1
|
Alty J, Lawler K, Salmon K, McDonald S, Stuart K, Cleary A, Ma J, Rudd K, Wang X, Chiranakorn-Costa S, Collins J, Merl H, Lin X, Vickers JC. A new one-stop interdisciplinary cognitive clinic model tackles rural health inequality and halves the time to diagnosis: Benchmarked against a national dementia registry. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2023; 38:e5988. [PMID: 37592719 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Unequal access to cognitive assessments is a major barrier to timely diagnosis, especially for those living in rural or remote areas. 'One-stop' cognitive clinic models are a proposed solution, but few such clinics exist. We evaluate the implementation of a new one-stop State-wide clinic model in Tasmania, Australia, where 27% of people live in rural/remote areas. METHODS A novel single-visit protocol has been developed, comprising interdisciplinary medical and cognitive assessments, research participation, consensus diagnosis and management plan. A cross-sectional evaluation was undertaken using the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) framework and results benchmarked against the national Australian Dementia Network Registry. RESULTS Over the first 52 consecutive weekly clinics: Reach: 130 adults were assessed (mean age [SD] 70.12 years [10.31]; 59.2% female) with 40 (36.8%) from rural/remote areas. EFFECTIVENESS 98.5% (128/130) received a same-day diagnosis: 30.1% (n = 40) Subjective Cognitive Decline, 35.4% (46) Mild Cognitive Impairment, 33.1% (43) dementia and one case inconclusive. Adoption: 22.9% (156) of General Practitioners referred patients. IMPLEMENTATION Nearly all 'ideal' diagnostic clinical practices were met and >90% of surveyed patients reported 'good/very good' clinic experience. The wait from referral to diagnosis was 2 months shorter than other national Registry clinics (78 vs. 133 days). CONCLUSIONS This 'one-stop' model provides an interdisciplinary consensus cognitive diagnosis quickly and is well accepted; this may reduce health inequities especially for people living in rural/remote areas. This cognitive clinic model may be of relevance to other centres worldwide and also provides a rich data source for research studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Alty
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
- Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - Katherine Lawler
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Katharine Salmon
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Scott McDonald
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
- Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia
| | - Kimberley Stuart
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Alison Cleary
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
- Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia
| | - Jak Ma
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
- I-Med Radiology Network Hobart, Hobart, Australia
| | - Kaylee Rudd
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Xinyi Wang
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | | | - Jessica Collins
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Helga Merl
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Xiaoping Lin
- Monash University, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Australia
| | - James C Vickers
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brodtmann A, Darby D, Oboudiyat C, Mahoney CJ, Le Heron C, Panegyres PK, Brew B. Assessing preparedness for Alzheimer disease-modifying therapies in Australasian health care systems. Med J Aust 2023; 218:247-249. [PMID: 36934371 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Brodtmann
- Monash University, Melbourne, VIC.,Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Bruce Brew
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mehrani I, Sachdev PS. The role of Memory Clinics in the assessment and management of dementia, now and into the future. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2022; 35:118-122. [PMID: 35026801 DOI: 10.1097/yco.0000000000000777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The diagnosis of dementia is often delayed and many individuals with the disorder go undiagnosed or receive an inadequate assessment. Specialist Memory Clinics have long been at the centre of such assessments. Recent developments in biomarkers and disease-modifying treatments are likely increase the need for specialist assessments. It is therefore timely to review the role of Memory Clinics internationally. RECENT FINDINGS The timely diagnosis of dementia and cognitive decline is the main responsibility of Memory Clinics. These clinics can diagnose dementia up to 4 years earlier than primary care services, but their low numbers and capacity of leads to long waiting times and a focus on complex cases. Few clinics are resourced to offer specific postdiagnostic support services, and their roles in clinical trials and research have not been realised. They are often well integrated with primary care and aged care services. SUMMARY Memory Clinics play an important role in bridging the gap between research and clinical practice and providing high-quality assessment and care. Additional Memory Clinic services and greater harmonisation of their responsibilities and procedures are needed to exploit their full potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga Mehrani
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of New South Wales
| | - Perminder S Sachdev
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of New South Wales
- Neuropsychiatric Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lin X, Wallis K, Ward SA, Brodaty H, Sachdev PS, Naismith SL, Krysinska K, McNeil J, Rowe CC, Ahern S. The protocol of a clinical quality registry for dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI): the Australian dementia network (ADNeT) Registry. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:330. [PMID: 32894049 PMCID: PMC7487842 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01741-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia was identified as a priority area for the development of a Clinical Quality Registry (CQR) in Australia in 2016. The Australian Dementia Network (ADNeT) Registry is being established as part of the ADNeT initiative, with the primary objective of collecting data to monitor and enhance the quality of care and patient outcomes for people diagnosed with either dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). A secondary aim is to facilitate the recruitment of participants into dementia research and trials. This paper describes the Registry protocol. METHODS The ADNeT Registry is a prospective CQR of patients newly diagnosed with either dementia or MCI. Eligible patients will be identified initially from memory clinics and individual medical specialists (e.g., geriatricians, psychiatrists and neurologists) involved in the diagnosis of dementia. Participants will be recruited using either an opt-out approach or waiver of consent based on three key determinants (capacity, person responsible, and communication of diagnosis). Data will be collected from four sources: participating sites, registry participants, carers, and linkage with administrative datasets. It is anticipated that the Registry will recruit approximately 10,000 participants by the end of 2023. The ADNeT registry will be developed and implemented to comply with the national operating principles for CQRs and governed by the ADNeT Registry Steering Committee. DISCUSSION The ADNeT Registry will provide important data on current clinical practice in the diagnosis, treatment and care of people with dementia and MCI in Australia as well as long-term outcomes among these people. These data will help to identify variations in clinical practice and patient outcomes and reasons underlying these variations, which in turn, will inform the development of interventions to improve care and outcomes for people with dementia and MCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoping Lin
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 3, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia.
| | - Kasey Wallis
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 3, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| | - Stephanie A Ward
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 3, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Henry Brodaty
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Perminder S Sachdev
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Neuropsychiatric Institute, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sharon L Naismith
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karolina Krysinska
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 3, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
- Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John McNeil
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 3, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| | - Christopher C Rowe
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susannah Ahern
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 3, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|