Venous thromboembolism management in Northeast Melbourne: how does it compare to international guidelines and data?

Predicting the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism: Impact and therapeutic consequences of inherited thrombophilia

BACKGROUND

Over the past decades, thrombophilia testing in patients with venous thrombo-embolism has increased tremendously. However, the role of inherited thrombophilie in prediction the risk of recurrence remains controversial. Consequently, it is still unclear whether thrombophilia testing influences decisions regarding duration of anticoagulation in clinical practices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact if inherited thrombophilia on venous thrombosis treatment decisions and on predicting the risk of recurrence.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal study (January 2011-Decembre 2016) including 131 patients with confirmed venous thrombo-embolism referred to the hematology laboratory from the internal medicine department for inherited thrombophilia screening was carried out.

RESULTS

The mean age patients was 39.4 years and the sex ratio (M/F) was 0.61. Inherited thrombophilia was confirmed in 27.5% of patients. A long term anticoagulation was decided in 46.9% of patients with thrombophilia. There was no significant difference in the duration of anticoagulation between patients with or without thrombophilia. Thrombosis recurrence was recorded in 16 (17%) patients. The 24 years cumulative incidence of recurrence was 19% in patients with thrombophilia and 17% in those without (plog Rank= 0.6). Inherited thrombophilia was not associated with increased risk of recurrence after treatment withdrawal (Hazard ratio=1.31 IC (0.47-3.63); P=0.6).

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice, inherited thrombophilia did not influence anticoagulation duration and was not associated with a higher venous thrombosis risk of recurrence. It seems to be less relevant for decision making than presumed.

Individualised Risk Assessments for Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: New Frontiers in the Era of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality and is associated with high recurrence rates. The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the 2010s has changed the landscape of VTE management. DOACs have become the preferred anticoagulant therapy for their ease of use, predictable pharmacokinetics, and improved safety profile. Increasingly, guidelines have recommended long term anticoagulation for some indications such as following first unprovoked major VTE, although an objective individualised risk assessment for VTE recurrence remains elusive. The balance of preventing VTE recurrence needs to be weighed against the not insignificant bleeding risk, which is cumulative with prolonged use. Hence, there is a need for an individualised, targeted approach for assessing the risk of VTE recurrence, especially in those patients in whom the balance between benefit and risk of long-term anticoagulation is not clear. Clinical factors alone do not provide the level of discrimination required on an individual level. Laboratory data from global coagulation assays and biomarkers may provide enhanced risk assessment ability and are an active area of research. A review of the prediction models and biomarkers for assessing VTE recurrence risk is provided, with an emphasis on contemporary developments in the era of DOACs and global coagulation assays.

Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism and thrombophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Essentials We investigated direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in venous thromboembolism and thrombophilia. A comprehensive search identified 10 studies, 8 of which were included in a meta-analysis. DOACs were overall safe and effective in patients with venous thromboembolism and thrombophilia. Efficacy/safety of DOACs was maintained in low-risk antiphospholipid syndrome patient subgroup. SUMMARY: Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in acute and long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, their role in management of thrombophilia-associated VTE is controversial. Methods Through a comprehensive search on MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov, we identified 10 eligible studies, 8 of which reporting data on 1994 thrombophilia patients were included in a random-effects meta-analysis. Eligible studies were phase 2 to 3 randomized controlled trials comparing DOACs to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with VTE, including those with thrombophilia. Results Of eight studies included in meta-analysis, four evaluated rivaroxaban, three dabigatran, and one edoxaban. No results could be obtained on apixaban use. The rates of VTE recurrence (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.34-1.44; I2  = 0%) and major/clinically relevant non-major bleeding events (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.62-1.36; I2  = 23%) were similar between thrombophilia patients treated with DOACs compared to VKAs. Results were comparable to findings in patients without known thrombophilia: RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.80-1.30; I2  = 46% for VTE recurrence and RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.90; I2  = 84% for major/clinically relevant non-major bleeding events. Conclusions Rates of VTE recurrence and bleeding events were both low and comparable in patients with various thrombophilias receiving either treatment, suggesting that DOACs are an appropriate treatment option in this population. Due to limited data, it is unclear whether these findings apply to specific subgroups such as high-risk antiphospholipid syndrome, uncommon thrombophilias, or the use of apixaban.

Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Submassive Pulmonary Embolism

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. PE associated with right ventricular strain, termed submassive or intermediate-risk PE, is associated with an increased rate of clinical deterioration and short-term mortality. Trials have demonstrated systemic thrombolytics may improve patient outcomes, but they carry a risk of major hemorrhage. Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) may offer similar efficacy to and a lower risk of catastrophic hemorrhage than systemic thrombolysis. Three prospective trials have evaluated CDT for submassive PE; ULTIMA, SEATTLE II, and PERFECT. These trials provide evidence that CDT may improve radiographic efficacy endpoints in submassive PE with acceptable rates of major hemorrhage. However, the lack of clinical endpoints, long-term follow-up, and adequate sample size limit their generalizability. Future trials should be adequately powered and controlled so that the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of CDT can be definitively determined.