Renal cell carcinoma in end-stage renal disease: Multi-institutional comparative analysis of survival

Renal cell carcinoma outcomes in end-stage renal disease: A 40-year study from two Japanese institutions

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to analyze the outcomes of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) arising in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) over a 40-year span.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated data of patients with ESRD-RCC diagnosed between 1979 and 2020 at two institutions. We assessed changes in stage, surgical approaches, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) following nephrectomy according to era between ESRD-RCC and sporadic RCC. Furthermore, perioperative outcomes in patients with ESRD-RCC were compared between laparoscopic and open surgery.

RESULTS

Patients with ESRD-RCC (n = 549) were diagnosed at an earlier stage (p = 0.0276), and the ratio of laparoscopic nephrectomy was increased (p < 0.0001) according to eras. Since 2000 (i.e., after implementation of laparoscopic nephrectomy), patients with ESRD-RCC (n = 305) had significantly shorter CSS (p = 0.0063) after nephrectomy than sporadic RCC (n = 2732). After adjustment by multivariate analysis and propensity score matching, ESRD status was independently associated with shorter CSS (p = 0.0055 and p = 0.0473, respectively). Improved CSS in sporadic RCC (p < 0.0001), but not ESRD-RCC (p = 0.904), according to era contributed to this difference. Laparoscopic nephrectomy showed favorable outcomes, including shorter surgery time, lower estimated bleeding volumes, transfusion rates, and readmission rates, and shorter postoperative hospitalization than open nephrectomy (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in diagnostic and treatment modalities potentially enable early diagnosis and minimally invasive surgery for patients with ESRD-RCC. As ESRD-RCC may not present indolently, careful post-operative monitoring is needed.

Comparable survival outcome between acquired cystic disease associated renal cell carcinoma and clear cell carcinoma in patients with end-stage renal disease: a multi-institutional central pathology study

Acquired cystic disease (ACD) associated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is designated as a new subtype unique to patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) according to the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. However, the oncological outcomes of the prognostic factors for patients with this subtype are not fully understood. In the present study, we compared the survival of ACD associated RCC patients who underwent nephrectomy with that of patients with other histological subtypes who developed ESRD. Over 378 patients who underwent nephrectomy at three Japanese institutes between 1987 and 2016 were included in this study. A central pathologist reviewed the sections from all patients according to the 2016 WHO classification. The central pathological review showed a clear cell subtype in 165 patients (43.6%), ACD associated RCC in 112 (29.6%), papillary in 61 (16.1%), and others in 40 (10.7%). The proportion of patients with pathological stage 1 was extremely high in both clear cell and ACD associated RCC cohorts (86.6%, 85.7%). The cancer specific survival (CSS) and recurrence free survival rates of patients with ACD associated RCC were comparable with those with clear cell carcinoma and significantly better than those with the papillary subtype. The factors predictive of unfavourable outcomes were long dialysis duration, tumour size, pathological stage, grade 4 tumour, and the presence of lymphovascular invasion or a sarcomatoid component. Patients with a pre-operative dialysis duration of 20 years or longer showed a significantly worse CSS than other patients, probably owing to sarcomatoid differentiation and stage migration during the advanced stages. In conclusion, this study included the largest number of patients with ACD associated RCC, showing a survival similar to that of clear cell histology patients with ESRD, except for the rarity of late recurrence. ACD associated RCC was not as indolent as initially recognised when patients were on long term dialysis.

Increased risk for renal cell carcinoma in end stage renal disease - a population-based case-control study

PURPOSE

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a known risk factor for the development of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This case-control study was performed to assess the risk in a nationwide cohort and evaluate tumor characteristics and survival in the ESRD-RCC population.

METHODS

In this study, 9,299 patients with RCC identified in the National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register from 2005 until 2014 and 93,895 matched controls were linked to the Swedish Renal Registry and the National Patient Register. ESRD was defined as chronic kidney disease stage 5, kidney transplantation or kidney dialysis 0-40 years before the diagnosis of RCC.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients with ESRD and subsequent RCC were identified and compared with 9,087 patients with RCC. There was a 4.5-times increased risk for RCC among ESRD patients (95% CI = 3.6-5.6; p < 0.001) compared to matched controls. Longer time with ESRD increased the risk of RCC (ESRD > 9 years, OR = 10.2, 95% CI = 7.0-14.8). The ESRD-RCC patients were younger (p = 0.002), had smaller tumors (p < 0.001) and had lower tumor stage (p = 0.045). The incidence of papillary and chromophobe RCC was higher and clear cell RCC lower among the ESRD patients (p < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival was 50% in ESRD-RCC patients and 63% in RCC-only patients (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

More than 9 years with ESRD increased the risk of developing RCC 10-times compared to individuals without ESRD and the tumors showed a different histopathological pattern. Despite a less advanced tumor stage at diagnosis, the overall survival in ESRD-RCC patients was lower compared to patients with RCC-only.

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma: Characteristics and survival outcomes from a large single institutional series

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of a large clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma cohort.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review of patients with clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma at a single academic center was performed after Institutional Review Board approval. Patients underwent either partial or radical nephrectomy from September 2009 to July 2019. Demographic and clinical characteristics, recurrence, and cancer specific and overall survival were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients were included in the study. Median follow up was 26.5 months. Median age was 61 (range 27 to 87). 47.8% of patients were African American. 26.7% of patients had end stage renal disease. 37.8% had multifocal renal tumors. 48.9% underwent partial nephrectomy, while the remainder underwent radical nephrectomy. 43.3% underwent an open surgical approach, 40.0% a robotic approach, and 16.7% a laparoscopic approach. Pathologic stage included T1a (90.0%), T1b (1.1%), and T2b (8.9%). Fuhrman grades 1-3 were present in 18.9%, 77.8%, and 3.3% of patients, respectively. There were no cancer specific deaths. There was one local recurrence and no metastases. The overall survival at a median follow up of 26.5 months was 92.1% (95% confidence interval 83.1%-96.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma typically presents at a low stage and grade and has favorable survival outcomes. A nephron-sparing approach to treatment should be considered when feasible due to the tumor's indolent nature and propensity towards multifocality.

Outcome of advanced renal cell carcinoma arising in end-stage renal disease: comparison with sporadic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The data regarding oncological outcome in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) arising in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are limited.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with advanced RCC on maintenance dialysis therapy (ESRD-RCC) and treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were retrospectively evaluated. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) after initiation of first-line TKI therapy in ESRD-RCC patients were compared to those in RCC arising in the general population (sporadic RCC).

RESULTS

A total of 36 and 240 patients were diagnosed with advanced ESRD-RCC and sporadic RCC, respectively. PFS and OS were significantly shorter in patients with ESRD-RCC than in those with sporadic RCC (p = 0.0004 and p = 0.0045). After adjusting for histopathological type, MSKCC risk and liver metastasis status, ESRD status (ESRD-RCC vs. sporadic RCC) was not an independent risk factor for PFS or OS (both, p > 0.05). The ORR tended to be lower in patients with ESRD-RCC than in those with sporadic RCC (11% vs. 28%, p = 0.0833). In 34 patients with ESRD-RCC treated with sorafenib, longer duration of dialysis was an independent prognostic factor for shorter OS (hazard ratio 3.21, p = 0.0370).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome of advanced ESRD-RCC was poorer than that of sporadic RCC, but this finding was affected by other prognostic factors. Nevertheless, the study suggested that advanced ESRD-RCC was not an indolent disease. Additionally, patients with a longer duration of dialysis therapy might require careful monitoring.

Cytomorphologic analysis of clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma: Distinguishing diagnostic features

BACKGROUND

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCPRCC) shares histomorphologic and immunophenotypic features with clear cell RCC (CCRCC) and papillary RCC (PRCC).

METHODS

We compared the cytomorphology, immunoprofile, and clinical management of CCPRCC (n = 18), CCRCC (n = 20), and PRCC (n = 18).

RESULTS

Useful cytomorphologic features for comparing CCPRCC with CCRCC include 3-dimensional clusters (72% vs 0%), papillae (50% vs 0%) and sheets (22% vs 70%), vasculature (papillary vs traversing), naked nuclei (17% vs 100%), prominent nucleoli (0% vs 65%), and amount of cytoplasm (small vs large). Useful cytomorphologic features for comparing CCPRCC with PRCC include sheets (22% vs 61%), naked nuclei (17% vs 67%), nuclear grooves (5% vs 67%) and inclusions (17% vs 67%), and pigmented cytoplasm (17% vs 83%). At on-site evaluation, 16 of 18 (86%) CCPRCC specimens were deemed adequate, with suspicion for CCPRCC in 5 of 16 (31%) cases. Core histology of CCPRCC showed low-grade malignant cells in nests (67%), tubules (100%), and papillae (72%), frequently in myxohyaline stroma (67%). Immunostains demonstrated expression of cytokeratin 7 (CK7; 100%), carbonic anhydrase IX (CA IX; 100%, cup-like), CD10 (53%, reverse cup-like), and α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR; 35%). Among 18 CCPRCC patients, 9 (50%) underwent nephrectomy, 5 (28%) underwent cryo-ablation, and 4 (22%) were under surveillance with serial imaging.

CONCLUSION

Certain morphologic features represent diagnostic criteria of CCPRCC in cytology specimens and help distinguish CCPRCC from CCRCC and PRCC. Immunostaining patterns with CK7, CA IX, CD10, and AMACR can confirm the diagnosis. Delineating CCPRCC from more biologically aggressive RCC types in cytology specimens enhances presurgical and clinical management of patients given CCPRCC's low-grade, indolent behavior.

A comparison of the prognosis of papillary and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Evidence from a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prognosis of papillary and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in order to determine the optimal follow-up and therapy for patients with RCC.

METHODS

A systematic search of Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases was conducted for articles published through July 30, 2018, reporting on a comparison of the prognosis of papillary RCC and clear cell RCC using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Of 1896 studies, 11 were considered for the evidence synthesis. A total of 35,832 patients were included. Of these patients, 6907 patients were diagnosed with papillary renal cell carcinoma, and 28,925 patients were diagnosed with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The prognosis of papillary RCC was better than that of clear cell RCC (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 0.56; P < .001; I = 91.9%). A subgroup analysis indicated that papillary RCC was associated with better outcomes (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.50-1.16), and a trend toward a higher risk of mortality was observed in patients with metastatic RCC presenting with papillary histology, but the difference was not statistically significant (HR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.71-1.76, P = .085). Pooled data suggested a lack of a significant difference between papillary RCC (p-RCC) type 1 and clear cell RCC (cc-RCC) (HR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.12-0.73, P = .085). The pooled HR for the prognosis of p-RCC type 2 compared to cc-RCC was 1.69 (95% CI 0.93-3.08; P = .032).

CONCLUSION

Papillary RCC is associated with better outcomes than clear cell RCC in patients without metastases, but not in patients with metastases. Optimal follow-up or therapy for patients with RCC should be assigned according to the tumor stage and subtype.

Prognostic Factors for Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes Diagnosed According to the 2016 WHO Renal Tumor Classification: a Study Involving 928 Patients

The morphotype and grade of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in 928 nephrectomies were reclassified according to the 2016 WHO classification in order to analyze the distribution and outcomes of RCC subtypes in Hungary, to assess whether microscopic tumor necrosis is an independent prognostic factor in clear cell RCC, and to study whether a two-tiered grading (low/high) for clear cell and papillary RCC provides similar prognostic information to that of the four-tiered ISUP grading system. 83.4% of the cohort were clear cell, 6.9% papillary, 4.5% chromophobe, 2.3% unclassified, 1.1% Xp11 translocation, 1.1% clear cell papillary, 0.3% collecting duct and 0.1% mucinous tubular and spindle cell RCCs. RCC occurred in 16 patients with end-stage kidney disease and none of them displayed features of acquired cystic kidney disease-associated RCC. The 5-year survival rates were as follows: chromophobe 100%, clear cell papillary 100%, clear cell low-grade 96%, papillary type 1 92%, clear cell high-grade 63%, papillary type 2 65%, unclassified 46%, Xp11 translocation 20%, and collecting duct 0%. The 5-year survival rates in low-grade and high-grade papillary RCC were 95% and 59%, respectively. In clear cell RCC, only the grade, the stage and the positive surgical margin proved to be independent prognostic factors statistically. Overall, papillary RCC occurred relatively infrequently; microscopic tumor necrosis in clear cell RCC did not predict the outcome independently of the tumor grading; and the assignment of clear cell and papillary RCCs into low-grade or high-grade tumors was in terms of survival no worse than the ISUP grading.

Cytomorphology of clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCPRCC) shares some morphologic and immunohistochemical markers with clear cell RCC and papillary RCC. To the author's knowledge, its cytomorphology on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or touch preparations (TPs) of core needle biopsy specimens has not been well delineated in the English language literature.

METHODS

The FNA/TP cytomorphology of 7 retrieved cases was studied.

RESULTS

The tumor cells were arranged in small nests (100%), 3-dimensional clusters (71%), papillary/tubular/acinar arrays (43%), and as single cells (57%). The tumor cells were columnar (100%) and polygonal (57%) in shape, with eccentric, small, round-to-oval nuclei. The nuclei contained evenly distributed, fine granular chromatin and demonstrated a smooth nuclear membrane (100%) (Fuhrman grade 1 to 2). The tumor cells had a moderate amount of delicate or clear cytoplasm containing small vacuoles (100%) and ill-defined cytoplasmic borders (100%). Scattered macrophages (57%) and necrosis (29%) were identified in the background. Vessels were noted within the papillary cores, transversing or surrounding nests of tumors. Immunochemical studies demonstrated expression of cytokeratin 7 (CK7) (100%), carbonic anhydrase IX (CA 9) (100% in a cup-shaped membranous pattern), α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) (50%), and CD10 (43%). The tumor cells were negative for CD117.

CONCLUSIONS

CCPRCC was found to demonstrate cytologic features that when taken together are helpful in diagnosing CCPRCC on FNA smears and TPs. If core needle biopsy specimens or cell blocks are available, an immunohistochemical panel including CK7, CA IX, CD10, and AMACR may help in excluding congeners. This subtype of RCC requires differentiation from clear cell RCC and papillary RCC due to its low-grade indolent behavior. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:48-54. © 2016 American Cancer Society.