Southcare Geriatric Flying Squad: an innovative Australian model providing acute care in residential aged care facilities

What Do We Know About Nurse Practitioner/Physician Care Models in Long-Term Care: Results of a Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

Due to the rise of the nurse practitioner (NP) role in long-term care settings, it is important to understand the underlying structures and processes that influence NP and physician care models. This scoping review aims to answer the question, "What are the structures, processes, and outcomes of care models involving NPs and physicians in long-term care (LTC) homes?" A secondary aim was to describe the structural enablers and barriers across care models.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Seven databases were searched. Studies that described NPs and physicians working in LTC were identified and included in the review. We stratified the findings by care model and synthesized using the Donabedian model, which evaluates health care quality based on 3 dimensions: structure, process, and outcome. We then categorized macro, meso, and micro structural enablers and barriers.

RESULTS

Sixty papers were included in the review. The main structural influencers within 5 care models included policies on scope of practice, clarity of role description, and workload. A limited number of papers referred to the process of enabling the development of a working relationship. Thirty-five (49%) studies described resident, staff, and health system outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Although structural characteristics of NP and physician care models are described in-depth, there is less detail on the processes that occur within the NP and physician care models. We highlight structural barriers and enablers within the care models, allowing for recognition of the importance of organizational influence on the NP and physician relationship. Future work should focus on the processes of the relationships in the models by identifying the drivers and initiators of collaboration between NPs and physicians and how these relationships influence outcomes.

Value-based care of older people-The impact of an acute outreach service unit on emergency medical service missions: A quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND

Transfers to the emergency department can be burdensome for the residents of long-term residential care facilities (LTRCFs) and often lead to adverse effects. Since March 2019, a nurse-led acute outreach service unit "Mobile hospital" (in Finnish, Liikkuva sairaala, LiiSa) has been providing on-site care to LTRCF residents to reduce transfers to the emergency department.

METHODS

This study compares the numbers and acuities of emergency medical service (EMS) missions carried out in the LTRCFs of Espoo and Kauniainen during two six-month periods: before the implementation of LiiSa and with LiiSa in use. In Finland, EMS missions are divided into four categories (A-D), with category A missions being the most urgent. These categories were used to investigate the impact on mission acuities.

RESULTS

Due to the implementation of LiiSa, the number of EMS missions decreased by 16.8% (95% confidence interval 10.6%-22.6%, p < 0.001), the number of category D missions by 19.8% (7.1%-30.8%, p = 0.003) and the number of category C missions by 30.3% (17.3%-41.3%, p < 0.001). Changes in the numbers of category A and B missions were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

LiiSa helped to avoid many transfers of frail LTRCF patients to the emergency department, and it did not hinder the care of patients with true emergencies by EMSs.

Telemedicine vs Face-to-Face for Nursing Home Residents With Acute Presentations: A Noninferiority Study

OBJECTIVES

Telemedicine and face-to-face outreach services to nursing homes (NHs) have been used to reduce hospital utilization rates for acute presentations. However, how these modalities compare against each other is unclear. This article examines if the management of acute presentations in NHs with care involving telemedicine is noninferior to care delivered face-to-face.

DESIGN

A noninferiority study was conducted on a prospective cohort. Face-to-face intervention involved on-site assessment by a geriatrician and aged care clinical nurse specialist (CNS). Telemedicine intervention involved on-site assessment by an aged care CNS with telemedicine input by a geriatrician.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 438 NH residents with acute presentations from 17 NHs between November 2021 and June 2022.

METHODS

Between-group differences in proportion of residents successfully managed on-site and mean number of encounters were evaluated using bootstrapped multiple linear regression; 95% CIs were compared against predefined noninferiority margins with noninferiority P values calculated.

RESULTS

In the adjusted models, care involving telemedicine demonstrated noninferiority in the difference in proportion of residents successfully managed on-site (95% CI lower limit -6.2% to -1.4% vs -10% noninferiority margin; P < .001 for noninferiority) but not in the difference in mean number of encounters (95% CI upper limit 1.42 to 1.50 encounters vs 1 encounter noninferiority margin; P = .7 for noninferiority).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

In our model of care, care that involved telemedicine was noninferior to care delivered face-to-face in managing NH residents with acute presentations on-site. However, additional encounters may be required. Application of telemedicine ought to be tailored to fit the needs and preferences of stakeholders.

Acute outreach service to nursing homes: A systematic review with GRADE and triple aim approach

BACKGROUND

People living in nursing homes face the risk of visiting the emergency department (ED). Outreach services are developing to prevent unnecessary transfers to ED.

AIMS

We aim to assess the performance of acute care services provided to people living in nursing homes or long-term homecare, focusing on ED transfer prevention, safety, cost-effectiveness and experiences.

MATERIALS & METHODS

This review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were peer-reviewed and examined acute outreach services dedicated to delivering care to people in nursing homes or long-term homecare. The service models could also have preventive components. The databases searched were Scopus and CINAHL. In addition, Robins-I and SIGN checklists were used. The primary outcomes of prevented ED transfers or hospitalisations and the composite outcome of adverse events (mortality/Emergency Medical Service or ED visit after outreach service contact related to the same clinical condition) were graded with GRADE.

RESULTS

Fifteen relevant original studies were found-all were observational and focused on nursing homes. The certainty of evidence for acute outreach services with preventive components to prevent ED transfers or hospitalisations was low. Stakeholders were satisfied with these services. The certainty of evidence for solely acute outreach services to prevent ED transfers or hospitalisations was very low and inconclusive. Reporting of adverse events was inconsistent, certainty of evidence for adverse events was low.

CONCLUSION

Published data might support adopting acute outreach services with preventive components for people living in nursing homes to reduce ED transfers, hospitalisations and possibly costs. If an outreach service is started, it is recommended that a cluster-randomised or quasi-experimental research design be incorporated to assess the effectiveness and safety of the service. More evidence is also needed on cost-effectiveness and stakeholders' satisfaction. Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42020211048, date of registration: 25.09.2020.

Use of health and aged care services in Australia following hospital admission for myocardial infarction, stroke or heart failure

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and heart failure (HF) are the leading cause of death amongst the older population worldwide. The aim of this study is to investigate trajectories of use of health and aged care services after hospital admission for MI, stroke or HF among community-dwelling people not previously receiving aged care services.

METHODS

The study population comprised people aged 65+ years from the 45 and Up Study with linked records for hospital stays, aged care services and deaths for the period 2006-14. Among those with an index hospital admission for MI, stroke or HF, we developed Sankey plots to describe and visualize sequences and trajectories of service use (none, re-hospitalization, community care, residential care, death) in the 12 months following discharge. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), for commencing community care and entering residential care (and the other outcomes) within 3, 6 and 12 months, compared to a matched group without MI, stroke or HF.

RESULTS

Two thousand six hundred thirty-nine, two thousand five hundred and two thousand eight hundred seventy-three people had an index hospitalization for MI, stroke and HF, respectively. Within 3 months of hospital discharge, 16, 32 and 29%, respectively, commenced community care (multivariable-adjusted HRs: 1.26 (95%CI:1.18-1.35), 1.53 (95%CI:1.44-1.64) and 1.39 (95%CI:1.32-1.48)); and 7, 18 and 14%, respectively, entered residential care (HRs: 1.25 (95%CI:1.12-1.41), 2.65 (95%CI:2.42-2.91) and 1.50 (95%CI:1.37-1.65)). Likewise, 26, 15 and 28%, respectively, were rehospitalized within 3 months following discharge (multivariable-adjusted HRs: 4.78 (95%CI:4.31-5.32), 3.26 (95%CI:2.91-3.65) and 4.94 (95%CI:4.47-5.46)).

CONCLUSIONS

Older people hospitalized for major CVD may be vulnerable to transition-related risks and have poor health trajectories, thus emphasizing the value of preventing such events and care strategies targeted towards this at-risk group.

What factors influence nursing home use of hospital avoidance programs? An interview study

AIMS

To understand why some nursing homes use hospital avoidance programs more frequently than others.

DESIGN

Two hospital avoidance programs, called residential-in-reach services in Victoria, Australia, were evaluated using a qualitative descriptive design.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2018, 127 semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff from nursing homes, general practitioners and staff from the residential-in reach services. The interviews took an average of 45 min and transcripts were thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Nursing home reliance on residential-in-reach services to manage deteriorating residents was evident in both evaluations. Irrespective of the model of service provision, reliance was associated with: the increased care needs of residents; difficulties accessing timely and appropriate medical care; and the reduced numbers of skilled registered nurses to assess and manage deteriorating residents.

CONCLUSION

The residential-in-reach services are highly regarded by nursing homes. However, some are reliant on these services to provide nursing assessment and management. Using residential-in-reach services to substitute for nursing care, deskills nurses and shifts the cost of providing care from the service provider to other agencies. To provide residents with quality nursing care, the number of skilled registered nurses able to work within their scope of practice needs to be increased in Australian nursing homes.

IMPACT

The findings highlight the challenges of providing care in older people living in aged care. Increasing the number of skilled registered nurses in Australian nursing homes, would support deteriorating residents to stay in familiar surroundings and reduce reliance on external services to provide nursing care.

Burden of cardiovascular diseases in older adults using aged care services

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the burden of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in older adults using community and residential care services.

METHODS

The study population comprised people aged 45+ from the 45 and Up Study (2006-09, n = 266,942) in Australia linked with records for hospital stays, aged care service and deaths for the period 2006-14. Follow-up time for each person was allocated to three categories of service use: no aged care, community care and residential care, with censoring at date of death. We calculated the prevalence at baseline and entry to aged care, and incidence rates for major CVD and six cardiovascular diagnoses, seven cardiovascular interventions (collectively CV interventions), cardiovascular-related intensive care unit stays and cardiovascular death.

RESULTS

The prevalence of major CVD at entry into community care and residential care was 41% and 58% respectively. Incidence per 1,000 person-years of all major CVD hospitalisations and CV interventions, respectively, was 182.8 (95% CI: 180.0-185.8) and 37.0 (95% CI: 35.6-38.4) for people using community care, and 280.7 (95% CI: 272.2-289.4) and 11.7 (95% CI: 9.8-13.9) for people using residential care. Similar trends were observed for each of the CVD diagnoses and interventions. Crude incidence rates for cardiovascular deaths per 1,000 person-years were 1.4 (95% CI: 1.3-1.5) in no aged care, 13.3 (95% CI: 12.6-14.1) in community care, and 149.7 (95% CI: 144.4-155.2) in residential care.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate the significant burden of CVD in people using both community-based and residential aged care services and highlights the importance of optimising cardiovascular care for older adults.

Impact of an acute geriatric outreach service to residential aged care facilities on hospital admissions

INTRODUCTION

Residential aged care facility (RACF) residents frequently present to the emergency department (ED) and are often admitted to hospital. Some presentations and admissions may be avoidable. In 2013, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital introduced a subacute geriatric outreach service (SGOS), which had little impact on reducing ED presentations. In 2015, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital introduced an acute geriatric outreach service (AGOS), a geriatrician-led team that assesses and treats acutely unwell patients in RACFs. We aim to determine whether the AGOS reduces the risk of hospital admission for RACF residents.

METHODS

Hospital admissions data from 2010 to 2019 were used to conduct an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis. AGOS activity data were also summarized.

RESULTS

The average number of admissions from RACF per month declined from 42.8 during the SGOS period to 27.1 during the AGOS period. The difference of 15.7 admissions from RACF per month was statistically significant (95% CI 12.1-19.2; P < .001). After the introduction of the AGOS, the risk of admission to our geriatric department from RACFs was reduced by 36.1% (incidence rate ratio =0.64; 95% CI: 0.58-0.71; P < .001) compared to the SGOS period, adjusting for seasonality.

DISCUSSION

The AGOS probably reduced the risk of hospital admission for RACF residents.

Root Cause Analysis to Identify Medication and Non-Medication Strategies to Prevent Infection-Related Hospitalizations from Australian Residential Aged Care Services

Infections are leading causes of hospitalizations from residential aged care services (RACS), which provide supported accommodation for people with care needs that can no longer be met at home. Preventing infections and early and effective management are important to avoid unnecessary hospital transfers, particularly in the Australian setting where new quality standards require RACS to minimize infection-related risks. The objective of this study was to examine root causes of infection-related hospitalizations from RACS and identify strategies to limit infections and avoid unnecessary hospitalizations. An aggregate root cause analysis (RCA) was undertaken using a structured local framework. A clinical nurse auditor and clinical pharmacist undertook a comprehensive review of 49 consecutive infection-related hospitalizations from 6 RACS. Data were collected from nursing progress notes, medical records, medication charts, hospital summaries, and incident reports using a purpose-built collection tool. The research team then utilized a structured classification system to guide the identification of root causes of hospital transfers. A multidisciplinary clinical panel assessed the root causes and formulated strategies to limit infections and hospitalizations. Overall, 59.2% of hospitalizations were for respiratory, 28.6% for urinary, and 10.2% for skin infections. Potential root causes of infections included medications that may increase infection risk and resident vaccination status. Potential contributors to hospital transfers included possible suboptimal selection of empirical antimicrobial therapy, inability of RACS staff to establish on-site intravenous access for antimicrobial administration, and the need to access subsidized medical services not provided in the RACS (e.g., radiology and pathology). Strategies identified by the panel included medication review, targeted bundles of care, additional antimicrobial stewardship initiatives, earlier identification of infection, and models of care that facilitate timely access to medical services. The RCA and clinical panel findings provide a roadmap to assist targeting services to prevent infection and limit unnecessary hospital transfers from RACS.

Rapid response teams to support dementia care in Australian aged care homes: Review of the evidence

OBJECTIVES

To identify attributes of rapid response services designed to support people with very severe and extreme responsive behaviours, otherwise known as behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, in aged care homes.

METHODS

A rapid evidence assessment was conducted to inform the evaluation of the Severe Behaviour Response Team (SBRT) service, including a targeted search of peer-reviewed academic literature and an Internet-based search of government, service provider, peak body and university websites.

RESULTS

A number of localised rapid response services targeting people with similar clinical profiles were identified, but none operated on the scale of the SBRT. Five operational attributes in common were as follows: clearly defined parameters and processes; provision of clinical expertise and knowledge translation activities; person-centred philosophy; relationship-oriented approach to stakeholders; and generalisable and sustainable outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The five attributes provided a useful framework to guide the evaluation of the SBRT and clarify opportunities for continued service development.