|
1
|
Barone B, Napolitano L, Reccia P, Calace FP, De Luca L, Olivetta M, Stizzo M, Rubinacci A, Della Rosa G, Lecce A, Romano L, Sciorio C, Spirito L, Mattiello G, Vastarella MG, Papi S, Calogero A, Varlese F, Tataru OS, Ferro M, Del Biondo D, Napodano G, Vastarella V, Lucarelli G, Balsamo R, Fusco F, Crocetto F, Amicuzi U. Advances in Urinary Diversion: From Cutaneous Ureterostomy to Orthotopic Neobladder Reconstruction-A Comprehensive Review. J Pers Med 2024; 14:392. [PMID: 38673019 PMCID: PMC11051023 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14040392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer ranks as the 10th most prevalent cancer globally with an increasing incidence. Radical cystectomy combined with urinary diversion represents the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, offering a range of techniques tailored to patient factors. Overall, urinary diversions are divided into non-continent and continent. Among the first category, cutaneous ureterostomy and ileal conduit represent the most common procedures while in the second category, it could be possible to describe another subclassification which includes ureterosigmoidostomy, continent diversions requiring catheterization and orthotopic voiding pouches and neobladders. In this comprehensive review, urinary diversions are described in their technical aspects, providing a summary of almost all alternatives to urinary diversion post-radical cystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biagio Barone
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AORN Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano, 81100 Caserta, Italy; (F.F.); (U.A.)
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (A.R.); (G.D.R.); (A.L.); (L.R.); (G.M.); (S.P.); (F.C.)
| | - Pasquale Reccia
- Urology Unit, AORN Ospedali dei Colli, Monaldi Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.R.); (F.P.C.); (R.B.)
| | - Francesco Paolo Calace
- Urology Unit, AORN Ospedali dei Colli, Monaldi Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.R.); (F.P.C.); (R.B.)
| | - Luigi De Luca
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Multispecialty, AORN Antonio Cardarelli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Michelangelo Olivetta
- Urology Unit, Gaetano Fucito Hospital, AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona, 84085 Mercato San Severino, Italy;
| | - Marco Stizzo
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (L.S.)
| | - Andrea Rubinacci
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (A.R.); (G.D.R.); (A.L.); (L.R.); (G.M.); (S.P.); (F.C.)
| | - Giampiero Della Rosa
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (A.R.); (G.D.R.); (A.L.); (L.R.); (G.M.); (S.P.); (F.C.)
| | - Arturo Lecce
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (A.R.); (G.D.R.); (A.L.); (L.R.); (G.M.); (S.P.); (F.C.)
| | - Lorenzo Romano
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (A.R.); (G.D.R.); (A.L.); (L.R.); (G.M.); (S.P.); (F.C.)
| | | | - Lorenzo Spirito
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (L.S.)
| | - Gennaro Mattiello
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (A.R.); (G.D.R.); (A.L.); (L.R.); (G.M.); (S.P.); (F.C.)
| | - Maria Giovanna Vastarella
- Gynaecology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Salvatore Papi
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (A.R.); (G.D.R.); (A.L.); (L.R.); (G.M.); (S.P.); (F.C.)
| | - Armando Calogero
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of General Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.C.); (F.V.)
| | - Filippo Varlese
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of General Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.C.); (F.V.)
| | - Octavian Sabin Tataru
- Department of Simulation Applied in Medicine, The Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies (I.O.S.U.D.), George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania;
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Dario Del Biondo
- Department of Urology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, 80147 Naples, Italy; (D.D.B.); (G.N.)
| | - Giorgio Napodano
- Department of Urology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, 80147 Naples, Italy; (D.D.B.); (G.N.)
| | - Vincenzo Vastarella
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Department, AORN Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano, 81100 Caserta, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| | - Raffaele Balsamo
- Urology Unit, AORN Ospedali dei Colli, Monaldi Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.R.); (F.P.C.); (R.B.)
| | - Ferdinando Fusco
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AORN Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano, 81100 Caserta, Italy; (F.F.); (U.A.)
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (L.S.)
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (A.R.); (G.D.R.); (A.L.); (L.R.); (G.M.); (S.P.); (F.C.)
| | - Ugo Amicuzi
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AORN Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano, 81100 Caserta, Italy; (F.F.); (U.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Martin R, Renouf T, Rigby J, Hafeez S, Thurairaja R, Kumar P, Cruickshank S, Van‐Hemelrijck M. Female sexual function in bladder cancer: A review of the evidence. BJUI COMPASS 2023; 4:5-23. [PMID: 36569507 PMCID: PMC9766865 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bladder cancer (BC) treatments are known to be invasive; nevertheless, research into the long-term effects is limited and in the context of sexual function often male focussed. Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) has been reported in up to 75% of female patients. This systematic scoping review examines the literature on sexual consequences of BC in female patients. Objective This study aimed to systematically evaluate the evidence on female sexual function in BC to identify areas of unmet need and research priorities. Evidence Acquisition We performed a critical review of PubMed, PsychMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library in March 2020 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) extension for Scoping Reviews statement following Levac et al. methodology. Identified reports were reviewed according to the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) criteria. 45 publications were included. Evidence Synthesis There was an inconsistent use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), with commonly used PROMs having a narrow symptom focus. However, common symptoms emerged: loss of desire, orgasmic disorders, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, difficult intromission, reduced clitoral sensation, psychological concerns related to diagnosis, fear of contamination and body image. Sexual activity was reduced in most groups, despite women expressing a motivation to retain sexual function. The degree of symptom distress associated with FSD is underreported. Evidence emerged regarding a gap for women in clinician counselling and follow-up. Conclusions The patient's perspective of FSD in BC patients is poorly understood and under-addressed in clinical practice. There have been very few qualitative studies of FSD in BC. Any intervention designed to address the problem must start with greater understanding of both the patients' and clinicians' perspective. Lay Summary We examined the evidence on sexual consequences of BC in women. It is apparent that despite common themes of sexual dysfunction emerging, the problem is poorly understood and addressed in clinical practice.
Collapse
|