First case report of staghorn calculi successfully removed by mini-endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in a 2-year-old boy

Efficacy of mini-endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for pediatric kidney calculi: a single center retrospective study

Management of large pediatric kidney calculi (PKC) is challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of miniature endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (mini-ECIRS) for PKC. We retrospectively analyzed mini-ECIRS in 16 pediatric patients undergoing kidney stone treatment between November 2014 and October 2023 to determine its safety, efficacy, and associated outcomes. The median age was 50.50 (interquartile range: 36.75, 84.75) months, and the mean stone size was 21.63 ± 11.65 mm. The stone-free rate was 81.25%. The median decrease in hemoglobin level on the day after surgery was 1.10 (0.80, 1.55), and no patient required a blood transfusion. The median number of general anesthesia procedures was 2.00 (2.00, 2.00). Postoperative complications included fever in two patients and difficulty in removing the ureteral stent in one patient. In this cohort, five patients underwent pre-stenting under general anesthesia before mini-ECIRS. Age was significantly lower in the pre-stenting group than in the non-pre-stenting (P < 0.01); however, there were no significant differences in operative time, stone-free rate, total number of general anesthesia procedures, hemoglobin loss, or postoperative hospital stay between the groups. Mini-ECIRS was found to be a safe and efficient treatment method with a high stone removal rate in pediatric patients.

Mini Endoscopic Combined Intra-Renal Surgery (MiniECIRS) with endoview puncture in A 12 month boy. A safe but challenging procedure

INTRODUCTION

Associating minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) is called Mini Endoscopic Combined Intra-Renal Surgery (miniECIRS). It's a safe and efficient technique, also in children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The video describes miniECIRS in a 12 month-old boy with an infectious pelvic left stone (16 mm) and multiple caliceal stones. The UAS used was a 10FR and the percutaneous access was a 14Fr with Clear-Petra® sheath.

RESULTS

The operative time was 180 min and blood losses were virtually absent. There were no intra- or post-operative complications and the patient was discharged at the 5th day. After 1 month, double J was removed having a stone free status.

CONCLUSIONS

MiniECIRS with endoview puncture is a safe and efficient technique when performed by experienced hands. Therefore, it is an alternative to consider for the treatment of complex lithiasis in the pediatric population.

Calcium Carbonate Urolithiasis in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report

Urinary stones composed of calcium carbonate are extremely rare, accounting for 0.01%-1.4% of urolithiasis (UL) cases. Urolithiasis is an infrequent condition in the pediatric population worldwide and in Mexico; nevertheless, the incidence in the Yucatán Peninsula is higher than that reported in other areas of Mexico and the world. Urolithiasis is the second most common urinary disease among pediatrics in the Yucatán Peninsula, which makes it an endemic region for this disease. We describe the case of a five-year-old male from the southeast region of Mexico who presented with signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI) and was diagnosed with bilateral staghorn stones of calcium carbonate, successfully treated by mini endoscopic combined intra-renal surgery, and dietary adjustments to prevent recurrence.

Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Children: Evolution, Current Status, and Future Trends

Introduction: Incidence of urolithiasis in children has increased in recent years and with technological advancements and miniaturization of surgical instruments, pediatric urologists have acquired an impressive arsenal for their treatment. Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) has gained widespread popularity as it is a natural extension of semirigid ureteroscopy and can be done through natural orifice minimizing the morbidity of percutaneous access. The aim of this narrative review is to describe how RIRS has evolved over the decades in children and if the age-related anatomical difference impacts reported outcomes especially stone-free rate (SFR) and complications. Materials and Methods: An electronic literature search from inception to October 15, 2021 was performed using Medical Subject Heading terms in several combinations on PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science without language restrictions. A total of 2022 articles were founded and 165 articles were full-text screening. Finally, 2 pediatric urologists included 51 articles that summarize the available literature regarding the development and use of RIRS in children. Results: RIRS as of today is well established as a superior modality for all stones in all locations compared with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy both in children and adults. The passive dilation has decreased the need of active ureteral dilation, but the need to perform prestenting is not defined yet. Regarding the use of the ureteral access sheath, the literature tends to lean toward its placement in most cases, but we do not know its long-term effects over the growth of children. Finally, the SFR has increased as the experience of pediatric urologists increases, as well as the number of complications has decreased. Conclusion: RIRS in pediatrics has crossed many milestones, yet many areas need further research and larger data are required to make RIRS the procedure of choice for renal stone management in children across all age groups.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy between the prone split-leg and Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia positions during endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: A multi-institutional analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the prone split-leg and the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia positions during endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery.

METHODS

A multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2014 and December 2018. The stone-free and complication rates were compared between the prone split-leg and the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia positions. Anatomical variations were evaluated using contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging.

RESULTS

In total, 118 and 100 patients underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the prone split-leg and Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia positions, respectively. Renal punctures in the prone split-leg position were predominantly executed through the lower calyces (78.0%), whereas those in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position were primarily performed through the middle calyces (64.0%; P < 0.001). Surgical duration in the prone split-leg position was significantly shorter than that in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position (106.5 vs 126.0 min; P = 0.0459). There were no significant differences in the stone-free rate between the two positions (78.8% vs 76.0%; P = 0.629). Incidences of urinary tract injury (P = 0.033) and febrile urinary tract infection (23.7% vs 10.0%; P = 0.011) in the prone split-leg position were significantly higher than that in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position. The tilt of the major renal axis was significantly greater in the prone position than the corresponding values in the oblique position (19.4° vs 8.5°; P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical variation might result in the differences of renal puncture calyx. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position may bring equal stone-free status, with a longer surgical time but fewer complications including febrile urinary tract infection and urinary tract injury than the prone split-leg position.

Update on Surgical Management of Pediatric Urolithiasis

Urolithiasis has always been a fascinating disease, even more so in children. There are many intriguing facets to this pathology. This article is a nonsystematic review to provide an update on the surgical management of pediatric urolithiasis. It highlights the pros and cons of various minimally invasive surgical options such as extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), laparoscopy, and robotics. This article also describes the various intracorporeal disintegration technologies available to fragment the stone, including the newer advancements in laser technology. It also emphasizes the cost considerations especially with reference to the emerging economies. Thus, this manuscript guides how to select the least-invasive option for an individual patient, considering age and gender; stone size, location, and composition; and facilities and expertise available.

Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing stone-free rates following retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) treatments of renal stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical trials comparing RIRS, SWL, and PCNL for treatment of renal stones were identified from electronic databases. Stone-free rates for the procedures were compared by qualitative and quantitative syntheses (meta-analyses). Outcome variables are shown as risk ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 35 studies were included in this network meta-analysis of success and stone-free rates following three different treatments of renal stones. Six studies compared PCNL versus SWL, ten studies compared PCNL versus RIRS, fourteen studies compared RIRS versus SWL, and five studies compared PCNL, SWL, and RIRS. The quality scores within subscales were relatively low-risk. Network meta-analyses indicated that stone-free rates of RIRS (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.22-0.64) and SWL (OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.067-0.19) were lower than that of PCNL. In addition, stone-free rate of SWL was lower than that of RIRS (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.20-0.47). Stone free rate of PCNL was also superior to RIRS in subgroup analyses including ≥ 2 cm stone (OR 4.680; 95% CI 2.873-8.106), lower pole stone (OR 1.984; 95% CI 1.043-2.849), and randomized studies (OR 2.219; 95% CI 1.348-4.009). In rank-probability test, PCNL was ranked as No. 1 and SWL was ranked as No. 3.

CONCLUSIONS

PCNL showed the highest success and stone-free rate in the surgical treatment of renal stones. In contrast, SWL had the lowest success and stone-free rate.

Two-year-old girl with impacted ureteral stone successfully treated with a single session of combined percutaneous nephrostomy and ureteroscopy

Impacted stones frequently cause changes in the ureter, including edema of the ureteral wall, stone embedding in the ureteral mucosa or ureteral bending, which often preclude spontaneous passing of the stone and increase the risk of complications during surgery. When stone impaction is suspected preoperatively, management should be adapted accordingly. However, surgical treatment strategies remain controversial in pediatric patients because of the scarcity of cases reported. We describe the case of a 2-year-old girl with a right impacted ureteral stone who presented with gross hematuria and pyuria, but no metabolic risk factors or hematological abnormalities. Ureteroscopy was carried out in the presence of a percutaneous nephrostomy catheter. At the 7-month follow up, hydronephrosis had improved from grade 3 to grade 1, and the ureter was free from residual or recurrent stones. No complications were noted. We believe that percutaneous nephrostomy before the lithotripsy facilitates treatment for impacted stones in pediatric patients.