Low expression of miR-204 is associated with expression of CD34 and poor performance status in denovo AML

Research progress on molecular biomarkers of acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common type of adult acute leukemia. The pathophysiology of the disease has been studied intensively at the cellular and molecular levels. At present, cytogenetic markers are an important basis for the early diagnosis, prognostic stratification and treatment of AML. However, with the emergence of new technologies, the detection of other molecular markers, such as gene mutations and epigenetic changes, began to play important roles in evaluating the occurrence and development of diseases. Recent evidence shows that identifying new AML biomarkers contributes to a better understanding of the molecular mechanism of the disease and is essential for AML screening, diagnosis, prognosis monitoring, and individualized treatment response. In this review, we summarized the promising AML biomarkers from four aspects, which contributing to a better understanding of the disease. Of course, it must be soberly aware that we have not listed all biomarkers of AML. Anyway, the biomarkers we mentioned are representative. For example, mutations in TP53, FLT3, and ASXL1 suggest poor prognosis, low remission rate, short survival period, and often require allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The CEBPA double mutation, NPM1 and CBF mutation suggest that the prognosis is good, the remission rate is high, the survival period is long, and the effect of chemotherapy or autotherapy is good. As for other mutations mentioned in the article, they usually predict a moderate prognosis. All in all, we hope it could provide a reference for the precise diagnosis and treatment of AML.

MicroRNA-1306-5p Regulates the METTL14-Guided m6A Methylation to Repress Acute Myeloid Leukemia

miRNA and m6A methylation are two key regulators in cancers. However, in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the relationship of miRNA and m6A methylation remains unclear. The present work is aimed at determining the effect of m6A methylation induced by miRNAs on AML and its underlying mechanism. The expression of METTL14 was detected by qRT-PCR and western blot. The growth of HL-60 cells was analyzed by CCK-8, Transwell assay, and flow cytometry. Tumor-bearing mice were established, and Ki-67 staining assay was used to detect the proliferation in vivo. Dual luciferase reporter system detected the effect of miR-1306-5p on METTL14 luciferase activity. Dot blot analysis detected m6A methylation. We found that METTL14 was upregulated in AML patients and overexpressed METTL14 promoted AML development. Further analysis indicated that METTL14 was directly targeted by miR-1306-5p and overexpressed miR-1306-5p alleviated AML progression. In addition, m6A methylation level regulated by METTL14 could be affected by miR-1306-5p. In conclusion, we found that suppressed miR-1306-5p enhanced AML progression by elevating m6A methylation level via upregulating METTL14. These findings provided basis for the development of new strategies for treating AML.

Leukemic Stem Cell: A Mini-Review on Clinical Perspectives

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are known for their ability to proliferate and self-renew, thus being responsible for sustaining the hematopoietic system and residing in the bone marrow (BM). Leukemic stem cells (LSCs) are recognized by their stemness features such as drug resistance, self-renewal, and undifferentiated state. LSCs are also present in BM, being found in only 0.1%, approximately. This makes their identification and even their differentiation difficult since, despite the mutations, they are cells that still have many similarities with HSCs. Although the common characteristics, LSCs are heterogeneous cells and have different phenotypic characteristics, genetic mutations, and metabolic alterations. This whole set of alterations enables the cell to initiate the process of carcinogenesis, in addition to conferring drug resistance and providing relapses. The study of LSCs has been evolving and its application can help patients, where through its count as a biomarker, it can indicate a prognostic factor and reveal treatment results. The selection of a target to LSC therapy is fundamental. Ideally, the target chosen should be highly expressed by LSCs, highly selective, absence of expression on other cells, in particular HSC, and preferentially expressed by high numbers of patients. In view of the large number of similarities between LSCs and HSCs, it is not surprising that current treatment approaches are limited. In this mini review we seek to describe the immunophenotypic characteristics and mechanisms of resistance presented by LSCs, also approaching possible alternatives for the treatment of patients.