Contemporary Characterization and Recategorization of Adult Unclassified Renal Cell Carcinoma

Our recent study of early-onset unclassified eosinophilic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) demonstrated that two third of cases could be reclassified by performing a limited number of immunohistochemistry stains. Following the same approach, we aimed to investigate what proportion of adult unclassified RCC could be reclassified. We identified 79 cases. The mean age at presentation was 58 years (range, 29 to 84 y). Tumors were grouped based on their predominant morphologic features as oncocytic (n=23); papillary (n=22); clear cell (n=22); mucinous tubular and spindle cell (MTSC; n=5); rhabdoid (n=4); or lacking a dominant pattern (n=3). By reviewing the morphologic features and performing ancillary studies, we were able to reclassify 10 cases (13%). Four cases were positive for CK20 and showed morphologic features consistent with eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC. Four cases were reclassified as MTSC based on VSTM2A expression by RNA in situ hybridization. One case was negative for SDHB and reclassified as succinate dehydrogenase-deficient RCC. None of the cases showed loss of expression of fumarate hydratase. One case was diffusely positive for CK7 and negative for CD117 and reclassified as a low-grade oncocytic tumor. Four cases were positive for both cathepsin-K and TFE3 by immunohistochemistry, although fluorescence in situ hybridization failed to identify rearrangement in either TFE3 or TFEB genes. Of the tumors that remained unclassified, those with oncocytic features were less likely to be a high grade (odds ratio [OR]=0.22, P=0.013) or advanced stage (OR=0.19, P=0.039) and were more common in women (OR=3.4, P=0.05) compared with those without oncocytic features. Tumors with rhabdoid morphology were associated with advanced stage (relative risk=3.6, P=0.009), while tumors with clear cell or papillary features had a wide range of grades and stages at presentation. In summary, the most frequent reclassified entity is eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC. Investigation of expression of succinate dehydrogenase or fumarate hydratase in individuals older than 35 years with unclassifiable tumors is low yield in the absence of specific morphologic features. A subset of MTSC without well-developed morphologic features can be reclassified by using RNA-ISH for VSTM2A. Recognition of more-recently described RCC subtypes allows for their distinction from the unclassified subtype and improves the prognostic information provided.

A Systematic Review of Systemic Treatment Options for Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

There have been a number of recent advances in the management of advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). However, the majority of these studies excluded patients with non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC), and optimal management of nccRCC remains unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to evaluate systemic treatment options in locally advanced or metastatic nccRCC between 2000-2019. Randomized controlled trials, single-arm phase II-IV trials, and prospective analyses of medication access programs were included. The primary outcome measures were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies were included in the final analysis. There was the highest level of evidence to support first-line treatment of nccRCC with sunitinib. Additional single-arm trials support the use of other vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors with axitinib and pazopanib, as well as mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition with temsirolimus or everolimus +/- bevacizumab. Immune checkpoint inhibition has an emerging role in nccRCC, but optimal sequencing of available options is not clear. Prospective data to support the use of newer immunotherapy combinations are lacking. Treatment for collecting duct carcinoma remains platinum-based chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The availability of randomized trials in nccRCC is limited, and most studies include outcomes for nccRCC as a group, making conclusions about efficacy by subtype difficult. This systematic review supports consensus guidelines recommending sunitinib or clinical trial enrollment as preferred first-line treatment options for nccRCC, but also suggests a more nuanced approach to management and new options for therapy such as immune checkpoint inhibition.

Morphological spectrum of renal cell carcinoma, unclassified: an analysis of 136 cases

AIMS

Renal cell carcinoma, unclassified (RCCU) is a category that includes a morphologically and biologically heterogeneous group of tumours that are unable to be diagnosed as other well-defined entities. We aim to describe the morphological findings of tumours within this category and to determine the most frequent morphological features leading to classification difficulty.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-six cases of RCCU were examined. Patients ranged in age from 23 to 87 years. Seventy-seven patients were men and 59 were women. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade was most commonly 3 (n = 66), followed by 2 (n = 42) and 4 (n = 28). Tumour size ranged from 0.6 to 24.9 cm. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathological T categories included pT1a (n = 50), pT1b (n = 14), pT2a (n = 7), pT2b (n = 4), pT3a (n = 50) and pT4 (n = 9). Forty-four cases included lymph node(s), 41% of which (n = 18) had metastases. Tumours were assessed for a variety of histological features and assigned to the following morphological groups: predominantly oncocytoma/chromophobe RCC-like; clear cell RCC-like; papillary RCC-like; collecting duct-like; and pure sarcomatoid differentiation. The majority of the oncocytoma/chromophobe and clear cell RCC-like phenotypes were low stage (pT1 or pT2). The papillary RCC-like, collecting duct-like and pure sarcomatoid phenotypes were mainly high stage (pT3 or pT4).

CONCLUSIONS

Renal cell carcinoma, unclassified is a term that encompasses tumours with a variety of morphological features and a wide biological spectrum. The most common source of diagnostic difficulty was tumours composed of predominantly eosinophilic cells.

Lymphovascular invasion status at transurethral resection of bladder tumors may predict subsequent poor response of T1 tumors to bacillus Calmette-Guérin

Background

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is an important step in the process of tumor dissemination and metastasis outside the primary organ, but the relationship between LVI and the prognosis of T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has not been fully evaluated. Accordingly, the present study was performed to evaluate whether LVI had an impact on the clinical outcome in patients with T1 NMIBC.

Methods

A total of 116 consecutive patients were diagnosed with T1 NMIBC from 1994 to 2013 at Keio University Hospital. All cases were reviewed by a single uro-pathologist. The prognostic significance of LVI was assessed in relation to recurrence and stage progression.

Results

The median follow-up period was 53 months. LVI was histologically confirmed in 30 patients (25.9%). There were no significant differences of clinical features between the patients with and without LVI. In T1 patients, univariate analysis demonstrated that LVI positivity was associated with stage progression (p = 0.003), but not with tumor recurrence (p = 0.192). Multivariate analysis confirmed that LVI was independently associated with stage progression (p = 0.006, hazard ratio = 4.00). In 85 patients who received BCG instillation, LVI was independently associated with both tumor recurrence and stage progression (p = 0.036 and 0.024, hazard ratio = 2.19 and 3.76).

Conclusions

LVI is a strong indicator of an increased risk of recurrence and progression in BCG-treated patients with T1 NMIBC. This information might assist clinicians to develop appropriate management and counseling strategies for these patients.