Week 4 viral load predicts long-term suppression of hepatitis B virus DNA during antiviral therapy: improving hepatitis B treatment in the real world

A randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation phase I/II multicenter trial of low-dose cidofovir for BK polyomavirus nephropathy

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is an important cause of allograft dysfunction and failure in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and there are no proven effective treatments. Case reports and in vitro data support the potential activity of cidofovir against BK polyomavirus (BKPyV).

METHODS

We report the results of a phase I/II, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized dose-escalation trial of cidofovir in KTRs with biopsy-confirmed BKPyVAN and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥30 mL/min. Intravenous cidofovir (0.25 mg/kg/dose or 0.5 mg/kg/dose) or placebo was administered on days 0, 7, 21, and 35, with final follow-up through day 49.

RESULTS

The trial was prematurely discontinued due to slow accrual after 22 KTRs had completed the study. Cidofovir was safe and tolerated at the doses and duration studied. The proportion of subjects with any adverse event (AE) was similar between groups (9/14 [64%] in the combined cidofovir dose groups and 6/8 [75%] in the placebo group); 84% of AEs were mild. BKPyV DNAemia reduction by day 49 was similar between groups (>1 log10 reduction in (2/9 [22.2%] of 0.25 mg/kg group, 1/5 [20%] of 0.5 mg/kg group, and 2/8 [25%] of placebo group).

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results indicate that low-dose cidofovir was safe and tolerated but had no significant BKPyV-specific antiviral effect in KTRs with BKPyVAN.

Social, clinical and biological barriers to hepatitis B virus suppression with nucleos/tide analogue therapy: who is at risk and what should we do about it?

Optimising treatment outcomes for people living with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is key to advancing progress towards international targets for the elimination of viral hepatitis as a public health threat. Nucleos/tide analogue agents (most commonly tenofovir or entecavir) are well-tolerated and suppress viraemia effectively in the majority of those who are offered therapy. However, outcomes are not consistent, and we explore the factors that may contribute to incomplete therapeutic responses. We discuss situations in which therapy is not accessible, affordable or acceptable, reflecting the impact of social, cultural and economic barriers, stigma and discrimination, low awareness, poor access to health systems and comorbidity. These challenges are amplified in certain vulnerable populations, increasing the risk of adverse outcomes-which include liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma-among people who already experience marginalisation and health inequities. We also tackle the physiological and biological mechanisms for incomplete virological suppression in individuals receiving HBV treatment, considering the possible impact of inadequate tissue drug levels, poor drug-target avidity and genomic resistance. These factors are interdependent, leading to a complex landscape in which socioeconomic challenges increase the challenge of consistent daily therapy and set the scene for selection of drug resistance. By putting a spotlight on this neglected topic, we aim to raise awareness, prompt dialogue, inform research and advocate for enhanced interventions. As criteria for HBV treatment eligibility relax, the population receiving therapy will expand, and there is a pressing need to optimise outcomes and close the equity gap.