1
|
Carter TJ, Shaw DR, Carslaw DC, Carslaw N. Indoor cooking and cleaning as a source of outdoor air pollution in urban environments. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE. PROCESSES & IMPACTS 2024; 26:975-990. [PMID: 38525871 DOI: 10.1039/d3em00512g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Indoor sources of air pollution, such as from cooking and cleaning, play a key role in indoor gas-phase chemistry. The focus of the impact of these activities on air quality tends to be indoors, with less attention given to the impact on air quality outside buildings. This study uses the INdoor CHEmical Model in Python (INCHEM-Py) and the Advanced Dispersion Modelling System (ADMS) to quantify the impact cooking and cleaning have on indoor and outdoor air quality for an idealised street of houses. INCHEM-Py has been developed to determine the concentrations of 106 indoor volatile organic compounds at the point they leave a building (defined as near-field concentrations). For a simulated 140 m long street with 10 equi-distant houses undertaking cooking and cleaning activities, the maximum downwind concentration of acetaldehyde increases from a background value of 0.1 ppb to 0.9 ppb post-cooking, whilst the maximum downwind chloroform concentrations increase from 1.2 to 6.2 ppt after cleaning. Although emissions to outdoors are higher when cooking and cleaning happen indoors, the contribution of these activities to total UK emissions of volatile organic compounds is low (less than 1%), and comprise about a quarter of those emitted from traffic across the UK. It is important to quantify these emissions, particularly as continued vehicle technology improvements lead to lower direct emissions outdoors, making indoor emissions relatively more important. Understanding how indoor pollution can affect outdoor environments, will allow better mitigation measures to be designed in the future that can take into account all sources of pollution that contribute to human exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toby J Carter
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, YO10 5NG, UK.
| | - David R Shaw
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, YO10 5NG, UK.
| | - David C Carslaw
- Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Nicola Carslaw
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, YO10 5NG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harding-Smith E, Shaw DR, Shaw M, Dillon TJ, Carslaw N. Does green mean clean? Volatile organic emissions from regular versus green cleaning products. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE. PROCESSES & IMPACTS 2024; 26:436-450. [PMID: 38258874 DOI: 10.1039/d3em00439b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Cleaning products emit a range of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including some which are hazardous or can undergo chemical transformations to generate harmful secondary pollutants. In recent years, "green" cleaners have become increasingly popular, with an implicit assumption that these are better for our health and/or the environment. However, there is no strong evidence to suggest that they are better for indoor air quality compared to regular products. In this study, the VOC composition of 10 regular and 13 green cleaners was examined by headspace analysis. Monoterpenes were the most prevalent VOCs, with average total monoterpene concentrations of 8.6 and 25.0 mg L-1 for regular and green cleaners, respectively. Speciated monoterpene emissions were applied to a detailed chemical model to investigate the indoor air chemistry following a typical cleaning event. Green cleaners generally emitted more monoterpenes than regular cleaners, resulting in larger increases in harmful secondary pollutant concentrations following use, such as formaldehyde (up to 7%) and PAN species (up to 6%). However, emissions of the most reactive monoterpenes (α-terpinene, terpinolene and α-phellandrene), were observed more frequently from regular cleaners, resulting in a disproportionately large impact on the concentrations of radical species and secondary pollutants that were formed after cleaning occurred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Harding-Smith
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, UK.
- Department of Chemistry, Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratory, University of York, UK
| | - David R Shaw
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, UK.
| | - Marvin Shaw
- National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of York, York, UK
| | - Terry J Dillon
- Department of Chemistry, Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratory, University of York, UK
| | - Nicola Carslaw
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martínez-Martínez M, Martínez-Martínez M, Soria-Guerra R, Gamiño-Gutiérrez S, Senés-Guerrero C, Santacruz A, Flores-Ramírez R, Salazar-Martínez A, Portales-Pérez D, Bach H, Martínez-Gutiérrez F. Influence of feeding practices in the composition and functionality of infant gut microbiota and its relationship with health. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0294494. [PMID: 38170702 PMCID: PMC10763948 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Establishing the infant's gut microbiota has long-term implications on health and immunity. Breastfeeding is recognized as the best practice of infant nutrition in comparison with formula feeding. We evaluated the effects of the primary feeding practices by analyzing the infant growth and the potential association with gut diseases. A cross-sectional and observational study was designed. This study included 55 mothers with infants, who were divided according to their feeding practices in breastfeeding (BF), formula feeding (FF), and combined breast and formula feeding (CF). Anthropometric measurements of the participants were recorded. Additionally, non-invasive fecal samples from the infants were collected to analyze the microbiota by sequencing, immunoglobulin A (IgA) concentration (ELISA), and volatile organic compounds (gas chromatography with an electronic nose). Results showed that the microbiota diversity in the BF group was the highest compared to the other two groups. The IgA levels in the BF group were twice as high as those in the FF group. Moreover, the child´s growth in the BF group showed the best infant development when the data were compared at birth to the recollection time, as noted by the correlation with a decreased concentration of toxic volatile organic compounds. Interestingly, the CF group showed a significant difference in health status when the data were compared with the FF group. We conclude that early health practices influence children's growth, which is relevant to further research about how those infants' health evolved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ruth Soria-Guerra
- Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosí, SLP, Mexico
| | | | | | - Arlette Santacruz
- Posgrado en Biotecnología, Centro de Biotecnología FEMSA, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Rogelio Flores-Ramírez
- Laboratorio de Salud Total, Centro de Investigación Aplicada en Ambiente y Salud -CIACYT, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, SLP, Mexico
| | | | - Diana Portales-Pérez
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Torreón, Mexico
- Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud y Biomedicina, Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosí, SLP, Mexico
| | - Horacio Bach
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Fidel Martínez-Gutiérrez
- Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosí, SLP, Mexico
- Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud y Biomedicina, Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosí, SLP, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Temkin AM, Geller SL, Swanson SA, Leiba NS, Naidenko OV, Andrews DQ. Volatile organic compounds emitted by conventional and "green" cleaning products in the U.S. market. CHEMOSPHERE 2023; 341:139570. [PMID: 37709066 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
Exposure to cleaning products has been associated with harm to the respiratory system, neurotoxicity, harm to the reproductive system, and elevated risk of cancer, with greatest adverse impacts for workers exposed in an occupational setting. Social and consumer interest in cleaning products that are safer for health created a market category of "green" products defined here as products advertised as healthier, non-toxic, or free from harmful chemicals as well as products with a third-party certification for safety or environmental features. In the present study we examined the air quality impacts of cleaning products and air fresheners, measuring the number, concentrations, and emission factors of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in an air chamber following product application. Across seven common product categories, 30 products were tested overall including 14 conventional, 9 identified as "green" with fragrance, and 7 identified as "green" and fragrance-free. A total of 530 unique VOCs were quantified with 205 additional VOCs detected below the limits of quantification. Of the quantifiable VOCs, 193 were considered hazardous according to either the California's Department of Toxic Substances Control Candidate Chemicals List or the European Chemical Agency's Classification and Labeling Inventory. The total concentration of VOCs and total emission factors across all products with detections ranged from below limits of detection to 18,708 μg/m3, 38,035 μg/g product and 3803 μg/application. Greater total concentration, total emission factors, and numbers of VOCs were generally observed in conventional cleaning products compared to products identified as "green", particularly compared to fragrance-free products. A hazard index approach was utilized to assess relative risk from measured VOC emissions. The five products with the highest hazard indices were conventional products with emissions of 2-butoxyethanol, isopropanol, toluene and chloroform. Overall, this analysis suggests that the use of "green" cleaning products, especially fragrance-free products, may reduce exposure to VOC emissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis M Temkin
- Environmental Working Group, 1250 I St NW Suite 1000, Washington DC, 20005, USA.
| | - Samara L Geller
- Environmental Working Group, 1250 I St NW Suite 1000, Washington DC, 20005, USA
| | - Sydney A Swanson
- Environmental Working Group, 1250 I St NW Suite 1000, Washington DC, 20005, USA
| | | | - Olga V Naidenko
- Environmental Working Group, 1250 I St NW Suite 1000, Washington DC, 20005, USA
| | - David Q Andrews
- Environmental Working Group, 1250 I St NW Suite 1000, Washington DC, 20005, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pan Q, Liu QY, Zheng J, Li YH, Xiang S, Sun XJ, He XS. Volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds in landfill gas: Composition characteristics and health risks. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2023; 174:107886. [PMID: 36989764 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.107886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Gas emitted from landfills contains a large quantity of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), some of which are carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic, thereby posing a serious threat to the health of landfill workers and nearby residents. However, the global hazards of VOCs and SVOCs in landfill gas to human health remain unclear. To quantify the global risk distributions of these pollutants, we collected the composition and concentration data of VOCs and SVOCs from 72 landfills in 20 countries from the core database of Web of Science and assessed their human health risks as well as analyzed their influencing factors. Organic compounds in landfill gas were found to primarily result from the biodegradation of natural organic waste or the emissions and volatilization of chemical products, with the concentration range of 1 × 10-1-1 × 106 μg/m3. The respiratory system, in particular, lung was the major target organ of VOCs and SVOCs, with additional adverse health impacts ranging from headache and allergies to lung cancer. Aromatic and halogenated compounds were the primary sources of health risk, while ethyl acetate and acetone from the biodegradation of natural organic waste also exceeded the acceptable levels for human health. Overall, VOCs and SVOCs affected residents within 1,000 m of landfills. Air temperature, relative humidity, air pressure, wind direction, and wind speed were the major factors that influenced the health risks of VOCs and SVOCs. Currently, landfill risk assessments of VOCs and SVOCs are primarily based on respiratory inhalation, with health risks due to other exposure routes remaining poorly elucidated. In addition, potential health risks due to the transport and transformation of landfill gas emitted into the atmosphere should be further studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Simulation and Control of Groundwater Pollution, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541000, China
| | - Qing-Yu Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Simulation and Control of Groundwater Pollution, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
| | - Jing Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Simulation and Control of Groundwater Pollution, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541000, China
| | - Yan-Hong Li
- College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541000, China
| | - Song Xiang
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Simulation and Control of Groundwater Pollution, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
| | - Xiao-Jie Sun
- College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541000, China
| | - Xiao-Song He
- State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Simulation and Control of Groundwater Pollution, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
| |
Collapse
|