Full blood count as an ancillary test to support the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis

Predictive biomarkers of response to tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis (GCA): correlations with imaging activity

In the recent EULAR recommendations, ultrasound examination is now recommended as a first-line imaging test in all patients with suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA) and the axillary arteries should be included in the standard exam. As an alternative to ultrasound evaluation, cranial and extracranial arteries can be examined using FDG-PET or MRI. The aim of our study was to observe in a retrospective case series whether there is a correlation between biomarkers and imaging activity in a population of patients followed in real life with GCA treated with prednisone (PDN) and tocilizumab (TCZ). We retrospectively enrolled 68 patients with newly diagnosed GCA between January 2020 and September 2021, followed in real life, who were examined at the Rheumatology Unit of the San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Florence, Italy. Patients were evaluated at T0-T3-T6-T12-T18-T24 for the following blood tests: ESR, CRP, fibrinogen, platelet count, serum amyloid A (SAA), IL-6, and circulating calprotectin (MRP). Ultrasound examination of the temporal arteries and axillary arteries was assessed at T0 within 7 days of starting treatment with high-dose glucocorticoids and subsequently at T3-T6-T12-T18-T24. A scale from 0 to 3 with semi-quantitative tools (SUV max) was assessed at T0-T12-T24. The evaluation of the correlation coefficient between laboratory and imaging variables has shown that SAA and MRP have the most powerful correlation with the PET score (0.523 and 0.64), and MRP also has an excellent correlation coefficient with the Halo score (0.658). The evaluation of the ROC curves shows for a PET score 3 and SAA values higher than 26 mg/L, sensitivity of 81.5% and specificity of 84.1%, and for a PET score 3 and MRP values higher than 2.3 mcg/mL, sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 76.8%. In this study, we demonstrated that SAA and MRP can be useful as promising tools to detect GCA activity. The study demonstrates a good correlation between the two biomarkers and the imaging activity evaluated by the Halo and PET scores.

Platelet count as a potential predictor in refractory Takayasu arteritis

Platelet parameters have been recognized as important markers for disease severity in various types of diseases. The aim of our study was to investigate whether platelet count could be used as a potential predictor of refractory Takayasu arteritis (TAK). In this retrospective study, fifty-seven patients were selected as development data group to identify the associated risk factors and potential predictors of refractory TAK. Ninety-two TAK patients were included in the validation data group to verify the predictive value of platelet count for refractory TAK. Refractory TAK patients had higher levels of platelet (PLT) than non-refractory TAK patients (305.5 vs. 272.0 × 109/L, P = 0.043). For PLT, the best cut-off value was 296.5 × 109/L to predict refractory TAK. Elevated PLT (> 296.5 × 109/L) was found to be statistically related to refractory TAK (OR [95%CI] 4.000 [1.233-12.974], p = 0.021). In the validation data group, the proportion of refractory TAK in patients with elevated PLT was significantly higher than that in patients with non-elevated PLT (55.6% vs. 32.2%, P = 0.037). The 1-, 3- and 5-year cumulative incidence of refractory TAK were 37.0%, 44.4% and 55.6% in patients with elevated PLT, respectively. Elevated PLT (p = 0.035, hazard ratio (HR) 2.106) was identified as a potential predictor of refractory TAK. Clinicians should pay close attention to platelet levels in patients with TAK. For TAK patients with PLT greater than 296.5 × 109/L, closer monitoring of the disease and comprehensive assessment of disease activity are recommended to be alert to the occurrence of refractory TAK.

Distinguishing laboratory characteristics in giant cell arteritis: a real-world retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Untreated Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) has the potential to cause serious complications such as vision loss. Appropriate initial assessment by General Practitioners, early treatment and specialist referral are therefore essential in reducing morbidity. However, lack of awareness around the range of presentations can lead to a delay in diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to evaluate the discriminative diagnostic performance of laboratory characteristics associated with GCA in our population over a period of 18 months.

DISCUSSION

This is a real-world retrospective review of patients referred to ophthalmology services with concern for GCA. The pre-test probability of a patient referred with suspected GCA was 13.9% to have GCA, highlighting the need for specialist referrals to continue. White Cell Count (p = 0.01), Platelet Count (p = 0.02), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.004) and C-reactive protein (p = 0.002) were significantly different between GCA and non-GCA cases. Moreover, this study demonstrates that absolute neutrophil count (p = 0.02) can be a useful parameter in initial investigations for GCA.

Biomarkers in the era of targeted therapy in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: is it possible to replace acute-phase reactants?

Research into giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) has become more important in the last few decades. Physicians are facing several challenges in managing the diagnosis, treatment, and relapses of GCA and PMR patients. The search for biomarkers could provide elements to guide a physician's decision. In this review, we aim to summarize the scientific publications about biomarkers in GCA and PMR in the past decade. The first point raised by this review is the number of clinical situations in which biomarkers could be useful: differential diagnosis of either GCA or PMR, diagnosis of underlying vasculitis in PMR, prediction of relapse or complications, disease activity monitoring, choice, and modification of treatments. The second point raised by this review is the large number of biomarkers studied, from common markers like C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or elements of blood count to inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, or immune cell subpopulations. Finally, this review underlines the heterogeneity between the studies and proposes points to consider in studies evaluating biomarkers in general and particularly in the case of GCA and PMR.

The neutrophil: A key resourceful agent in immune‐mediated vasculitis

The term "vasculitis" refers to a group of rare immune-mediated diseases characterized by the dysregulated immune system attacking blood vessels located in any organ of the body, including the skin, lungs, and kidneys. Vasculitides are classified according to the size of the vessel that is affected. Although this observation is not specific to small-, medium-, or large-vessel vasculitides, patients show a high circulating neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, suggesting the direct or indirect involvement of neutrophils in these diseases. As first responders to infection or inflammation, neutrophils release cytotoxic mediators, including reactive oxygen species, proteases, and neutrophil extracellular traps. If not controlled, this dangerous arsenal can injure the vascular system, which acts as the main transport route for neutrophils, thereby amplifying the initial inflammatory stimulus and the recruitment of immune cells. This review highlights the ability of neutrophils to "set the tone" for immune cells and other cells in the vessel wall. Considering both their long-established and newly described roles, we extend their functions far beyond their direct host-damaging potential. We also review the roles of neutrophils in various types of primary vasculitis, including immune complex vasculitis, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, polyarteritis nodosa, Kawasaki disease, giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, and Behçet's disease.

Systemic immune-inflammation index and other inflammatory parameters in patients receiving biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs for inflammatory rheumatic disease

Objective: To investigate the short – and long-term dynamics in inflammation markers [systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte/ monocyte ratio (LMR)] before and after biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) or targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD) treatment. Patients and Methods: wo hundred twenty-six patients (115 women, 47±13.8 years) were included. Age, gender, disease duration, and treatments were recorded retrospectively. Complete blood counts including neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet, monocyte and acute phase reactants were noted at the visit before the biological treatment, at the 3rd month, 6th month, and the last visit on medication. SII, NLR, PLR and LMR were calculated, and their dynamics over time were compared. Results: Significant changes were observed over time in all parameters reflecting inflammation (SII, NLR, PLR, LMR, ESR, and CRP) (p

The role of neutrophils in rheumatic disease-associated vascular inflammation

Vascular pathologies underpin and intertwine autoimmune rheumatic diseases and cardiovascular conditions, and atherosclerosis is increasingly recognized as the leading cause of morbidity in conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Neutrophils, important cells in the innate immune system, exert their functional effects in tissues via a variety of mechanisms, including the generation of neutrophil extracellular traps and the production of reactive oxygen species. Neutrophils have been implicated in the pathogenesis of several rheumatic diseases, and can also intimately interact with the vascular system, either through modulating endothelial barriers at the blood-vessel interface, or through associations with platelets. Emerging data suggest that neutrophils also have an important role maintaining homeostasis in individual organs and can protect the vascular system. Furthermore, studies using high-dimensional omics technologies have advanced our understanding of neutrophil diversity, and immature neutrophils are receiving new attention in rheumatic diseases including SLE and systemic vasculitis. Developments in genomic, imaging and organoid technologies are beginning to enable more in-depth investigations into the pathophysiology of vascular inflammation in rheumatic diseases, making now a good time to re-examine the full scope of roles of neutrophils in these processes.

Giant Cell Arteritis and COVID-19: Similarities and Discriminators. A Systematic Literature Review

OBJECTIVE

To identify shared and distinct features of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) to reduce diagnostic errors that could cause delays in correct treatment.

METHODS

Two systematic literature reviews determined the frequency of clinical features of GCA and COVID-19 in published reports. Frequencies in each disease were summarized using medians and ranges.

RESULTS

Headache was common in GCA but was also observed in COVID-19 (GCA 66%, COVID-19 10%). Jaw claudication or visual loss (43% and 26% in GCA, respectively) generally were not reported in COVID-19. Both diseases featured fatigue (GCA 38%, COVID-19 43%) and elevated inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein [CRP] elevated in 100% of GCA, 66% of COVID-19), but platelet count was elevated in 47% of GCA but only 4% of COVID-19 cases. Cough and fever were commonly reported in COVID-19 and less frequently in GCA (cough, 63% for COVID-19 vs 12% for GCA; fever, 83% for COVID-19 vs 27% for GCA). Gastrointestinal upset was occasionally reported in COVID-19 (8%), rarely in GCA (4%). Lymphopenia was more common in COVID-19 than GCA (53% in COVID-19, 2% in GCA). Alteration of smell and taste have been described in GCA but their frequency is unclear.

CONCLUSION

Overlapping features of GCA and COVID-19 include headache, fever, elevated CRP and cough. Jaw claudication, visual loss, platelet count and lymphocyte count may be more discriminatory. Physicians should be aware of the possibility of diagnostic confusion. We have designed a simple checklist to aid evidence-based evaluation of patients with suspected GCA.

ROS-producing immature neutrophils in giant cell arteritis are linked to vascular pathologies

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a common form of primary systemic vasculitis in adults, with no reliable indicators of prognosis or treatment responses. We used single cell technologies to comprehensively map immune cell populations in the blood of patients with GCA and identified the CD66b⁺CD15⁺CD10^lo/–CD64^– band neutrophils and CD66b^hiCD15⁺CD10^lo/–CD64^+/bright myelocytes/metamyelocytes to be unequivocally associated with both the clinical phenotype and response to treatment. Immature neutrophils were resistant to apoptosis, remained in the vasculature for a prolonged period of time, interacted with platelets, and extravasated into the tissue surrounding the temporal arteries of patients with GCA. We discovered that immature neutrophils generated high levels of extracellular reactive oxygen species, leading to enhanced protein oxidation and permeability of endothelial barrier in an in vitro coculture system. The same populations were also detected in other systemic vasculitides. These findings link functions of immature neutrophils to disease pathogenesis, establishing a clinical cellular signature of GCA and suggesting different therapeutic approaches in systemic vascular inflammation.

Bona fide immature neutrophil subsets produce unchecked extracellular ROS that contributes to vascular pathologies.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Symptoms, Physical Signs, and Laboratory Tests for Giant Cell Arteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Current clinical guidelines recommend selecting diagnostic tests for giant cell arteritis (GCA) based on pretest probability that the disease is present, but how pretest probability should be estimated remains unclear.

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms, physical signs, and laboratory tests for suspected GCA.

Data Sources

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from November 1940 through April 5, 2020.

Study Selection

Trials and observational studies describing patients with suspected GCA, using an appropriate reference standard for GCA (temporal artery biopsy, imaging test, or clinical diagnosis), and with available data for at least 1 symptom, physical sign, or laboratory test.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Screening, full text review, quality assessment, and data extraction by 2 investigators. Diagnostic test meta-analysis used a bivariate model.

Main Outcome(s) and Measures

Diagnostic accuracy parameters, including positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs).

Results

In 68 unique studies (14 037 unique patients with suspected GCA; of 7798 patients with sex reported, 5193 were women [66.6%]), findings associated with a diagnosis of GCA included limb claudication (positive LR, 6.01; 95% CI, 1.38-26.16), jaw claudication (positive LR, 4.90; 95% CI, 3.74-6.41), temporal artery thickening (positive LR, 4.70; 95% CI, 2.65-8.33), temporal artery loss of pulse (positive LR, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.49-4.23), platelet count of greater than 400 × 103/μL (positive LR, 3.75; 95% CI, 2.12-6.64), temporal tenderness (positive LR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.14-8.65), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate greater than 100 mm/h (positive LR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.43-6.78). Findings that were associated with absence of GCA included the absence of erythrocyte sedimentation rate of greater than 40 mm/h (negative LR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.08-0.44), absence of C-reactive protein level of 2.5 mg/dL or more (negative LR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.59), and absence of age over 70 years (negative LR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27-0.86).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study identifies the clinical and laboratory features that are most informative for a diagnosis of GCA, although no single feature was strong enough to confirm or refute the diagnosis if taken alone. Combinations of these symptoms might help direct further investigation, such as vascular imaging, temporal artery biopsy, or seeking evaluation for alternative diagnoses.

Leukocyte Dynamics Reveal a Persistent Myeloid Dominance in Giant Cell Arteritis and Polymyalgia Rheumatica

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) are inflammatory diseases requiring long-term glucocorticoid treatment. Limited data on dynamics in leukocyte counts before, during and after treatment are available. Leukocyte counts were measured, as cellular markers of inflammation, at fixed time points in our prospectively studied cohort of pre-treatment glucocorticoid-naive GCA (N = 42) and PMR (N = 31) patients. Values were compared with age-matched healthy controls (HCs; N = 51) and infection controls (N = 16). We report that before start of treatment monocyte and neutrophil counts were higher in GCA and PMR patients than in HCs, while NK- and B-cell counts were lower. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels correlated positively with monocyte counts in GCA, and negatively with B-cell and NK-cell counts in PMR. During glucocorticoid treatment, myeloid subsets remained elevated whereas lymphoid subsets tended to fluctuate. Interestingly, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) outperformed CRP as marker for relapses in GCA. We defined stable treatment-free remission groups in both GCA and PMR. GCA patients in treatment-free remission still demonstrated elevated monocytes, neutrophils, ESR, and platelets. PMR patients in treatment-free remission had normalized levels of inflammation markers, but did have elevated monocytes, lowered CD8+ T-cell counts and lowered NK-cell counts. Finally, we showed that low hemoglobin level was predictive for long-term GC treatment in PMR. Overall, leukocyte composition shifts toward the myeloid lineage in GCA and PMR. This myeloid profile, likely induced by effects of inflammation on hematopoietic stem cell differentiation, persisted during glucocorticoid treatment. Surprisingly, the myeloid profile was retained in treatment-free remission, which may reflect ongoing subclinical inflammation.

The Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as an Inflammatory Marker in Rheumatic Diseases

The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) has emerged as an informative marker revealing shifts in platelet and lymphocyte counts due to acute inflammatory and prothrombotic states. PLR has been extensively examined in neoplastic diseases accompanied by immune suppression and thrombosis, which can be predicted by combined blood cell counts and their ratios. Several large observational studies have demonstrated the value of shifts in PLR in evaluating the severity of systemic inflammation and predicting infections and other comorbidities, in inflammatory rheumatic diseases. The value of PLR as an inflammatory marker increases when its fluctuations are interpreted along with other complementary hematologic indices, particularly the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), which provides additional information about the disease activity, presence of neutrophilic inflammation, infectious complications, and severe organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus. PLR and NLR have high predictive value in rheumatic diseases with predominantly neutrophilic inflammation (e.g., Behçet disease and familial Mediterranean fever). High PLR, along with elevated platelet count, is potentially useful in diagnosing some systemic vasculitides, particularly giant-cell arteritis. A few longitudinal studies on rheumatic diseases have demonstrated a decrease in PLR in response to anti-inflammatory therapies. The main limitations of PLR studies are preanalytical faults, inadequate standardization of laboratory measurements, and inappropriate subject selection. Nonetheless, accumulating evidence suggests that PLR can provide valuable information to clinicians who encounter multisystem manifestations of rheumatic diseases, which are reflected in shifts in platelet, lymphocyte, neutrophil, or monocyte counts. Interpretation of PLR combined with complementary hematologic indices is advisable to more accurately diagnose inflammatory rheumatic diseases and predict related comorbidities.

The utility of ESR, CRP and platelets in the diagnosis of GCA

Background

To compare the utility of ESR, CRP and platelets for the diagnosis of GCA.

Method

A clinical diagnosis of GCA was determined by case-note review of 270 individuals (68% female, mean age 72 years) referred to a central pathology service for a temporal artery biopsy between 2011 and 2014. The highest levels of ESR, CRP and platelets (within 2 weeks of diagnosis) were documented. Evaluation of ESR, CRP and platelets for the diagnosis of GCA were compared using Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC), and sensitivity/specificity at optimum cut-off values.

Results

GCA was clinically diagnosed in 139 (67%) patients, with 81 TAB positive. The AUC estimates for ESR, CRP and platelets were comparable (0.65 vs 0.72 vs 0.72, p = 0.08). The estimated optimal cut-off levels were confirmed at 50 mm/hour for ESR, and determined as 20 mg/L for CRP and 300 × 10⁹/L for platelets. Sensitivity estimates for these three tests were comparable (p = 0.45) and ranged between 66% for ESR and 71% for platelets. Specificity estimates were also comparable (p = 0.11) and ranged between 57% for ESR and 68% for CRP. There was only moderate agreement between the three positive tests (agreement 67%, kappa: 0.34), and when considered collectively, CRP and platelet positive tests were independent predictors of GCA (p <  0.001), but the ESR was not (p = 0.76).

Conclusion

ESR, CRP and platelets are moderate, equivalent diagnostic tests for GCA, but may yield disparate results in individual patients. A combination of CRP and platelet tests may provide the best diagnostic utility for GCA.

[Characteristics of giant cell arteritis patients under and over 75-years-old: A comparative study on 164 patients]

PURPOSE

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis of the elderly. In order to assess the impact of age at diagnosis, we compared the characteristics of patients of less than 75 years (<75 years), to those of the 75 years and over (≥75 years).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 164 patients with GCA diagnosed from 2005 to 2017. All patients had at least 3/5 of the ACR criteria and had a CT-scan at diagnosis. The mean age was of 73±9.6 years. The age was<75 years for 84 patients (59 women) and≥75 years for 80 patients (53 women).

RESULTS

Patients≥75 years had more cardiovascular underlying diseases (P=0.026), a higher rate of hypertension (P=0.005) and more ophthalmic complications (P=0.02). They had less large vessel involvement (P<0.001), showed lower biological inflammatory reaction and had a more frequently positive temporal artery histology (P=0.04). The oral initial dose of corticosteroids did not differ between the groups. Corticosteroids pulse therapy was more frequent in patients≥75 years (P=0.01). The frequency of anti-platelet agents use was similar in the two groups. Relapse rate, corticodependance and the rate of corticosteroids weaning were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients≥75 years at diagnosis of GCA were at lower risk of aortitis but were more likely to suffer from ophthalmic complications and to receive corticosteroid pulse therapy.