leishmaniasis in people living with HIV

OBJECTIVE

Post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) is a rare complication of visceral leishmaniasis. We aimed at reporting PKDL cases in people living with HIV (PLHIV) and compare their characteristics based on whether PKDL occurred in the context of immune recovery under antiretroviral therapy (ART) or not.

DESIGN

National survey and literature review.

METHODS

We called for observations in France in October 2020 and performed a literature review from PubMed (Medline) and Web of Science up to December 2020. Two groups of patients were defined based on whether PKDL occurred in the context of immune recovery under ART (group 1) or not (group 2), and compared.

RESULTS

Three PLHIV with PKDL identified in France in the last decade were described and added to 33 cases from the literature. Compared with group 2 (16/36, 44.4%), patients from group 1 (20/36, 55.6%) originated more frequently from Europe (12/20, 60% vs. 2/16, 12.5%; P  = 0.0038), had higher median blood CD4 + cell counts (221/μl vs. 61/μl; P  = 0.0005) and increase under ART (122/μl, interquartile range 73-243 vs. 33/μl, interquartile range 0-53; P  = 0.0044), had less frequently concomitant visceral leishmaniasis (3/20, 15% vs. 8/12, 66.7%; P  = 0.006), and a trend to more frequent ocular involvement (7/20, 35% vs. 1/16, 6.25%; P  = 0.0531).

CONCLUSION

In PLHIV, PKDL occurs after a cured episode of visceral leishmaniasis as part of an immune restoration disease under ART, or concomitant to a visceral leishmaniasis relapse in a context of AIDS. For the latter, the denomination 'disseminated cutaneous lesions associated with visceral leishmaniasis' seems more accurate than PKDL.

Decline in Clinical Efficacy of Oral Miltefosine in Treatment of Post Kala-azar Dermal Leishmaniasis (PKDL) in India

Background

Recent studies have shown significant decline in the final cure rate after miltefosine treatment in visceral leishmaniasis. This study evaluates the efficacy of miltefosine in the treatment of post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) patients recruited over a period of 5 years with 18 months of follow-up.

Methodology

In this study 86 confirmed cases of PKDL were treated with two different dosage regimens of miltefosine (Regimen I- 50mg twice daily for 90 days and Regimen II- 50 mg thrice for 60 days) and the clinical outcome assessed monthly. Cure/relapse was ascertained by clinical and histopathological examination, and measuring parasite burden by quantitative real-time PCR. In vitro susceptibility of parasites towards miltefosine was estimated at both promastigote and amastigote stages.

Results

Seventy three of eighty six patients completed the treatment and achieved clinical cure. Approximately 4% (3/73) patients relapsed by the end of 12 months follow-up, while a total of 15% (11/73) relapsed by the end of 18 months. Relapse rate was significantly higher in regimen II (31%) compared to regimen I (10.5%)(P<0.005). Parasite load at the pre-treatment stage was significantly higher (P<0.005) in cases that relapsed compared to the cases that remained cured. In vitro susceptibility towards miltefosine of parasites isolated after relapse was significantly lower (>2 fold) in comparison with the pre-treatment isolates (P<0.005).

Conclusion

Relapse rate in PKDL following miltefosine treatment has increased substantially, indicating the need of introducing alternate drugs/ combination therapy with miltefosine.

Increasing resistance to antimonials has paved the way for the oral drug miltefosine for PKDL treatment. Recent studies show a significant decline in the final cure rate of VL after miltefosine treatment in the Indian subcontinent. This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy of miltefosine treatment in a large number of PKDL cases with 18 months follow-up. PKDL cases that completed miltefosine treatment responded well and showed initial cure; however, with 18 months of follow up period, the final cure rate was only about 85%. Treatment regimen based on high dosage over short duration resulted in high relapse rate. We observed that the parasites isolated from the cases that relapsed were more tolerant to miltefosine (>2 fold) compared to the isolates from pre-treatment stage. Estimation of parasite load at pre-treatment stage indicated that the patients with higher initial parasitic burden were at a higher risk of relapse. The declining efficacy of monotherapy with miltefosine warrants the need of alternate regimens for treatment of PKDL.