|
1
|
Copp T, Pickles K, Smith J, Hersch J, Johansson M, Doust J, McKinn S, Sharma S, Hardiman L, Nickel B. Marketing empowerment: how corporations co-opt feminist narratives to promote non-evidence based health interventions. BMJ 2024; 384:e076710. [PMID: 38355160 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Copp
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kristen Pickles
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jenna Smith
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jolyn Hersch
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Minna Johansson
- Global Center for Sustainable Healthcare, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jenny Doust
- Australian Women and Girls' Health Research Centre, School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Shannon McKinn
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sweekriti Sharma
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Brooke Nickel
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Wiersma M, Kerridge I, Lipworth W. Clinical innovation ethics frameworks: A systematic narrative review. Health Policy 2023; 129:104706. [PMID: 36639310 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is common for doctors to engage in clinical innovation-i.e. to use novel interventions that differ from standard practice, and that have not yet been shown to be safe or effective according to the usual standards of evidence-based medicine-in the belief that this will benefit their patients. Clinical innovation is currently poorly defined and lacks cohesive oversight mechanisms. METHODS A systematic narrative review, with the aim of identifying areas of similarity and divergence in innovation ethics frameworks developed across different medical specialties. RESULTS 47 articles were included in the review. Few ethical issues raised by the ethics frameworks appear to be unique to distinct areas of practice. While variations exist in the oversight mechanisms suggested, these are again not specific to areas of practice, but rather reflect either cautious or more permissive attitudes towards clinical innovation. CONCLUSIONS There is considerable overlap amongst ethics frameworks developed for use in diverse areas of practice. This reflects a tendency to treat innovative interventions in each area of practice as "exceptional" and a failure to develop "higher order" frameworks such as those that have been developed for research. Those involved in the oversight of clinical innovation need to aim for a balance between exceptionalism and harmonisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Wiersma
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Rm 134, Edward Ford Building A27, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| | - Ian Kerridge
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Rm 134, Edward Ford Building A27, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Haematology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Road, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia; Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Wendy Lipworth
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Rm 134, Edward Ford Building A27, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Oxlad M, Edwards G, McKinlay KA. Patients' perspectives about doctor-patient communication regarding transvaginal mesh implant surgery. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:3534-3539. [PMID: 36114043 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many women experience pelvic floor disorders which may require medical intervention such as transvaginal mesh implant surgeries (TVM; the abdominal or vaginal insertion of woven netting to support pelvic tissue). We examined women's perceptions of communication with their health professionals concerning TVM. DESIGN We analysed 153 women's written submissions to an Australian Government Inquiry regarding their experiences of transvaginal mesh surgery to explore their perceptions of TVM-related doctor-patient communication. Data were analysed using deductive and inductive reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS Women expressed several challenges in their communication with their health professionals. Three themes regarding communication were generated: Insufficient information was abundant; Normalisation and minimisation of the procedure and risks; and, Desired communication interactions. CONCLUSIONS According to women's accounts, doctor-patient communication was poor. Health professionals must be knowledgeable about medical procedures and their potential complications and provide their patients with adequate, accurate information to make informed choices about their health. Health professionals should also document informed consent. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Health professionals should be well-informed about TVM, including best-practice treatments for pelvic floor disorders, indications for TVM, the risks, outcomes and potential complications from various forms of TVM, and ways to adequately communicate sufficient information to women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Oxlad
- School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Georgina Edwards
- School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Kate A McKinlay
- School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
King J. Real story behind transvaginal mesh. Intern Med J 2020; 50:527-529. [PMID: 32431034 DOI: 10.1111/imj.14831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Much of the debate over the use of transvaginal mesh for incontinence and prolapse has been conducted on social media, in the tabloid press and through a very public Senate inquiry. It has been a very emotionally charged debate with surgeons variously accused of scandalous behavior, financial impropriety, surgical experimentation and misogyny. What really happened, how did we get here and what can we learn from these complex events?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny King
- Pelvic Floor Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|