Partial nephrectomy preserves renal function without increasing the risk of complications compared with radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinomas of stages pT2-3a

A clinical study on 3D virtual model-assisted precise navigation for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is a standard surgical treatment option for renal tumors. Prior to LPN, it is necessary to evaluate the tumor condition and develop a surgical plan using precise imaging.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical application value of 3D virtual model (3DVM) in LPN.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients with renal tumor who underwent LPN were measured. Patients were divided into three cohorts (A, B, C) according to the difficulty of surgery. Each group was further divided into the test and control groups based on the application of preoperative 3DVM. Surgical safety and efficacy were assessed, and a questionnaire was developed to investigate the opinions of patients and physicians on 3DVM.

RESULTS

The duration of LPN and intraoperative renal artery occlusion were significantly different between the test and control groups in both cohorts A and B (P< 0.05). In cohort C, the surgical duration, duration of intraoperative renal artery occlusion, length of stay, time to postoperative ambulation, intraoperative bleeding, incidence of postoperative bleeding were significantly between the two groups (P< 0.05). The analysis both of patients and physicians questionnaire scores were statistically significant (P< 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

3DVM contributes to safer and more effective LPN. It benefits both doctors and patients.

Partial versus radical nephrectomy for the treatment of pT3aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma: A propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND

The survival benefit of partial nephrectomy (PN) in pT3a RCC patients is controversial. Here we aimed to explore the potential benefit of PN for pT3aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data of patients with pT3aN0M0 RCC who were diagnosed between 2010 and 2012 in the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were retrospectively collected. Overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were compared using a Cox proportional hazards model between PN and radical nephrectomy (RN) in pT3aN0M0 RCC. Propensity score (-adjusted, -stratified, -weighted, and -matched) analyses were performed to control for imbalances in individual risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 1277 patients with pT3aN0M0 RCC were identified, of whom 200 patients were treated with PN and 1077 patients were RN. PN showed favorable OS and CSS in 0-4 cm pT3aN0M0 RCC (P < 0.05), and similar OS and CSS in 4-7 cm pT3aN0M0 RCC, compared with RN using un-adjusted analyses. The Propensity score analyses further demonstrated the survival benefit of PN compared with the RN in 0-4 cm pT3aN0M0 RCC (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, PN was associated with improved survival compared with RN in 0-4 cm pT3aN0M0 RCC. Moreover, survival was comparable between PN and RN in 4-7 cm pT3aN0M0 RCC. These data provided evidence that PN could be an alternative choice for T3aN0M0 RCC less than 7 cm. Particularly, patients with 0-4 cm pT3aN0M0 RCC might benefit from PN.

Nephrometric scoring system: Recent advances and outlooks

A nephrometry scoring system is a key standard to evaluate the feasibility of partial nephrectomy (PN). Whether based on two-dimensional or three-dimensional images, simplicity, effectiveness, and practicality are the keys to the nephrometric scoring system. Since the emergence of RENAL score in 2009, numerous scoring systems based on different anatomical parameters are established to seek accurately and few parameters to assess the risk of PN and complications. This study aimed to achieve a three-game winning streak in PN more easily and efficiently (negative resection margin, maximum preservation of normal nephron function, and avoiding short-term and long-term complications). Using PubMed, we counted 28 kinds of nephrometric scoring systems. We considered only English literatures published and excluded editorials, commentaries, and meeting abstracts. To the best of our knowledge, this is to date and most comprehensive summary as well as an outlook of the nephrometric scoring system.

Partial versus radical nephrectomy in clinical T2 renal masses

OBJECTIVE

To report perioperative, renal functional and oncologic outcomes for patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy for cT2 renal masses.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients who underwent partial (n = 72) or radical nephrectomy (n = 379) for cT2 renal masses from 2000 to 2016. After propensity adjustment using inverse probability weighting, the following were compared by surgery (partial or radical nephrectomy): complications, renal function measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate as continuous and as <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 1 and 3 years postoperatively and overall, metastases-free survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

RESULTS

After propensity adjustment, clinical and radiographic features were well-balanced between groups. Overall and severe complications were more common for partial compared with radical nephrectomy, although not statistically significant (19 vs 13%, P = 0.14 and 4 vs 2%, P = 0.3, respectively). Estimated glomerular filtration rate change at 1 and 3 years was more pronounced in radical compared with partial nephrectomy (median -16 vs -5 and -14 vs -2, respectively, P < 0.001). A greater proportion of radical nephrectomy patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 at 1 and 3 years (55 vs 17% and 48 vs 17%, respectively, P < 0.01). In renal cell carcinoma patients, overall, metastases-free and cancer-specific survival were not significantly different between groups (median survivor follow up 7.1 years, interquartile range 3.6-11.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Partial nephrectomy appears to be a relatively safe and a potentially effective treatment for cT2 renal masses, conferring better renal functional preservation compared with radical nephrectomy. These data support continued use of partial nephrectomy for renal masses >7 cm in appropriately selected patients.

A meta-analysis for comparison of partial nephrectomy vs. radical nephrectomy in patients with pT3a renal cell carcinoma

Background

Kidney cancer is the most common malignant tumor of the kidney in adults. However, in terms of the treatment for pT3a renal cell carcinoma (RCC), whether partial nephrectomy (PN) can be selected is still controversial. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of PN and radical nephrectomy (RN) in treatment for patients with pT3a RCC.

Methods

The relative English databases including PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies comparing PN and RN for pT3a RCC between 2010 and 2020. Stata 13.0 software was used to compare the cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), cancer-specific mortality (CSM), relapse-free survival (RFS), complications and positive surgical margin.

Results

Nine articles were included with a total of 3,391 patients, of whom 2,113 received RN and 1,278 received PN. The results showed that there is no statistical difference in CSS, OS, CSM, RFS, complications and positive surgical margin between RN and PN. No heterogeneity was shown in study.

Conclusions

There were no differences in the CSS, OS, CSM, RFS, complications and positive surgical margin of the patients in RN and PN group. For pT3a RCC, RN did not provide a better survival benefit compared to PN. Considering PN can suppress the progression of tumor and reduce the risk of postoperative chronic renal insufficiency, we found PN is a good choice for pT3a RCC. However, further large-sample, studies are still needed in future.