Stainless steel crown vs bulk fill composites for the restoration of primary molars post-pulpectomy: 1-year survival and acceptance results of a randomized clinical trial

One-year radiographic and clinical performance of bioactive materials in primary molar pulpotomy: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) is considered the gold standard material for pulpotomy procedures. However, some drawbacks such as poor handling and long setting time are challenging when it is used as pulpotomy dressing in primary molars in children. Hence, the purpose of this study was to compare the radiographic and clinical performance of a premixed, fast setting bioceramic root repair material (BC RRM-F) with MTA in vital pulpotomy procedures of primary molars, with or without the added seal of a stainless steel crown (SSC).

METHODS

In this double blinded, four-arm, parallel group randomized contolled trial (RCT), 64 primary molars were randomly allocated to one of the four treatment groups: MTA (PDTM MTA WHITE)+SSC, MTA+GI (bulk fill glass ionomer with glass hybrid technology GC EQUIA Forte® HT), BC RRM-F+GI and BC RRM-F+SCC. All molars were evaluated clinically and radiographically according to the modified Zurn and Seale criteria at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months follow up. Multivariate cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the success of both pulp capping materials used. Overall survival analysis showed that using GI instead of SCC as a final restorative material was significantly associated with increased risk of failure.

CONCLUSIONS

TotalFill® BC RRM™ Fast Set Putty can be used as an alternative to MTA in primary molar pulpotomy. Regardless of the pulp capping material, one year survival of pulpotomized primary molars restored with SSC is higher compared to those restored with GC EQUIA Forte® HT.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Clinicians' preference and cost effectiveness may justify the use of either material in primary molar pulpotomy. Parents insisting on tooth-colored restorations for their children's pulpotomized teeth cannot be told that the expectation for success is the same as those restored with SSC, even if calcium silicate-based pulp capping materials are used.

Comparative evaluation of clinical performance, child and parental satisfaction of Bioflx, zirconia and stainless steel crowns in pediatric patients

Background

Pediatric dental treatment is challenging in patients with early childhood caries. For clinician its difficult to manage child and provide good work at the same time. Its necessity to have the best equipments as well as materials. Nowadays, aesthetics play an important role in managing decayed teeth. Zirconia crown is better option but requires excessive preparation. As Bioflx is newly developed crown and has combined stainless steel and zirconia properties.

Aim

To assess the clinical performance and child and parental satisfaction of Bioflex crowns compared to zirconia and stainless steel crowns.

Methods

In this comparative study of Bioflx crowns with zirconia and stainless steel crowns, children aged three to seven years old will be selected, and 72 primary teeth requiring crowns will be randomly distributed into three groups, n = 24: Group I: Preformed stainless steel crown, control; Group II: Preformed Bioflex crown; Group III: Preformed zirconia crown. Crowns will be evaluated for recurrent caries, plaque accumulation, restoration failure, gingival status opposing tooth wear, and clinicians and parental satisfaction at zero, three, six, and 12 months.

Results

Bioflx crown will have better clinical as well as parental satisfaction among zirconia and stainless steel crowns.

Conclusions

The Bioflx crown can be used as an alternative economical esthetic full-coronal restoration for primary teeth.

Trial registration

CTRI registration number: CTRI/2023/05/052256; Date of registration: May 03, 2023.

Protocol version

Two; Date: April 22, 2023.

Evaluation of the reasons for failure in teeth with vital amputation treatment

AIM

This study aims to evaluate the primary teeth undergoing amputation due to dental caries or trauma clinically and radiologically.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The amputation treatment of 90 primary teeth of 58 patients (Female: 20, Male: 38) aged 4-11 years was evaluated clinically and radiologically. Calcium Hydroxide was used for amputation in this study. Composite or amalgam was preferred as filling material in the same session of the patients. Clinical/radiological (Periapical/Panoramic X-ray) examination was performed on the teeth that were unsuccessful in treatment, on the day of the patient's complaint, and at the end of 1 year in the others.

RESULTS

According to the clinical and radiological findings of the patients, 14.4% of the boys and 12.3% of the girls were unsuccessful. Amputation in male was a need in the 6-7 age group with a rate of 44.6% at most. Amputation in females was a need in the 8-9 age group with a rate of 52% at most.

CONCLUSION

Success in amputation treatment depends on the tooth, the dentist, and the dental material applied.

Reciprocating instrumentation for endodontic treatment of primary molars: 24-month randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Although reciprocating instrumentation has been extensively studied for permanent teeth, stronger evidence for its use in primary teeth is lacking.

AIM

The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the efficacy of endodontic treatment in primary molars using reciprocating (RECIP) and manual (MAN) instrumentation techniques after 24 months.

DESIGN

Primary molars with indication of endodontic treatment were randomly divided into two groups: MAN and RECIP. Treatments were performed, and root canals were filled with calcium hydroxide and iodoform paste. Teeth were later restored with bulk-fill composite resin and re-evaluated after 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary outcome was the success of the endodontic treatment evaluated by Cox regression analysis adjusted by cluster and success rate after 24 months in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Instrumentation time, discomfort, postoperative pain, and quality of root canal filling were also evaluated as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 151 primary win 107 children were included, and 137 were followed up for 24 months. Success rate of teeth allocated to the MAN group was 57.3% and 55.3% for RECIP (p = .792); MAN instrumentation, however, was more time-consuming (p = .005).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of endodontic treatment in primary molars using reciprocating and manual instrumentation is similar after 24 months.

Efficacy of an iodoform-based filling material for pulpectomy of primary teeth: A 24-month non-inferiority randomized clinical trial

AIM

The aim of this non-inferiority randomized clinical trial was to compare the efficacy of an iodoform-based paste (Guedes-Pinto -(GP)) as a filling material in pulpectomies of primary teeth, and a standard material composed by calcium hydroxide and iodoform (CaOH/Iodof paste; Vitapex^® ).

DESIGN

A total of 104 teeth from 61 children (3-8 years old) were randomly allocated to two groups according to filling materials. Children were followed up for 24 months. The primary endpoint was the treatment success rate evaluated through clinical and radiographic examinations at follow-up, and the secondary outcome was the analysis of the canal filling quality. Differences in the proportion of treatment success was calculated based on 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and with the Miettinen and Nurminen method in the intention-to-treat population, considering a -20% of the non-inferiority limit.

RESULTS

From 104 randomized teeth, 102 were followed up after 24 months (attrition rate of 1.9%). The success rate of teeth treated with the GP paste was 86.8% (95% CI: 69.9-94.9) and 78.4% (95% CI: 61.8-89.1) with the CaOH/Iodof paste. Consequently, a non-inferiority of the GP paste was observed when compared to the CaOH/Iodof paste (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The GP paste has a non-inferior success rate than the CaOH/Iodof paste used as filling material for pulpectomy in primary teeth.

An approach of preserving a mandibular primary second molar by a hemisection procedure: A case report with 36-month follow up

Primary teeth play a crucial role in functional, aesthetic and speech tasks. They are also responsible for maintaining the jaw space for successor permanent teeth. Thus, dentists should understand that extraction might be the easiest decision but not always the correct one, especially, in the case of multiple loss of primary molars. On the other hand, endodontic treatments should be accurately diagnosed - necrotic and irreversibly inflamed teeth - and performed with suitable dental tools and materials. Then it is important to provide a good sealing with a suitable final restoration. This case report discusses an approach for preserving a mandibular primary second molar which had a radiographic lesion in the mesial root and the furcation area with multiple loss of primary molars (before eruption of first permanent molar). This treatment was done by performing a root canal treatment (pulpectomy) just for the distal root and a hemisection procedure by extracting the mesial root, followed by applying SSC crown and space maintainer (band and loop). To conclude, this type of treatment should be temporary until the eruption of the first permanent molar and then changed to be a lingual arch appliance. Moreover, hemisection was a suitable alternative approach to extraction over 36 months of following up.

Review on Preformed Crowns in Pediatric Dentistry—The Composition and Application

The purpose of this review is to compare and contrast the various types of preformed crowns that can be used to restore the primary teeth in children. Historically, preformed crowns have been widely available for the past 50 years. The clinical performance of preformed crowns has evolved to meet higher functional, mechanical, and aesthetic demands. Preformed crowns are available in a range of prefabricated sizes and shapes. Preformed crowns can vary depending on their properties, compounds, methods of preparation, and biocompatibility.