Quality of life outcomes after low dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: Current status and future perspectives

Comparative effectiveness of low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy in favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer

We compared clinical outcomes associated with seed brachytherapy (SEED-BT) alone and SEED-BT plus external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for intermediate-risk prostate cancer using propensity score-matched analysis. From 2006 to 2011, 993 patients diagnosed with intermediate-risk were treated with either SEED-BT alone (n = 775) or SEED-BT plus EBRT (n = 158) at 3 tertiary hospitals. In the propensity score-matched analysis (102 pairs), median follow-up was 95 months (range 18–153 months). The 8-year biochemical recurrence-free rate (bRFR) was significantly better with SEED-BT alone than with combined radiotherapy (93.3% vs. 88.4%; HR 0.396; 95% CI 0.158–0.991). Grade 2 or greater late genitourinary toxicities were significantly fewer with SEED-BT alone than with combined radiotherapy (21.0% vs. 33.2%; HR 0.521; 95% CI 0.308–0.881). Similarly, grade 2 or greater late gastrointestinal toxicities were significantly fewer with SEED-BT alone (0% vs. 12.2%; HR 0.125; 95% CI 0.040–0.390). For the unfavorable intermediate-risk subgroups, SEED-BT alone yielded a significantly better bRFR than the combined radiotherapy (HR 0.325; 95% CI 0.115–0.915). SEED-BT alone might be a better disease-management plan than SEED-BT plus EBRT for intermediate-risk prostate cancer regardless of favorable and unfavorable characteristics.

Image-guided robots for low dose rate prostate brachytherapy: Perspectives on safety in design and use

BACKGROUND

Image-guided brachytherapy (BT) robots can be used to assist urologists during seed implantation, thereby improving therapeutic effects. However, safety issues must be considered in the design of such robots, including their structure, mechanical movements, function, materials and actuators. Previous reviews focused on image-guided prostate BT robot technology (e.g., imaging and robot navigation technology and robot system introduction); however, this review is the first time that safety issues have been investigated as part of a study on low-dose-rate (LDR) prostate BT robots.

METHODS

Multiple electronic databases were searched for LDR prostate BT robot articles published during the last 24 years (1996-2020), with a particular focus on two aspects of robots: safety in design and use.

RESULTS

We retrieved a total of 26 LDR prostate BT robots. BT robots were divided into ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and fusion-guided systems. The conditions associated with each system were then analysed to develop a set of requirements for the safety of prostate BT robots. Recommendations are also provided for future BT robot development.

CONCLUSIONS

The transrectal approach for prostate seed implantation is safer than the traditional transperineal approach. Research into the control of a steerable needle by the urologists and robot, the needle deflection model, and robotic automated needle changing and seed injection equipment should be pursued in a future study.