Predicting risk for seroma development after axillary or inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma patients

Using the Merlin assay for reducing sentinel lymph node biopsy complications in melanoma: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The assessment of the sentinel lymph node is a cornerstone of melanoma staging. However, ~80% of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) are negative and nontherapeutic, and patients are unnecessarily exposed to surgery-related complications. Here, we gauged the potential of the Merlin assay to reduce SLNB-associated complications. The Merlin assay uses clinicopathologic variables and tumor gene expression profiling to identify low-risk patients who may forgo SLNB.

METHODS

We utilized the Merlin test development cohort to determine SLNB complication rates for procedures performed between 2004 and 2018 at Mayo Clinic. Complications evaluated were lymphedema, seroma, infection/cellulitis, hematoma, and wound dehiscence. Patients who underwent a completion lymph node dissection were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 558 patients were included. The overall 90-day complication rate specific to SLNB (1 year for lymphedema) was 17.4%. The most common complications were seroma (9.3%), infection/cellulitis (4.8%), and lymphedema (4.3%). All three were more common in patients with a lower extremity primary tumor location versus other locations. With Merlin test results applied, SLNB-related complications would have decreased by 59%.

CONCLUSION

SLNB is a safe procedure but carries a significant complication rate. Merlin testing might reduce the need for SLNB and its associated complications.

Seroma after Simple Mastectomy in Breast Cancer-The Role of CD4+ T Helper Cells and the Evidence as a Possible Specific Immune Process

Seroma development after breast cancer surgery is the most common postoperative complication seen after mastectomy but neither its origin nor its cellular composition is known. To investigate the assumption of immunological significance, one of the first aims of this pilot study is to describe the cellular content of collected seroma fluids and its corresponding serum in patients with simple mastectomy after needle aspiration, as well as the serum of healthy controls. The content of red blood cells (RBC) was measured by haemato-counter analyses, and the lymphocyte identification/quantification was conducted by flow cytometry analyses in seroma fluid (SFl) and the sera of patients (PBp) as well as controls (PBc). Significantly lower numbers of RBCs were measured in SFl. Cytotoxic T cells are significantly reduced in SFl, whereas T helper (Th) cells are significantly enriched compared to PBp. Significantly higher numbers of Th2 cells were found in SFl and PBp compared to PBc. The exact same pattern is seen when analyzing the Th17 subgroup. In conclusion, in contrast to healthy controls, significantly higher Th2 and Th17 cell subgroup-mediated immune responses were measured in seroma formations and were further confirmed in the peripheral blood of breast cancer (including DCIS) patients after simple mastectomy. This could lead to the assumption of a possible immunological cause for the origin of a seroma.

Randomized Study of Wound Drainage on Early Complications After Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma

INTRODUCTION

The complication rate after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in melanoma patients is high. The aim of this randomized non-inferiority study was to evaluate the effect of postoperative wound drainage on early complications after ALND and ILND.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2018 and 2020, 104 stage III melanoma patients operated on with ALND or ILND were randomized to a study group with complete wound drain removal 3 wk after surgery or a control group with progressive drain removal. The primary end point was overall early complications graded according to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary endpoints were length of hospital stay and prognostic factors for early complications.

RESULTS

Of the 99 patients analyzed, ALND was performed in 58 patients and ILND in 41 patients. Overall, 62 patients (62.6%) developed early complications: 30 in the study group and 32 in the control group (P = 0.53). The confidence interval for the difference in proportions of patients without early complications in the two groups was -0.27 to 0.11 (P = 0.42), hence non-inferiority could be claimed. Length of hospital stay was 5 d in the study group compared to 6 in the control group (P < 0.01). ILND was associated with increased risk of early complications compared to ALND (75.6% versus 53.4%, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Complete drain removal 3 wk after ALN and ILND in stage III melanoma patients did not increase the risk of early complications compared to progressive drain removal.

Proposed quality performance indicators of sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND

Melanoma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Australia and New Zealand. New Zealand has the highest melanoma incidence in the world alongside Australia at 54 per 100 000 persons. The aim of this study is to conduct a retrospective quality audit of sentinel lymph nodal biopsy (SLNB) practices from 2007 to 2019 of a high-volume melanoma surgeon. Primary outcome was false negative rate (FNR). Secondary outcomes were sentinel node (SN) identification and removal rate, and complication rates.

METHODS

A database was maintained, containing n = 553 consecutive SLNB's for cutaneous melanoma from 31 August 2007 to 31 August 2019. Patient characteristics and details of the primary lesion, sentinel lymph node biopsy, recurrence and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

SN's were successfully identified in 444 (99.6%) out of 446 patients with an FNR of 9.1%. Positive SN's were identified in 70 (12.7%) SLNB's. Complications occurred in 76 out of 553 (13.7%) SLNB's. A review of internationally published literature reveals an SN identification rate of 94.4-99.5% with an FNR of 4.0-37.5%. SLNB is the best staging tool for melanoma and gives potential access to adjuvant systemic treatment if >1 mm deposits are found. It is a day-stay procedure with a low-complication rate.

CONCLUSION

SLNB is a safe and reliable procedure utilized for cutaneous melanoma. We propose our data should be used alongside international SN series to establish Quality Performance Indicators to improve melanoma management.