1
|
Litchfield SG, Tan M, Schulz KG, Kelaher BP. Disposable surgical masks affect the decomposition of Zostera muelleri. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2023; 188:114695. [PMID: 36774916 PMCID: PMC9911587 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The coronavirus pandemic has caused a surge in the use of both disposable and re-usable mask pollution globally. It is important to understand the potential impact this influx of novel pollution has on key ecological processes, such as detrital dynamics. We aimed to understand the impact mask pollution has on the decomposition of a common coastal seagrass, Zostera muelleri. Using an outdoor mesocosm system with heater chiller units and a gas mixer, we were able to test the impact of both re-usable single-ply homemade cotton masks and disposable surgical masks on samples of Z. muelleri detritus under different environmental conditions. We found that disposable masks, but not re-usable masks, significantly increased decomposition of Z. muelleri detritus. This may be due to the increased surface area available for detritivorous microorganism colonisation, driving further decomposition. This could have negative ramifications for seagrass communities and adjacent ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian G Litchfield
- National Marine Science Centre and Marine Ecology Research Centre, Southern Cross University, PO Box 4321, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia
| | - Melissa Tan
- National Marine Science Centre and Marine Ecology Research Centre, Southern Cross University, PO Box 4321, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia
| | - Kai G Schulz
- Centre for Coastal Biogeochemistry and School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, East Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
| | - Brendan P Kelaher
- National Marine Science Centre and Marine Ecology Research Centre, Southern Cross University, PO Box 4321, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Whyte HE, Montigaud Y, Audoux E, Verhoeven P, Prier A, Leclerc L, Sarry G, Laurent C, Le Coq L, Joubert A, Pourchez J. Comparison of bacterial filtration efficiency vs. particle filtration efficiency to assess the performance of non-medical face masks. Sci Rep 2022; 12:1188. [PMID: 35075199 PMCID: PMC8786818 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05245-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
As a result of the current COVID-19 pandemic, the use of facemasks has become commonplace. The performance of medical facemasks is assessed using Bacterial Filtration Efficiency (BFE) tests. However, as BFE tests, require specific expertise and equipment and are time-consuming, the performance of non-medical facemasks is assessed with non-biological Particle Filtration Efficiency (PFE) tests which are comparatively easier to implement. It is necessary to better understand the possible correlations between BFE and PFE to be able to compare the performances of the different types of masks (medical vs. non-medical). In this study BFE results obtained in accordance with the standard EN 14683 are compared to the results of PFE from a reference test protocol defined by AFNOR SPEC S76-001 with the aim to determine if BFE could be predicted from PFE. Our results showed a correlation between PFE and BFE. It was also observed that PFE values were higher than BFE and this was attributed to the difference in particle size distribution considered for efficiency calculation. In order to properly compare these test protocols for a better deduction, it would be interesting to compare the filtration efficiency for a similar granulometric range.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrietta Essie Whyte
- Mines Saint-Etienne, Université Lyon, Université Jean Monnet, INSERM, U 1059 Sainbiose, Centre CIS, 42023, Saint-Etienne, France. .,IMT Atlantique, CNRS, GEPEA, UMR 6144, 4 rue Alfred Kastler, 44307, Nantes, France.
| | - Yoann Montigaud
- Mines Saint-Etienne, Université Lyon, Université Jean Monnet, INSERM, U 1059 Sainbiose, Centre CIS, 42023, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Estelle Audoux
- CIRI (Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie), GIMAP Team, University of Lyon, University of St-Etienne, INSERM, U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, St-Etienne, France
| | - Paul Verhoeven
- CIRI (Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie), GIMAP Team, University of Lyon, University of St-Etienne, INSERM, U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, St-Etienne, France.,Laboratory of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University Hospital of St-Etienne, St-Etienne, France
| | - Amélie Prier
- CIRI (Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie), GIMAP Team, University of Lyon, University of St-Etienne, INSERM, U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, St-Etienne, France
| | - Lara Leclerc
- Mines Saint-Etienne, Université Lyon, Université Jean Monnet, INSERM, U 1059 Sainbiose, Centre CIS, 42023, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Gwendoline Sarry
- Mines Saint-Etienne, Université Lyon, Université Jean Monnet, INSERM, U 1059 Sainbiose, Centre CIS, 42023, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Coralie Laurent
- Mines Saint-Etienne, Université Lyon, Université Jean Monnet, INSERM, U 1059 Sainbiose, Centre CIS, 42023, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Laurence Le Coq
- IMT Atlantique, CNRS, GEPEA, UMR 6144, 4 rue Alfred Kastler, 44307, Nantes, France
| | - Aurélie Joubert
- IMT Atlantique, CNRS, GEPEA, UMR 6144, 4 rue Alfred Kastler, 44307, Nantes, France
| | - Jérémie Pourchez
- Mines Saint-Etienne, Université Lyon, Université Jean Monnet, INSERM, U 1059 Sainbiose, Centre CIS, 42023, Saint-Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|