High rates of respiratory symptoms and airway disease in mental health inpatients in a tertiary centre

Primary care for people with severe mental illness and comorbid obstructive airways disease: a qualitative study of patient perspectives with integrated stakeholder feedback

OBJECTIVES

To explore patient and stakeholder perspectives on primary respiratory care for people with severe mental illness (SMI) and comorbid obstructive airways disease (OAD).

DESIGN

Qualitative, semistructured qualitative interviews were undertaken with a purposive sample of people with a diagnosis of SMI (bipolar illness, schizophrenia, affective disorder with psychosis) and comorbid asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Transcribed data were analysed using an interpretive phenomenological approach. Study results were discussed with stakeholders.

SETTING

Eight UK general practices.

PARTICIPANTS

16 people aged 45-75 years, with SMI and comorbid asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were interviewed. Twenty-one people, four with lived experience of SMI and seventeen health/social care/third sector practitioners, participated in discussion groups at a stakeholder event.

RESULTS

Participants described disability and isolation arising from the interplay of SMI and OAD symptoms. Social support determined ease of access to primary care. Self-management of respiratory health was not person-centred as practitioners failed to consider individual needs and health literacy. Participants perceived smoking cessation impossible without tailored support. Less than half of the practices facilitated personalised access to timely primary care and continuity. Overall, there was a reliance on urgent care if service adaptations and social support were lacking. The stakeholder group expressed concern about gaps in care, the short-term funding of community organisations and fear of loss of benefits. Potential solutions focused on supported navigation of care pathways, relational continuity, individual and community asset building and the evolving social prescriber role.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that despite UK guidelines and incentives to optimise physical healthcare, primary care fails to consistently deliver integrated biopsychosocial care for patients with SMI and OAD. Collaborative, personalised care that builds social capital and tailors support for self-management is needed, alongside service-level interventions to enhance access to healthcare for patients with comorbid SMI and OAD.

"Somebody else's business": The challenge of caring for patients with mental health problems on medical and surgical wards

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: People with mental health problems have higher rates of physical health concerns and hospital admissions than those without mental health problems. These patients have poorer outcomes from surgery and have worse experiences of care when admitted for medical or surgical procedures. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: This paper looks to understand why care may be poorer for patients with mental health problems by speaking to staff providing care in these settings. We spoke to 30 general hospital staff about mental health on the wards and found that a lack of leadership and ownership for prioritising mental health led to people not seeing it as their job, and that it was somebody else's business to manage that side of care. We also found that the emotional effect of caring for people who had attempted suicide or had self-harm injuries was difficult for staff, impacting on staff well-being and leading them to distance themselves from providing care in those cases. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: There is a need for staff to be supported from the top-down, with management providing clear leadership around issues and pathways for mental health needs so they know the best way to provide care and encourage collaborative working. In addition, bottom-up support is needed to help staff personally manage their own well-being and mental health, including supervision and debriefing from mental health specialists to improve understanding from the patient's perspective and to provide emotional support to manage difficulties. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This paper places focus on the care of patients with mental health problems in medical and surgical care settings highlighting the interplay between mental and physical health from a perspective that is less often explored. This paper provides insights into the multidisciplinary nature of nursing and the need for integrated care. This provides findings that build a picture of how mental health nursing specialism is needed beyond psychiatric wards and within medical and surgical settings. ABSTRACT: Introduction Evidence shows that patients with mental health problems have poorer physical health outcomes, increased mortality and experience poorer care during surgery and medical admissions. Issues related to lack of training, stigmatizing attitudes, fear or hopelessness may help understand these poor outcomes. Aim To explore the experiences of staff in providing care for people with mental health problems. Method A qualitative service evaluation approach was used. Participants working in an acute care hospital in inner-city London were recruited across professions and job levels using a self-selection sampling method. A total of 30 participants took part in semi-structured interviews (n = 17) and two focus groups (n = 13), and data were thematically analysed. Relevant organizational documents and service use data were utilized to inform the evaluation. Results Key themes were organized across the macro, meso and micro levels to understand the levels of disconnection and silence around mental health in acute care. Themes include systemic factors surrounding the institutional culture, ward cultures and collaborative working, and individuals' sense-making of mental health and personal well-being. Implications for practice These findings signpost the growing need for greater mental health nursing input on medical and surgical wards and within these teams to provide informed knowledge, support and supervision.

Supportive and palliative care for people with respiratory problems and preexisting serious mental illness

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

People living with serious mental illness are at a higher risk of developing respiratory problems that can lead to increased morbidity and early mortality. This review aimed to identify recent advances in care provision for people with respiratory problems and preexisting serious mental illness to ease symptom burden and reduce the risk of premature mortality.

RECENT FINDINGS

Intervention-based studies in this area are scarce. The evidence reviewed originated from observational studies. Concluding comments from the synthesis suggest there are specific needs for proactive screening of respiratory function as part of routine physical health checks across care settings for people living with serious mental illness, more stringent monitoring of comorbid chronic lung conditions and increased attention in reducing the frequency respiratory infections. Integrated services across care settings are needed to support people with serious mental illness to limit the impact of modifiable lifestyle factors known to be detrimental to respiratory health, such as smoking.

SUMMARY

Key priorities are identified to improve accessibility and inclusivity of respiratory care pathways for people living with serious mental illness to support early detection and proactive monitoring of respiratory problems to help reduce the risk of early mortality.

Late Potentials and Early Repolarisation Are Associated With Serious Mental Illness and May Portend Increased Arrhythmic Risk

BACKGROUND

Patients with serious mental illness (SMI) have an increased risk of sudden death. Higher rates of signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) abnormal late potentials (LP), which may be a predictor of sudden death risk, have been shown in patients with schizophrenia. We aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of electrocardiograph (ECG) and SAECG abnormalities in a mixed SMI population.

METHODS

Consecutive consenting inpatients with SMI had 12-lead ECG and SAECG recorded in addition to demographics, diagnoses and medications. Standard criteria for abnormal SAECG were applied. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of SAECG abnormalities including diagnoses, body mass index, ECG parameters, psychotropic medication use, and medications associated with Long QT or Brugada syndromes.

RESULTS

Eighty (80) patients, 49% male, mean age 39±17 years were included. SAECG criteria abnormality for 1, 2 or 3 criteria were seen in 19, 3 and 5 cases (34% in total) respectively. Early repolarisation pattern was seen in 19% of patients. SAECG abnormality was associated with male gender (OR 7.3; 95% CI 2.3-23.4), and schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder diagnosis (OR 7.4; 95% CI 1.9-29.0), but not with medication type or dose.

CONCLUSIONS

In the mixed SMI population studied, there was a high rate of SAECG-detected late potentials (34%) and early repolarisation pattern (19%). Schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder diagnosis was the strongest multivariate predictor identified. Further studies are needed to define the mechanism and significance of these cardiac abnormalities in SMI patients.

Why are somatic diseases in bipolar disorder insufficiently treated?

Background

Somatic diseases, including cardiovascular, respiratory, and cancer diseases, are the main contributors to a shortened life expectancy of 10–20 years in patients with bipolar disorder as compared to the general population. In the general population an increase in survival has been observed over the last decades, primarily due to the advances in primary prophylaxis, medical treatment and progress in early detection and monitoring of somatic diseases. In this narrative review, we discuss the existing literature on treatment and outcomes of cardiovascular, respiratory, and cancer diseases in patients with bipolar disorder, and put this in the context of findings in studies on patients diagnosed with other severe mental disorders.

Main body

The existing literature suggests that patients with bipolar disorder receive fewer or delayed medical interventions, when admitted with severe somatic diseases, compared to those not diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Cardiovascular disease is the most investigated disease regarding outcomes in patients with severe mental illness, and novel findings indicate that the increased mortality following cardiac events in these patients can be reduced if they are intensively treated with secondary prophylactic cardiac intervention. Elderly patients diagnosed with mental disorders and cancer experience a delay in receiving specific cancer treatment. No studies have investigated treatment outcomes in patients with severe mental disease and respiratory diseases.

Conclusion

It is surprising and of major concern that patients with bipolar disorder have not benefitted from the significant improvement that has taken place over time over time of somatic treatments in general, especially in countries with equal and free access to healthcare services. Therefore, no matter whether this situation is a result of a negative attitude from health care providers to patients with mental illness, the result of the patient’s lack of awareness of their physical illness or the results of other factors, further attention including research on developing strategies for improving the management of somatic diseases in patients with bipolar disorder is needed.