Our Sunshine place: A collective narrative and reflection on the experiences of a mental health crisis leading to an admission to a psychiatric inpatient unit

'Waiting for the verdict': the experience of being assessed under the Mental Health Act

BACKGROUND

Following the Independent Mental Health Act review, there is increasing focus on this coercive part of mental health services and a call for service user views to be central to proposed changes. Although there are numerous studies into being detained in hospital, there is a lack of data exploring the service user experiences of the assessment process.

AIM

To explore the subjective experience of being assessed under the Mental Health Act (MHA).

METHOD

10 participants were interviewed about their recent assessment experience and the transcribed interviews were analysed using framework approach.

RESULTS

The overarching theme of person centred care emerged from these interviews with interconnecting sub themes: 1) information and options; 2) "the barrage of three"; 3) "sit down and listen"; and 4) service user voice.

CONCLUSION

As one of the first studies into service user experiences of MHA assessments, this exploratory study indicates that there is lack of person centeredness. The Independent Mental Health Act review has set a challenge for treating person as individual and increasing rights and involvement of service users. This study suggests service user's experiences do not yet meet this aspiration and they want to discuss these experiences and have their voices heard.

Comparison of a co-produced mental health service to traditional services: A co-produced mixed-methods cross-sectional study

This study investigates the differences between a co-produced experimental mental health centre and traditional day centres. For this purpose, we used a collaborative and mixed-method approach in two complementary studies: (i) a quantitative cross-sectional study designed to compare users' hospitalization rates and their use of psychiatric medications and (ii) a qualitative study designed to explore and document the experienced differences between co-produced and traditional services. In the quantitative cross-sectional study, surveys were administered to 37 users of one co-produced mental health service and to 40 users of traditional mental health services. A negative binomial regression analysis was performed to examine the relationships between predictors and users' hospitalization rates. After adjusting for the potential confounders, users of the co-produced centre reported a 63.2% reduced rate of hospitalizations compared with users of traditional mental health services (P = 0.002). Furthermore, 39% of users of the co-produced centre reported a reduction or even withdrawal from psychiatric medications against 22% of the comparison group (P = 0.036). In the qualitative study, six main differences emerged from a thematic analysis of a large user-led focus group. In the participants' experiences, the co-produced service focused on (i) parity and respectful relationships, (ii) people's strengths, (iii) freedom, (iv) psychological continuity, (v) social inclusion, and (vi) recovery orientation. Our research provides empirical evidence concerning the 'preventive aspect' of co-produced mental health services. Additionally, new insights into how different stakeholders, particularly users of co-produced mental health services, experience the differences between co-produced and traditional mental health services are provided.

[From clinical practice to nursing research: Auto-ethnography as a tool for analyzing the researcher’s identity transitions]

The scientific legitimacy of nursing research depends on its adherence to different scientific criteria. Despite the lack of consensus on predetermined criteria, reflexivity is widely discussed as a strategy to establish rigour in qualitative research. Unfortunately, with the exception of tools such as the reflexive journal, little is said about how reflexivity can be completed. Several recent studies suggest the relevance of autoethnography to support the reflexive approach of nurse researchers. Inspired by the findings of an autoethnography and a narrative literature review, this article examines how this approach can contribute to the reflexivity of the nurse researcher. Autoethnography seems particularly adapted to the professional and academic context in which many nurses evolve. As a reflective tool, autoethnography can promote the development of the researcher's self-awareness, provide analytical tools to help better understand the influence of previous experiences on the relationship to research and report on the transition between different professional identities. In order to contribute to the debate on the use of autoethnography in qualitative research, central elements to this approach are discussed.