The course of infectious hepatitis with special reference to prognosis and the chronic stage

Fashioning the immunological self: the biological individuality of F. Macfarlane Burnet

During the 1940s and 1950s, the Australian microbiologist F. Macfarlane Burnet sought a biologically plausible explanation of antibody production. In this essay, we seek to recover the conceptual pathways that Burnet followed in his immunological theorizing. In so doing, we emphasize the influence of speculations on individuality, especially those of philosopher Alfred North Whitehead; the impact of cybernetics and information theory; and the contributions of clinical research into autoimmune disease that took place in Melbourne. We point to the influence of local experimental and intellectual currents on Burnet's work. Accordingly, this essay describes an arc distinct from most other tracings of Burnet's conceptual development, which focus on his early bacteriophage research, his fascination with the work of Julian Huxley and other biologists in the 1920s, and his interest in North Atlantic experimental investigations in the life sciences. No doubt these too were potent influences, but they seem insufficient to explain, for example, Burnet's sudden enthusiasm in the 1940s for immunological definitions of self and not-self. We want to demonstrate here how Burnet's deep involvement in philosophical biology - along with attention to local clinical research - provided him with additional theoretic tools and conceptual equipment, with which to explain immune function.

A 50-year experience with autoimmune hepatitis: and where are we now?

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) as chronic active hepatitis became recognized in the 1940s as a progressive hyperglobulinemic disease affecting younger women attributed to persisting virus infection of the liver: autoimmunity then was barely on the horizon.

EARLY OBSERVATIONS

The lupus erythematosus (LE) cell reported in 1948 signified the presence of antinuclear autoantibodies, promoting perceptions of autoimmunity in certain chronic diseases. Recognition of LE cells in chronic hepatitis led to the designation of 'lupoid hepatitis', with autoimmunity further substantiated by anti-cytoplasmic autoantibodies detected by complement fixation. Next a serum reactant with smooth muscle of rodent stomach was found to have a wider distribution and became identified as an autoantibody to filamentous (F) actin. Therapy with corticosteroids proved effective, particularly combined with azathioprine. Various trials showed greatly improved survival and established modern therapy of AIH. An HLA-based predisposition (B8, DR3) was the first pointer to a genetic etiology.

RECENT ADVANCES

Recombinant or purified autoantigenic substrates have led to automated assays, which, together with improved immunofluorescence procedures, allow serological confidence in diagnosis and institution of effective immunosuppressive therapies. The liver-kidney 'microsomal' autoantigen reactive with cytochrome P450 2D6 distinguishes two serological types of AIH that appear pathogenetically distinct. Molecular characterization of antigens and epitopes remains wanting in type 1 AIH.

FUTURE PROSPECTS

The challenge remains with both types of AIH to elucidate in molecular terms the genetic and environmental basis of pathogenesis from initiation to ultimate progression and cirrhosis (when inadequately treated). Advancing technologies are bringing this goal closer to being attainable.

Overview: Liver disease and transplantation

Australia has had a proud and enviable record of seminal contributions to hepatology, with many contributors. Thus, any attempt to summarize these contributions ab initio in a brief review article is a significant challenge, primarily because it is so easy to overlook or underestimate particular aspects. In this article, I have confined my comments primarily to the areas where the contributions have had a significant global impact and have clearly been recognized internationally. This means that many worthwhile Australian additions will be omitted if there was less apparent international impact. The first significant interest in liver disease in Australia was from the Melbourne group at the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI) and Royal Melbourne Hospital, leading to seminal contributions to the description, diagnosis, aetiopathogenesis and therapy of autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cirrhosis. Others from Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Sydney contributed substantially to the effects of immunosuppression of autoimmune hepatitis and to early descriptions of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Other areas where Australians have contributed significantly include steatohepatitis, iron metabolism (and in particular hemochromatosis), viral hepatitis (both at the molecular and clinical level), portal hypertension, and transplant immunology. The remarkable contribution of Professor Dame Sheila Sherlock to Australian hepatology is also summarized.

Historical reflections on autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), initially known as chronic active or active chronic hepatitis (and by various other names), first came under clinical notice in the late 1940s. However, quite likely, chronic active hepatitis (CAH) had been observed prior to this and was attributed to a persistently destructive virus infection of the liver. An earlier (and controversial) designation in 1956 as lupoid hepatitis was derived from associated L.E. cell test positivity and emphasized accompanying multisystem features and immunological aberrations. Young women featured prominently in early descriptions of CAH. AIH was first applied in 1965 as a descriptive term. Disease-characteristic autoantibodies were defined from the early 1960s, notably antinuclear antibody (ANA), smooth muscle antibody (SMA) and liver-kidney microsomal (LKM) antibody. These are still widely used diagnostically but their relationship to pathogenesis is still not evident. A liver and disease specific autoantigen has long been searched for but unsuccessfully. Prolonged immunosuppressive therapy with predisolone and azathioprine in the 1960s proved beneficial and remains standard therapy today. AIH like many other autoimmune diseases is associated with particular HLA alleles especially with the "ancestral" B8, DR3 haplotype, and also with DR4. Looking forwards, AIH is one of the several enigmatic autoimmune diseases that, despite being (relatively) organ specific, are marked by autoimmune reactivities with non-organ-specific autoantigens. New paradigms are needed to explain the occurrence, expressions and pathogenesis of such diseases.

Autoimmune hepatitis: diagnostic criteria, subclassifications, and clinical features

The diagnosis of AIH depends on the finding of several suggestive features together with careful exclusion of liver diseases of other etiologies. Wherever possible, the diagnosis should be confirmed histologically by an experienced hepatopathologist. Seronegativity for the conventional autoantibodies at presentation does not exclude a diagnosis of AIH. It is important to test for anti-LKM1 antibodies to avoid missing a diagnosis of type 2 AIH, with potentially serious consequences. Although the syndrome is associated with characteristic biochemical abnormalities, and biochemical parameters are commonly used for monitoring response to therapy, it should be borne in mind that neither these nor autoantibody titers are completely reliable indices of disease activity. Although the various systems that have been promulgated for classification of the disease may identify different groups of patients on pathogenetic or clinical criteria and are useful for research purposes, none is yet sufficiently exclusive in terms of defining prognosis or planning treatment strategies to be applicable to the individual patient seen in the clinic. Clinical management should therefore continue to be individually tailored.

Autoimmune chronic active hepatitis: changing reactivity for antibodies to hepatitis C virus after immunosuppressive treatment

Thirty-three patients fulfilling stringent criteria for autoimmune chronic active hepatitis (CAH) were tested for antibodies against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) with an enzyme immunoassay. Eleven of the 33 (33%) patients were anti-HCV-reactive in a serum drawn before initiation of immunosuppressive therapy. Anti-HCV-reactive patients had significantly higher median s-IgG level (32.3 g/l) than nonreactive patients (23.5 g/l) (p less than 0.01). When in remission with normalized s-IgG levels as a result of the immunosuppressive therapy, only 1 of the 11 initially reactive patients was still reactive. Sera from patients with acute autoimmune CAH and high s-IgG levels may be nonspecifically reactive for anti-HCV.