The HemoScreen hematology point-of-care device is suitable for rapid evaluation of acute leukemia patients

Home self-testing of complete blood counts in patients with breast cancer during chemotherapy: A proof-of-concept cohort study in e-oncology

BACKGROUND

Before administration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, complete blood counts (CBC) collected at the hospital/nursing stations are evaluated to avoid severe bone marrow suppression. This maintains disease fixation which often reduces their quality of life. This mixed-method study examined at home self-testing of CBC, the test quality, and the effects on patients' mental well-being.

METHODS

Patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy were recruited and trained to perform capillary finger prick CBC testing at home using the HemoScreen Point-of-Care instrument and to upload the test results to the hospital's IT system subsequently. A venous reference CBC sample was taken and tested at the hospital on the day of self-testing. Semi-structured interviews with open-ended components were performed to investigate the user experience and the impact of self-testing on the patients' everyday lives.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients completed the self-testing education using the HemoScreen instrument. Eight patients withdrew, while the remaining 31 patients performed 161 home tests (2-11 tests per patient) over a 4-month period. The test results compared well with the venous reference CBCs except for platelet counts (correlation coefficient 0.26). Qualitative interviews with nine of the 31 patients emphasized that the patients were comfortable using the self-testing instrument and becoming an active partner in their own treatment.

INTERPRETATION

CBC self-testing at home produced clinically valid hemoglobin and white blood cell counts with the added benefit that the patients became active partners in their own treatment course, which was of great importance for the patients and increased their wellbeing.

Advances in Hematology Analyzers Technology

The evolution of complete blood count (CBC) methodology from manual calculations to sophisticated high throughput hematology analyzers is the focus of this article. In recent years, hematology testing has greatly benefitted from the combination of various technologies with automated neural networks. In addition to an increasing complexity of the laboratory instrumentation, there is a demand on point of care CBC testing with its benefits and drawbacks. This article highlights exciting advancements of hematology testing from the past to the present and into the future.

Analytical Performance Evaluation of Three Point-of-Care CBC Analyzers for Management of Clozapine Therapy in Ambulatory Psychiatry Clinics

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is a first-line therapy and the only FDA-approved drug for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). However, frequent measurement of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) is required to monitor for potential adverse severe neutropenia from clozapine therapy. We evaluated 3 point-of-care (POC) instruments that perform the complete blood count (CBC) with differential to assess their analytical performance and potential to meet the clinical need for clozapine therapy management.

METHODS

A CBC with differential was performed on 104 residual whole blood specimens using 3 CBC analyzers (Sight OLO, PixCell HemoScreen, and Sysmex pocH-100i) to assess analytical precision, linearity, and accuracy vs the ADVIA 2120i and manual differential reference methods. Clinical concordance of ANC between POC devices and manual differential at medical decision points for mild, moderate, or severe neutropenia, and the threshold for clozapine therapy discontinuation (1.0 × 109/L) were determined.

RESULTS

For CBC parameters, a CV ≤ 6.4% was observed on the OLO, CV ≤ 6.2% for the HemoScreen, and CV ≤ 5.1% with the pocH-100i. Each device accurately identified ANC with the greatest mean bias ±0.42 × 109/L using the pocH-100i vs manual differential. For results near the medical decision points (ANC <1.5 × 109/L), clinical concordance of ANC results was 55.6% for the OLO, 89.5% for the HemoScreen, and 82.4% for the pocH-100i.

CONCLUSIONS

The HemoScreen device demonstrated the best clinical concordance in ANC values at medical decision thresholds for clozapine therapy management.

HemoScreen hematology analyzer compared to Sysmex XN for complete blood count, white blood cell differential, and detection of leukocyte abnormalities

We compared a point-of-care HemoScreen hematology analyzer to an automated Sysmex XN analyzer for complete blood count (CBC) and white blood cell (WBC) differential, and evaluated its capacity to detect leukocyte abnormalities. A total of 100 K2-EDTA whole blood samples, median age 56 years (2 months to 92 years), were compared. For CBC and WBC differential we compared 74 samples with no confirmed abnormal leukocytes. For 26 samples both analyzers gave flagging regarding leukocytes and the accuracy of the flagging was compared. Abnormal leukocytes were confirmed with manual microscopy (200 cells). HemoScreen CBC and WBC differential were highly comparable to Sysmex XN for most of the essential parameters (r = 0.909-0.975). More variation was seen for basophil and monocyte counts (r = 0.452 and 0.753, respectively). Sysmex XN gave more false WBC abnormal flagging (n = 15 altogether) compared to HemoScreen. In addition, Sysmex XN, as well as HemoScreen, gave false WBC flagging for eight samples confirmed normal. The samples verified by microscopy review to truly contain leukocyte abnormalities (n = 18) were flagged abnormal with both analyzers. The specificity for analyzer flagging was 72% and 88% for Sysmex XN and HemoScreen, respectively. HemoScreen hematology analyzer is essentially comparable to Sysmex XN for CBC and WBC differential analysis. Most importantly, HemoScreen detected all the samples confirmed to include abnormal leukocytes. HemoScreen was less prone for false WBC flagging compared to Sysmex XN, thereafter requiring less microscopy review. These abilities increase its utility in small health care units. Studies with a larger number of abnormal leukocyte samples are needed to confirm HemoScreen performance.