Cutaneous manifestations of graft-versus-host disease: role of the dermatologist

Livedo-like acute cutaneous graft-versus-host disease in two children

We present two pediatric patients who exhibited an unusual clinical presentation of cutaneous acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), characterized by livedo-like appearance. Such manifestations of cutaneous acute GVHD have not been previously documented.

Survey of European Blood and Marrow Transplant (EBMT) nurses to explore the current topical skin management of chronic cutaneous graft versus host disease in the real-world clinical environment

PURPOSE

To understand the current practice in relation to the management of topical therapy for cutaneous chronic Graft versus Host Disease (ccGvHD) and access to extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) within European allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation centres by a survey of nurses.

METHOD

This was a multicentre cross-national study at eligible European Blood and Marrow Transplant centres. Eligibility required more than 30% of treated patients having allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant. Centres performing only autologous stem cell transplants were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

12% of respondents were unaware of whether their centre had a policy or not for monitoring chronic cutaneous graft versus host disease. Over half had the affiliation of a dermatologist for referral, but only 19% had access to a specialist nurse. Patient education was routinely provided in most of the centres (86%). Results suggested as the severity of a patient's chronic cutaneous graft versus host disease increased, there was a reduction in the amount of topical emollients and steroids employed. Following topical therapies, systemic treatments, and other modalities such as ECP were employed with less focus directed towards topical care.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical treatment is the backbone of any treatment paradigm for chronic cutaneous graft versus host disease, however, there is no universally agreed algorithm. Improved skin care may lead to a reduction in the amount of systemic therapy required, thus increasing patients' quality of life. There is little standardisation in the topical management of chronic cutaneous graft versus host disease, despite skin being the most cited organ affected by chronic graft versus host disease, this should be addressed.

Topical therapy and skin care for transplant-associated atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

New-onset allergic diseases, such as food allergy or atopic dermatitis, can develop after allogeneic transplantation. There are limited reports of new-onset atopic dermatitis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents, and its treatment is yet to be established. The pathogenesis may differ from typical atopic dermatitis in terms of alloimmunity including graft-versus-host disease.

METHODS

We present five children and adolescents with new-onset atopic dermatitis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The characteristics and clinical profiles of skin treatment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are summarized.

RESULTS

Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis included systemic tacrolimus for all patients. After hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, all patients achieved complete donor chimerism of the bone marrow and had acute graft-versus-host disease of the skin. After engraftment, all patients had skin lesions that met the international consensus diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis. None of the patients met the diagnostic criteria for chronic graft-versus-host disease. Topical therapy and skin care based on atopic dermatitis guidelines improved skin condition and atopic dermatitis severity scores in all patients. In addition, type 2 inflammatory markers improved accordingly.

CONCLUSION

Topical therapy and skin care may be effective for transplant-related atopic dermatitis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. When extensive dermatitis is observed after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, this treatment may avoid excessive immunosuppressive therapy if it meets the diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis.

Protocol for a feasibility trial (EXPRESS-C-GVHD) for an expressive helping intervention within a support group for cutaneous graft-versus-host-disease

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous graft-versus-host disease (cuGVHD) is a complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation that presents with varying severity and can significantly affect one's quality of life (QOL). No trials have yet tested nonpharmacologic interventions to improve the QOL of patients with cuGVHD. The primary objective of the Expressive Helping in Support Groups for Cutaneous GVHD (EXPRESS-C-GVHD) Trial is to evaluate the effect of a support group that employs expressive writing on cutaneous and systemic GVHD symptoms, general distress, and QOL immediately after the intervention. Secondary objectives include evaluating the impact of the intervention on QOL at 1 month post intervention, as well as willingness to participate, compliance, feasibility, and satisfaction.

METHODS

The EXPRESS-C-GVHD Trial will include patients with chronic cuGVHD who are at least 18 years old and able to use a writing utensil, have access to Zoom, an online video conference platform, and attend all four live support group sessions. Subjects will be recruited from the Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL and will participate in a 4 week program via Zoom. Program activities will be 1 h long and consist of 40 min of participant-led verbal reflection and discussion in a group setting in response to prompts, and 20 min of expressive writing. Participants will fill out a baseline willingness survey, follow-up surveys after every session, and post-intervention surveys at 2 weeks and 1 month after intervention.

DISCUSSION

The EXPRESS-C-GVHD Trial is a pilot trial and will assess whether a Zoom-based expressive writing intervention within the framework of a support group is feasible and can improve QOL outcomes among individuals with cuGVHD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered under number NCT05694832.

The Relevance of Skin Biopsies in General Internal Medicine: Facts and Myths

INTRODUCTION

Non-dermatology medical specialties may refer patients for skin biopsies, searching for a particular diagnosis. However, the diagnostic impact of the skin biopsy is not clearly established. This article aims to assess the indications for, and evaluate the clinical relevance of, skin biopsies in non-dermatology medical specialties.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to 23 non-dermatology specialty departments in a university medical center, requesting a list of indications for skin biopsies, as well as to 10 staff dermatologists to collect the indications of skin biopsies requested by non-dermatology specialties. Once the indications were collected, a literature search was performed to evaluate their clinical value and relevance.

RESULTS

Eleven non-dermatology specialties provided a list of skin biopsy indications, to which staff dermatologists added seven more indications. A literature search revealed evidence-based medicine data for six diseases, that is, amyloidosis, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, Sneddon's syndrome, intravascular lymphoma, sarcoidosis, and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Results were questionable concerning infectious endocarditis, acute graft-versus-host-disease, and the lupus band test. Skin biopsy were not evidenced as useful for the diagnosis of calciphylaxis, systemic scleroderma, Behçet's disease, or hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. For the diagnosis of Alport's syndrome, pseudoxanthoma elasticum, and vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, skin biopsy is currently outperformed by genetic analyses. For diagnoses such as Henoch-Schönlein purpura and Sjögren's syndrome, skin biopsy represents an additional item among other diagnostic criteria.

CONCLUSION

The usefulness of skin biopsy as requested by non-dermatology specialties is only evidenced for amyloidosis, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, Sneddon's syndrome, intravascular lymphoma, sarcoidosis, chronic graft-versus-host-disease, Henoch-Schönlein purpura, and Sjögren's syndrome.

IFNG-AS1 and MAF4 long non-coding RNAs are upregulated in acute leukemia patients who underwent bone marrow transplantation

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) is an immune-mediated reaction that results in impaired immune and body function after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). lncRNAs have been discovered as particular T cell regulators, and alloreactive T cells have been known as a critical factor in aGVHD. As a result, we investigated the importance of lnc-MAF4 and IFNG-AS1 expression levels in aGVHD patients versus non-aGVHD patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This research included 38 patients with hematological disorders who were undergoing primary allo-HSCT. Human identical siblings or unrelated donors were used to collect stem cell. Samples were taken within days 0, 7, 14, 28, and 52±8 after transplantation. The expression of lncRNA levels was measured using the QRT-PCR technique. And the data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 6 RESULTS: Our data revealed that LncRNA MAF4 and INFG-AS1 expression levels in aGVHD were not significantly different compared to the non-GVHD group immediately after transplantation, nor at day 7 or 14. However, the aGVHD group showed an overt up-regulation of the two lncRNAs on samples taken at day 28 and 52±8 compared to non-GVHD patients.

DISCUSSION

Since the intracellular pathway of these lncRNAs shows a direct relationship with the IFNγ cytokine production resulting in differentiation to TH1 cells and inhibition of differentiation to TH2 cells, they can be, therefore, considered as suitable molecular candidates for the prediction of aGVHD in patients receiving HSCT.

Methods to Assess Disease Activity and Severity in Cutaneous Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: A Critical Literature Review

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), a potentially debilitating complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation, confers increased risk for mortality. Whereas treatment decisions rely on an accurate assessment of disease activity/severity, validated methods of assessing cutaneous cGVHD activity/severity appear to be limited. In this study, we aimed to identify and evaluate current data on the assessment of disease activity/severity in cutaneous cGVHD. Using modified PRISMA methods, we performed a critical literature review for relevant articles. Our literature search identified 1741 articles, of which 1635 were excluded as duplicates or failure to meet inclusion criteria. Of the included studies (n = 106), 39 (37%) addressed clinical and/or histopathologic parameters, 53 (50%) addressed serologic parameters, 8 (7.5%) addressed imaging parameters, and 6 (5.5%) addressed computer-based technologies. The only formally validated metric of disease activity/severity assessment in cutaneous cGVHD is the National Institutes of Health consensus scoring system, which is founded on clinical assessment alone. The lack of an objective marker for cGVHD necessitates further studies. An evaluation of the potential contributions of serologic, imaging, and/or computer-based technologies is warranted.

A clinical and histological comparison between acute cutaneous graft-versus-host disease and other maculopapular eruptions following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Prompt management of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) may prevent its morbidity and mortality. Maculopapular (MP) eruption is a presenting sign of acute GVHD, but differentiation from other causes of MP rash is challenging.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted among patients developing MP eruptions after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We compared the clinical and histopathological differences between an acute cutaneous GVHD (group 1) and other MP eruptions (group 2). We also determined the clinical prognostic indicators linked to acute GVHD severity, morbidity, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of 95 patients identified, 75 met the classification criteria for acute GVHD, and 25 had other MP eruptions. Palm and/or sole involvement was more frequently found (51.4% vs. 12%, odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval] = 7 [2.1, 23.7], P < 0.01 and 41.4% vs. 0%, OR 37.2 [2.2, 635], P < 0.01, respectively) in group 1 than in group 2. Comparing the histological features between the two groups, necrotic keratinocytes in basal and spinous layers (92.9% vs. 22.2%, OR 27 [3.5, 594.7], P < 0.01) and (85.7% vs. 33.3%, OR 9.3 [1.4, 60.8], P = 0.02, respectively), diffuse basal vacuolization (42.9% vs. 0%, OR 14.5 [0.7, 298.2], P = 0.04), lymphocyte satellitosis (71.4% vs. 0%, OR 44.3 [2.1, 936.8], P < 0.01), and subepidermal clefts (42.9% vs. 0%, OR 14.5 [0.7, 298.2], P = 0.04) were significantly more apparent in group 1. Among extracutaneous presentations, diarrhea alone and/or accompanied by hyperbilirubinemia (47.1% vs. 16%, OR 4.3 [1.4, 13.1], P = 0.03 and 27.1% vs. 0%, OR 19.3 [1.1, 332.8], P < 0.01, respectively) and newly developed transaminitis (37.1% vs. 12%, OR 3.3 [1.1, 12.6], P = 0.02) suggested the diagnosis of acute GVHD. Mucosal involvement and/or blister formation correlated with severe acute GVHD (OR 26.6 [5.4, 130.4], P < 0.01). Skin and systemic GVHD severity correlated with time to rash resolution (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively), length of hospital stays (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively), and mortality (OR 4.87 [1.4, 17.4], P = 0.02 and OR 4.6 [1.3, 16.5], P = 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings may be beneficial tools for establishing the diagnosis of acute GVHD.

Local immune cell infiltration in cutaneous acute graft versus host disease

Background

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant is a crucial intervention to definitively treat many hematopoietic malignancies, but it carries great risks of morbidity and mortality often associated with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Acute and chronic GVHD are distinct entities, defined by a combination of historical, clinical, and pathologic data, but both are generally thought to stem from self-propagating aberrantly activated immune cells inflicting end organ damage, with the potential to cause significant illness or even death. Event-free survival rates after hematopoietic stem cell transplant continue to improve each year, but GVHD remains a major hurdle in improving the efficacy and safety of transplant.

Objective

Recent studies demonstrating tissue-specific immune effector phenotypes underscore the need for a deeper understanding of the cellular and molecular pathways driving the destruction of target tissues in patients with acute GVHD.

Methods

Samples were collected from lesional and unaffected skin in five patients with acute cutaneous GHVD. Fresh tissue was processed for fluorescence-activated cell sorting and analysis of macrophages and lymphocytes.

Results

The percentage of lymphocytes and macrophages as a representation of total cells varied among patients and was not always consistent between lesional and unaffected sites. The heterogeneity in immune cell profiling observed in patients in this study could reflect the diverse demographics, conditioning, and transplant conditions of each individual.

Conclusion

This study provides initial insight into the underlying molecular mechanisms of cutaneous GVHD progression and paves the way for additional studies to examine the cellular and molecular landscape in greater detail.

Are apoptosis-determining techniques useful to establish an early diagnosis of acute graft-vs-host disease in pediatric patients under treatment with multiple drugs?

BACKGROUND

There are no pathognomonic histopathological features to distinguish acute graft-vs-host disease (aGVHD) from skin drug reactions (SDRs) in pediatric patients with multiple drug regimens that have received blood transfusions and/or transplants. We aimed to determine if the addition of apoptosis markers is helpful to distinguish aGVHD from SDRs in these patients.

METHODS

Skin biopsy specimens from patients with a clinical diagnosis of aGVHD or SDRs were evaluated for the presence of apoptotic bodies, satellitosis, interface damage, vasculitis, and inflammatory infiltrate on H&E stain. Information was completed with apoptotic markers (transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling [TUNEL], bcl-2, and caspase-3).

RESULTS

The skin biopsy specimens of 32 patients with aGVHD and 11 with SDRs were included for study. Only the number of apoptotic keratinocytes per 10 high-power fields (hpf) showed a significant difference between both groups (P = 0.02); the presence of ≥4 apoptotic keratinocytes per 10 hpf was identified as the optimal cut-off point to discriminate aGVHD from SDRs. No SDRs cases had follicular apoptotic cells. TUNEL, bcl-2, and caspase-3 determination showed no difference between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of ≥4 apoptotic keratinocytes per 10 hpf (in aGVHD) and the absence of follicular apoptotic cells (in SDRs) might be a useful marker to distinguish between them.

Common and critical inflammatory dermatoses every pathologist should know

Inflammatory dermatopathology remains a challenging area for surgical pathologists. Yet every surgical pathologist encounters inflammatory dermatoses as part of routine practice. This review will focus on selected diagnoses that are either commonly encountered in the routine practice of surgical pathology or are critically important. The following entities will be covered: spongiotic dermatoses, lichen simplex chronicus, and early lichen sclerosus in the setting of vulvar biopsies, as well as graft versus host disease, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, granuloma anulare, pyoderma gangrenosum, and calciphylaxis. Practical points and key histologic features will be emphasized.

Novel therapeutic approaches in utilizing platelet lysate in regenerative medicine: Are we ready for clinical use?

Hemoderivative materials are used to treat different diseases. These derivatives include platelet-rich plasma, serum, platelet gel, and platelet lysate (PL). Among them, PL contains more growth factors than the others and its production is inexpensive and easy. PL is one of the proper sources of platelet release factors. It is used in cells growth and proliferation and is a good alternative to fetal bovine serum. In recent years, the clinical use of PL has gained more appeal by scientists. PL is a solution saturated by growth factors, proteins, cytokines, and chemokines and is administered to treat different diseases such as wound healing, bone regeneration, alopecia, oral mucositis, radicular pain, osteoarthritis, and ocular diseases. In addition, it can be used in cell culture for cell therapy and tissue transplantation purposes. Platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, insulin-like growth factor, transforming growth factor β, and vascular endothelial growth factor are key PL growth factors playing a major role in cell proliferation, wound healing, and angiogenesis. In this paper, we scrutinized recent advances in using PL and PL-derived growth factors to treat diseases and in regenerative medicine, and the ability to replace PL with other hemoderivative materials.

Dermatologic Urgencies and Emergencies: What Every Pathologist Should Know

CONTEXT.—

Fatal dermatologic diseases and ones with high morbidity can occur in the inpatient setting. In such cases, prompt and accurate assessment of a bedside skin biopsy is required. This may be challenging for many pathologists who are not familiar with the complexity of skin pathology and skin terminology within the fields of dermatopathology and dermatology.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide the pathologist with a practical, up-to-date, and "must-know" reference guide on dermatologic urgencies and emergencies from a real-world perspective, highlighting diagnostic pearls, diagnostic pitfalls, and commonly encountered practice gaps. This review will focus on key diseases with which every pathologist should be familiar, including angioinvasive fungal infections, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, staph-scalded-skin syndrome, acute graft-versus-host disease, bullous pemphigoid, calciphylaxis, Sweet syndrome and its histiocytoid variant, pyoderma gangrenosum, and leukocytoclastic vasculitis, as well as those in their clinical and histopathologic differential.

DATA SOURCES.—

This review is based on peer-reviewed literature and our personal experiences with these diseases at major academic institutions, including one where a large number of stem cell transplants are performed. This review is unique as it represents collaborative expert opinion from both a dermatopathology and a dermatology standpoint.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This review outlines the critical role that the pathologist plays in the outcomes of patients with dermatologic urgencies and emergencies. Improved patient care will result from prompt and accurate histopathologic diagnoses as well as an open line of communication with the dermatologist.

Follicular Graft-versus-host Disease: A Rare Manifestation in a Patient with the Overlap Subtype of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a frequent and potentially life-threatening complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although skin involvement is common, generalized follicular eruption as the major clinical manifestation is rare. However, it is important for clinicians to recognize it at the earliest to initiate an appropriate therapy. We report a case of a patient with multiple myeloma who developed extensive hyperkeratotic, lichenoid folliculocentric papules with perifollicular erythema on day 53 following an allogeneic HSCT. The overall clinical and histological findings were consistent with the overlap subtype of chronic follicular GVHD.

Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation in the Modulation of Human Diseases

This review focuses primarily on the beneficial effects for human health of exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR). UVR stimulates anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive pathways in skin that modulate psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and vitiligo; suppresses cutaneous lesions of graft-versus-host disease; and regulates some infection and vaccination outcomes. While polymorphic light eruption and the cutaneous photosensitivity of systemic lupus erythematosus are triggered by UVR, polymorphic light eruption also frequently benefits from UVR-induced immunomodulation. For systemic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, type 1 diabetes, asthma, schizophrenia, autism, and cardiovascular disease, any positive consequences of UVR exposure are more speculative, but could occur through the actions of UVR-induced regulatory cells and mediators, including 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D₃, interleukin-10, and nitric oxide. Reduced UVR exposure is a risk factor for the development of several inflammatory, allergic, and autoimmune conditions, including diseases initiated in early life. This suggests that UVR-induced molecules can regulate cell maturation in developing organs.

Xanthomatous Cells in Cutaneous Graft-Versus-Host Disease Biopsies: A Clue for the Diagnosis of Hepatic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is one of the most common and serious complications of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation that mainly affects the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and liver. Hepatic GVHD is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and its diagnosis can be especially challenging because of nonspecific clinical signs and symptoms. It must be suspected in patients with elevated liver enzymes and cholestasis, especially in those with a history of preceding skin rash and diarrhea. We describe 3 patients with cutaneous and hepatic GVHD that presented with severe hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia, and no xanthomatous macular lesions, in which cutaneous biopsies revealed the presence of xanthomatous dermal histiocytes. We propose that the presence of these xanthomatous cells in skin biopsies from patients with cutaneous GVHD could be a dermatopathological clue for the diagnosis of hepatic GVHD.