Effect of a pharmacist-led intervention on adherence among patients with a first-time prescription for a cardiovascular medicine: a randomized controlled trial in Norwegian pharmacies

Impact of Pharmacist-Led Intervention on Adherence to Inhalers, Inhalation Technique, and Disease Control Among Asthma/COPD Patients in a Resource Limited Center: An Interventional Study

Background

Asthma and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are chronic respiratory conditions characterized by airflow obstruction and respiratory symptoms. Adherence to prescribed inhaler therapy and correct inhalation technique are essential for effective disease management and optimal disease control. However, non-adherence and incorrect inhalation technique are common challenges faced by patients with asthma and COPD, leading to suboptimal treatment outcomes and increased healthcare burden.

Purpose

To study the impact of a pharmacist-led intervention on inhaler adherence, inhalation technique, and disease control among patients with asthma and COPD.

Patients and Methods

A pre-post interventional design assessed the effects of pharmacist-led intervention on inhaler adherence, inhalation techniques, and disease control in asthma and COPD patients at Dhulikhel Hospital in Nepal. Inclusion criteria: adult patient clinically diagnosed with asthma or COPD patients of all genders. The intervention comprised counseling patients with aids like videos, and informational leaflets. Impact was measured using checklist method for inhalation technique, the Test of Adherence to Inhaler (TAI) questionnaire for adherence to inhaler, and "Asthma Control Test (ACT)" or "COPD Assessment Test (CAT)" for disease control.

Results

The pharmacist-led intervention significantly increased adherence to inhalers, evidenced by a notable rise in the proportion of patients with good adherence (P<0.001). Sporadic, deliberate, and unwitting noncompliance pattern also improved significantly after the intervention (P<0.001, P<0.001 and P=0.001). Inhalation technique exhibited substantial improvement after intervention (P<0.001). The analysis indicated significant moderate negative correlations between "TIA" and "CAT" [ρ=-0.31; P=0.01], and between "inhalation technique score" and "CAT score" [ρ=-0.31; P=0.01] suggesting that as adherence to inhaler usage and inhalation technique improve, CAT scores tend to decrease, indicating reduced disease impact on the patient.

Conclusion

This study shows the potential efficacy of pharmacist-led intervention in enhancing adherence to inhaler, inhalation technique, and disease control in respiratory conditions such as asthma and COPD.

An evaluation of written materials for supporting hypertensive patient education and counselling when performing a new medicine service in Poland

BACKGROUND

The New Medicine Service (NMS) was developed in England more than ten years ago, as a three-stage consultation led by community pharmacists to support patients taking new medication for a chronic disease. In Poland, the scheme was officially introduced in January 2023. However, its implementation into common practice has been presented with various obstacles, including the need to develop relationships with general practitioners, resolve the payment structure, and provide training with adequate supporting materials. Hence, written materials have been designed for use as an optional tool for counselling patients receiving an NMS in community pharmacies.

METHODS

The present study evaluates the ability of these materials to inform patients about the need to adhere to anti-hypertensive medication. A group of 401 randomly-selected adult visitors to pharmacies and/or healthcare centres were surveyed; one third had hypertension in their history.

RESULTS

The structure, grammar and readability of the text achieved the required threshold of 40% according to the Plain Language Index. The designed materials effectively informed the patients about anti-hypertensive medication, reflected in an increased score in a knowledge test, and were rated positively regarding information level, comprehensibility and presentation.

CONCLUSION

The proposed material may serve as an additional, "patient-friendly" educational tool for use as part of an NMS.

Enhancing Patient Adherence to Newly-Prescribed Medicine for Chronic Diseases: A Comprehensive Review and Cost-Effective Approach to Implementing the New Medicine Service in Community Pharmacies in Poland

New Medicine Service (NMS) components are an important element to improve patient compliance with medical recommendations. NMS provides support to patients prescribed new medicines, helping them to manage long-term conditions. The purpose of this service is to provide patients with advice, guidelines, and educational materials regarding the use of new medicines to increase patient compliance and therapy safety. The NMS has already been introduced in many European countries. This review aims to identify the benefits and potential barriers to implementing the NMS in community pharmacies and to suggest solutions that would increase its effectiveness. Previous studies have primarily shown that the NMS improves patient compliance with therapy, accelerating the expected effects of the therapy. Pharmacist support during implementation of a new drug therapy substantially increases patient safety. As the experience of numerous countries shows, both pharmacists and patients express positive opinions on this service. Therefore, it seems that NMS should be an indispensable part of pharmaceutical patient care in any healthcare system. This article aims to review the implementation of the New Medicine Service (NMS) for community pharmacists in Poland and the provision of a cost-effective approach to improve patient adherence to newly-prescribed medicine for chronic diseases.

A systematic review on experimental studies about patient adherence to treatment

A better understanding of patients' adherence to treatment is a prerequisite to maximize the benefit of healthcare provision for patients, reduce treatment costs, and is a key factor in a variety of subsequent health outcomes. We aim to understand the state of the art of scientific evidence about which factors influence patients' adherence to treatment. A systematic literature review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines in five separate electronic databases of scientific publications: PubMed, PsycINFO (ProQuest), Cochrane library (Ovid), Google Scholar, and Web of Science. The search focused on literature reporting the significance of factors in adherence to treatment between 2011 and 2021, including only experimental studies (e.g., randomized controlled trials [RCT], clinical trials, etc.). We included 47 experimental studies. The results of the systematic review (SR) are grouped according to predetermined categories of the World Health Organization (WHO): socioeconomic, treatment, condition, personal, and healthcare-related factors. This review gives an actual overview of evidence-based studies on adherence and analyzed the significance of factors defined by the WHO classification. By showing the strength of certain factors in several independent studies and concomitantly uncovering gaps in research, these insights could serve as a basis for the design of future adherence studies and models.

Dispensing by Family Pharmacists as a Potential Factor in Pharmacist-initiated Prescription Change: A Retrospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

No studies in Japan have examined whether dispensing by family pharmacists, who are incentivized by reimbursement to provide continuous and exclusive medication management, results in prescription changes. Our primary objective was to identify the variables affecting prescription changes, particularly to investigate dispensing by family pharmacists as a possible factor.

METHODS

We identified 333,503 records of pharmacy claims data from patients aged 65 years or older who received medication instructions at outpatient pharmacies at Tsukuba, a medium-sized city near Tokyo, between April 2018 and March 2019. We extracted data on dispensing by family pharmacists, number of medicines, patient sex, patient age, and pharmacy category. A multilevel modified Poisson regression analysis was performed to analyze the correlation between dispensing by family pharmacists and pharmacist-initiated prescription change.

RESULTS

Dispensing by family pharmacists was 1.37 times more likely to involve a record of prescription change than dispensing by non-family pharmacists. Older age, female sex, polypharmacy, and small-scale pharmacies were also found to be factors.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that dispensing by family pharmacists was a potential factor for pharmacist-initiated prescription changes that may prevent excessive medication and limit pharmacological interactions. Since the likelihood of inappropriate prescriptions being issued varies from hospital to hospital, subsequent studies should take into account the quality of each institution.

Implementing a newly prescribed cardiovascular medicine in daily routine: The patient perspective at readmission to primary care

BACKGROUND

Readmission to primary care is challenging for patients due to involvement of multiple healthcare providers across different settings and implementing new medicines into their daily routine. Elucidating patients' needs is crucial to tailor counseling support.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the patient perspectives on implementing a newly prescribed cardiovascular medicine into their daily routine at readmission to primary care.

METHODS

A qualitative study was performed within the outpatient pharmacy. Adult patients who were prescribed a new cardiovascular medicine by their treating hospital physician at hospital discharge or during an outpatient clinic visit were eligible to participate. Purposive sampling was applied to equally distribute adherence-influencing factors. Patients were interviewed by telephone and inclusion continued until theoretical data saturation. An adapted Greenhalgh framework for implementation research was used for a thematic content analysis by conceptualizing the new medicine as an innovation that requires implementation by a patient (adopter).

RESULTS

Data saturation was reached at 44 patients of which 19 discontinued their new medicine at the time of the interview. Reasons for discontinuing included: side-effects, insufficient efficacy or negligence. Patients considered a lack of basic knowledge on their newly prescribed cardiovascular medicine as a major barrier for adopting it into their daily routine. They were in need of information on risks and benefits of their new medicine. A noticeable effect and tailored counseling facilitated patients in taking their medicine as prescribed. Patients mentioned personalized organizing tools and routinization of medication intake as important success factors for addressing their practical challenges with their new medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

By applying the adapted Greenhalgh framework, this study provided a unique and structured insight in patients' barriers and facilitators that could influence their ability to implement a new cardiovascular medicine at readmission to primary care. This knowledge enables pharmacists to tailor their patient support and provide individualized patient counseling.

[Effect of a Family Pharmacist System on Medication Adherence of Patients with Dyslipidemia during a COVID-19 Epidemic]

The pharmacy pharmacist's function as a family pharmacist is expected to improve adherence to medication in patients suffering from chronic diseases, including dyslipidemia. This is true even in infectious disease epidemics. In this study, using anonymously processed receipt data from 700 insurance pharmacies in our group, we evaluated medication adherence in patients taking statin drugs before, during the first and second years of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic in terms of medication persistence and medication possession, and compared the results between the family pharmacist group (FP group) and non-family pharmacist group (NoFP group). The odds ratios of good medication adherence (medication persistence and medication possession) rates for the FP group relative to the NoFP group were 1.446 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.210-1.727] in the pre-epidemic period, 1.428 (1.192-1.710) in the first year of the epidemic, and 1.270 (1.113-1.450) in the second year of the epidemic. The FP group was significantly higher in all time periods. Therefore, it is suggested that the family pharmacist function improves adherence to statins not only before but also during the COVID-19 epidemic.

Pharmacist's interventions in factors contributing to medication errors reduces medication errors in self-management of patients in the rehabilitation ward

BACKGROUND

The number of medications, number of administrations per day, dosing frequency on indicated day, and medication from multiple prescriptions are the medication factors prone to medication errors in self-management that have been previously reported. However, whether pharmacists actually intervene in medication factors that affect medication error occurrences in self-management is unclear. Therefore, we conducted this study to clarify these issues.

METHOD

This study included patients who underwent self-management in the rehabilitation ward of Higashinagoya National Hospital. From April 2019 to March 2020, a one-pharmacist period existed, and from April 2020 to March 2021, a two-pharmacist period existed. The number of patient instructions and interventions were expected to increase with an increase in the number of pharmacists. Considering this to be an environment of differential interventions by pharmacists, a pre-post-test design was conducted with all self-managed patients in both the time periods. The primary and secondary endpoints were the proportion of medication error occurrences and proportion of pharmacist's interventions in medication factors, respectively.

RESULT

The proportions of medication error occurrences during the one-pharmacist and two-pharmacist periods were 41% (71/173) and 28% (51/180) (relative risk 0.690, 95% confidential interval 0.515-0.925), respectively. The proportion of pharmacist's interventions in medication factors in the one-pharmacist period was 13% (22/173) and 22% (40/180) in the two-pharmacist period; there was an increase in the proportion of pharmacist's interventions in medication factors in the two-pharmacist period.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of medication error occurrences was significantly lower in the two-pharmacist period than that in the one-pharmacist period. This can be attributed to the increase in the proportion of pharmacist's interventions in medication factors. Therefore, an environment in which pharmacists could intervene in the medication factors to prevent medication errors in advance is necessary.

Reimbursed medication adherence enhancing interventions in 12 european countries: Current state of the art and future challenges

Background: Medication non-adherence jeopardises the effectiveness of chronic therapies and negatively affects financial sustainability of healthcare systems. Available medication adherence-enhancing interventions (MAEIs) are utilised infrequently, and even more rarely reimbursed. The aim of this paper was to review reimbursed MAEIs across selected European countries.

Methods: Data on reimbursed MAEIs were collected from European countries at the ENABLE Cost Action expert meeting in September 2021. The identified MAEIs were analysed and clustered according to their characteristics, direct vs. indirect relation to adherence, and the targeted adherence phase.

Results: Out of 12 contributing countries, 10 reported reimbursed MAEIs, 28 in total, of which 20 were identified as MAEIs targeting adherence directly. Reimbursed MAEIs were most often performed by either doctors (n = 6), nurses (n = 6), or pharmacists (n = 3). The most common types of MAEIs were education (n = 6), medication regimen management (n = 5), and adherence monitoring feedback (n = 4). Only seven reimbursed MAEIs were technology-mediated, whereas 11 addressed two interlinked phases of medication adherence, i.e., implementation and persistence.

Conclusion: Our review highlights the scarcity of reimbursed MAEIs across the selected European countries, and calls for their more frequent use and reimbursement.

Drug-related problems and satisfaction among patients receiving pharmacist-led consultations at the initiation of cardiovascular drugs

BACKGROUND

Drug-related problems (DRPs) lead to substantial morbidity and mortality and increase healthcare costs. Several interventions have been developed to reduce DRPs and improve the outcome of drug therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate DRPs identified through a pharmacist-led intervention and to assess patient satisfaction with the intervention.

METHODS

Patients received two pharmacist consultations 1-2 weeks and 3-5 weeks after collecting a new cardiovascular medicine. Information about patient characteristics, beliefs about medicines (BMQ), DRPs, and patient evaluations were collected using questionnaires.

RESULTS

Pharmacists identified DRPs among 52.4% and 43.1% of the 633 patients at consultation 1 and 2, respectively. Of the DRPs reported in consultation 1, 43.7% were solved at consultation 2. Among patients with side effects, patients who received advice on managing these in consultation 1 where more likely to have solved problems at consultation 2 (61.2% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.008). Female gender, high BMQ concern and the number of new medicines were associated with DRPs. Patients were highly satisfied with the intervention. Predictors of satisfaction were female gender, older age, higher BMQ necessity, face-to-face consultations, longer duration of consultation 1, and solved problems in consultation 2.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that the pharmacist-led follow-up intervention can aid early identification and solving of DRPs in patients prescribed new cardiovascular drugs. Knowledge of factors associated with DRPs and patients' satisfaction may allow further improvement of the intervention.

Scalability of effective adherence interventions for patients using cardiovascular disease medication - a realist synthesis inspired systematic review

Upscaling of medication adherence interventions to routine care is still challenging. This realist theory inspired review aimed to assess which intervention aspects are potentially important for the scalability of effective cardiovascular disease (CVD) medication adherence interventions and how they are reported in effectiveness studies. A total of 4097 articles from four databases were screened of which ultimately 31 studies were included. Relevant information on scalability was extracted using a theoretic framework based on the scalability assessment tool used in the QUALIDEC study for the following domains; (i) innovation, (ii) implementers and patients, (iii) adopting organizations and health system and (iv) socio-political context. Extracted articles were analysed for themes and chains of inference, which were grouped based on commonality and source of evidence to form new hypotheses. Six different domains relevant for scalability of adherence interventions were identified: 1) Complexity of the intervention 2) training; 3) customization of the intervention; 4) drivers of the intervention; 5) technical interventions 6) stakeholder involvement. These six domains might be useful for the development of more scalable interventions by bridging the gap between research and practice. Data relevant for scalability is not well reported on in effectiveness trials for CVD medication adherence interventions and only limited data on scalability has been published in additional papers. We believe the adoption and reach of effective CVD medication adherence interventions will improve with increased awareness for the necessity of scalability in all phases of intervention development.

Effects of a pharmaceutical care intervention on clinical outcomes and patient adherence in coronary heart disease: the MIMeRiC randomized controlled trial

Background

In the treatment of coronary heart disease, secondary prevention goals are still often unmet and poor adherence to prescribed drugs has been suggested as one of the reasons. We aimed to investigate whether pharmaceutical care by a pharmacist at the cardiology clinic trained in motivational interviewing improves clinical outcomes and patient adherence.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, outcomes-blinded trial designed to compare pharmaceutical care follow-up with standard care. After standard follow-up at the cardiology clinic, patients in the intervention group were seen by a clinical pharmacist two to five times as required over seven months. Pharmacists were trained to use motivational interviewing in the consultations and they tailored their support to each patient’s clinical needs and beliefs about medicines. The primary study end-point was the proportion of patients who reached the treatment goal for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 12 months after discharge. The key secondary outcome was patient adherence to lipid-lowering therapy at 15 months after discharge, and other secondary outcomes were the effects on patient adherence to other preventive drugs, systolic blood pressure, disease-specific quality of life, and healthcare use.

Results

316 patients were included. The proportion of patients who reached the target for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were 37.0% in the intervention group and 44.2% in the control group (P = .263). More intervention than control patients were adherent to cholesterol-lowering drugs (88 vs 77%; P = .033) and aspirin (97 vs 91%; P = .036) but not to beta-blocking agents or renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors.

Conclusions

Our intervention had no positive effects on risk factors for CHD, but it increased patient adherence. Further investigation of the intervention process is needed to explore the difference in results between patient adherence and medication effects. Longer follow-up of healthcare use and mortality will determine if the increased adherence per se eventually will have a meaningful effect on patient health.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02102503, 03/04/2014 retrospectively registered.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-021-02178-0.

Medication regimen complexity of coronary artery disease patients

Objective:

To determine the factors associated with the high complexity of medication regimen in patients with coronary artery disease.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study was carried out in a multiprofessional cardiology outpatient clinic, in the Secondary Care of the Unified Health System, where sociodemographic (age, sex, and education), clinical (number of health conditions, cardiovascular diagnoses, and comorbidities) and pharmacotherapeutic (adherence, polypharmacy, and cardiovascular polypharmacy) characteristics were collected. These were related to complexity of medication regimen, measured through the medication regimen complexity index. The classification of high complexity of medication regimen was carried out using standardization for the older adults and stratification for adult patients, as suggested in the literature.

Results:

The total complexity medication regimen of 148 patients had a median of 17.0 (interquartile range of 10.5). In the univariate analysis, the factors associated with high complexity were heart failure, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, five or more diseases, and non-adherence to treatment. In the final model, after logistic regression, there was a statistically significant association (p<0.05) with the variables diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and non-adherence.

Conclusion:

The high complexity of medication regimen in patients with coronary artery disease was associated with the presence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and reports of non-adherence to treatment.