Multicenter evaluation of analytical performances of platelet counts and platelet parameters: Carryover, precision, and stability

Reproducibility and stability of the immature platelet fraction using Sysmex XN-10

BACKGROUND

The Immature Platelet Fraction (IPF) is an indicator of thrombopoiesis which is a useful parameter in thrombocytopenia. It demonstrates compensatory mechanisms in production of platelets, but currently not implemented in routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to establish the reproducibility and stability of IPF, for both percentage (%-IPF) and absolute (A-IPF) measurements.Material/methods: A total of 71 samples, of which 45 for reproducibility and 26 for stability analysis, were assayed for full blood count using the Sysmex XN-10 analyser at room temperature (RT:19-25 °C). For reproducibility analysis, IPF measurements were analysed 11 times by different appraisers using the same sample, while for stability analysis, IPF was measured over fourteen hourly-intervals up to 24 h (n = 21) and then separately extended beyond the point of stability to 72 h (n = 5).

RESULTS

Reproducibility analysis of %-IPF and A-IPF (n = 45) showed very reliable results, with the range of mean CV% values between 1.25-8.90% and 1.70-9.96%, respectively. On the other hand, overall, stability analysis of %-IPF and A-IPF (n = 21) at RT over 24 h showed reliable results, with pooled mean CV% values of 1.32% and 1.43%, respectively, with no significant difference between %-IPF and A-IPF (p = 0.767 and p = 0.821). All %-IPF and A-IPF values had exceeded the set acceptance criterion of stability (CV% ≥ 10.0%) before 72 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, %-IPF and A-IPF reproducibility and storage at RT for 24 h predominantly demonstrates the suitability of their usage for testing on the Sysmex XN-series analysers.

Performance evaluation of a novel platelet count parameter, hybrid platelet count, on the BC-780 automated hematology analyzer

OBJECTIVES

Automated hematology analysis is expected to improve the performance of platelet counting. We evaluated the performance of a new platelet counting, hybrid (PLT-H) and also impedance (PLT-I) and optical (PLT-O) on the BC-780 automated hematology analyzer compared to the international reference method (IRM) in blood samples with thrombocytopenic and platelet interference.

METHODS

The basic platelet count performance of the BC-780 automated hematology analyzer was evaluated according to the requirements of the Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute (CLSI) Document H26-A2. Additionally, the thrombocytopenic (low PLT count) blood samples and the platelet interference blood samples including fragmented red blood cells (RBCs), microcytes or small RBCs, and giant platelets were determined with the BC-780 hematology analyzer compared to the IRM.

RESULTS

Blank counting and the carry-over contamination rate of platelet count using the BC-780 both met the manufacturers' claim. For both 123 thrombocytopenic and 232 platelet interference blood samples (72 fragmented RBCs, 91 microcytes and 51 giant platelets), all three platelet counting methods exhibited high comparability with the IRM (the lowest correlation (r)=0.916). Interestingly, the comparability of PLT-H (r=0.928-0.986) with the IRM was better than that of PLT-I (r=0.916-0.979).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of PLT-H in the BC-780 met the manufacturer's specifications. PLT-H exhibits better reproducibility than did PLT-I, correlates well with the PLT-O for thrombocytopenic samples and demonstrates good anti-interference ability. PLT-H counting is therefore recommended as a zero-cost alternative platelet counting method for platelet interference samples in clinical settings.

Stability over time of immature platelet fraction and comparison between EDTA and citrated whole blood samples

BACKGROUND

Immature platelets (IP) are the youngest circulating platelets, released from megakaryocytes, and demonstrating increased dimensions, significant RNA content, and enhanced activity. Immature platelet research focuses on a differential diagnostic help in patients with thrombocytopenia. The objectives of this study were to compare the variability of IP in citrate and EDTA samples, and to determine stability over time.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients were included for comparison between EDTA and citrate whole blood sample collection. Among the patients, 28 had thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 150G/L). Platelet measurement impedancemetry and fluorimetry were performed with Sysmex XN-9000. The immature platelet fraction (IPF) and absolute immature platelet count (A-IPC) were determined with a fluorescent method.

RESULTS

The mean value of platelet count with fluorescence was, in EDTA sample, 215 ± 171 and, in citrate sample, 153 ± 118 G/L. No significant difference was observed between IPF between EDTA and citrate (7.74 ± 6.68% vs. 8.45 ± 7.37%, p = 0.69), respectively. With the Bland-Altman analysis, the mean difference in the EDTA sample, between 1 and 24 h, was 8.06 ± 6.96% and 8.73 ± 7.12% for IPF, whereas in the citrate sample, between 1 and 6 h, it was 8.60 ± 7.29% and 7.54 ± 6.97%, for IPF. Comparing 1 h EDTA sample with 6 h citrate sample, the variance ratio was 0.974 (95% CI: 0.864-1.084) in IPF.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed the potential to conduct IP measurements up to 24 h in the EDTA sample and IPF measurements in the citrate sample for up to 6 h. These results may be useful for the use of IPF, which is a promising parameter whose interest in clinical practice and standardization is not yet well defined.

Alinity hq platelet count is not impacted by severe microcytosis

Background

Impedance technology has been shown to overestimate platelet (PLT) count in samples with microcytes, while the optical‐fluorescence PLT count (PLT‐F) by Sysmex has been suggested to be unaffected by microcytosis. The Abbott Alinity hq analyzer employs multi‐dimensional optical PLT counting. Our goal was to assess the accuracy of this technology in microcytic samples.

Methods

Platelet measurements were performed by Alinity hq and the impedance (PLT‐I) and PLT‐F methods on a Sysmex XN‐3000 analyzer on 464 samples. PLT concentration range was 6.56–947 × 10⁹/L and mean cell volume (MCV) 40.9–123.0 fL. Samples were categorized into normocytic (MCV > 80 fL), microcytic (MCV 65–80 fL), and severely microcytic (MCV < 65 fL) groups.

Results

Alinity hq PLT count showed excellent agreement with PLT‐F (r = 1.00). Sysmex PLT‐I data showed somewhat weaker correlation with both PLT‐F and Alinity hq (r = 0.98). Increasing bias between Sysmex PLT‐I and PLT‐F was seen with decreasing MCV values, with mean bias of 35.2 × 10⁹/L in severe microcytosis. An inverse relationship was demonstrated between the PLT‐I versus PLT‐F bias and MCV (p < 0.0001). Consistent mean bias was observed between Alinity hq and PLT‐F across all MCV ranges.

Mean platelet volume was suppressed or flagged by Sysmex XN in 50% of the samples in the severely microcytic group, and markedly higher red cell distribution width (RDW) was reported compared to Alinity hq (18.1% vs 13.7%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The Sysmex PLT‐I method overestimated the PLT count in samples with severe microcytosis. Alinity hq provided PLT counts and PLT and RBC indices that were not impacted by microcytosis.

Performance of Platelet Counting in Thrombocytopenic Samples: Comparison between Mindray BC-6800Plus and Sysmex XN-9000

The performance of platelet (PLT) counting in thrombocytopenic samples is crucial for transfusion decisions. We compared PLT counting and its reproducibility between Mindray BC-6800Plus (BC-6800P, Mindray, Shenzhen, China) and Sysmex XN-9000 (XN, Sysmex, Kobe, Japan), especially focused on thrombocytopenic samples. We analyzed the correlation and agreement of PLT-I channels in both analyzers and BC-6800P PLT-O mode and XN PLT-F channel in 516 samples regarding PLT counts. Ten thrombocytopenic samples (≤2.0 × 10⁹/L by XN PLT-F) were measured 10 times to investigate the reproducibility with the desirable precision criterion, 7.6%. The correlation of BC-6800P PLT-I and XN PLT-I was arranged moderate to very high; but the correlation of BC-6800P PLT-O and XN PLT-F was arranged high to very high. Both BC-6800P PLT-I vs. XN PLT-I and BC-6800P PLT-O vs. XN PLT-F showed very good agreement (κ = 0.93 and κ = 0.94). In 41 discordant samples between BC-6800P PLT-O and XN PLT-F at transfusion thresholds, BC-6800P PLT-O showed higher PLT counts than XN-PLT-F, except the one case. BC-6800P PLT-O exceeded the precision criterion in one of 10 samples; but XN PLT-F exceeded it in six of 10 samples. BC-6800P would be a reliable option for PLT counting in thrombocytopenic samples with good reproducibility.

Full-field hemocytometry. Forty years of progress seen through Clinical and Laboratory Hematology and the International Journal of Laboratory Hematology

The extraordinary advances in clinical hematology, biology, and oncology in the last decades would not have been possible without discovering how to identify and count the cells circulating in the blood. For centuries, scientists have used slides, counting chambers (hemocytometers), and diluting and staining solutions for this task. Then, automated hemocytometry began. This science, now linked to the daily routine of laboratory hematology, has completed an overwhelming path over a few decades. Our laboratories today operate with versatile multiparameter systems, ranging from complex single-channel instruments to bulky continuous flow machines. In terms of clinical information obtained from a simple routine blood test, the full exploitation of their potential depends on the operators' imagination and courage. A comprehensive review of the scientific publications that have accompanied the development of hemocytometry from the 1950s to today would require entire volumes. More than seven hundred contributions that authors worldwide have published in Clinical and Laboratory Haematology until 2007 and then the International Journal of Laboratory Hematology are summarized. Such journals have represented and hopefully will continue to represent the privileged place of welcome for future scientific research in hemocytometry. Improved technologies, attention to quality, new reagents and electronics, information technology, and scientist talent ensure a more profound and deeper knowledge of cell properties: current laboratory devices measure and count even minor immature or pathological cell subpopulations. Full-field hemocytometry includes the analysis of nonhematic fluids, digital adds to the microscope, and the development of effective point-of-care devices.

Alinity hq platelet results are equivalent with the international reference method in thrombocytopenic samples

INTRODUCTION

Accurate and precise platelet (PLT) count is critical for the appropriate management of patients with thrombocytopenia. This study evaluated the performance of PLT counting with the Abbott Alinity hq hematology analyzer, which utilizes multi-dimensional optical technology.

METHODS

Imprecision, linearity, and accuracy were assessed per CLSI guidelines. Alinity hq PLT results were compared to the international flow cytometry reference method (IRM) in the concentration range of 6.3 to 103.0 × 10⁹ /L. Additional comparisons were made with Sysmex XN-3000 PLT counts: impedance (PLT-I), optical (PLT-O), and optical fluorescent (PLT-F) methods.

RESULTS

The average within-run %CV was 4.7% on patient samples with PLT concentrations ranging from 13.1 to 41.7 × 10⁹ /L, and the within-laboratory %CV was 3.6% at the level of 68.2 × 10⁹ /L. Linearity evaluation indicated a maximum deviation of 3.1% from the linear fit in the range of 0.1 to 316.8 × 10⁹ /L. Comparison between Alinity hq and the IRM PLT counts yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.99 and predicted bias of 0.0 and -0.5 × 10⁹ /L at 10.0 and 20.0 × 10⁹ /L transfusion thresholds, respectively. Alinity hq PLT counts also correlated well with Sysmex PLT counts, with strongest correlation obtained with PLT-F and PLT-O (r = .99) methods.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated excellent analytical performance of Alinity hq PLT counting in thrombocytopenic samples, equivalency with the IRM and strong agreement with Sysmex PLT-F and PLT-O methods. The Alinity hq multi-dimensional optical PLT count is available with every CBC without additional reagents and may help promote efficiency in clinical laboratories.

Performance evaluation of optical platelet counting of BC-6000Plus automated hematology analyzer

Background

The BC-6000Plus (Mindray, Shenzhen, China) is a recently developed hematology analyzer that utilizes fluorescent technology. Based on fluorescent nucleic acid stain and optical detection, the optical platelet counting (PLT-O) on the BC-6000Plus has strong anti-interference potential in platelet (PLT) detection. Its Auto 8×PLT-O Counting Tech can be automatically triggered in low-PLT samples, which enables the PLT-O on the BC-6000Plus to count low PLT more efficiently. Here, we evaluated the performance of the BC-6000Plus automated hematology analyzer in optical PLT counting.

Methods

The basic features (including blank counting, carryover, trueness, and accuracy) of the BC-6000Plus for PLT counting were evaluated according to the Analytical Quality Specifications for Routine Tests in Clinical Hematology (WST 406-2012). Low-PLT samples with a PLT count of below 100×10⁹/L were selected for repeatability tests. Meanwhile, the potential correlations of BC-6000Plus with the XN-L 350 and manual microscopy within different PLT ranges or under interferences of small red blood cells (RBCs) or PLT aggregation were analyzed.

Results

The PLT-O on BC-6000Plus met the technical requirements of PLT counting in terms of blank count, carryover, trueness, and accuracy. The repeatability of the enhanced mode (PLT-O 8×) on the BC-6000Plus was better than that of the XN-L 350 in three low PLT count ranges, including 10–20, 20–60, and 60–100 (×10⁹/L). Under the interference-free conditions, the BC-6000Plus correlated well with the XN-L 350 in different PLT counting ranges. Under the interferences of small RBCs and PLT aggregation, the PLT-O on BC-6000Plus correlated better with microscopy than with the platelet impedance count (PLT-I).

Conclusions

The PLT-O on BC-6000Plus can meet the technical requirements of PLT counting in terms of blank counting, carryover rate, trueness, and accuracy. The PLT-O 8× has good repeatability, correlates well with the XN-L 350, and demonstrates good anti-interference ability. It can thus meet the needs of blood cell analysis in clinical settings.