The Asia-Pacific AMS800 artificial urinary sphincter consensus statement

This Asia-Pacific (AP) AMS 800™ artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) consensus statement aims to provide a set of practical recommendations to assist surgeons with the AMS 800 device surgery. The AP consensus committee consisted of key opinion leaders with extensive experience with AMS 800 surgery across several AP countries. The panel reviewed and discussed relevant findings with emphasis on locoregional and specific clinical challenges relevant to the AP region. Recommendations were made in key areas namely (1) patient selection and informed consent process; (2) preoperative assessment; (3) dealing with co-existing urological disorders; (4) surgical principles and intraoperative troubleshooting; (5) postoperative care; (6) special populations; and (7) cost analysis and comparative review. The AMS 800 device should be offered to males with moderate to severe stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Full informed consent should be undertaken, and emphasis is placed on surgical contraindications and high-risk candidates. The presence of a surgical mentor or referral to experts is recommended in complex AUS candidates. Preoperative cystoscopy with or without multichannel urodynamic study is necessary and patients with pre-existing urological disorders should be treated adequately and clinically stable before surgery. Adherence to strict patient selection and safe surgical principles are critical to ensure excellent clinical outcomes and minimize complications. Given that InhibiZone-coated device is not available in many AP countries, the use of prophylactic antibiotics pre-and post-operatively are recommended. The AMS 800 device should be prepared according to the manufacturer's guidelines and remains a cost-effective treatment for male SUI. The AMS 800 device remains the surgical benchmark for male SUI but is associated with certain mechanical limitations and a unique set of complications.

Artificial Urinary Sphincter Complications: Risk Factors, Workup, and Clinical Approach

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review risk factors for AUS complications and present a systematic approach to their diagnosis and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Established risk factors for AUS complications include catheterization, channel TURP, pelvic radiation, urethroplasty, anticoagulation, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, frailty index, hypertension, low albumin, and low testosterone. We present our algorithm for diagnosis and management of AUS complications. Despite being the gold standard of treatment for men with SUI, major and minor complications can occur at any point after AUS insertion. Careful consideration of the urologic, medical, and operative risk factors for each patient can help prevent complications. A systematic approach to early and late complications facilitates their identification and effective management. The evaluating urologist must have a thorough understanding of potential AUS complications in order to restore quality of life in men with bothersome SUI.

Continence outcomes following a modification of the Mitchell bladder neck reconstruction in myelomeningocele: A single institution experience

BACKGROUND

Many surgical procedures have been developed to improve continence in myelomeningocele patients. Our modification of the Mitchell bladder neck reconstruction involves removal of a diamond-shaped wedge of the anterior bladder neck, tubularization of the bladder neck and urethra to increase outlet resistance, and addition of a bladder neck autologous fascial sling.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate rates of continence and re-operation in children with myelomeningocele undergoing this Modified Mitchell bladder neck reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively identified children with myelomeningocele having undergone bladder neck reconstruction at our tertiary care referral center from 2012 to 2016.

RESULTS

We identified twelve patients with myelomeningocele undergoing this modified bladder neck reconstruction with sling, four female and eight male, median age at the time of surgery was 7 years old. After initial bladder neck reconstruction with sling only 33% were dry. All patients with bothersome leakage after reconstruction underwent bladder neck bulking. Two patients of twelve (17%) ultimately underwent bladder neck closure and achieved dryness. 58% of patients ultimately achieved continence (Summary Figure).

DISCUSSION

Our modification of the bladder neck reconstruction with autologous fascial sling showed midterm rates of incontinence near 60%, with initial post-operative continence at 33%. Our patients, however, required higher rates of reoperation (43%) than previous results would suggest (27%). The first line of re-treatment was bladder neck bulking, but this showed low success. While this procedure is minimally invasive and safe, reasonable expectations of efficacy should be established with families when offering this option. Two patients (17%) required bladder neck closure to achieve dryness. While bladder neck closure is often considered a procedure of last resort, both of these patients were immediately dry. Perhaps bladder neck closure should be considered earlier in our algorithm of surgical continence.

CONCLUSION

Our rates of continence with the Modified Mitchell bladder neck reconstruction with a fascial sling were similar to prior bladder neck reconstructions. We did find higher rates of reoperation, and further modifications are warranted to continue to improve continence after surgical procedures in the myelomeningocele population. Select cases may warrant early consideration of bladder neck closure.