Aberrant expression of histone deacetylase 8 in endometriosis and its potential as a therapeutic target

Purpose

To screen Zn2+-dependent histone deacetylase (HDAC) 1-11 in endometriotic cells and then evaluated the HDACs identified from the screening in ovarian endometrioma (OE) and deep endometriotic (DE) lesions, and to evaluate the therapeutic potential of HDAC8 inhibition in mice.

Methods

Quantification of gene and protein expression levels of HDAC1-11 in endometriotic cells stimulated by TGF-β1, and immunohistochemistry analysis of Class I HDACs and HDAC6 in OE/DE lesion samples. The therapeutic potential of HDAC8 inhibition was evaluated by a mouse model of deep endometriosis.

Results

The screening identified Class I HDACs and HDAC6 as targets of interest. Immunohistochemistry analysis found a significant elevation in HDAC8 immunostaining in both OE and DE lesions, which was corroborated by gene and protein expression quantification. For other Class I HDACs and HDAC6, their lesional expression was more subtle and nuanced. HDAC1 and HDAC6 staining was significantly elevated in DE lesions while HDAC2 and HDAC3 staining was reduced in DE lesions. Treatment of mice with induced deep endometriosis with an HDAC8 inhibitor resulted in significantly longer hotplate latency, a reduction of lesion weight by nearly two-thirds, and significantly reduced lesional fibrosis.

Conclusions

These findings highlight the progression-dependent nature of specific HDAC aberrations in endometriosis, and demonstrate, for the first titme, the therapeutic potential of suppressing HDAC8.

Corroborating evidence for aberrant expression of histone deacetylase 8 in endometriosis

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the dynamic change in staining of Class I HDACs and Hdac6 in lesions harvested serially from different time points in mice with induced endometriosis. In addition, the effect of Hdac8 activation as well as Hdac8 and Hdac6 inhibition on lesional progression and fibrogenesis was evaluated.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry analysis of Class I HDACs and Hdac6 in serially harvested lesion samples in mouse. Hdac8 activation, as well as Hdac6/8 inhibition, was evaluated in mice with induced endometriosis.

Results

We found a progressive increase in lesional staining of Hdac1, Hdac8, and Hdac6 and gradual decrease in Hdac2 staining and consistently reduced staining of Hdac3 during the course of lesional progression. The stromal Hdac8 staining correlated most prominently with all markers of lesional fibrosis. Hdac8 activation significantly accelerated the progression and fibrogenesis of endometriotic lesions. In contrast, specific inhibition of Hdac8 or Hdac6, especially of Hdac8, significantly hindered lesional progression and fibrogenesis.

Conclusions

Hdac8 is progressively and aberrantly overexpressed as endometriotic lesions progress. This, along with the documented HDAC1 upregulation in endometriosis and the overwhelming evidence for the therapeutic potentials of HDACIs, calls for further and in-depth investigation of epigenetic aberrations of endometriosis in general and of HDACs in particular.

Pharmacotherapeutic management of trigeminal neuropathic pain: an update

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines recommend a number of pharmacotherapeutic options used as monotherapy or in combination with others for treating the pain of trigeminal neuropathy.

AREAS COVERED

The authors examine the pharmacotherapeutic options for treating trigeminal neuralgia and supporting evidence in the literature. Guidelines reported the most effective treatment for trigeminal neuropathy, in particular trigeminal neuralgia, appears to be carbamazepine or oxcabazepine, but side effects can be treatment limiting. Lamotrigine and gabapentin are also recommended in guidance. In real-world clinical practice, baclofen, cannabinoids, eslicarbazepine, levetiracetam, brivaracetam, lidocaine, misoprostol, opioids, phenytoin, fosphenytoin, pimozide, sodium valproate, sumatriptan, tizanidine, tocainide, tricyclic antidepressants, and vixotrigine are sometimes used, either as monotherapy or in combination. The relatively small patient population has limited the number of large-scale studies and there is limited evidence on which to base prescribing choices.

EXPERT OPINION

While there is no optimal pharmacotherapy for treating trigeminal neuropathy, advancements in our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of this condition and drug development indicate promise for NaV inhibitors, despite the fact that not all patients respond to them and they may have potentially treatment-limiting side effects. Nevertheless, better understanding of NaV channels may be important avenues for future drug development for trigeminal neuropathy.