Lessons from the past: Family involvement in patient admission and discharge, Beechworth Lunatic Asylum, 1900-1912

Family involvement in transitional care from hospital to home and its impact on older patients, families, and health care providers: a mixed methods systematic review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this review is to synthesize the available evidence on family involvement in transitional care and its impact on patients' and family caregivers' health as well as health care providers' satisfaction.

INTRODUCTION

Involving families in transitional care from hospital to home has been undertaken to improve care quality, patient safety, and well-being. Successful family involvement in care depends on the interaction between the health care system and health care providers. However, family involvement in this process has not yet been systematically examined. This review will examine published quantitative and qualitative studies to create a better understanding of family involvement in transitional care.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review will consider family involvement in transitional care, encompassing older patients, family caregivers, and health care providers. The quantitative component will compare family involvement interventions with standard care or alternative interventions. Outcomes will be grouped by older patients, family caregivers, and health care providers. For the qualitative component, the subjective experiences of all groups will be explored.

METHODS

Eligible quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method studies will be searched in databases and gray literature sources. The review will consider studies from 1989 to the present, published in English or Thai. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis will be undertaken by two independent reviewers following the segregated JBI approach to mixed methods reviews.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42020191464.

The relationship between comorbidities in dementia patients and burden on adult-child primary caregivers: Does having a secondary caregiver matter?

Primary family caregivers of patients with dementia often experience high caregiver burden and significant decline in a range of health outcomes. The current study examined the relationship between medical comorbidities of inpatients with dementia and caregiver burden in adult-child primary caregivers, and the buffering effect of having a secondary caregiver on the relationship between patients' comorbidities and caregiver burden. The study is a secondary analysis of data from a cross-sectional observational study design. The sample comprised 477 dyads of inpatients with dementia and adult-child primary caregivers attending the neurological department of two grade A hospitals. All the inpatients were assessed with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). All the adult-child primary caregivers were assessed with the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) and completed the questionnaires on socio-demographic data, caring hours, presence of secondary caregiver, and the level of impairment of the patient. Higher burden was associated with higher scores on the CCI and having a spouse of the patient as the secondary caregiver. A significant interaction occurred between the CCI and caregiver burden when having a spouse as the secondary caregiver, indicating the negative effect of the CCI on caregiver burden was greater when the spouse of the patient served as the secondary caregiver. In summary, the negative impact of patients' comorbidities on caregiver burden in adult-child primary caregivers was heightened when the secondary caregiver role was undertaken by the spouse of the patient with dementia. These results may inform programmes targeted to improve care arrangements for people with dementia and their caregivers.