1
|
Zechmeister-Koss I, Aufhammer S, Bachler H, Bauer A, Bechter P, Buchheim A, Christiansen H, Fischer M, Franz M, Fuchs M, Goodyear M, Gruber N, Hofer A, Hölzle L, Juen E, Papanthimou F, Prokop M, Paul JL. Practices to support co-design processes: A case-study of co-designing a program for children with parents with a mental health problem in the Austrian region of Tyrol. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2023; 32:223-235. [PMID: 36226745 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Forms of collaborative knowledge production, such as community-academic partnerships (CAP), have been increasingly used in health care. However, instructions on how to deliver such processes are lacking. We aim to identify practice ingredients for one element within a CAP, a 6-month co-design process, during which 26 community- and 13 research-partners collaboratively designed an intervention programme for children whose parent have a mental illness. Using 22 published facilitating and hindering factors for CAP as the analytical framework, eight community-partners reflected on the activities which took place during the co-design process. From a qualitative content analysis of the data, we distilled essential practices for each CAP factor. Ten community- and eight research-partners revised the results and co-authored this article. We identified 36 practices across the 22 CAP facilitating or hindering factors. Most practices address more than one factor. Many practices relate to workshop design, facilitation methods, and relationship building. Most practices were identified for facilitating 'trust among partners', 'shared visions, goals and/or missions', 'effective/frequent communication', and 'well-structured meetings'. Fewer practices were observed for 'effective conflict resolution', 'positive community impact' and for avoiding 'excessive funding pressure/control struggles' and 'high burden of activities'. Co-designing a programme for mental healthcare is a challenging process that requires skills in process management and communication. We provide practice steps for delivering co-design activities. However, practitioners may have to adapt them to different cultural contexts. Further research is needed to analyse whether co-writing with community-partners results in a better research output and benefits for participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Annette Bauer
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | | | - Anna Buchheim
- Institute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Hanna Christiansen
- Institut für Klinische Kinder- und Jugendpsychologie, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Maria Fischer
- Hilfe für Angehörige Psychisch Erkrankter Menschen in Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Marianne Franz
- Mental Health Research Program, The Village, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Innsbruck, Austria.,Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Division of Psychiatry I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Martin Fuchs
- Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.,Abteilung für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Tirol Kliniken GmbH, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Melinda Goodyear
- School of Rural Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emerging Minds, Hilton, South Australia, Australia
| | - Nadja Gruber
- Mental Health Research Program, The Village, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Innsbruck, Austria.,Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Division of Psychiatry I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Alex Hofer
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Division of Psychiatry I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Laura Hölzle
- Mental Health Research Program, The Village, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Innsbruck, Austria.,Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Division of Psychiatry I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Evi Juen
- Kinder- und Jugendhilfe, Landeck, Austria
| | | | - Mathias Prokop
- Univ. Klinik für Psychiatrie, Landeskrankenhaus-Universitätskliniken Innsbruck Tirol Kliniken GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Jean Lillian Paul
- Mental Health Research Program, The Village, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Innsbruck, Austria.,Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Division of Psychiatry I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goodyear M, Zechmeister-Koss I, Bauer A, Christiansen H, Glatz-Grugger M, Paul JL. Development of an Evidence-Informed and Codesigned Model of Support for Children of Parents With a Mental Illness- "It Takes a Village" Approach. Front Psychiatry 2022; 12:806884. [PMID: 35173638 PMCID: PMC8841827 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.806884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Providing support to parents and their children to help address the cycle of intergenerational impacts of mental illness and reduce the negative consequences for children is a key focus of selective prevention approaches in public mental health. However, a key issue for children of parents with a mental illness is the lack of access to early intervention and prevention support when needed. They are not easily identifiable (until presenting with significant mental health issues of their own) and not easily accessing the necessary support that address the complex interplay of parental mental illness within families. There are significant barriers to the early identification of these children, particularly for mental health care. Furthermore, there is a lack of collaborative care that might enhance identification as well as offer services and support for these families. The "It takes a Village" project seeks to improve mental health outcomes for children through the co-development, implementation and evaluation of an approach to collaborative practice concerned with the identification of families where a parent has a mental illness, and establishing a service model to promote child-focused support networks in Austria. Here we describe the development of service delivery approach for the "It takes a Village" project that aims to improve identification and support of these children within enhancements of the existing service systems and informal supports. The paper describes the use of codesign and other implementation strategies, applied to a research setting, with the aim of impacting the sustainability of workforce reform to achieve lasting social impact. Results highlight the steps involved in translating evidence-based components, local practice wisdom and lived experience into the "It takes a Village" practice model for Tyrol, Austria. We highlight through this paper how regional context-specific solutions are essential in the redesign of care models that meet the complex needs of children of parents with a mental illness. Service system and policy formation with local and experienced stakeholders are also vital to ensure the solutions are implementation-ready, particularly when introducing new practice models that rely on organizational change and new ways of practice with vulnerable families. This also creates a solid foundation for the evaluation of the "It take a Village" approach for children of parents with a mental illness in Austria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda Goodyear
- School of Rural Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Emerging Minds, National Workforce Centre for Child Mental Health, Hilton, SA, Australia
| | | | - Annette Bauer
- Department of Health Policy, Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hanna Christiansen
- Department of Psychology, Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Martina Glatz-Grugger
- Mental Health Research Program, The Village, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Jean Lillian Paul
- Mental Health Research Program, The Village, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Innsbruck, Austria
- Division of Psychiatry I, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Allchin B, Solantaus T. An Evidence-Based Practice Developed in-situ: Let's Talk About Children and a Consolidation of Its Evidence Base. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:824241. [PMID: 35237194 PMCID: PMC8882815 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.824241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditional models of evidence-based practice assume knowledge is developed in research settings before being installed in practice settings. The role practice settings can play in enhancing effectiveness and enabling sustainability is not therefore acknowledged. Developing interventions in-situ alongside developing their evidence base, provides another pathway to evidence-based practice. One example is Let's Talk about Children (LTC), a brief family-focused intervention that promotes parent, family and child wellbeing. Let's Talk about Children has been developed and adapted to respond to the context into which it has been established, leading to different descriptions reported in its 20 year collection of evidence. Collating the diverse literature on LTC, this paper showcases an evidence-based practice developed in-situ in order to guide future innovation. METHOD Using an integrative review, key literature using LTC were identified through electronic databases and snowballing techniques. Constant comparison analysis synthesized the data to develop patterns and themes. FINDINGS From the 26 records, three forms of LTC were identified and outcomes related to parents, family and child wellbeing, implementation and sustainability were collated. Consolidated outcomes show overall agreement in effectiveness and acceptability outcomes across different settings and populations. Implementation and sustainability impacts are entwined with the context, and influenced by its development in-situ. CONCLUSIONS The study documents that the in-situ model is effective at developing sustainable evidence-based practice. In consolidating the evidence, the review clarified LTC's forms and outcomes, and draws attention to the importance of research on mechanisms of change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Becca Allchin
- Eastern Health, Mental Health Program, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,School of Rural Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tytti Solantaus
- Department of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Laser C, Modarressi A, Skogøy BE, Reupert A, Daubmann A, Höller A, Zapf A, Pawils S, Taubner S, Winter S, Maybery D, Wiegand-Grefe S. Clinical Implementation and Evaluation of Three Implementation Interventions for a Family-Oriented Care for Children of Mentally Ill Parents (ci-chimps): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:823186. [PMID: 35295776 PMCID: PMC8919324 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.823186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Germany, approximately three million children under the age of eighteen have a mentally ill parent. These children are at an increased risk of developing a mental illness themselves (1) as well as a physical illness (2). While research has identified numerous evidence-based family-oriented interventions, little is known about how to implement such interventions effectively and efficiently in clinical practice in Germany. This implementation study (ci-chimps) evaluates three clinical implementation projects with three different implementation interventions for the optimal implementation of the tailored family-oriented preventive and therapeutic interventions in the CHIMPS-NET (children of mentally ill parents-research network) with an implementation model for children of mentally ill parents. METHODS A two-group randomized controlled multicenter trial will examine changes in family-oriented practice and aspects of implementation at baseline as well as at 12- and 24-months follow-up. The CHIMPS-Network consists of 20 clinical centers. The centers in the intervention group receive the support of all of the three implementation interventions: (1) optimal pathways to care, (2) education and a training program for professionals, and (3) systematic screening for children. The centers in the control group do not receive this specific implementation support. DISCUSSION While we know that children of mentally ill parents are an important target group to be addressed by preventive and therapeutic interventions, there is often a lack of structured implementation of family-oriented interventions in clinical practice in Germany. Using a randomized controlled multicenter trial design with a large and wide-ranging sample (clinics for adult psychiatry and clinics for child and adolescent psychiatry, university clinics and clinics at the real health care) will provide a robust understanding of implementing family-oriented changes in German clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION The CHIMPS-NET-study was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register on 2019-12-19 (DRKS00020380) and with Clinical Trials on 2020-4-30 (NCT04369625), the ci-chimps-study was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00026217) on 2021-08-27, the Clinical Trials registration is in review process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Laser
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Modarressi
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bjørg Eva Skogøy
- Nordland Hospital Trust, Nordland Research Institute, Bodø, Norway
| | - Andrea Reupert
- Krongold Clinic, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Anne Daubmann
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexandra Höller
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Antonia Zapf
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Silke Pawils
- Institute and Outpatients Clinic of Medical Psychology, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Svenja Taubner
- Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Institute for Psychosocial Prevention, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sibylle Winter
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Darryl Maybery
- Department of Rural Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Silke Wiegand-Grefe
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Allchin B, Weimand BM, O'Hanlon B, Goodyear M. A Sustainability Model for Family-Focused Practice in Adult Mental Health Services. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:761889. [PMID: 35115958 PMCID: PMC8804966 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.761889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Translating evidence-based practice to routine care is known to take significant time and effort. While many evidenced-based family-focused practices have been developed and piloted in the last 30 years, there is little evidence of sustained practice in Adult Mental Health Services. Moreover, many barriers have been identified at both the practitioner and organizational level, however sustainability of practice change is little understood. What is clear, is that sustained use of a new practice is dependent on more than individual practitioners' practice. DESIGN AND METHOD Drawing on research on sustaining Let's Talk about Children in adult mental health services and in the field of implementation science, this article proposes a model for sustaining family focused practice in adult mental health services. SUSTAINABILITY MODEL FOR FAMILY-FOCUSED PRACTICE An operational model developed from key elements for sustaining Let's Talk about Children identifies six action points for Adult Mental Health Services and their contexts to support the sustainability of family-focused practices. The model aims to support Services to take action in the complexity of real-world sustainability, providing action points for engaging with service users and practitioners, aligning intra-organizational activities, and the wider context. CONCLUSION The model for sustaining family-focused practice draws attention to the importance of sustainability in this field. It provides a practical framework for program developers, implementers, adult mental health services and policy-makers to consider both the components that support the sustainability and their interconnection. The model could be built on to develop implementation guides and measures to support its application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Becca Allchin
- School of Rural Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Eastern Health, Mental Health Program, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Bente M Weimand
- Division Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.,Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Brendan O'Hanlon
- The Bouverie Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Melinda Goodyear
- School of Rural Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Emerging Minds, Hilton, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Allchin B, O'Hanlon B, Weimand BM, Boyer F, Cripps G, Gill L, Paisley B, Pietsch S, Wynne B, Goodyear M. An explanatory model of factors enabling sustainability of let's talk in an adult mental health service: a participatory case study. Int J Ment Health Syst 2020; 14:48. [PMID: 32670399 PMCID: PMC7346490 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-020-00380-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While effective interventions have been developed to support families where a parent has a mental illness in Adult Mental Health Services, embedding and sustaining them is challenging resulting in families not having access to support. This study developed an explanatory model of influencers that had enabled sustainability of the Let’s Talk intervention in one service. Methods A participatory case study was used to build an explanatory model of sustainability at the service using theoretical frameworks. Qualitative and quantitative data was collected about practitioner’s practice and the organisation’s implementation process and capacity to support practice. A local research group worked with the researcher using a transforming data approach through description, analysis and interpretation. Results Influencers were grouped into four major categories: (1) External social, political and financial context, (2) Resources, (3) Prior organisational capacity and (4) Sustainability Factors. The last category, Sustainability factors, was divided into three subcategories: (4.1)Practitioner (4.2) Organisation and (4.3) Parent-Client. These categories form part of an explanatory model for the key influencers of continued practitioner practice and organisational capacity to support practice. Conclusions and implications for practice In this case study, the pre-existing organisational context along with practitioner, organisation and parent-client factors operated together to influence sustainability. The results suggest that sustainability is more likely to be supported by both linking Let’s Talk to existing organisational identity, capacity, structures and relationships and by supporting mutual adaptations to improve the fit. Additionally, by understanding that setbacks are common and ongoing adjustments are needed, implementers are able to have realistic expectations of sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Becca Allchin
- School of Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC Australia.,Eastern Health Mental Health Program, Box Hill, VIC Australia
| | - Brendan O'Hanlon
- The Bouverie Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Bente M Weimand
- Division Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.,Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet-Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fran Boyer
- Eastern Health Mental Health Program, Box Hill, VIC Australia
| | - Georgia Cripps
- Eastern Health Mental Health Program, Box Hill, VIC Australia
| | - Lisa Gill
- Eastern Health Mental Health Program, Box Hill, VIC Australia
| | - Brooke Paisley
- Eastern Health Mental Health Program, Box Hill, VIC Australia
| | - Sian Pietsch
- Eastern Health Mental Health Program, Box Hill, VIC Australia
| | - Brad Wynne
- Eastern Health Mental Health Program, Box Hill, VIC Australia
| | - Melinda Goodyear
- School of Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC Australia.,Emerging Minds, Hilton, SA Australia
| |
Collapse
|