Implementation of the new EUR IVD regulation and relation with ISO15189 accreditation: Guidance is urgently required for haemostasis testing

Evaluation of the AltoStar AM16 system for the quantitation of AdV, CMV and HHV-6 DNA from clinical specimens

The vulnerability of immunocompromised patients to common or opportunistic viral infections is particularly high. The quantitation of viral load in clinical specimens is important for the diagnosis and management of the infection and reactivation in this patient population, particularly transplant recipients. As the new regulation "IVDR" regarding in vitro diagnosis methods is about to come into effect in France, diagnostic laboratories have to implement methods and systems compatible with this new regulation. Technical performance of the AltoStar® Adenovirus (AdV), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and human Herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) DNA PCR Kits 1.5 was assessed on the AltoStar Automation system AM16 using reference kits in 146 clinical samples. Overall agreement in clinical specimens was 87.5 % (28/32), 96.8 % (62/64), 100 % (22/22), 100 % (28/28) and 92.8 % (26/28) for AdV, CMV (WB samples and other matrices), HHV-6 A&B respectively. Quantitative results were highly correlated and estimated to be equivalent within a 0.057-0.648 log-amount difference.We found that altona kits on The AltoStar AM16 system are suitable for clinical monitoring of AdV, CMV and HHV-6 in immunocompromised hosts.

Variability among commercial batches of normal pooled plasma in lupus anticoagulant testing

INTRODUCTION

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing requires normal pooled plasma (NPP) in performing mixing studies and can be used for normalized ratios of clotting times (CTs). The aims were to demonstrate whether significant differences in clotting times between two batches of a same commercial NPP (CRYOcheck™) directly affect NPP-based cut-off values.

METHODS

Diluted Russell Viper venom time (DRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were used for LA testing. Screening, mixing and confirm tests were performed with Stago® instruments and reagents. Two batches of commercial NPP (A1291 and A1301 from CRYOcheck™; frozen) were compared in the determination of cut-off values. Cut-off values were defined as 99th percentile values of 60 healthy donors and compared with Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Cut-off values obtained with the two NPP batches were significantly different for DRVVT (screen normalized ratio: 1.09 vs. 1.24, screen mix: 41.9 s vs. 38.9 s; index of circulating anticoagulant: 5.0 vs. 8.4; all had p-value <.001). On the contrary, no significant differences were observed for aPTT (screen normalized ratio: 1.32 vs. 1.34; p-value = .4068, screen mix: 37.8 s vs. 38.1 s; p-value = .1153) except for index of circulating anticoagulant: 9.6 versus 10.4 (p-value <.05).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that differences between two commercial NPP batches produced by a same manufacturer influenced LA cut-off values used for mixing studies and normalized ratios. Adequate cut-off setting, taking into account NPP CTs, is important to provide accurate conclusion about the presence or absence of a LA and avoid potential clinical impact.

Laboratory evaluation of a new integrative assay to phenotype plasma fibrinolytic system

BACKGROUND

There is currently no universal and standardized test available to phenotype plasma fibrinolytic system.

AIMS

Our main aims were to evaluate the performances of the 'global fibrinolysis capacity' assay (GFC) performed with the Lysis Timer® instrument, and to study the influence of some preanalytical conditions.

METHOD

Euglobulin clot lysis time (ECLT) and GFC were performed under several preanalytical conditions.

RESULTS

GFC showed satisfactory intra- and inter-run precision. Frozen controls and reagents showed stability over the studied period. There was no statistically significant difference between GFC assessed in plasma samples processed at 4 °C or at 20 °C. GFC assessed with frozen-thawed plasma samples was prolonged when compared to fresh samples (p = 0.014). The centrifugation scheme had no influence on PAI-1 activity levels, GFC and ECLT. Reference interval for GFC ranges from 29.3 (C I90% = 26.9-31.9) to 49.5 (90% CI = 45.9-52.2) minutes. In addition, a preliminary study in 40 healthy volunteers and 43 adult patients referred for investigation of a bleeding disorder was conducted to compare GFC and ECLT assays in their ability to classify samples with shortened or prolonged clot lysis times. Disagreements between ECLT and GFC were observed for 23 samples (out of 83), most of them minor.

CONCLUSION

GFC is suitable and convenient for a broad clinical use and can be performed with frozen-thawed plasma samples. Unlike ECLT, GFC is designed to take into account the balance between inhibitors and activators of the fibrinolytic system and could detect both hypo- and hyperfibrinolytic states. Whether it is as suitable as or even better than ECLT to detect a bleeding tendency due to a hyperactive fibrinolytic system deserves to be properly investigated.

D-dimer Testing in Pulmonary Embolism with a Focus on Potential Pitfalls: A Narrative Review

D-dimer is a multifaceted biomarker of concomitant activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis, which is routinely used for ruling out pulmonary embolism (PE) and/or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) combined with a clinical pretest probability assessment. The intended use of the tests depends largely on the assay used, and local guidance should be applied. D-dimer testing may suffer from diagnostic errors occurring throughout the pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases of the testing process. This review aims to provide an overview of D-dimer testing and its value in diagnosing PE and discusses the variables that may impact the quality of its laboratory assessment.